Watch General

File: ae175f0f0cb3634f6d0040c5ed0e4337.png (122KB, 1001x862px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1001x862px

>>12081666
dont buy

>>12081674
fuck off faggot

your pretentious charts are useless if they don't make any effort to explain the reasoning behind the hierarchy

>>12081674
this pyramid should have omega move from should buy to vintage (pre-1998) only desu

>>12081674
>>12081674
whats wrong with tag and victorinox? I thought they were quality watches.

File: mine2.jpg (101KB, 800x810px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 800x810px

Got given this for Christmas. Any of you get anything nice?

>>12081666

The strap is shit, so be sure to get a replacement one.

File: roamer.jpg (987KB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

987KB, 3264x2448px

gifted this a while ago, sexy or no? idek if roamer is a good brand.

File: 0d97e1d6028047348163c8c44996a4eb.jpg (298KB, 1152x1536px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 1152x1536px

>>12081709
Just because you don't understand horology doesn't mean this chart is pretentious, it's pretty fucking accurate.

The only thing thats wrong is that Tags are usually pretty tolerated among the watch community

>>12081812
ew

>>12081767
asked for a Vostok Amphibian ((the zissou one) and got it. Gotta shorten the strap otherwise I think it looks pretty good.

>>12081767
Nice, just got the same one but in gold.

>>12081973
Pretty fucking comfy hey. I dunno if they're fashionable or anything but I could really get used to this lightweight for sure.

File: Lady-killer9000.jpg (496KB, 2100x2718px) Image search: [Google]

496KB, 2100x2718px

>not rocking one of these bad boys

File: c412c68d-1fe4-4e3f-be1b-58fc86834ea3.jpg (32KB, 588x441px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 588x441px

>>12082021
Get on my level

>>12081918
>The only thing thats wrong is that Tags are usually pretty tolerated among the watch community
I don't think you understand horology either

File: watch.png (616KB, 640x541px) Image search: [Google]

616KB, 640x541px

Could you lads identify the watch on this ass tatoo por favor ?

Is there a watch sub 150 Euro range that won't get me torn to pieces on /fa/?
Something modern, like OP's pic. Black sleek leather band, simple white face. Some gold/silver accents?

File: montre-evo-big-alarm-black-40-mm-mondaine.jpg (49KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 800x800px

>>12082391
It doesn't matter what watch you have, someone will tear your ass apart for it.

>>12081666
moden braun watches are trash

I know a legit Daniel Wellington is not worth it and are equal to Replicas but,
W2c the best replica?

>>12081666
gf just graduated, want to buy her something decent. Is it possible for the 500USD price range? Know nothing about watches but she's made mention of wanting a good one for a while now. Any suggestions?

File: skagenwatch.jpg (780KB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

780KB, 2448x3264px

got this fucker today for xmas

i wish the band was removable though, was hoping to put a black twill band on

anyway leather straps stainless steel

File: 3786962-p-4x.jpg (198KB, 1920x1440px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 1920x1440px

My girlfriend bought me this and I feel obligated to wear it.

Is it at all /fa/?

>>12082442
Do you sell Buicks for $5k over sticker value?

>>12082442

lmao that is the worst watch i've ever seen, pls be bait

>>12082447
I do have a white color job, but no not a car salesman

>>12082449
;_;

>>12082456
Well most people won't care, and those that actually know watches will snicker behind your back at best.

File: 4dbfdf06-9269-4e04-9492-34cb0be84cdc..jpg (301KB, 962x532px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 962x532px

>>12082447
$5000 was about the average dealer markup at Buick dealerships back when the GNX came out, and dealers got them in very limited quantities.

File: 1482643344693.jpg (158KB, 843x1500px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 843x1500px

Its my gramps watch

>>12081767
Bought this for 16 online. Best purchase all year

>>12082707
hows it holding up? Really hope this thing lasts a while, it's only been a day and im attached to it.

File: 1481901265269.jpg (49KB, 437x403px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 437x403px

>want to buy skx009
>read on a lot of forums how often chapter ring/bezel is misaligned
>forced to buy from either creationwatches or a shop like that
>a lot of people say they often give out returned watches with defects
wat do

>>12082918
wait and pray

>>12081763
Extremelly overprice, now they are a better, but their older models they cost 3x more than what they should.

File: 1480738924549.png (416KB, 645x367px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 645x367px

Who is the Rick Owens of the Watch Industry?

>>12082391
You will always find someone that is going to make fun of you because your watch is cheaper/less rare or you could buy something better with that money etc.Just buy what you. like.

>>12081666
Get a Braun watch from the eighties

>>12083186
richard mille
>avant-garde
>overpriced

File: img_6389-001.jpg (78KB, 1128x752px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1128x752px

>>12082961
Are there any alternatives to creationwatches?
anyone used them before?
Thanks

>>12082478
Is this some fake vintage watch?

File: Pebble&Diver.jpg (1MB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1500x1000px

Pepple Steel Time. Awesome but dead smart-watch I enjoy(ed). The other one that got decent wrist time recently is a Seamaster PO.

>>12081918
>Just because you don't understand horology doesn't mean this chart is pretentious, it's pretty fucking accurate.
that's what I'm saying you moron, the chart is only understood by people who already know about watches, i.e. people who don't need a chart for any other reason than pretentious circlejerks

>>12081729
Actually that's the complete opposite of what should happen.

>>12082442
It's pretty bad, looks like a women's watch.

>>12082391
Buy whatever you like, I think you will like Bauhaus watches

>>12081674
Can someone explain why tissot is bad, since this picture doesn't

>>12081674

>Stowa
>Watches you should never buy

Disregarded

>>12084805

It's not, chart is bullshit

>>12081674
why is IWC omega etc, is it because they use ETA movements

File: IMG_20161226_190501.jpg (2MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4160x3120px

>>12081666
Thoughts on my collection? I've just started collecting them, so my current watches aren't the best quality. Just got my first hand wound Vostok (far left) and I love it, gonna get a new band for it though since the one it comes with is cheap.

