Does /fa/ have any suggestions for sunglass brands or models?

>>11119188
Porsche Design
Oakley
Depends on your budget

>>11119188
Luxottica dominates so quality is pretty samey for a lot of brands.

I adore Maui Jim, I've had a pair for a few years that have held up like a tank. I also like oldschool Ray Bans. Simple, classic, work on most faces, easy to find at a decent price. I've heard Oliver Peoples are good, can't confirm.

>>11119188
SALT
Garrett Leight

is it possible to get a decent pair of sunglasses for under like $20? Or are those just k-mart tier?

>>11119396
k mart tier, dont do it

Nothing posted is a "sporty" type of sunglasses. They are all some over the top fashion ones

I have head like huge watermelon, like aeronaut helmet

any sunglasses for me? i dont want them to look like children sunglasses on me

like really HUGE angular/non-round sunglasses would be nice

File: image.jpg (58KB, 570x446px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 570x446px

Just ordered these

>>11120403
>moonman

Triple K maffia

Kings of /fa/

File: image.jpg (43KB, 570x427px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 570x427px

>>11120448
Shit is too dope. Can't wait till they get here

>>11119400
why? are they bad for the eyes or what?

File: frogs.png (94KB, 500x300px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 500x300px

>>11119188
mt wife's son loves oakley frogskins and the latch

Do all wayfarers have that shiny diamond next to the lens?
Is it preferred for that? like would it be awful looking if it didnt have it?

>>11119188
http://www.ourlegacy.se/shop/eyewear
Our legacy has some pretty Sick eyewear

>>11119188
If they're not exclusively for sport ID avoid polarized glasses

Make certain smart phones get a rainbow effect, looking through tinted car Windows is difficult if you live in a place like SoCal or Florida where limo tint is a must or die in a car

Some train departure signs in Japan don't show well through polarized lenses some bigger screens (new years) don't show well

And some higher end optics like eo tech don't show through polarized lenses

They're really only good for fishing

Don't wear them for cycling and walking down town

File: 20160331_122854.jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5312x2988px

Anyone know what brand these are? I work at a glasses store and this guy dropped these off and I took them

>>11121690
>this guy dropped these off and I took them
goodbye job

>>11121690
>works at glasses store
>doesn't know glasses brand

File: 662563_mrp_ou_l.jpg (37KB, 455x475px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 455x475px

Maison Margiela sunglasses.

>>11121717
Should have made it clear he donated them but we kept them around for like a year until I decided to put new lenses in them

>>11121815
Yeah I don't know every single brand senpai

Does anyone know a really dark pair of sunglasses? I want the lenses to be polarized but like, black frames and DARK black lenses, like that you couldn't see the eyes of the person.

what's a reasonable price for good sunglasses that will last a long time? $100? $200? Not paying for a name, that is

File: 1450543926255.jpg (29KB, 240x237px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 240x237px

What kind of sunglasses for people who already wear glasses?

http://www.williampainter.com/products/titanium-sunglasses

Never tried them but according to site theyre the same size as my RayBans RB2132. Want to get the round ones but i dont think theyd complement my face :(

im just gonna buy some oakleys on ebay fuck you guys

>>11122766
Buy the fake ones.

>>11122791
hell no man, im not wearing these for fashion, im wearing them for eye protection. im not gonna buy some fake chinese shit that isnt even UV protected

but im not a person whos gonna spend fucking $100 on a pair on sunglasses. usually i just buy the $10-15 ones from a drugstore or whatever.

>>11122766
Oakley refuses to use real lense materials because sports brand marketing hurr durr

It's the worst luxxotica brand in the hierarchy since they have the greatest distortion due to how they pour their polycarbonate into lense molds and lowest abbe value of any material ever for all glasses

>>11122828
>wont purchase polarized sunglasses
>believes drugstore ones provide any uv protection
Those fake ones are exactly $10-$15 the only reason I suggest them because even though theyre fake they knock those drugstore flimsy, glarey lens shits out of the park.

File: american_optical_ao_pilot_randolph_engineering_goldtone_front_large.jpg (29KB, 480x319px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 480x319px

I'm using American Optical. Quality is okay but quite terrible for someting miUSA and military tested. It seems they were made for people with really big nose bridge.

persol for days.

>>11123015
Randolph eng is prob better than AO

>>11120541
nah
basically all sunglasses from 10 to 200 bucks have same UV filters

>>11123159
Small shit hurts the eyes though like on the back of most real brand sunglasses having AR coating

And the cheaper glasses tend to have weaker tint - strain

And the super cheap glasses only come in yellow/amber/blue tints which tend to make most people sick

File: colab-1265-501343-1.jpg (177KB, 2362x2953px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 2362x2953px

Got these a little while ago.

>>11122844
Just go buy poly polarized lenses. Most stock lenses that come with sunglasses aren't that good anyway

>>11119188
Fendi or Dior

File: franklin black.png (165KB, 1523x569px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 1523x569px

just copped pic related, they're great look just like raybando's w/out being ray bands

>>11123957
they look kawaii