>implying /fa/ has enough money to have a car
>implying /fa/ is even old enough to drive
Im a senior in highschool where my parents co signed for me to get a 2015 corolla. Me and my father also share an e30 which he is letting me take to college and he will have my car. Both are dark grey so i dont really have to match if people actually do that.
Not my actual car but it's the closest thing to it. I think it suits my style.
I think the car suits me pretty well.
it's often misunderstood, looks cool and quirky in a unique way, and is usually forgotten when 90's Jap hero cars are mentioned.
Everything about it I love. From the dangerous yet rewarding MR handling to the super unique looks.
on the style side of things I really like Jap/Korean inspo (yes I am Asian)
With all the weird andro looks and kpop inspired 2block haircut dyed brown and permed to be wavy.
Ok let's have test come down French Guiana to drive on the back roads off the nation BMW Vs Lincoln see who wins
>driving a post 1985 car
You people disgust me.
Not my one but 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste GT
Just picked this up a week or so ago: 1987 Caterham Super 7 Sprint (factory built). Image from other dealer who the guy had it on consignment with. Have other pics but don't really want to post anything that links me back. Fucking tight car though. Only weighs about 490kg after some additional mods.
I drive a beat up 1999 pontiac bonneville.
Its extremely bland, but is really comfy and works great. Thats why it fits my style i guess
Celicas and eclipses are chick cars bro. They are slow as fuck. At least mx5s and frs's are fun to drive chick cars. Celicas and eclipses aren't even that.
I like the 80s supras and mr2s better than the 90s ones. The 90s ones look like squeezed out turds. I want to rebuild an 86 supra, they look like if deloreans actually looked good.
>Celicas and eclipses are chick cars bro
You do realize the 2nd gen supra is widely known as the Celica SUpra and is essentially a Celica, right?
You literally just said
>They are slow as fuck
Here's a little protip: A stock 1.8l mx5 or eclipse gsx is going to be faster, more fun to drive, easier to work on and maintain, than a Celica Supra, right?
You're contradicting yourself calling these supposed 'chick cars' worse and slow but you don't even know anything about the car you say is better
I drive my mum's old Toyota Corolla from 2003
It's very well maintained and runs perfectly fine. It's a little slow especially with 3-4 people inside but it gets me everywhere I want to go.
She gave it to me as a gift back in 2014 when she bought a new one. I love it.
That's like comparing a base impreza to an sti. Or a 6 cylinder automatic pony car to an actual v8. They're different. Not really an argument.
I like the old supra purely for looks. It's also 30 years old as opposed to 10. If I were to buy a modern car I would get a '10 wrx hatchback because it's a do everything car. If I were to buy a romantic toy for cruising I would buy the supra.
I drive a '05 Acura RL. I love it but it's such a fucking heavy car. it weighs a whopping 4,000lbs so when I have more than 2 people in the car it accelerates a lot slower. I can't exactly match my fits to it because it's just white and a regular sedan. who tf wears white anyways. not my pic but this exact car, but in "crystalline white"
>That's like comparing a base impreza to an sti. Or a 6 cylinder automatic pony car to an actual v8. They're different. Not really an argument.
No it's not. It's literally comparing it to cars that you already compared it to.
Like it for looks all you want because they do look fantastic but don't fall down the cognitive dissonance well where you let that skew how it actually performs compared to these other cars you convinced yourself are worse
And then when you come to you'll realize the z20 soarer is the underrated gold that came out of the supra line
not my car but its just like this, but with better rims. fits my aesthetic well and is fun as hell to hoon in even tho its FWD
I didn't compare it to them at any point. A 30 year old classic car does not served the same function as a 10 year old car marketed to hairdressers.
Once again, if I were to buy a car made in the last 15 years I would buy pic related.
And your pictured car is heinous.
>Celicas and eclipses are chick cars bro. They are slow as fuck. At least mx5s and frs's are fun to drive chick cars. Celicas and eclipses aren't even that.
>I like the 80s supras and mr2s better than the 90s ones. The 90s ones look like squeezed out turds. I want to rebuild an 86 supra, they look like if deloreans actually looked good.