I will admit in advance that my digital Casio was a utilitarian purchase rather than a aesthetic one (I still love how ugly it looks)

>>12085074
casio a best
wearing the same one rn

>>12083762
every infographic ever
>is only understood by people who already know about *subject*

go complain about the /fa/ infographics in the sticky or the /mu/ charts, or any 4chan infographic ever then.

What smartwatch should I get now that Pebble is defunct?

>>12085254
get a real watch or an urbane

File: 1481379570102.jpg (98KB, 1342x664px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1342x664px

Gonna go buy an skx007 today from some retard close to me
Anything I should look for?

how is skagen's quality? i like the look but if they feel shitty at $100 i might as well buy a $10 watch from aliexpress

>>12082439
>band is not removable
wtf

>>12085680
not sure if that is still the case today but skagen used to be infamous for their shitty, easily breakable crystals a few years ago

>>12085712
I've had one gifted to me about two years ago, the "hardened mineral crystal" is so far free nicks or cracks. I got a titanium model as a gift, and its one of my daily wear watches, so it's gotten banged around a lot. So far the case and crystal are scratch free, and it keeps excellent time. For a so called fragile fashion watch, so far it has proven to be anything but fragile.

>>12082439
I call bullshit in this claim. I've never seen a watch from them, where the band wasn't removable. Prove it!

>>12083231
cant find one

File: watch.jpg (41KB, 583x960px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 583x960px

Rather gaudier and larger than my taste would usually allow, but it's a present from mama and I do like that it's a karousel movement. Thoughts?

File: vostok.jpg (49KB, 583x960px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 583x960px

>>12081958
Good taste, tovarich

>>12085625
I hope the buy went well

you strike me as 'a victim'

hopefully you weren't harmed, and have acquired the watch.

>>12082442
damn

it's pretty fucking ugly my man

>>12083583
I have, bought a snk503 and it came out all good.

>>12083603
looks it lmao

File: GA-100-1A2ER.jpg (117KB, 710x864px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 710x864px

what are the most aesthetic g-shocks? I really want one, but there are so many to choose from! if it means anything, I need something that can take a beating day in and day out (im an icu nurse), so i cant get something too flashy

>>12087268
5600 best

>>12082442
>$115
Why would she even bother? I've never understood this... Spending such a trivial amount of money on something that's meant to be frivolous, like a watch. You should say thanks sweetie, that's very thoughtful of you, but how would you like it if I bought you a handbag from Nine West?

How long have you guys been together anon? If you've been together for a few years at least, then you should just be honest with her and tell her it doesn't really suit you. I've gotten to the point with my gf where I do that without thinking twice. She respects my sense of personal style and realizes that we don't always see eye-to-eye with what we think looks good.

If you've only been with her for a short period of time and you're worried about offending her by hating her horrible fucking gift, then your best bet is to just lie and tell her that it doesn't fit right on your wrist (the face obviously, since you can get the band adjusted) or say that it's really uncomfortable, likely due to its poor quality.

>>12081763
They are dogshit.

Tag has been caught lying about their products and generally making ugly ass watches.
Victorinox is just not up to par.

>>12086030
Awful

File: IMG_7745.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

So I got this now. Really happy with it. Thoughts?

>>12087856
Besides it being the fucking quartz version good watch.

>>12085254
Good question, Pebble alone got the concept right. It was a smart watch that enhanced the user experience of a smart phone instead of mirroring a small mobile phone on your wrist. I was always torn between wearing some nice timepieces and that one. If anyone knows a good replacement with similar technology and runtime I'd be happy to hear about it as well.

>>12087877
Why is that a problem?

>>12085680
They are China made but with a certain degree of quality control, as an example the crystal are placed neatly and the coating looks nice and seamless.
I gave away some timepieces to girlfriends over the years and my wife has one as well. The crystals are fine on those, but maybe it's a different story with bigger diameters on mens watches.

File: its just luke.png (146KB, 311x306px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 311x306px

is tsovet a solid brand

>wake up
>no new posts

Meh

File: tumblr_n7f6rgE8Xw1rut56oo1_500.jpg (110KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 500x667px

Is this watch a ultimate no go ?
I kinda like how extremly tacky it is, planning on getyimg one

Whats the verdict on this ?
T. Watch newfag

>>12082918
Buy straight from yobokies

http://s161.photobucket.com/user/yobokies/library/?sort=3&page=1

He has everything for SKX

>>12087856
the white date field triggers my autism, i couldnt wear it

I need advice.
Last time I went running and had my vintage Seiko 5 on, I was sweating ofc and at the end I noticed its glass had a little steam inside. Soon it disappered though and I didn't have any problem with the watch working either.
Should I be concerned?
Will the moisture start to corrode the movement?

File: 51C0uz76+gL._SX342_.jpg (32KB, 342x410px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 342x410px

I'm new to /fa/ but watch threads on every other board get deleted.

I got pic related as a gift, and I really don't like it. Do you people know a good avenue for selling or trading watches? This thing weighs too much, its too big, I can barely get my sleeves over it. I had to wear it for 3 days and its just comically too big.

>>12082026
This guy fucks

File: DSC_1009.jpg (486KB, 2160x2414px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 2160x2414px

>>12081767

Pic related. Love it. Looks so much better with a darker strap than the original beige one.

File: IMG_0752.jpg (39KB, 332x392px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 332x392px

>>12085254

>>12088780
spotted the cuck

>>12088780
how the fuck is it tacky nigga

it's like the ultimate normcore watch

can't go wrong unless you're explicitly going for hypecore or something

>>12089030
https://youtu.be/uQFuZL14Aaw?t=16m45s

>>12089173
Return it. Most places will take it back w/o a receipt if they sell the exact watch. They'll just give you store credit.

>>12081674
pretty accurate but move breitling, omega down a tier, panerai top of the tier. Making good in house movements these days

I really want a skeleton/open heart watch but my budget is £200 cause poor. Anything decent for that?

