/zara/ Discussion

Because they make shitty knock offs of popular (mostly the shit hypebeast trash) designer clothes that fuccbois and tumblerinas eat up cause they can't afford the real thing.

>>11938152
True this. I am hating all the girls over here wearing more inditex garbage like shitty Pull & Bear denim jackets with that shitty default patches pack. It's kind of autistic.

Sometimes you find inditex Jewels, like some good basic jeans, a nice jacket, or a good belt. But most of the shit is so generic, cheap and horrible that I just want to end its poor misery.

That's their whole business model m8
making stuff that lasts is only worth it if you're selling it for high sums, Zara makes fakes of stuff that lasts, prices it for a fraction and you can wear it for a maybe a season or two tops before it breaks down and you have to buy a new one.

>>11938196
I once saw a real leather jacket for like 150 in P&B, but I didn't take it. It was between generic bomber and biker jacket, I'll keep an eye out for something like it in the future, someday I'll report in with my findings.

One thing I don't grasp, is how Zara managed to grow so international from like 2 stores in Coruña.

More like, how it managed to stay relevant after switching to this sales model in the early 2000s.