THE UNIQLO MA-1 BOMBER IS BACK PLEBS
are bombers still cool or are they dead
http://www.uniqlo.com/us/product/men-ma-1-blouson-178772.html#57~/men/outerwear-and-blazers/jackets-and-coats/blousons/~
>>11557479
>are bombers still cool or are they dead
honestly idgaf, i already had 3 cotton bombers, i just copped 3 other, i went for some shiny ones this time >>11557339
Do they size up like most bombers and parkas or are they true to size?
>>11557497
Do you listen to Kanye west and asap rocky
No shade
>>11557547
just did, both were a lot better when they started
i guess i just like military inspired street wear
Litterally everyone who is not even into fashion has a cheap looking black bomber at the moment.
Suede Rick bomber is my grail, but will never be able to afford q_q are there any mid range price alternatives for a suede dark/black bomber?
Fucking Uniqlo, I recently cop a military jacket on sale, my parents won't give me money for another jacket... If I only knew they would sell bombers...
>>11557666
get a job
just ordered
nice one OP
Got this one. Not fa, but anyway. Btw, bombers are dead for years now.
you can wait a bit and probably get Uniqlo UUUU bomber
>>11558249
what's UUU?
>>11558262
New Lemaire line.
>>11558263
just found where you got it from, neato
uniqlo fucking stinks poorfags
bombers will always be cool though
I only have like 1 cotton one though
>>11558272
>bombers will always be cool though
>>11558288
theyve been in and out of style since the 1950s, you trendhopping faggot. theyre not going anywhere soon
>>11557497
>ASOS
ugh kys
>>11558530
>mfw keep buying their chinos because they're actually quite nice
>>11557655
try zara or pull & bear
I bought a stone suede bomber at p&b for 16 euros today
>>11558558
>suede
faux suede m8
>>11558533
one thing is common in those who bash ASOS: they have never bought anything from there they can be divided into two groups:
1. muh exclusivity, muh quality elitist
2. pleb sheeple, who just go by the elitist's opinion
there's absolutely nothing wrong with ASOS, it's fairly decent quality for cheap
Uniqlo is no better
when you look at that bomber which is posted by the OP, it looks cheap, looks like something which could be from H&M, which is not a problem, because it's cheap, but if you look around on ASOS, for the same price, you'll find better looking stuff
Uniqlo has 1 kind of bomber at the moment called blouson (whatever the fuck that means, i guess it's some gay shit), ASOS has 700 bombers, yes they carry a lot of brands, but out of those 700, there will be at least 200-250 in the Uniqlo price range or even cheaper
if i'd need to cop a cheap black bomber, just skimming through the bombers on ASOS quick, i'd go with pic related and not with the Uniqlo one, that's for sure
>Bomber
Sorry, but I'd rather not dress like a tasteless sandnigger.
>>11557479
do these come with drkshdw tags?
>>11558657
I gotta say I've found uniqlo's quality to be better but their selection isn't that big
>>11558662
it's your loss m8
fortunateky not every country is a sandnigger ridden cesspool, ya know, so bombers don't everywhere have that connotation what they might have in your country, although this is a new one for me
>>11558263
When is that out
>>11557479
>>11558662
that's a Harrington jacket without the tartan lining
>>11558657
Uniqlo only has three versions, but it's exactly the reason why quality is a bit above other cheap brands.
>>11557666
Dude they always rotate their shit. When this is gone, expect it to return again in a year. Their fleece jackets, for an example, always returns in the asian market during the Ber months (oct, sept, etc). Right now, theyre pushing their field jackets and parkas here. So just search what you like and search when it'll come back
>>11559424
no, that's a bomber
>>11558657
blouson means jacket in french, generally waist long.... interestingly, jaquette also means jacket in french, but knee long or a bit shorter.
>>11559560
Sorry mate, but if a Harrington is a bomber with a tartan lining, then a bomber has to be a Harrington without a tartan lining.
>>11558564
its all the same to me :^)
>>11559593
a bomber is also the same as a harrington, but without the tartan lining
i have one from 2012, is it worth anything on grailed
>>11559708
what's a harrington again?
>>11558657
i have bought shit from asos' house brand, and i honestly regret every purchase
tops/outerwear is always too long/slim proportionally. collars on shirts are retardedly small. jeans are glorified jeggings. literally everything is low waisted. quality is complete ass. fabrics are thin uncomfortable poor quality stretchy etc. i could go on, you get the point.
so fucking ugly and cheap
tldr fast fashion is unanimously garbage. stop trying to convince yourselves otherwise.
women ruined bombers this winter. (Melbourne)
they ruin fucking everything
I heard Uniqlo ones feel like trashbags
>>11559838
a bomber with tartan lining
>>11557655
Depends what you classify as mid-range
I got a siki im bull bomber scored off grail for $250, which is a pretty damn good deal for a jacket thats 100% cashmere
>>11558657
>>11559867
Seconding this. I copped shirts shoes and undies, all were absolute trash. The shirts were unbreathable as fuck, cut ridiculously slim (and i mean tight fitting as fuck. I lift and swim so my upper body's okay/not a fatty, but these are gay ass tight especially around the armpit area).
Shoes was thin pleather garbage, which in hindsight did well to survive 2 years of wear even when a hole developed on the sole and subsequent water damage from the rain
Undies fit like crap, too low, too tight, rubbish material
How do bombers fit? I'm a small in T's. I'm about 5'8 - 5'9, should I size up or stay tts?
>>11560011
Harringtons have a collar, you pleb
>>11559905
I know the Melbourne feels, man. But if you wear a decent bomber in a good fit isn't it possible to rise above the rest of the trash?
Where do you guys go for good bombers? I always here MA-1 thrown around and that's really it. How are the slim ones compared to the regular ones?
>>11557479
is this gonna sell out?