Archived threads in /fa/ - Fashion - 175. page

File: lol.jpg (90KB, 843x843px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 843x843px

>>12672866
had to reverse image search this girl and couldn't help but to kek at how stereotypical this pic is

>>12672889
Me at the cash register

>>12672866
What part of CT are you from?

Yeah, in 2014. Unfortunately, you're three years behind.

>>12672726
It's OK, but I would advise against taking it to extremes. Don't get the sides shorn off completely, or otherwise too short. I urge you to avoid that look. Instead, get your haircut tapered on the sides, while retaining a longer top length. The style is fading a bit in popularity, though. I'm noticing it less now than a year ago or more. Guys are either going for regular short haircuts like the buzz, crew, or Caesar cuts, or something more like medium length with somewhat long, fuller sides, but still tapered.

File: IMG_0382.png (869KB, 442x502px) Image search: [Google]

869KB, 442x502px

>>12672726

ONLY IF YOU ARE ARYANID.

>>12672694
Quality is absolute shit. But I buy stuff there occasionally when things are on sale. Bought a parka which costed € 90 and was € 15. In that case it can be worth the money.

But you ALWAYS have to check Pull&Bear items thoroughly before buying. Most of them have some defects, like bad stitching, even rips and holes. If you but online it is a bit better, but overall still pretty bad. You get a better value at H&M for example, however when they have like 50-70 % discounts you can sometimes find a nice piece.

>>12672708
Good reply.

I would like to add on that the design is actually kind of nice but the print text comes off as a bit edgy imo.

looks like a horrible midnight studios ripoff
>roses

Fine if you can't get them hemmed for whatever reason.

>>12672590
Like almost all things fashion, depends on the fit, footwear, and the rest of outfit.

>>12672590
It's good. I wear pants with or without cuffs. It used to mean that it was a throwback to the early and mid-20th century style of cuffing jeans, but I think it's become common enough that it's fairly normal. I usually notice somewhat smaller cuffs than in that picture, though.

what the fuck are they thinking, they look like actual kids shoes now

MORE LIKE

gloe in the dank

>>12672353
as if they didn't before

>>12672246
ROSS?

Your phrasing and word choice are cancerous but yeah, TJ Maxx is worth visiting. I used to get a lot of cheap tees from there, most of which I still own and have held up better than fancy shirts. Sometimes you can find decent jeans.

Don't expect to find designer deals or anything though. Most of what they stock is no-name brands and the poorly designed overstock name brand pieces that don't sell.

>>12672248
ross is a really strange shithole of a store with the possibility for amazing deals

they mostly have overstock, seconds, irregular items, and the weird cuts of Levis that don't end up in real stores and are of questionable quality

the one near me is full of sketchy black people with security guards following them around and the clothing racks look like they just survived a tornado

that being said I've found a nice classic Levis trucker jacket for twenty bucks, black Levis 511 commuter jeans for thirty, and I've seen SFBs there for sixteen dollars

if you're willing to dig around and you're diligent, you can find some good stuff

god those glasses are horrendous.

drake bell

manlet

File: chadwood.jpg (240KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 1024x768px

>>12671791

she has em nice tittays

File: image.jpg (85KB, 634x784px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 634x784px

>>12671791
Why is she dating a 20 year old?

>>12671791
who gives a fuck?

>music as a fashion accessoire
kys youreself

comfycore hype

>>12671611
>look nothing like roshes
?

>>12671673
>>12671673
they do actually

>>12671544
just buy inlay soles

File: 53960_CCBK.jpg (162KB, 1300x1152px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1300x1152px

>>12671544
Skechers Go Run or Go Walk. Find the kind with the super squishy insole & outsole. Just try them on. Just try them on. You will buy them.

like this go walk 2

Anything with good arch support. Any quality running shoe will provide that.

Runners only get about 3-500 miles of running out of any pair of shoes. Most shoes lose a quarter of their cushioning only 50 miles into wearing them. This happens to all major brands and there is no real way to mitigate the damage. Go with brands you like that feel right on your feet. Rotate pairs to prolong the lifespan of them all.

Consider Dr. Scholls at around 5-6 months of use and retirement from everyday use at around 8-10 months. Poor shoes can lead to all sorts of medical problems and your only real problems will come from wearing old and worn out ones every day.

Home Counties core

File: 148225544438.jpg (110KB, 736x983px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 736x983px

>>12671539
State Fair core.

Impregnation core

>>12671449
I bet with the right make up and head angle they would look almost identical (except the left has a better nose)

I'd like to see them both at the same angle. Right has prettier eyes but its possible her jawline is a bit harsh, left's face is softer and more feminine overall even if she has less striking features.

>>12671449
The one on the left is uncanny. It's as if she's too pretty or something

>>12671313
Donate fuccboi.

Jeans are not a single big piece of cloth that will evenly shrink across. Jeans are cut and sewn from multiple pieces of cloth that are put together in a perfect ratio. If you try to shrink them, you have no guarantee that all prices of cloth that make up the jean will shrink evenly and maintain their ratio. Additionally, shrinking the jeans will also shrink the stitching that holds these multiple pieces of cloth together. It'd be a miracle to suddenly get the jean's ratios to magically all decrease by a ratio of 3 to get to a 29. Ain't gonna happen. Just buy pants that fit u fucktard.

File: 0e9.jpg (27KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 600x600px

>>12671343
>Additionally, shrinking the jeans will also shrink the stitching that holds these multiple pieces of cloth together. It'd be a miracle to suddenly get the jean's ratios to magically all decrease by a ratio of 3 to get to a 29. Ain't gonna happen. Just buy pants that fit u fucktard.
Thoughts on buying 1:1 rep levi's? I'm not paying 70 dollars for jeans that used to be used as expendable clothing.

>>12671313
only hope is to literally put them in a pot of boiling water for a few hours, then take them out and put them in the dryer on hottest setting. i shrank a pair of jeans by 2 waist sizes doing this.