Is it /fa/?
Anything is /fa/ just depends on what YOU do with it
not really
>>11122889
Is it cheap ?
Its neutral
>>11122889
not normally, but they actually some some really good basics, like hats and shirts.
people that hate on it just haven't actually looked at it
>>11122961
no, thats not how it works, basic uninteresting clothes are fashionable
>>11122889
vintage 90s tommy is super /fa/
>>11123010
*aren't I think you meant
>>11123504
This shit right here. I see old dudes looking fly as fuck with Tommy fits older than me
>>11122889
Pretty fa if you're a young black male or white female
yeah
>>11123010
I disagree
It ain't Ralph
>>11124388
...but that's not what that meme means
>>11123010
wrong.
Old Tommy is /fa/, but the new shit is just dad wear or clothes for lower or middle class people who can't manage their money and like to think they've "made it". Same for RL, Lacoste and all the others.
Vintage Tommy is nice but it looks better on black guys.
>>11125054
Lower middle class can't go around buying too many $100 RL sweaters though so wear 5 layers of polo shirts and sweaters and you've made it