Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: 11708599_7912970_1000.jpg (55KB, 1000x1334px) Image search:
[Google]
55KB, 1000x1334px
So why did Raf make Converse ripoffs again?
>Not nearly as good as Ramones or Ann D.'s Converse-like designs
>Looks kinda cheap in photos
Are they better in person, or what?
I guess this is the same person who stuck an "R" on the side of Stan Smiths ("muh superior leather") and called it a day so it's kind of expected? But still.
>>
looks like raving shoes, the ones you fuck up badly
only a lil expensive for what they are
>>
>>11980417
Like, I saw these on sale today for about the same prices as normal cons, maybe a bit pricier, but I don't see why you'd buy these at normal price. You might as well get CDG cons or Jack Purcells, save a few bucks, and have a better looking pair of shoes.
>>
Saw them at Neiman Marcus yesterday. They look like ass in person. But I guess if you find them for in the low to mid 100s, they might be worth it.
>>
The cream / blue colorway isn't bad, I'd swap the blue laces for cream ones though
>>
>>11980514
Yeah, I'd agree, except Shoes Like Pottery are already doing similar shit, and better.
>>
Might as well be DC shoes
>>
might as well be skate shoes with the suede and the toe cap
>>
Why dont you stay with your own Americuck brand and leave European product alone?
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1