what is wrong with converse, /fa/?

>>10864164
Literally nothing

>>10864164
Nothings wrong with them. Converse are the Coca-Cola of shoes

>>10864164
Literally everything

File: A-Closer-Look-At-The-Converse-Chuck-Taylor-All-Star-II.jpg (351KB, 1000x500px) Image search: [Google]

351KB, 1000x500px

>>10864166
>>10864177

what do you guys think of the II's?

>>10864164
if your foot size is above 9 they make you look like a fucking clown you stupid cunt

but they sometimes have nice high tops that aren't as clunk but they're all collab shit so they don't count

>>10864180
Blacks look shit. Whites and Cream are god tier

>>10864186
this

>>10864164
Fine but only if you lace them to the top and cuff /pinroll your pants appropriately

>>10864186
seconding cream

pants look like shit over them

File: IMG_20160121_115022.jpg (2MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2448x3264px

>>10864186
>>10864193
>>10864302
agreed

>>10865585
What colorway is this with the converse logo being white, or is it painted/paint removed to look like this, couldn't find a cream colorway and the white one has the star and converse lettering in black, which I dislike.

>>10864185
us 9?

are the cdg ones a meme, /fa/?

>>10865644
original CDG cons (highs and lows) are great in both colorways, however the 70s CDG cons are fucking awful:
>CDG logo looks like shit
>standard Converse Chuck Taylor heel logo
>the black colorway's white stitching

really emphasizes just how delicate fashion design is. details man, details.

>>10864164
Too many faggots who don't enjoy my rock n' roll lifestyle wearing them. If you listen to hip hop or pop you need to stop wearing these fucking shoes REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Does it look retarded to tuck in pants to high tops or should you always just style them cuffed above the top?

>>10865684
Use your own judgement

>>10865684
the latter sounds better

>>10864164
I think they looks good on girls with slim pants.

File: Chuck.jpg (90KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 900x900px

>not getting these

smdh

>>10865622
its called parchment
http://www.converse.com/us/en/regular/chuck-taylor-all-star-ii/151222C_030.html

>>10865722
they really do look p great, i can see them becoming meme status by summer desu

>>10865727
Cheers, unfortunately they aren't available in Europe, I hope they get released here as well, they look amazing.

>>10865670
>rawk en rawl
hello grandpa

>>10865722
link?

>>10865865
This is where I got 'em

http://www.kicksusa.com/converse/all-star-ii-ox-mono-parch-navy-white-151222c.html

There's a Converse link, too, below that post.

File: ShoesLikePotteryHighTopVulcanizedSneakersWhiteCanvas_L1.jpg (53KB, 499x472px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 499x472px

>>10865722
which are better? converse or shoes like pottery?

File: WP_20160121_16_20_41_Pro.jpg (2MB, 2000x3552px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x3552px

Converse = life

File: Shroud.png (468KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 1000x1000px

Wish Converse had made Shroud models for men.

>>10864164

Because they are for kids, women and faggots.

>>10865905
Why dont you wear them then

>>10865912

because I do not fall in that category

File: image.jpg (253KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 1000x1000px

Thinking about going for these but can't decide if they're cringe or not.
Discuss.

>>10866017
If you like them buy them, make your own decisions.

Which colourway should I get for lifting purposes? Am female.

>Not getting the Margiela ones

Shiggy diggy

>>10866017
depends on how the rest of you look, I wouldnt wear them but you might be able to pull them off

>>10865878
Original>ripoff

>>10866017
is your favourite band my chemical romance

File: converse-ct-ox-navy-8010432-0-1413216114000.jpg (39KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 800x800px

i got these, really happy with them, kinda hard to wear with jeans though

should i replace the laces with white ones or something

>>10864180
>>10865585
Old standard chucks of mine wore out, can't decide which of these two I should get.

>>10866105
nah, laces look good like this.

Probably the perfect beater shoes

>>10865878
I'd rather wear slp for better quality, better details, etc

I have more respect for converse for being the originals.

>>10866105
Those look like ass

File: alexa.jpg (378KB, 886x591px) Image search: [Google]

378KB, 886x591px

What's the verdict on supergas for women?

>>10864284
>cuff /pinroll your pants appropriately
teach me

>>10865684
>tuck in pants to high tops
this is what i do, i don't like cuffing jeans with high tops.

>>10866032
stop lifting instead

>>10864164
its the only shoe people can talk about outside of nigger shoes

4/5 here are underaged poorbois

>>10866356
its a go

Thinking of getting the 70s model. Should I get the Black or White hightop?

>>10866591
Nah, I'm done being /thinspo/.

>>10869814
then go to fucking /fit/

>>10866463
you can't roll your trousers?

>>10869992
i guess i can in theory, just haven't really attempted it.

>>10869814
>>10869838
this

or go get a sex change

>>10865734
They're already meme status. Girls on college campuses wear these with tights all the time

File: 000015008-converse-chuck-70s-low-black-2.jpg (45KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 750x750px

>>10864164
anybody know how to get the black lines off the mid sole?
or should i just buy cdg cons
but then how do i get rid of the ugly heart

>>10868161
>70s model
>Black or White hightop?

?
link?
pictures?

File: ss+(2016-01-23+at+01.17.47).jpg (94KB, 806x952px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 806x952px

>>10870760

im not

>>10868161
but

>>10864164
No support

>>10865904
converse owens

File: 61hHhn+GprL._UX695_.jpg (30KB, 695x608px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 695x608px

>>10870742
Chuck Taylor II's don't have it.