You're actually falling for the hairdresser meme too
>And your pictured car is heinous.
If by heinous you mean fantastic drivetrain combined with some of the best luxury options toyota had at the time in a fairly compact and lightweight package
You're quite literally being blinded by the popups
Here's a pic. I won't post my car because it always gets shitted on lol
I've only seen a small number of soarers in the states and a bunch of the ones I've seen have just been the front half cut off for the engine and associated parts
Tell your friend it's nice and to keep it safe and that wheels are tacky but funny
Ignore him anon, he's a dumbass that doesn't even know anything about the cars he swears by. Not knowing what panasports are is like not knowing what cragars are if you're into American cars, or what work wheels are if you're into modern Japanese.
Sure dude, it you knew anything about old Japanese cars you'd know what parts were available for them. That's how you can get them to be faster than any modern car. None of the z20s you posted were stock. If you don't know what parts were on either of those then I only consider you a fanboy.
A car with wider wheels, lower suspension and better tires will always go faster than a stock car. That's not irrelevant.
You're talking about how you know those cars but you don't know about what parts are on them, nor what kind of parts exist for it. Therefore you don't know shit about old Japanese cars. Knowing that they came with good engines and good suspension is not enough. 1g isn't that great anyways. You're just a fanboy.
Once again you completely miss the point. It's irrelevant because I never had anything to prove about whether they're stock or not. All the images I posted were just random nice looking soarers
You can have better tires and a lower suspension without the specific era-correct rims that I wasn't aware of
You're shifting the argument because all you can do is call me a fanboy
>Not driving a bagged Station Wagon
Car is absolute shit engine wise, But interior and exterior to fresh not to pass up on.
Doesn't pull too many bitches, most people think some white mom with a bowl haircut is about to step out of it.
Pic related is the same model as my car (96 Formula Firebird) except my hood is also black and everything else is silver.
WTF, I had a W108 as my first car. Suprised other people here pull the same shit.
>pic related, That was the car
This is what I drive. It doesn't fit what I wear, I wear mostly tech wear and stuff. I don't like it, but my dad gave it to me. I want a Subaru
2006 Toyota Yaris, Silver
it sucks when it breaks down because i'm american and it is a german model car, so parts are few and far between.
Looks exactly like pic related
wow so hostile
dont get ur lululemon tights in a bunch
did u forget to take ur estrogen supplements today?
its cold af and i only wear columbia puffy jackets and thick patagoina fleeces with corduroy pants f a m
come at me.
you know what that IS a car made for suburban trophy wives but fuck it since your parents bought it for you, its prob comfy as fuck and faster than most of what people drive on here and /o/.
heres to hoping you actually get to experience a real porsche sometime. i.e. an aircooled 911 or just any 911 in general.
>you just know you're jealous you can't afford it
The cost ceiling for a Macan is around 70k. Everyone here with actual money is laughing at you.
Should have asked your parents to work harder to buy you a real Porsche.
Front bumper is fucked up and I don't have a good camera but fuck it.
My first manual transmission. Planning on driving saab 9-5s for the rest of my life.
hey thanks netizen
it's interesting you're trying so hard to get a rise out of me. Must either mean you don't have 'actual money,' whatever that is or how it correlates to spoiling children, or that you have something else to feel bad about. Either way, seems like money means a lot to you—there's more to life y'know, anon
>there's more to life y'know
this coming from the guy who went "y-youre just jealous you cant afford a porsche!"
My first reply to you, kid.
My down payment on my second house could have bought 7 of your Porches outright. Nothings interesting. I forgot about you until someone bumped the thread.
Well I was just saying what I thought to be probably true. It's highly typical of people on this site to denigrate anyone who posts something that reminds them of their insecurities or inadequacies, which are often the seeds for each boards' weirdly cultivated brand of pretentiousness for their trademark homebrew tastes.
Anyway, it is easy for me to say money is no substantial matter because I have it though I really believe that, so in the great words of Kanye West, "money isn't everything, but not having it is"