Bottomless

File: 1443127048553.jpg (388KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

388KB, 1280x720px

>we already have a bottomless thread
Yeah, and they can go fuck themselves.

There was already a bottomless thread.

Pay attention.

There is a difference between bottomless and no panties. An example of "bottomless" is shirt only. An example of "no panties" is shirt + skirt only.

>>2066134
>Yeah, and they can go fuck themselves.

I don't understand. You willingly made a dupe thread without giving any reason, but you're angry at the old one? Can't you communicate reasoning if you expect two threads of the same purpose to be filled? You're being really selfish right now and posting content not belonging to your own topic.

File: Megumin - SevenDay C*10 009 - P.jpg (546KB, 1060x1500px) Image search: [Google]

546KB, 1060x1500px

So let's just make this a no-panties thread then. Don't really care for that autistic distinction the other thread makes.

>>2066247
How is it "autistic". It reduced the definition for what "is" to one line of greentext, and "isn't" to three. It is much friendlier than gelbooru's multiple paragraphs for each.

Really you and OP are just very bitter individuals who hate communicating your reasoning, and the two fetishes are different, anyway, so distinction is useful. Bottomless is the absence of modesty (a sharp contrast to the clothing still worn). "No panties" is feigned/ contextual modesty depending on the skirt and angle and context. A lot of people turn their heads away from "bottomless" because the tease isn't there.

You're free to be like "fuck you", accuse me of being the OP of the thread you hate, and conitnue posting. But this could've been way cleaner had you only communicated your stance better originally.

File: 44487e08ae82d636ebd2965fd8207927.gif (708KB, 600x374px) Image search: [Google]

708KB, 600x374px

>>2066186
>An example of "bottomless" is shirt only.
No, that is a stupid definition. Which is exactly the problem, that thread is stupid.

>>2066133
Fake!!
hinagiku has fear to the heights.

File: Ryouko - konton 13994214 - P.jpg (464KB, 992x1500px) Image search: [Google]

464KB, 992x1500px

>>2066382
she doesn't even look like Hinagiku

File: Hinagiku - T2 remodk21261 - P.jpg (522KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

522KB, 1280x960px

>>2066382
this is what Hinagiku looks like, idiot

File: 1464792002250.jpg (125KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1200x900px

Good thread OP.
I also think the other bottomless thread is crap.

just don't post here and wait until mods delete this autist's thread

File: katzueki 59591538_p0 - EP.jpg (552KB, 960x1600px) Image search: [Google]

552KB, 960x1600px

>>2067553
not gonna happen if it's already been up that long

>>2066340
Then just make it a nopan thread.

>>2072587
yeah, that's what this is

File: 41437165-1894-4be7-b371-db15df0d222c.jpg (271KB, 1280x992px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 1280x992px

We need more

>>2075052
The other thread is stupid this is way better

File: go on.png (65KB, 210x225px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 210x225px

>>2066135

>>2066404
>>2075056
Shit taste detected.

File: __souryuu_asuka_langley_neon_genesis_evangelion_drawn_by_ao_madou_shi__cd3032a972ea2e058888e2bcc6c8009e.jpg (247KB, 1000x1402px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 1000x1402px

too bad it's censored

>>2075425
Shit taste detected.

File: Yin - morihama 051 - AEP.jpg (230KB, 1150x800px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1150x800px

>>2075820
I'll just post here though but of course people are free to browser whichever threads they like.

>>2072587
The only person who thinks 'bottomless' means Shirt only is the idiots in that thread.

https://gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=list&tags=bottomless
http://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=bottomless

File: 6e9905bdd21179abbc71b4c2f947250d.png (1MB, 1400x2520px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1400x2520px

>>2076055
Actually, if you read the descriptions of the bottomless tags, instead of just looking at the images submitted with those tags (for mistagging is a thing you know), you'd see that the descriptions on the boorus and the guidelines in that bottomless thread are pretty much the same. Here's gelbooru's description:
>Pictures in which a subject is wearing no clothing from the waist down. The subject does not have to be barefoot for this to apply; this refers more to a lack of pants, skirts, undergarments etc. If the subject is both topless and "bottomless", use nude tag instead. Also, this does NOT apply to pictures where the lower half a person (or people) are cut out of the picture.