File: nato22-nyjbblack-gd_-nato22-nyjbblack-gd.jpg (894KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

894KB, 1200x900px

>guy sells new skx007 in my town
>pm him if he can lower price
>says he sold them out but can sell me the one in his collection
>says it keeps -+2s/24h and still has sticker on the back
>will gift me a bond nato aswell and I made him give me a strap change tool
>tomorrow I will go pick it up
wat do? he is from the main countrywide forum about watches and regulary sells watches n shit on it so I doubt he would scam me

File: DBC-611G-1DF_02.jpg (72KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 600x450px

>>12088780
Gold is sorta tacky, but if you want maximum i r o n y then get the Databank one

>>12089499
>200 poounds
>poor
orient has nice open hearths

File: 0_215e4e_95aad536_orig.jpg (116KB, 800x1202px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 800x1202px

Anyone here knowledgeable in Slav watches? I found this Raketa for $60 shipped and it says it's NOS, but the hands make me feel like it's not 100% original.

File: s-l1600.jpg (239KB, 1600x1064px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 1600x1064px

>>12089706
Oh and ere's the movement if it matters.

File: Skagen.jpg (11KB, 172x300px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 172x300px

Is this a good first watch?

I honestly don't know much about watches.

>>12089425
Can't, I have no idea where it was purchased from, it was brought from another state, and the box it came in was destroyed.

>>12089862
It's a watch, it tells time and looks decent.
That's about all Skagens do.

>>12086030
kys

File: 4_6_70.jpg (38KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 400x400px

>>12087268
I've got this about a month ago. It looks pretty nice, but the digital watch isn't synced with the other one, it always gets some seconds ahead over the time.
Anyone knows how long their battery life span is?

>>12089862
It's a Danish fashion watch maker, that was bought by Fossil a few years back. The case is probably made in China, but the movement is a decent metal Miyota quartz movement from Japan, so it will keep excellent time. Early models had issues with crystal breakage, but newer models seem to have addressed that problem with hardened mineral crystals.

I have a titanium model, and have worn it as one of my daily wear watches for a couple of years, and the case and crystal still look like new!

>>12090504
>miyota
>excellent time
just buy a terrorist casio m8

>>12090592
Yeah Dumbass. Good quartz movement watches keep better time than any mechanical movement, without the need and expense of regular maintenance. I'd still take an analog quartz watch, over some plastic POS shit tier digital.

File: WIN_20161228_17_58_44_Pro.jpg (352KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 1920x1080px

a fossil watch that my good friend got me for Shitscram. Italian leather and dyed with all natural indigo from china

File: a84a2a2533e5bbc9e89da40062b1a4e51355366338_full.png (143KB, 451x449px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 451x449px

>>12087268
>tfw no Kaneda G-Shock

File: $_57.png (2MB, 1600x860px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1600x860px

Can I get a legit check please? I know there are a lot of fakes of this casio model.

File: $_57 (1).png (3MB, 1600x870px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1600x870px

>>12090766

>>12090766
Bracelet is wrong.

>>12090766
Why would people fake a $12 watch?

>>12090774
how so?

File: Casio-Mens-A158WEA-9CF-Casual-Classic-Digital-Bracelet-Watch-0.jpg (26KB, 281x500px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 281x500px

>>12090774
>>12090784
Wait that's the A159, not the A158 like I have.

Disregard that, I suck cocks.

File: x.jpg (1012KB, 1198x800px) Image search: [Google]

1012KB, 1198x800px

picked this up recently

File: 577180f31c784_356147b.jpg (187KB, 810x1500px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 810x1500px

c/n?

>>12081767
good lord f91w is effay af

File: 1228161748a-768x1365.jpg (189KB, 768x1365px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 768x1365px

Contributing so I don't leech. Seiko 5M62-0AS0 that I desperately need to clean up and polish.

>>12085074
>>12085130

What's the Casio? It sexy.

>>12087314

Next watch for o p e r a t o r a e s t h e t i c

>>12091001
which one? The analog or digital?

>>12091068

Digital, oops.

I have a thing for electronic watches in that style.

File: IMG_0155.jpg (357KB, 901x967px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 901x967px

Is Timex the ONLY watch company with an Indiglo thing? I know Indiglo is a Timex brand, but no competitor even has something similar?

>>12081674
>Ulysse Nardin in top tier

Anything that popular with Russians can't be good

>>12091071
It's the AE1200WH-1A, I put a NATO strap on it, but it was a bitch to put on as I had to strip a small layer of plastic to make it fit. Otherwise fantastic watch as it has time zones, is fairly rugged and has a long battery life.

File: desperado-530g-automatic-pocket-watch-with-power-reserve-indicator-33-jewels.jpg (40KB, 500x386px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 500x386px

Are automatic pocket watches a meme?

>>12085254
>>12089387
No thank you Apple im not a fuccboi
I'm getting a Garmin Tactix Bravo for the battery life. I know I could get a real watch for that kind of money but I've had three Pebbles since the first kickstarter so it's hard to kick the notification habit.

>>12091081
Tons of companies have illuminated dials, but I can't think of any that have one like Timex's.

>>12091169
That glow in the dark stuff is such horse shit, you have to expose it to sunlight to have it be worth a damn. Well if you have that much light you don't need glow in the dark paint on your watch.

>>12081812
Reminds me of some of the old Seikos, wear it in good health!

>>12087856
Nice watch anon - the only thing I'd have to say that I hate on it is the strap, but that's easily replaceable and personal preference.

>>12087898
Not him, but there's nothing wrong with a quartz - they're just inherently more boring than an automatic from a horological point of view.
Personally, there's nothing wrong with a quartz for me and some of the nicest watches I've seen are quartz.

>>12091081
Lorus

>>12091434
I dunno man, they look like Timex knockoffs, but I don't see any indication they have an Indiglo copy. do they simply not advertise it?

