does this aesthetic only work with SFBs? or would any brand work?

>>10617846
shirt's too big and you need to lose the chain. colorwise i'd say it's pretty good, but i always go with dark and earthy colors myself.

Palladiums work too

>>10617846
dont just pick any brand, the silhouette of combat boots varies quite a lot brand to brand

>>10618027
fuck palladiums.

File: 5058-B.jpg (675KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

675KB, 1500x1500px

>>10617846
i've been eyeing these guys

>>10617846
stop using the word "aesthetic" you keks. doesn't make your hypebeast shitfits any better

Palladiums or ShiaBoots only

>>10617846
this looks like shit.
do not buy sfb if youre a manlet

>>10617846

Yeezy 950s

File: CFVWK6mVAAA5Jkj.jpg (52KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 600x600px

>harry styles interests me: the boots

>>10618301
the god of sfb's himself is a manlet so it has nothing to do with that. Its the body type/proportions and general aesthetic that make them work

>>10618229
the biggest difference between these and SFB is the toe

>>10618369
now we're memeing

File: z163cMt.jpg (266KB, 791x1089px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 791x1089px

Google 'Shia Labeouf sfb' for how to properly rock SFB's

>>10618533
he pulls it off well. though, IRL I cringe when people who haven't served in military try this hard.
>USMC sweatshirt+backpack+SFBs = too much

>>10618538
This teebeeaych

File: 400_F_1714240_WzaxKqNtl8j6zrEFld1FGHoBCZ5SU0.jpg (64KB, 400x267px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 400x267px

>>10618538

Just having a body type similar like Shia has and you're good to go. Well fitting pants go a long way too, so no stacking on top. Or if your pants are pretty wide then do it like in the picture.

>>10618369
literally male uggs

>>10617846
I was wearing sfbs with my skinnies 5 years ago. Kek.

>>10618533
those aren't fucking sfbs.

>>10618581
they are though, theyre the first generation ones and theyre really beat up

>>10618570
WOAH COOL

File: not sfbs. .png (979KB, 634x876px) Image search: [Google]

979KB, 634x876px

>>10618600
nope they are not. just look at the sole.

>>10618581
Who fucking cares, they're combat boots. Look up 'shia labeouf sfb' on google images and you'll see plenty of Shia's in SFB's.

>>10618622
shia isnt wearing sfbs you fuck

>>10618630
That's what i'm pointing out...

>>10618395
How's the construction compared to the sfb? Sizing?

>>10618639
just as shitty as the sfbs.

>>10617846
ID on those pants?

>>10618641
The construction on the sfbs is great, fuck are you talking about? Been abusing mine for a year now and theyre fine. Theyre military issue how shitty can they be?

>>10618809
So would you guess the rothcos would last well?

>>10618857
I would assume theyre decent, anything thats designed for the military isnt just gonna fall apart right away

>>10618867
>>10618809
SFB owner here

none of that means jack shit. These are not approved for military wear. The EVA portion of the sole is guaranteed to fail after so many miles. It won't happen any time remotely soon but citing "military grade" is fucking retarded

That being said I like mine and they were pretty cheap and they look cool so I like them

>>10618881
But there are sfb models that are approved military wear. Google AR670-1 compliancy.

And the only difference between the newer models that aren't compliant is they have no real leather and just have more synthetic leather so theyre still gonna last ages.