Danbooru's goes into even more detail.

https://gelbooru.com/index.php?page=wiki&s=view&id=843

http://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/4131

File: 59f2be37d7da9b380e3fe944a0b6bce8.jpg (404KB, 849x1200px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 849x1200px

>>2076061
Although there are two major differences between the danbooru definition and the other thread's guidelines. Raised dress/skirt and and lowered panties do count as bottomless but only if the dress/skirt is pulled high enough to completely expose the crotch, and the panties are pulled low enough. I do not think lowered skirts or pants count as bottomless at all according to Danbooru's definition.

>>2076055
Are you a fucking child? Seriously, you must be if you're bent up over a definition. Even then, what the fuck else would you call it when someone isn't wearing ANYTHING on their lower half?

File: 222f6985c793415b562000f4d5b0ca86.jpg (302KB, 620x846px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 620x846px

>>2076065
>Even then, what the fuck else would you call it when someone isn't wearing ANYTHING on their lower half?

I'm guessing that he still thinks that it counts, it's just that he thinks it's dumb to exclude certain things that he believes to count as bottomless such as a skirt lift + no panties images.

File: Ar Tonelico - Soma - unihati 8797414 remodk99349 - APW.jpg (401KB, 840x1070px) Image search: [Google]

401KB, 840x1070px

>>2076070
This.

File: Tenshi - retas1811 47339113_p1 - PW.jpg (1MB, 1051x1577px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1051x1577px

>>2076339
>>2076341
I like how this guy draw nothing but Tenshi

>>2072648
Then why call it a bottomless thread?

>>2078123
Nopan is still a kind of bottomless.

>>2079398
Only if the skirt is also not wearing a skirt/dress, otherwise it's just nopan/going commando.

File: 015.jpg (131KB, 1050x1493px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 1050x1493px

>>2079561
Why would a skirt wear a skirt, are you high?

Either way, nopan is bottomless.

>>2079612
In a case like that picture, sure. But if the girl is wearing a dress or skirt, it's not bottomless.

File: 49880138_p0.jpg (448KB, 1000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 1000x1333px

>>2079693
She's wearing a dress though, and you say it's bottomless. Because the skirt is pulled to the side? What if it's pulled up?

>>2080544
Because bottomless is literally defined by the girl not wearing a fucking skirt or any sort of article that hangs from the hips. Why the hell is this so difficult for you people to grasp?

File: Nagi - Nise Betsujin 02 - PU.jpg (346KB, 1200x1696px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 1200x1696px

>>2080742
Women's bottoms are literally panties. Therefore bottomless literally means without panties.

Why the hell is this so difficult for you people to grasp?

>>2080765
Did you not see me say "or any sort of article that hangs from the hips" in my post? Are you illiterate?

File: pettaka 2511706 remodk118741 - HP.png (1MB, 1600x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1600x1000px

>>2080788
I saw your post, and explained why you were wrong. Did you not read what I wrote?

>>2080873
You didn't explain shit, moron. That dress doesn't hang on the hips. Skirts do, and skirts have to be absent along with panties to be bottomless.

File: ryuken miku-02 - AP.jpg (269KB, 550x772px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 550x772px

>>2081471
That really is completely arbitrary. Nobody calls skirts "bottoms", bottoms are panties and therefore bottomless is pantiless. How are hips even supposed to be related to bottoms at all?! It makes no sense.

Just call the thing you want "bottomless with no skirt" and everybody will be happy.

File: Merchant girl half naked.jpg (246KB, 596x812px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 596x812px

>>2081514
I never said skirts were bottomless you illiterate buffoon. The fact remains that numerous websites define bottomless as a girl who both wearing no panties and nothing on her hips like a skirt. The whole fucking point of bottomless is that the girl's hindquarters are unclothed, your inability to accept it as such is just laughable. You want girls in skirts and not wearing panties? Fine, but that's nopan/going commando, not bottomless no matter how much you cry about panties being referred to as "bottoms".

>>2072767
fuck you

>>2081576
Hell's wrong with you?

File: 1310311438327.jpg (100KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 480x640px

I want to leap in as a neutral and explain something that I think is a bit misunderstood.

What you understand when you hear the term "Bottomless" generally is determined by whether you have a very specific bottomless fetish - for a lot of people, it just means "Pictures where you can see the pussy, but without the tits", which includes the vast amount of no-pan pics. Technically these are all bottomless to a degree and fulfill the desire to see the lower parts but not being concerned about whether the tits are exposed.

However, true bottomless fetish does NOT include NoPan for the reason that the INTENTION of the girl in their clothing choice is a VERY important part of the fetish.