File: Winston_Royale_-_Rose_Gold_Black_172f10e7-5855-4895-9d12-d0dbbd8fb548.png (803KB, 1017x2048px) Image search: [Google]

803KB, 1017x2048px

>>12081666
w2c a nice gold mesh watch with a black dial? I've been looking for a few months now and can't seem to find any.

Closest thing i could find is pic related, but it's rose gold unfortunately.

>>12082863
Holds up great! Friend of mine had hers for about 5 years so far, not a problem - she didn't even change the battery yet. :)

File: 1475445486227.jpg (2MB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1500x1000px

This is the kind of watch /fa/ should aspire to own

Anything below it is just not cutting it

>prove me wrong

>one day I'll buy one
>:^)

>>12091702
Lorus is actually a Seiko bottom tier brand. It's basically a direct competitor to Timex. A tier above that is Seiko's Pulsar brand, which competes with other similar designer/fashion watch brands.

The one plus of Lorus over Timex, is that they don't have that loud ticking time bomb movement that is so common with the Timex brand.

>>12091077
his looks like longines legend diver (no date).

what is it and how much.

>>12090846
panda-esque

you... have chosen wisely.

>>12089862
pass.

buy a Hamilton khaki chronograph.

>>12089550
of course buy it. and look up his feedback on the forum.

>>12087856
like. I think you're on WUS.

remember this: the ONLY thing that matters with watches, is that YOU like it. period. end of.

>>12081674
interesting. although I disagree about "Steinhart and Squale being trash".

>breitling in the top tier KEK!

File: 1482754047532.jpg (25KB, 480x474px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 480x474px

who the fuck is that fatass that keeps popping up when I try to watch watch videos
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>12091077

Looks nice. Looked it up, but it's a bit expensive for what you get imo.

>>12081918
Source on the Orient?

>>12091740
Does the case need to be gold?

>>12092147
Not him but it looks like a Ray:
http://www.orient-watch.com/products/category/item/?category_id=39

>>12092236
Thanks senpai. It does look pretty close. Looks pretty nice for the price. Might pick one up.

>>12092248
It's often compared to the Orient Mako (google for countless Mako vs ... threads), so there's even more options for you.

>>12092301
Yep. Just spent like an hour watching comparison videos. Pretty keen on the blue Orient Ray 2, the Mako features the exttra date button. Other comparatively similar watches are the SKX007/SKX009, and a similar spec'd Citizen entry-level dive watch. Leaning to blue ray 2 and/or pepsi SKX007. Thanks for the help.

>>12091958
I bought it pretty happy with it only downside is that the endlinks or whatever arent that solid to the case but otherwise its mint even had the blue cover sticker on the back

File: Dogturdarooni.jpg (58KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 1280x720px

THE PONTIFF here, just poppin in to look at your SHITTEROONIS and tell you what DOG TURDS they are! You FUCKAS wouldn't know a decent watch if it came up and bit you on your 3RD OR 4TH ASSHOLE! Work with me big boy, not against me, let me give you the drum, it's all gone PEAR SHAPED, ITS OVER RED ROVER FUCKAS you nasty viscious vinyl CUNTERS, rolex explorer II speedmastermanonthefuckinmooooooooon reverso grand date AND A FUCK OFF GOLD SUBMEISTER FUCKAROONIS
>guzzles whiskey in the junk yard while filming himself screaming at clapped out old bangers and seagulls nibbling at his head moles

>>12092361
All of those are great divers, you can't go wrong with any of them. Enjoy and sorry - in 6 months time your diver collection will most likely be significantly larger (or at least in your head) and your wallet significantly lighter.
On a sidenote, you may like the stuff (either now or later) that the famous modder yobokies makes (just google him).

>>12091961
>remember this: the ONLY thing that matters with watches, is that YOU like it. period. end of.
This so much - there's very little point in spending a lot on a watch for the sake of others or for the sake of compliments.
A watch is a personal thing and should be bought because YOU like it, no matter how tacky or cheesy others find it.

File: DSC_0567.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

I know its a shitter watch I got it as a present for bday tho I picked it and paid half of the price
decided to put the nato I got for my new skx007 and its kinda ok

>>12092682
>he fell for the car meme

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>12092407
Is Archie the most based man on the planet?

pic is my titanium marina

>>12092682
This one right?
http://www.maseratistore.com/us_en/watches/traguardo-6875.html
For the price you paid ($175) and the fact that it's essentially a fashion watch, it's honestly not that shit.
For the same price you could have bought a horologically superior watch blah blah, but if you chose that yourself and like it, then there's nothing wrong with it.
All in all, even horologically speaking within that price range of $175, it's really not that bad anon.
Wear it proud.

>>12092904
Fuck man, got a lume shot?

>>12092904
Never understood what makes this watch so sought after, can anyone enlighten me?

File: DSC_0571.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

>>12092913
lol no need to be so kind
Its not the one you posted but close to it. Its so fucking massive tho I mean look at it compared to my skx007 it makes it look like an skx013 and like I have a tiny wrist
I love it a lot and I kinda lost interested in it after learning about watches and knowing what I could have gotten but still I love it and wouldnt change it for anything

>>12089383
ive got the black one, snk809. i was surprised how beautiful it is. using it with a brown leather strap

>>12093156
Yeah, it's a 45mm(?), but from that picture it looked like it fit your wrist fine. It may just be the angle of the picture combined with the curved lugs though.
Nothing wrong with owning fashion watches as long as you buy them for the looks and not the horology.

File: DSC_0565.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

>>12093177
well thanks for the positivity
I have a fat wrist so anything will fit me really I am kinda bothered that the skx is so small tho

>>12093191
It's amazing that the SKX007 looks so small on you - I can barely wear 42mm and there's no way I could ever wear your Maserati watch so I'm a bit jealous of your wrist in that respect.

