sneaker of the year?
>>11813728
"no"
>>11813802
damn that post from 2012 only just now came through? uuuh time for an upgrade on that cox bro
regardless of how you think they look the ultra-boosts are the defining shoe of 2016
>>11813728
>sneakers of the year?
foh, they dope but not sneaker of the year dope
>>11815058
ultra boosts came out before 2016
>>11813728
i yet to see a single one in real life and i live in EU, where Adidas supposed to be strong
how can a sneaker would be the sneaker of the year, when it's not a recognizable trend on the streets? if Adidas, it's still Superstars and Yeezys (fake Yeezys mostly), it doesn't matter that they came out before this year, it just means that 2016 sucked in terms of new sneakers
>>11815050
underrated anon
>>11815747
>i yet to see a single one in real life and i live in EU, where Adidas supposed to be strong
fucking idiot
>>11815759
kek, i see now, you meant the collab
i meant i haven't seen any eqts obviously, not the collab
but how can a shoe even more rare than regular eqts be the sneaker of the year? they aren't even that nice, especially compared to the triple black or triple white regulars
>>11815826
your post made no sense. nike and adidas tend to limit their stock of new shoes. Parley ultraboosts are the sexiest sneakvers ive seen this year but noone will have the chance to wear them
>>11815833
you still haven't answered my question
how could a shoe be the sneaker of the year when practically noone (or just a selected few) is being able to wear it?
if anywhere, this particular shoe can be sneaker of the year only in small, isolated fashion realms like /fa/ and even here not for everyone for sure
>>11815925
Because that's how it works. People want sneakers that are limited and harder to find. adidas and nike release their best sneakers in small batches
Hence why you will hardly see anyone see people wear acroym prestos.
>>11816441
i think everyone knows that
that still doesn't make them the sneaker of any year, because of the very fact that they are rare
Even though I am no way a fan of them, Adidas NMD is the sneaker of the year.
I think you mean these.
>>11813728
Geobaskets are sneakers of the year every year.
>>11816581
Not even close. If these were an adidas collab itwould be nothing special. adidas had mad various collabs as good as them
>>11816660
Gotta disagree my dude, Acronym took the prestos and really made them unique, I just got my pair and the little touches like the zippers and straps and leather in certain places is incredible. The Adidas collabs were good (SNS Tee Times by far the best) but aside from uncaging the UB didn't really do anything to make the shoes stand out, just different colourways, the Mastermind Tubulars being the exception.
>>11816670
So a collab made a sketchers looking sneaker to a non sketchers looking and that makes it collab of the year?.
I would say Kith Dooms are the best out of any collab and pic related as well.
>>11816688
Kith dooms were a let down to me. Fieg does better work with Asics.
>>11816581
How can that due stand on those twigs. It looks like his ankles could snap at the slightest step.
Also. By the looks of it, he's got a serious liver infection. Skin doesn't just turn this oily yellow Color for fun
>>11816688
winrar
>>11816754
Are you ok?