>>10870782
Ivory 70s are the best

>>10870782
i love the whites, copped em for $20.

people with big feet look shit in them

im one of those people

>>10864185
This.
I ordered high cream cons on internet but I didn't wear them in other than a few occasions becuse they look like clown shoes in size 11. Looks great on women with small feet though.

>>10865670
>tfw wearing chucks while listening to kpop
fite me gramps

>>10870821

nice senpai, where'd you get em?

>>10870861
mrporter, deal is long gone by now though.

i highly recommend that website, the packaging and everything is great and their customer service is perfect. definitely impressed me.

>>10864164
everyone, their little sister, and their grandma has a pair

sk8 his, sambas and superstars are infinitely better

I'm not trying to sound hipster, but they're a little too popular for my liking. When pretty much every other person has a pair they don't really look that special or great.

>>10870862

thanks mate

>>10870930
np friendo. a word of advice, converse are surprisingly big like i usually wear 14s and the 13s i got were way to big. sending them back for a pair of 12s, mrporter just includes a prepaid shipping label with your order so you don't even have to bother printing one. pretty great.

>>10870957

im pretty small dude but im skinny as fuck so im like 8.5-9
converse in big sizes look like clown shoes most of the time

>>10870782
what's the difference between these and regular modern high tops you can buy literally everywhere?

I dont see any difference but maybe im retarded

>>10870987
The 70s are pretty much the premium version of the regular chucks. Has insole that provides actual cushioning, thicker canvas, roomier toe etc

>>10864164
They're only good for lifting

>>10870976
yeah, i'm hoping that my being 6 2' counteracts the fact that i need to wear 12s. it's all to scale yaknow?

>>10871019

tru that

>>10864185
same meme thats spouted about the stan smiths. im a size 12 (but 11 in chuck 1s) and the look completely fine and i get compliments in them.

[spoiler]idk why but for some reason girls really really like chuck taylors on guys[/spoiler]

>>10871002
your gay

>>10865684
i dont necessarily tuck them up like a boot or anything but I sort of just set my pants ontop of them/tongue is showing if that makes any sense.

>>10865722
Duck damn it I'm going to buy these and didn't want to spend on anymore shoes. Has anyone spotted these in Toronto?

Nothing wrong with them. They're cheap and useful during the summer when you're just bumming around.

>>10870760
parchment 70s are the best

>>10864164
nothing mate, just get the 1970s repro ones. don't wear them with skinny jeans, don't get ones with wild prints or anything on. Don't get the cdg ones.

>>10871174
they don't look fine
I'm an 11 in converse
they are disgusting

why are y'all not /smallfeetmasterrace/? 5'10, size 8, usually down half a size in converse. Sure is nice having proportional feet.

>>10866356
They good

>>10871880
>proportional
thats seems weirdly small for that height. im a bit jealous desu tho kind of wish my feet were smaller sometimes

File: history15.jpg (42KB, 374x221px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 374x221px

I just find it fascinating that their appearance changed so little in almost a century, they have a very timeless look

>>10873338
Honestly I love it. Shoes being a little small is so much nicer than them being too big. Also I like having small hands because I'm a fag that likes guys with bigger hands than me.

>>10871183
Take a picture?

>>10871819
>>>10864164 (OP)
>nothing mate, just get the 1970s repro ones. don't wear them with skinny jeans, don't get ones with wild prints or anything on. Don't get the cdg ones.
>>10871819
>>>10864164 (OP)
>don't wear them with skinny jeans
What? Why not?

File: 1449936697253.jpg (106KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 612x612px

>wearing CDG x Converse
>"dude are those girl shoes?"

>>10873372
this. they can still look good. of course, if you wear them the wrong way...they don't

but they're easy to style

>>10873604
First day on 4chan?

>>10874500
nah, i was using clover and accidentally quoted twice. didn't feel like fixing it.

w2c cheap black leather hi-tops

Perfect for squatting in anon. Make sure you get enough scoops to get big

they only look good if you're wearing skinny jeans + if you can actually see the entire shoe

>>10866017
garbage

>>10866105
throw them away

>>10874772
>>10874777

same senpai

File: All-Star-II-Header.jpg (75KB, 630x250px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 630x250px

Should I get low or high top II's?

Leaning towards the lows.

>>10875071

Lows

>>10864164

nothing but its a very safe shoe

nobody is ever going to look at an outfit with converse and say "that person really made those shoes work in a different way"

File: rip.jpg (69KB, 736x1111px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 736x1111px

>>10864164
A timeless design and a necessary addition for every ayliumcore closet.

>>10866017
these are good but don't base an entire fit around them. Cons are a good way to tone down a fit from being flashy or obnoxious and the colorway of these look pretty versatile.

Way too fucking thin.

Canvas a shit.

File: 2.jpg (29KB, 550x287px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 550x287px

what do you all think of the rubbers?

>>10864185
The only ones that look decent are the black and white with bigger feet. We have Johnny Knoxville to thank for that.

File: 1445015251336.png (7KB, 208x244px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 208x244px

>>10864164
>tfw bought low-top converse

>>10864186
Just saw the cream ones today, the only reason I didn't buy them is because I just bought my girlfriend some expensive ass boots... Fucking bitch

>>10877083
Cool if you're a power ranger