>>12093156
i think it would look better with a black rubber band

File: IMG_0867.jpg (640KB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

640KB, 3264x2448px

>>12093126
Most people either love them or hate them. I got it over a submariner because I already have a date just and found the sub to be a bit too ubiquitous for my taste, the pans are more interesting IMO. Only regret with this one is it does not have a sandwich dial, but it came on a titanium bracelet which is a rare offering from panerai.
>>12092943

File: a9f7600a828de8aff2ace7cf1eb95dba.jpg (71KB, 595x700px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 595x700px

>>12093172

Amazing what a bit of contrast does to the look of it.

When wearing a black or brown leather strap, do you always try to match it with shoe / belt colors?

>>12093420
Nice. Straps are always the nicest and easiest way to freshen up a watch.

>>12091891
Alright, but I specifically want the indiglo, and nobody seems to make a similar feature.

>>12092904
archie's a fat douchebag living in abject poverty.

and panerais are abominations.

>>12092631
well said friend.

I'd like an update on the poor young lad that was going to buy an SKX007 from some psychopath.

I only hope that the child is safe, and hasn't been abducted for some diabetic octogenarian's sex slave.

Please report in anon. And post photos of said SKX immediately, including a report on your physical well-being.

File: 20161209_225823-01.jpg (610KB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

610KB, 3264x1836px

You like my seamaster?

File: IMG-20161229-WA0003.jpg (121KB, 900x1600px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 900x1600px

This good for military?

File: 1455507647870.png (230KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 640x360px

>>12093830
god no, honestly one of the worst watch designs

I use it as a good example of why Omega design dept, beyond riding the speedmaster pro coattails, is shit.

>>12093833
Seems fine.

>>12093833
yes.

>>12093849
oh how dare you. The Seamaster 300 vintage and new coaxial are remarkable designs.

the speedmaster's overrated. perhaps the most overrated watches amongst horological hobbyists.

>>12093918
Yeah but who can argue when MAN ON THE FUCKING MOON

>>12093659
I bought it I am the guy with the maserati

>>12093646
Stay mad bitch boy

Show watch worth more or you are a confirmed bitter poorfag

File: clint beastwood.jpg (13KB, 264x234px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 264x234px

>>12093991
I own *SEVERAL* Patek Philippes. They're for me. Not for 'showing off'. Because I'm not new-money filth.

Unlike you, I won't let a watch, car or clothing (luxury or not) define me. I won't attempt to let it demonstrate my status in society.

You're classless, cheap and too young to realize that your status symbol only makes you look like a douchebag.

Also... archie? really? A poor, obese deviant -- you're holding him on a pedestal.

And panerai? I mean come on. you're massively compensating -- and with the tackiest "luxury" watch on the market. blech.

>>12093934
meh, that wretched new bulova can make the same claim.

if we're going to praise chronographs, let's talk turkey: 1969 Rolex Daytona.

Hi you dick gypsies.

Why are Squale and Steinhart watches worse than invictas? This is horrifying >>12081674

Is it true? If so why.

File: 13081-450-450[1].jpg (21KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 450x450px

How do I get over being too much of a pussy to spend a month's worth of pay on a watch? I don't have any other hobbies that cost money to maintain and I don't eat out so I have the money to burn, so to speak. Also, this is not a whim, I have been admiring this watch for a couple years now. I would just hate to have people know that I spent a lot (relatively speaking) of money on a watch.

People, as in my coworkers. I don't have any friends.

File: IMG_0162.jpg (215KB, 1101x759px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 1101x759px

Please, kill me

>>12094381
The same reason why someone gets a luxury car when a geo metro does the job, or why people buy nice jewelry; people like having nice things.

File: A500WGA-1_l.jpg (174KB, 500x600px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 500x600px

>>12081767
Lost this exact watch earlier this year. Great watch, loved wearing it. Pic is what I got for christmas to replace it.

>>12094381
Do you simply have trouble spending money, even on things you want or need? I have that problem.

File: OmegaSpeedmasterHODINKEE_37[1].jpg (41KB, 580x387px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 580x387px

>>12094585
In my case I'm more concerned about people getting the wrong impression -- like they think that I think I'm better than everyone else or that I'm trying to project some false image that I'm loaded with money.

Also the thought of there being people out there who have significantly more money than me wearing Seiko 5's and driving Ford Tauruses makes me feel like shit for wanting a luxury item.

File: IMG_2147.jpg (60KB, 768x491px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 768x491px

There are many accessories that men and women wear at all times, but if there is one accessory that men are always going to find essential as part of their fashion identity, it has to be the wrist watch. It has always provided the perfect complementary item for a man’s look.

There are all kinds of watched out there, but the luxury watch has always been a great way to display your success and your status without having to mention it. This is one of the reasons why this has always been a very appealing purchase for those who enjoy the status it provides....http://www.fashionwaylab.com/5-interesting-topics-fashion-bloggers/

>>>/sp/73329831
Rate these watches lads

>>12081674
What's wrong with Stowa?

>>12094721
Mike Phelan one is wrong, it's a seamaster of some sort.

Also I've seen Pep wear a ceramic GMT recently.

>>12081666
"The 5th" makes some pretty cool stuff.

>>12094381
You know mate, the money just doesn't go poof after you got the timepiece? If you got the right brand, certain Rolex among them, they won't decrease in value even as an everyday timepiece. So just see it as money on your wrist that looks nice... and has to get laundred ever five odd years.

File: CIMG0133.jpg (3MB, 4608x3456px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4608x3456px

Current Collection:

Top: Casio MQ-10 - c.1988 Swatch - Casio PAW-1500-7v (Solar/Atomic) - 1961 Vostok Komandirskie (Soviet Military Issue) - Seiko SNK805

Bottom: 1932 Bulova - 1952 Tissot Bumper Auto - 1953 Longines 19a Auto - Seiko SARB065 "Cocktail Time"

File: CIMG0135.jpg (2MB, 3357x3456px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3357x3456px

>>12095015
Close Up of the Vostok, great watch, bullet proof Vostok 2234 Mechanical Movement, this is a nearly NOS example, not a redial!

