What brands for you instantly bring to mind class and luxury?

rick owens raf simons

File: tumblr_n8t297FP0J1rfduvxo1_250.gif (2MB, 245x285px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 245x285px

Chanel, Dior, Dolce and Gabbana, Lanvin, Moncler, Thom Browne, Valentino

raf simons rick owens is what i wear for class and luxury

>>11320079
umbro, diadora, kappa, lonsdale, everlast

rick owens

>>11320082
>>11320153
hectic memes anon!

gucci
versace
prada
louis vuitton

zara tbqh

Fred Perry
Burberry
Hugo Boss
Lacoste
Tommy Hilfiger
Raulph Lauren
Cartier
Omega
Patek Philippe

>>11320212


https://youtu.be/6WJFjXtHcy4

>>11320237
>lacoste
>tommy hilfiger

haha woo some good jokes there xD!

rick owens

Clothing:
Brooks Brothers
J. Press
Thom Browne
Ralph Lauren: Black Label, Purple Label, RRL
Gant Rugger
Ermenegildo Zegna (mainline)
Canali
Kiton

Shoes:
Any Benchmade British shoemaker, particularly John Lobb, Edward Green, Crockett & Jones, Alfred Sargent and Church's amongst others

Thom Browne is just another Kenzo

i.e. overpriced trash for the Chinese market

>>11320079
>class and luxury
this shit is never uniform but if you wanna see what rich people do (albeit a specific kind) look up the blod Italian industrialist) and or milstil

A variety of tailors (Savile Row is the most hyped but there, in my opinion, are better ones).

>>11320337
In terms of people buying it for purely flexing reasons and in the realm of tailored clothing in a traditional sense most definitely it's just a hype brand. But as a design persep and influence he's done quite a bit through the years, though I don't care for his designs I can certainly respect his work.

Dior, Chanel, Hermès, Rick Owens, Juicy Couture, Target, C&A, New Look, La Halle Aux Chaussures

Tom Ford

>>11320082
Trust fund daddy-rich millenial tier

>>11320084
Stripper/Hooker tier

>>11320107
Dangerous minority tier

>>11320212
Nigger tier

>>11320237
Middle-class american suburban dad tier

>>11320318
Middle-class European suburban dad tier

>>11320349
Welfare queen baby bonus tier

>>11320355
The only correct response thus far

>>11320436
"I can't afford luxury clothes" tier

File: image.jpg (30KB, 347x341px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 347x341px

>nobody has mentioned based Hedi yet

Louis Vuitton, Gucci, Saint Laurent, Givenchy

Tom Ford, Loro Piana, Ermenegildo Zegna, Brioni, Lanvin (apart from sneakers), Berluti, Loewe, Bruno Cucinelli, (some) Gucci

>>11320462
I absolute love Saint Laurent, it is my favourite brand for sure but I wouldn't call it very luxurious. There's a difference between trendy and luxurious. Also, luxurious doesn't always mean the item/brand look good.

Goyard

anything reviewbrah wears, but I guess it is what it is

>>11320487
bang on

Brioni
Breguet

>>11321533
btw if you go to the website for virtually any luxury watch maker they'll one-day mail you a niiiice catalog. just throwing that out there if anybody wants a coffee table book

File: Hermes-spring-summer-2013-ad-campaign-campanha-verao-primavera-2013-blog-moda-manu-luize.jpg (281KB, 2048x1327px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 2048x1327px

>>11320318
These plus Hermes under limited circumstances.

>>11320079
Rolls Royce

Old Money:
Miu Miu, Channel, Goyard

New Money:
Moschino, SLP, Raf Simons

Tom Ford, Loro, Hermes, Zara

>>11321856
>ZARA

class

nice fucking kek

dries van noten my boyos

great taste and the money to apply it implies true sophistication

Loro Piana, Higher end British shoe makers, Thom Browne if the person wearing it isn't Chinese or Korean, RLPL, Hermes, the usual suspects.

I see too many basic chicks with Bottega and Goyard to match their lululemon so they're off the list.

Dior - revolutionary, French. It's the classy older brother of SLP

>>11320079
Hilfiger. Shits classic

class and luxury are kind of mutually exclusive IMO.
most things that scream luxury aren't exactly associated with class anymore.

Valentino
Marni
Loro Piana
Burberry Prorsum
Chanel
Tom Ford
Ralph Lauren Purple Label

>>11320079
>brands
>class
No.

>>11322488
Anyone who sells clothes has a brand. I don't think people are talking about visible logo prints.

Ralph Purple Label
Marni
Brioni
Chanel
Dior
Tom Ford
Loro Piana
Audemars Piguet
Valentino

>>11320474
Givenchy a shit, Saint Laurent as well.

Easily accessible pleb new-wealth brands with shit quality at a shit price

>>11322988
literally this

saint laurent has a great aesthetic that I love and so does givenchy but neither of them are classy or luxurious

givenchy in particular is renowned for having meme-tier construction and an ultra premium price

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aMtKyeoEN0&list=PL_Nt3sZ4p2eXQHCMehJx6YNtGTXJcKFCh&index=3

>>11320079
Oxxford,

They're not stylish and they don't follow trends

But they make up for it in functional, hand sewn and high quality everything from skeleton lining to the functional vents and lapels that actually protect in the rain.

Suit was expensive as fuck. And I don't like to spend like I did back when I was younger...but that suit scream luxury


I have enough loro piana a d Hermes in daily rotation to where its nice shit but it's not omg luxury tier.

Anyone with a part time job can afford Hermes if they save

>>11321871
>baited this easily