are these effay? Why or why not
>>11684808
simple design, comfortable, nice colorways. I think they're effay.
I like them but if you look at other pics the sole and the seam between the sole and the upper makes them look like cheap shit
they feel and look cheap
>>11684945
>>11684968
Exactly. I've seen great colorways for the Roshes but the quality always puts me off. Same with the cheap China-made NBs
>>11684808
way overdone, just like fluxes
thoughts? i saw these today at big w and got them cuz one, they were 19 bucks and two they look exactly like these roshes or w/e just with no branding
i should try figure out a way to mock a nike tick
t. poorfag
>>11685468
ignore the mess im messy
>>11685468
>and two they look exactly like these roshes or w/e just with no branding
lad they really don't
they look like cheap shit I'm sorry to say, because that's what they are
the sole especially looks atrocious
if you're a poorfag just learn to save your money
20 bucks here could have gone towards an actual nice pair of nikes or adidas or something
>>11685499
nah lad pretty good i must say
>>11685510
you're wrong mate
>>11685514
literally
the
same
thing
>>11685514
>>11685499
t. butthurt nike shill
>roshes
what is it 2013-2014 in here?
no these things are played out
get some new adidas
thats the new roshe
>>11684808
they suck cock and the fact that kanye just made an ornate roshe and hypebeasts ate it up really shows where the game is right now
>>11685499
you're a dumbass
>>11684808
Roshes are for teen faggots they look bad if you think they're effay you're fucking wrong