What is /fa/'s the general consensus on Gant? I'm having a hard time pinpointing what exactly they are about and how effay they are. Just another generic mid tier brand?
>>11922325
Gant rugger used to do some decent stuff. Haven't really check them out in a while though so they may have gone to shit.
>>11922325
I have three sweaters and a jacket from them and for the price the quality isn't really what it should be, noticed after I bought the stuff that on my cable knit sweater the sleeve on one side was longer than the other side, the jacket's material (which was too cheap to justify the price of the jacket) got "wrinkles" and insulation threads popped out of the jacket leaving tufts that got bigger when pulling on them so I had to use a scissor and get a "close cut" so they weren't noticeable. The sewing on the jacket (it's a quilted jacket) was somewhat poor, threads are loose now. Don't even look at the jeans they were piss poor quality in the store, abhorrent sewing.
They can charge what they want because all the swedish middle class kids see it as the ultimate prep brand so they'll pay anything to approach le yale lifestyle.
It's safe clothing though that makes you look a bit more chad, in the sense that it's simple traditional design that looks good and somewhat professional to even those who don't care about clothing.
Wouldn't buy it at full price, that's getting scammed
>>11922325
Essentially European Tommy Hilfiger. Entry level "luxury" clothing
I have a hoodie and a sweater from Gant. Hoodie is good, a bit pleby with big branding. The sweater is of poor quality and was expensive.
>>11922325
>Just another generic mid tier brand?
yes