With nopan the girls have clearly dressed normally and either forgotten panties or lost them later or had them taken off or ruined, or removed them for access/flirting. They can still walk around normally with their pussy covered by a skirt, just at the moment of the pic itself

True bottomless has this view that the girl CHOSE to get dressed specifically with nothing covering her lower half. It has elements of ENF, casual public nudity or confidant domination depending on the picture and her expression.

In a true "Bottomless" pic it isnt just about a visible pussy, its about the idea that the girl has chosen an outfit where her pussy and ass are completely exposed to the entire world (which somehow is kinkier than just being naked because you legitimately had to choose to put SOME clothes on so it was a clear aesthetic choice here).

That's why nopan is often frowned on in these threads, as nopan pics don't contain that Chosen Public Nudity element in most cases.

>>2081580
Excuse me, but what you refer to as Bottomless is actually GNU/Bottomless.

File: 1492s2941 12015380_p2 - PT.jpg (445KB, 1050x732px) Image search: [Google]

445KB, 1050x732px

>>2081563
Are you intentionally reading the opposite of what I write, or are you just functionally retarded? I said skirts have nothing to do with being bottomless, because skirts are not bottoms.

>>2081591
Are you? Because again, I didn't say skirts are bottoms, but their absence is what makes a girl bottomless. Seriously, get your head out of your ass. The boorus all define bottomless as "No panties and nothing worn on the hips", if you can't accept that, then I don't know what else to tell you.

File: Mikoto + Kuroko - bisyamonoh 15814766 - HP.jpg (390KB, 744x1052px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 744x1052px

>>2081596
Finally you make a coherent argument. But appeal to authority is not a very good reason. I'm arguing that this definition doesn't make a lot of sense, and therefore should at least not be considered to be the one, or "true" definition.

>>2081597
I've been coherent since the start. And why doesn't it make sense? If a girl is wearing everything but panties, then that's Nopan. If she's also not wearing a skirt or any kind of garment that hangs from the hip, she's bottomless. That's pretty damn sensible.

>>2081514
>Nobody calls skirts "bottoms"
You ever played a video game with equippable skirts? They're always bottoms. Dresses are simultaneously tops and bottoms.

>>2081874
Hell, if you shop online, skirts are listed under the "bottoms" category.

>>2081580
Why is she brazillian now?

Can't I just have a wank to drawn vag without autistic faggots splitting hairs?

File: norizou-r 27664197_big_p2+4 remodk130834 - HP.jpg (659KB, 1300x2000px) Image search: [Google]

659KB, 1300x2000px

>>2082664
Porn is serious business. Leave if you can't handle it.

>>2082664
This is 4chan, if someone says something wrong, you know damn well others are going to rub it in their faces.

>>2082664
Fuck off

>>2082753
Ladies first.

File: __ushiwakamaru_fate_grand_order_and_fate_series_drawn_by_lasterk__d058a02d26b2b789e880f7a3943e3c42.jpg (409KB, 637x901px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 637x901px

Less talking, more pics.

>>2082872
Then why don't you fuck off already, bitch?

>>2083043
After you, kiddo.

>>2083188
Fuck off

>>2083197
You first.

>>2083334
You're stupid.

>>2084031
No you are

Oh real fucking mature. The thread's premise is pretty stupid. >>2084031 and so are you, child.

>>2072767
More hoodies and jackets like pic related. I need to know where I can find shit like this.

File: asuka exposed.jpg (153KB, 1399x1119px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 1399x1119px

>>2084473

>>2084556
Thanks, moar?
Also
>Rule 63 of Dimitry Gopnikvich Slavanov

>>2081514
So what do you call a skirt? A top? It's either a top or a bottom and skirts are very clearly not a top. The terminology is already established but you keep shitting up threads since you want overlapping terms because you're too dumb to understand the literal definition of bottomless and nopan. Go to any booru and check what pictures with bottomless tags have. I'll tell you right now that it isn't just nopan

I was really looking forward to reading a bottomless thread but instead I got a faggot who doesn't know bottomless from nopan.
How is this nigger not banned?

>>2084821
He got triggered and started shitposting in two bottomless threads constantly. Mods were useless

>>2084833
Wasn't it that he got triggered in the original thread and made this one as a massive "take that!" to the first, effectively making this whole thread a shitpost?

