is height the most determinative /fa/ factor?

>>11865114
it's facial features/bone structure

if you disagree then you probably just at the very least lack any "great" features but in all likelihood you're average looking at best

>>11865137
Proportions and face are key

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oo7o75-w94c

Face>height>hair>proportions=clothes

>>11865306
On second thought
Face>height=weight>hair=proportions>clothing

if height was a deal breaker, women would never be fashionistas. most women (5'2-5'6" or so) are normal short.

File: weird.jpg (86KB, 800x1136px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 800x1136px

>>11865114
-weight
-height
-face

look how some model have really special facial features, like big noses, big ears, weird mouthes, face is the last thing, actually, it's great to have a weird face, if you have the weight and the height, you're /fa/.

Face > weight > hair > height* > fashion

*I personally rank this low, but I can understand how others put it higher. Full disclosure, I'm a avg faced, skinny-fit, balding() 5'6" guy. I'm way more stressed about losing my hair than being a manlet.

Fashion should always be last, since even the most un-fa person can look /fa/ if given the right clothes. Fatties will always be lumpy fucks, manlets always short, etc...

below avg tall guy > > > handsome manlet

>>11866842
define manlet, ~5'10 good looking "manlet" with good proportions >>>>> ugly 6'1 guy

>>11865340
Don't be thick, you know we're talking about guys.

Plus taller girls who know how to dress DO look better anyway.

>>11866853
I know this is 4chan but let's be real, in real life 5'10" is not short. Not super tall, but you're tall enough that most girls can still date you AND wear heels, since the average American woman is like 5'4". Manlet status doesn't start until about 5'6".

>>11865271
lol

>>11866861
imo 5'8 is already bordeline manlet, 5'10 can be manlet if your proportions fit the bill. otherwise 5'10 to 5'12 is not a manlet

>>11866842
Keep dreaming

>>11868311
>5'12"

>>11865925
I agree with this.
A weird face means its a memorable face

6'2.5 here, also 220 lbs football player. I don't think anyone understands how difficult it is finding clothes that match my physique...

>>11868357
thats why chads like you need to stick with under armour hoodies

File: george_clooney2.jpg (27KB, 300x400px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 300x400px

weight and proportions probably

>>11868321
>imperial system

>>11865114
being true 2 yourself is the most determinative and only factor for /fa/

5'7" pants are always too long, and shirts are always too puffy. I can't find the right size
also got jack in confidence which helps all around

>>11868376
This pic bugged me. I googled and they're both the same size(5'11")
>>11868385
Nah, I think he's just an idiot. 12" to a foot. X'12" would be x+1'. You're not 5'12". You're 6'.

File: 1474320573599.jpg (54KB, 700x467px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 700x467px

optimal height is when you can smell girls' pits

It's complicated.

I would rather be an attractive manlet than an ugly lanklet

But an attractive tall person is the pinnacle of beauty

>>11865925
That post is a pretty huge boost for my confidence. I've just recently discovered that my nose is a little bit off like the one on this pic and while it never was really bad for me or anything this makes me feel better:)

Face > height > frame.

>>11865114
>multiple chins
>having the luxury of standards

Fuck fatties bruh

>>11868705
people like to use this pic to make fun of manlets but sophie is just taller than the average women and also has heels on. Daenerys targaryen next to her is more average height for a women and shes probably wearing heels too

>>11865114

jawline>jawline>jawline

>>11868705
How tall is this man?
Or better yet how tall is that huge bitch?

>>11870297
jon snows 5'8'' i think sophias 5'9'' plus heels

Proportions.

how is 6'6" and 330lbs looking with a jew fro?