File: CIMG0105.jpg (2MB, 3526x3079px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3526x3079px

>>12095028
The SARB065 "Cocktail Time"

Designed in collaboration with one of the best Japanese Bartenders, excellent movement and the dial is even more stunning in real light. Constantly shifting and shimmering.

File: CIMG0097.jpg (1MB, 3074x3005px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3074x3005px

>>12095035

And this is the Longines 19a, a gem of a watch. This was taken with a macro lens that highlights the patina, it is much softer on the wrist. I had it serviced last week and it runs like a dream. Beautiful little piece and one of the first vintage watches I have bought

>>12095035
That is one sexy Seiko!

is there like a battle between the fans of Orient Ray/Mako and the SKX
I like to imagine that there is and people are buttmad at eachother

>>12094381
Don't buy new, don't buy shit. Even better, learn the true value of second hand watches and buy pieces that you can sell for more money.

>>12095035
They don't make a Cocktail Time with a pure or off white face, do they? Love watch but I never really like how the pale blue dial looks in photos.

>>12087353
You sound like a dickhead

File: lorus-rh941gx9_113789_1.jpg (73KB, 544x747px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 544x747px

Any experience with this brand?
>cheap
>somehow related to seiko

>>12094504
whats that abomination?

>>12094332
Not him but how on earth is a Panerai considered more tacky than a Rolex? I would venture that most people probably don't even know about Panerai, compared to entry level Rolexes being the typical "status symbol" for moderately successful professionals.

>>12095928
It's a bottom end subtier of Seiko, and as you pointed out, it's cheap.
Even if you buy it and it's shit, no problem, it was cheap anyway.

File: Techne Merlin watches.jpg (39KB, 810x402px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 810x402px

>>12095928
looks nice
I wouldnt get the pepsi one if it looks like shit irl tho
look at what the colors actually look like irl

File: IN3107BBKO-824x1024.jpg (223KB, 824x1024px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 824x1024px

thoughts on pic related?
Ingersoll Cobham II

File: IMG_0158.jpg (449KB, 707x1413px) Image search: [Google]

449KB, 707x1413px

>>12095964
Invicta speedway racer or something. Xmas present. To give you some perspective, from case to crown its 56mm. Height from the back to face is 18.5mm.

File: IMG_20161227_143225.jpg (3MB, 3120x4160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3120x4160px

What does /fa/ think of my watch?

File: 1483138404281.jpg (1015KB, 707x1413px) Image search: [Google]

1015KB, 707x1413px

>>12097216
it really wouldn't be that bad if it didnt have all the accented bullshit

best budget watch? and by budget i really mean too poor to buy decent food

>>12097319
It's a classic understated look, but that crystal needs a cleaning.

>>12097364
If you just need something on your wrist that tells time then get a F91W. If you want a mechanical then the Seiko 5 has a wide variety of watches to suit anyone's tastes, but the SNK803/5/9 is the king of poorfag mechanicals.

>>12097382
owned that casio for two years, cost me € 8 shipped, but last week the plastic just ripped. don't know if i should just replace it or save up. not having a watch drives me nuts currently though.

>>12095741
It's actually not pale-blue at all. In actual light it's silver. The blue face is just a common photo issue.

>>12097358
That's typical of Invicta - ruining a watch by making it fucking huge.

>>12097396
Why not do both - replace it and save up? It's just 8 euros.

>>12087353
Autism detected

>>12090917
Hell yeah that's i r o n y at it's best

File: IMG_3332.jpg (226KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 720x1280px

Gothic/Clint Eastwood Cuff/Apple watches lets go!

>>12097358
The red lines are because of a nearby light.

Btw, why did you save my image and repost it?

File: IMG_0145.jpg (286KB, 1067x796px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 1067x796px

>>12097364
Uh, what? A digital casio will work for under $12, mechanical casio will run about $25

>>12097948
Fuck that's actually a pretty decent looking Casio.

File: 163e42620d37ac4fbaa022f0cee6dfbc.png (41KB, 639x171px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 639x171px

Some people, I fucking swear.

File: IMG_20161230_232857.jpg (3MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3024x4032px

Can someone value these two for me, they're my granddads he gifted them to me.

File: IMG_20161230_232843.jpg (3MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3024x4032px

>>12098429

File: 1483140986438.jpg (3MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3024x4032px

>>12098432

File: 1483141136455.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

>>12098440

>>12098429
>>12098432
Not very much, under $100. Its gold plated steel, quartz, and an outdated square design. The new ones are selling on ebay for $200 with some diffrent features, new in box, and RW's have a bit of a price premium for whatever reason.

The 9983 appears to be the mechanism reference number, and not the model number of the watch. Was it a gift that you simply don't want, or a watch that he wore for years?

>>12098447
It was a set with a smaller women's one that matches, he gave both of them to my parents, my mum still has the women's one and my dad gave me this one. He had worn them for years up until 25 years ago where they have been in storage. They're now mine I don't particularly want to sell them but I was just curious as to how much they would be worth. Thanks for the quick reply.

>>12098458
By they I mean the ones I have posted here, my mother's one has been worn for years.

>>12097319
10/10

but that sweater... are you a Chicago pimp?

come on Eric. come on.

>>12098440
>>12098442
this one may be worth upwards of 350 after a cursory ebay / google search

>>12087268
It looks like a gaymer product for gaymers made by razer

>>12098564
Thats just an Devold woolen sweater. Nothing pimp about it mate.

File: 1483184254575.jpg (875KB, 1936x2293px) Image search: [Google]

875KB, 1936x2293px

Requesting the homage genuine of this watch please.

>>12098429
>>12098440
Take these to Reddit and ask for a value - there are actual knowledgeable people there rather than jokers like these guys:
>>12098447
>>12098585
who clearly know nothing about collector's pieces.

>>12098891
That's a fucking fossil, isn't it

>>12099153
Oh are they wrong? That's a relief it was very off-putting. I'll do that, thanks.

