>2016 >wearing nikes

>>11472674
reebok/fila/adidas or kys

Being a slave to trends isn't effay in any year.

File: 1467379713193.jpg (90KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 540x540px

>>11472674
nice trend hopping, laggard.

see you in 6 months when you've moved on to reebok and start talking shit about adidas.

>>11472927
But reebok is adidas

>>11472927
trend hopping with stans? even superstars are not cool anymore and those were after the stans

>>11472674
Fucking sheep lmao.

>>11473077
Nike just sucks m8.

>>11472987
Superstars and Stans have been wardrobe staples for decades

>>11473085
Literally no one even mentioned nike.

>>11473104
superstars came back into wide popularity only recently, the last time they were this big was the mid 80s.

also they stopped production of stan smiths for a while until 2012-2013, when they re-released the shoe.

I wouldn't call the superstar a staple but the stan smith is inoffensive and clean looking, so i guess youre right on about half.

>>11472674
its not about wearing or avoiding a certain brand, its about buying quality items you can use well in a fit. They can be from nike, adidas, reebok, or whatever, it doesn't matter. Anybody who fawns over one brand and one brand only has their eyes shut and is missing out.

>>11473105
And no one mentioned wearing just adidas.

>>11473104
everybody knows that, i obviously meant the past few years when Adidas made the Stans popular again, then the Superstars
anyway, wearing Stans in the 2016th year of our lord hardly can be called trendhopping

>>11472935
i wonder when he'll get the meme

>>11473085
I'm sorry you fell for the stan smith meme, boyo. Don't worry, you look very #pale #chill maybe even #slackercore, haha, just a sensitive guy who's into cuck pornography ;).

>>11474605
I don't wear stan smiths but try again

>mall shoes
>ever
o i am laffin

File: janoski.jpg (39KB, 540x640px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 540x640px

I've never been a huge fan of nike, but janoski's are one of the best pairs of shoes I've ever bought

>>11474624
Why?

>>11474659
Well made, super comfortable, look really good. I have nothing bad to say about them, bit pricey I guess.

What went wrong familias?

did kanye ever wear rod lavers? I wonder why they didn'tblow up as much as stan smiths

File: cFGrLhp.jpg (927KB, 1200x1520px) Image search: [Google]

927KB, 1200x1520px

>>11472674
id on the green ones in the back?

File: memes.jpg (15KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 500x500px

>>11474739

>>11474624

Janoskis are cancer

>>11474862
why do people say this? Are they just skate snobs?

They're basic and go well with a lot of things. Maybe a bit overpriced.

>>11474709
something always put me off about rod lavers, they just look weird to me. also the GR colorways are trash with the colored outsoles.

>>11474689
>look really good
kek

>>11474874
there's nothing wrong with janoskis except a lot of people who arent /fa/ wear them. not nearly enough people as the people who wear roshes but yeah

>>11472674
isn't this pic from the /r/streetwear meetup lmao

>>11472674

used to love adidas and dad hats as a kid

long since moved up to effay shit but it's fun to watch the eternal nike fans reveal they were fuccbois all along