opinions on Zara?

Here in Germany it's the store mainly Turks buy their latest gear. It's cheap so they go there.

Guess it's okay for teenagers.

cheap when on sale. fit well looks well, quality is sub par worth it, wont fall apart after first wash like most /fa/ said they would.

>>10880041
I want to think they have some good basics, always pick things up in the sale, buuut they are shit so i always end up returning them, quality is appauling, on thing i kept are some beaten up joggers for lounging in. Don't recommend

Bought some shoes from there. Most uncomfortable things I've ever worn. Decided to wear them to SXSW last year (I hadn't worm them yet, didn't know they were shitty). By the end of the first night, I was worried my heels were bleeding.

They have some cool designs, just shit quality.

Went there for the first time today. One of my new favorite stores desu.
Pretty great quality for the pricing, lots of options, friendly and helpful staff. 9/10

Been to Zara two times.
Black, black clothing everywhere.

Any opinion on their jeans

>>10880041
>>10880180

>>10880083
Like this guy said, quality is so terrible it really is not worth it even if the designs are good. I have one jacket I found and kept, jesus everything from it just fell apart super fast and it was about as warm as a wife beater. Too ashamed even to give it to a homeless person because he would be dissappointed.

high fashion ripoffs
with very low-mediocre quality

I buy basics on Zara, but i wouldnt buy something too fancy there

>>10880046
this.
it's like a refugee camp or something like this. subhuman shitskins only.
also zara quality is trash.

>>10880180
Even H&M jeans last longer than Zara's.

I've never had a problem with shirts I've bought from them -- in terms of wear.

Shoes, however...

Every low shoe I've bought from them cuts my goddamn heels. Learned my lesson twice.

i find them to have a decent quality EXCEPT OF SHOES. Shit made SHOES.

better quality to price ratio than rick

dont buy their shoes

dont buy anything thats not a high designer ripoff cause basics are better elsewhere.

>>10881173
H&M catches a lot of flack but their slim low jeans fit me so good, better than levis.

>>10881504
Their slim low jeans are literally Levi 511s... Compare the measurements of the two jeans and you will see.

Mum got me a hideous jacket for Christmas 2014, exchanged it for a nice polo and button up. The quality isn't very good, but isn't Primark-tier either, and the designs are decent, so fuck it, I'm happy out.

>>10880041
Basically, H&M quality shit, but for name brand $$$

File: JE0034-lg-ultra-lo-rise_jeans.jpg (104KB, 949x575px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 949x575px

>>10881504
>wearing low rise pants as a male

>>10882488
w2c natural/high rise pants that are worth it

>>10880041
Their jeans are fucking garbage and their faux leather rips like paper but I've found some decent shirts there.

>>10880041
Their tees are really good. The outerwear and shoes are horrifying. The pants/jeans are ok.

>>10880041
Overpriced shit in America

>>10882488
They're not that low on me, they're called slim lows but they're actually more of a mid rise imo.

>>10880041
Genuinely the worst clothing company.
Overpriced for the simply ABYSMAL quality. I bought a hoodie from them once. The zip broke after a few uses... Seemed to be plastic immitating metal. The zip pull itself was obviously plastic painted silver, made to look like a modern sleek bullshit, when really it was some plastic pellets melted down and then squirted into a plastic mold, leaving an abbrasive razor-edge around the plastic which was then sprayed silver... All in some highly carcinogenic factory in south asia (cheaper than china)
The fit was way to slim, too. But, i guess that's the modern cuck fashion and what i get for shopping online.

>>10880041
I've been on /fa/ for 4 years and never found a damn good thing at Zara