>>12099153
The problem with "collector's pieces" is they're only appealing (not sought after) to collectors.

Even the rares postage stamp is typically valued at 50 cents to the general consumer, only "collectors" are even remotely interested in it. I ask if it was worn by your grandfather to see if it had sentimental value; you will receive more in value from that than the 100-200 dollars you may or may not fetch from ebay.

>>12099172
GENEVA. It's right there in blinding pimptastic gold!

File: f4952f6ca82cec2a6c54b78532d0e23a.png (42KB, 758x137px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 758x137px

>>12099453
Well the only things that come up are for places like Dhgate and Aliexpress so you got chink'd if you paid more than $25.

>>12094636
It ain't a hobby if it doesn't take all of your money. I'm just a poor student and got speedy as well and in my opinion, that is a great watch to start with in the higher end spectrum.

>>12099496
I wouldn't pay the price listed in the photo for that junk! I was just pointing out that even Fossil isn't tacky enough to design a watch that fugly!

>>12099153

Or go to fucking Watchuseek.

But seriously, those are 70's low-mid range luxury quartz watches, the least desirable of all luxury watches. The guy got them from his Grandfather and their only real value is that they are heirlooms.

File: 81ALhdVBLJL._UY445_.jpg (22KB, 273x445px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 273x445px

Are Daniel Wellingtons worth it?

>>12081729
Kind of agree. Vintage Speedy > new swag shit, but Seamasters are still top tier, especially the PO.

>>12099617
of course no, they're a fashion watch made in chine with shit quality

>>12099617
No.

>>12099617
nope, no horological value to speak of. Buy a Timex and you're getting a better watch.

DW is a made in china "lifestyle" brand watch, if they are still around in 5 years I'll be shocked.

>>12099717
Honestly I could see them getting bought out by Timex or Fossil. Maybe more so Fossil since they own Skagen and make a bunch of watches for various designer brands.

>>12099717
If you can stand the loud ticking timebomb quartz movement of a Timex. Timex uses cheap brass cases that amplify the sound. At least the designer china made crap uses stainless steel cases, and are relatively quiet.

Not that I would want either. Save up and get something decent. At least save enough for a Seiko or Orient. An Orient Bambino is affordable and has the same simple dress watch design asthetic, and it's a better made watch for an entry level tier timepiece.

File: WP_20161231_21_13_23_Pro.jpg (1MB, 3264x1840px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x1840px

>>12093420
True. Im in love with automatics

File: JUNG-J30BZ-5.jpg (180KB, 409x500px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 409x500px

Happy new year watchfriends
wish you many new watches and matching nato straps for 2017

>>12100076
Thank you friend, you too.

Happy New Year to the rest of you as well.

>>12099731
desu fossil has had some interesting new offerings. it will be cool to see where they go as a brand.

>>12098758
I was kidding, it looks good (watch and sweater).

It would be nice if the watch experts could tell me why Squale and Steinhart are such "awful" brands?

Please?

>>12100709
They get some sneers at certain members of the watch community as they are hommage watches that borrow heavily from rolex in terms of design.
I wear an Ocean One sometimes and think Steinhart could do a better job with the clasp and lume, but they are actually nice pieces with sapphire glass, reliable movements, good finish and even screwed in links.
Perfect for travelling as well, as the price point for the whole watch is even cheaper than a standard service.

File: SARW025_5-700x700.jpg (81KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 700x700px

Can anyone rec me a watch like this Seiko but smaller? In love with the design but it's bulky af and I've got tiny wrists.

>>12101545
Bulky as in the case thickness or the diameter? Because the diameter is already pretty small at 40.5mm

>>12101602
Mostly the thickness, but I watched someone handle it on youtube and it looked kind of disproportionately big. My current watch is actually about 43mm and looks acceptable so I guess I'm just not used to a white clockface that stands out so much? In retrospect I think it'd fit quite well.

File: bambinov3.jpg (1MB, 2782x2086px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2782x2086px

>>12099763
Vote II for Bambino. Such a shame the v3 ones with new movement are so hard to find. Really dig the bauhaus design

>>12101636
A lot of classy watches seem to be quite thick in pictures, but on the wrist they fit really well.
If you can already wear a 43mm then you probably won't have any problems.
Perhaps you could try out the watch at a local AD or try out some other watch of similar thickness and see how it feels?

>>12101672
That doming really sells it.
Is that strap the original?

>>12101672
hands are too short, can't be unseen

>>12090768
I must have a fake. Mine is the same but with China, not Japan. Coat 16 bucks.

File: d473b2470adbda9cafb5504d89ac77f2.jpg (307KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 1500x1000px

I have found my timex watch to stay accurate to 3 seconds a month when checking against the atomic clock and the train station clock. Is this just a fluke and will this watch stay accurate over time?

>>12101963
eww

>>12101963
Nice watch.
It's a quartz so it'll have high accuracy and most likely stay that way unless you make really really bad movements with the arm wearing the watch, e.g. using a chainsaw.
It'd be a (bad) fluke if you managed to get a quartz with terrible accuracy.

>>12095028

oh shit I fucking love this
w2c

>>12102460
Vostok Komandirskie, so eBay or through a watch forum.

>>12095015
>>12095028
>>12102460
>>12102467

actually, better question, where did you get that strap? it goes with the watch beautifully

File: IMG_20170101_170109.png (2MB, 1024x1285px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1024x1285px

My two main watches. Any recommendations for brown casual shoes too pair with jeans and a t-shirt that is a similar color to the brown watch band I have?

>>12102480

Clockwork Synergy 18mm NATO w/ Gold Hardware, comes in like 25 different colors and sizes.

>>12085254
Withings

How are MVMT?

>>12087268
get one of the Gundam g-shocks 2bh

>>12102571
Any T-shirt will do, the problem with leather color and photos is you have to look at them in the same light, something the internet cannot do for you.

Hello I want to buy a watch. maybe spend around $150 or something on one. I have absolutely 0 knowledge about watches at all, could I get a tier list?

I sort of dress like an emo fag in all black with skinny jeans and black Zoo York with snapbacks if that matters, plz no bully

>>12103368
All black Casio G-Shock or a Timex Weekender.
Then upgrade when you start dressing like an adult.

File: GA-100-1A1ER.jpg (110KB, 710x864px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 710x864px

>>12103372
>Casio G-Shock
Like this?

File: watch.jpg (9KB, 157x193px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 157x193px

What watch is this /fa/m?

>>12103411
Any diver by any company.

File: watch.png (470KB, 1120x606px) Image search: [Google]

470KB, 1120x606px

>>12103368
>>12103372

The Timex Weekender is THE undisputed solid, cheap starter watch. This, speaking as someone who got one as his first watch, 3 months ago. I got the white face, red second hand, olive green strap. For your style, might recommend black face, red second hand, maybe black strap?

Also fuck the g-shocks, I hate them so much. Consider a Casio A168w-1, the stainless steel digital. Or if that doesn't quite hit you right, Timex Classic Digital, silver. I have one in gold, and I love it to death.

Pictured, from left to right: Weekender, Casio, Timex Digital

>>12103455
That looks plain to me though and kind of hipster

>>12103455
And I would definately want a black strap

>>12103472

Well, one man's "plain" is another man's "understated". My personal taste, I don't like anything too flashy or over the top. Hence why I like simple 25 dollar watches. Not sure how to take the word "hipster" on /fa/ of all places. But it's a start.

>>12103482
im just fuckin with ya. I never go on this board. I'll check out those maybe theyll grow on me and the price tag looks nice

>>12103485

neither of us has used the word "normiecore" in earnest yet, so we're good. I think the Casio would be the best fit for you, from how you described your style, but I'm having a little bit of trouble picturing it. And it might be that I just really want that watch myself.

File: 1482022716205.png (332KB, 804x656px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 804x656px

>>12103492
like this

>>12097948
Nice. And here I was looking at Daniel Wellington when this beauty was here all along.

File: IMG_0150.jpg (418KB, 1424x614px) Image search: [Google]

418KB, 1424x614px

>>12103516
If Casio made one in white I would buy it. Also, if it had indiglo it would be the perfect watch.

>>12097948
Do you know of any similarly thin models you could recommend? I'm looking into this one, but I'm not sure where else to look for a thin analog watch. Doesn't help I'm a watch newb.

>>12103544
Sorry bub, I only own 4 watches. I usually just go through amazon looking at watches. The thickness measurements are usually pretty accurate unless the reviews say otherwise.

However, the thinner the watch, the pricier it gets, or wider it gets. Buy the casio and love it. I'm going to buy another one because I've scratched the crystal.

>>12101962
It's not fake. I own a A159 with Japan markings. You own a A158 with Chinese or Thailand marking or whatever Chink country it's from.

>>12099717

Can you explain what makes a watch have "horological value"? What makes Fossils and DW and such "bad watches" and Timex "good watches"? Is it just the ability to lose/gain less time over the course of a given timespan? How do you know what's good and what's bad? How would an average person know? What would be the downsides of owning a "horologically bad" watch?

Teach me!

>>12103590 here
also, aren't the vast majority of watches relatively accurate over reasonable amounts of time? I don't know much about watches but I thought this whole "cheap chinese quartz" thing was a big equalizer that made most even cheap watches fairly accurate.

File: 20170101_231639.jpg (357KB, 608x672px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 608x672px

I need a band to go with this. Any suggestions?

>>12103617

oh shit
what is this, tell me more, tell me more

File: IMG_20161217_153102.jpg (3MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3024x4032px

Just finished restoring my first pocket watch.
Nothing crazy, came in pretty good condition:, had to remove the tarnish, replace the hands, and replace the winding staff.
1900 grand prix Paris open faced Zenith watch (.800 silver case).

File: ruwelektronika3b.jpg (192KB, 950x750px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 950x750px

>>12103622
For once my basic knowledge of Cyrillic comes in handy. It's an Elektronika 77.
A Soviet clone of the Casios from the same era.

File: IMG_20160618_203937.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x4032px

Always loved the look of moon phase watches. Me and my fiancee agreed that she'd buy my a watch and I'd buy her a ring. With a budget of $700 is there any worth while brands I should be looking at?

>>12103649

I absolutely love it holy shit
it looks just like my Timex digital but all Soviet and shit

w2 fucking c

>>12103675
There's tons of them on eBay, but you'll have to buy it from a seller based in a former Soviet country.

File: 20161209_160023.jpg (1MB, 1788x1537px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1788x1537px

>>12103617
i went w the mesh

>>12103675
Check eBay ~$20. Some charge a lot to ship since they're pretty much only in Eastern Europe. Find one with a best offer.

>>12103683

Reminds me of an old joke.
The year is 1965, and three Soviet workers show up to the factory at which they work. By the end of the day, all three are disappeared to go count trees in Siberia.
The first man showed up early. He was sentenced on suspicion of being a spy.
The second man showed up late. He was sentenced on suspicion of being a poor proletariat.
The third man showed up on time. He was sentenced on suspicion of buying an American watch.

File: sensible chuckle.gif (993KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

993KB, 250x250px

>>12103704
Medium kek.

>>12103704
Not even a chuckle, famalam.

File: GA100-1A1.jpg (31KB, 473x500px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 473x500px

>>12087268
Ordered pic related. Should arrive this week.

>>12103704
My Luch has been keeping good time.

>>12103769
why?
gshocks are stupidly big and they arent really a watch more like a gadget

>>12104230
To workout in anon. Aren't you /fit/?

>>12104296
no im not fit but I work out and I use my daily watch for that I just put a nato on it

>>12104299
Surely you can see why others wouldn't do that however and so a GShock is a good choice.

>>12104308
>not being a poorfag

File: Rosslingwatch.jpg (126KB, 1360x907px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1360x907px

c/n?