More loli

>>2085255
>>>/b/

>bottomless
>has skirt on

I think you meant 'no panties/underwear'

File: 63659307_p0+1.png (1MB, 1250x2250px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1250x2250px

>>2089258
exactly, nothing on her bottom

>>2089385
Skirt is a bottom. You're looking for nopan. I don't know why you insist on trying to change already established and effective terminology

File: __nishizumi_maho_and_nishizumi_miho_girls_und_panzer_drawn_by_tanaka_takayuki__sample-3a8102d8c02bc8a8d0bc2a490f973b5e.jpg (201KB, 850x1353px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 850x1353px

>>2081148
>>2066399
>>2066137

Based, Tony Taka

>>2089705
Just leave it be. The guy has some sort of issue about the definition and doesn't want to admit that he's wrong.

The day I because president/emperor of the world is the day it will be illegal for girls to wear bottoms.

File: 9709d3ab2636d52f7a44621c0a100889.png (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

>>2090535
watch it with the loli. that belongs on /b/.

>>2090637
I don't think that's a loli if we get to broad with the definition of lol I nothing will be allowed.

File: __yagyuu_senran_kagura_and_senran_kagura_series_drawn_by_kuimono__ed0f85d119c5da09adedbe5eb56724bb.jpg (187KB, 750x1000px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 750x1000px

>>2090758
it's labeled as loli else where so not sure how young you like them. your claim is also a false pretense since there are obvious markers to know the person in question isn't loli.

>>2091406
Then I guess this whole thread better be deleted because the majority of it's loli based on modern day SJW standards.

File: 46343207_p0.jpg (109KB, 627x885px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 627x885px

>>2091778
fortunately 4chan doesn't care about them except for the purpose of ridicule

>>2081577
I think you've got the wrong place. The leather club's three blocks down.

>>2075705
She's fat so there's already no way it can be worth saving already
Censorship doesn't really matter

File: vempire-465063-Kichis_booty.jpg (145KB, 800x906px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 800x906px

Many of the vags are so poorly drawn that it turns me off.

>>2092041
Agree... too bad really.

>>2076065
>>2076070
Actually the most retarded thing is that you autists are arguing the definition of fucking porn. Who gives a shit if theirs two of the same thread up, its fucking porn.

>>2094884
>>2094885
>you autists
says the guy posting shitty meme images on a porn board

File: Bulma's booty.jpg (562KB, 840x1200px) Image search: [Google]

562KB, 840x1200px

>>2094884
Gee, nice contribution, cunt. Really smart to drag up the argument after it was won 2 MONTHS ago.

>>2094885
>hurr hurr, yur autistic!
No, that would be you and your lack of anything resembling an argument and just calling people who gave the proper definition "autistic". So fuck off, kiddo.

>>2075633
glancing over the thumbnail I legit thought I saw a dick

File: 1438925882328.jpg (377KB, 983x1400px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 983x1400px

>>2095333
AAAAAAAAAAAAY

File: Flandre - idolum 36320309 - EP.jpg (444KB, 1200x852px) Image search: [Google]

444KB, 1200x852px

>>2095217
you know what they say about people who see dicks when there aren't any

You know, I remember when /e/ was friendly and people weren't stubborn dickheads. Those were the days.

>>2092041
agreed

>>2099732
This is really the only thread that's ever had a concentration of idiocy. Most of the time, /e/ doesn't have much drama, outside of maybe some idiots on the drawthreads getting uppity about adhering to rules and etiquette or whatever.

>>2099996
the best way to fix it is by posting pics

File: __prinz_eugen_bilan_hangxian_drawn_by_wangchuan_de_quanyan__aaf83d6af3cf4e0d13daf1fb60ef71e8.jpg (1MB, 2035x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2035x1080px

>>2100001
you know I meant pics actually related to the thread?

File: 5565322_49951815_.jpg (620KB, 743x1052px) Image search: [Google]

620KB, 743x1052px

>>2100003
Alright, fine.

>>2099732
I remember when people knew actual definition of stuff before posting any pic they found

File: f45b8862aad2aee83f75a405ff4225d64b5f3f22.jpg (838KB, 1284x1852px) Image search: [Google]

838KB, 1284x1852px

>>2100089
The problem is this is basically the debate between whether dictionaries should be telling people the proper use for a word or whether dictionaries should tell you how words are used.

The French decided their dictionaries would be about the proper way to use words, today they're stupid about 'proper' French. Like demanding only proper French be spoken in Quebec and shit

vs English which long ago decided that dictionaries should be about how English is used and avoids telling people what's proper. Dictionaries are simply repositories of words.

This is a thread telling that other thread to fuck itself for demanding that people define 'bottomless' only as wearing a shirt only instead of looking at how the word is actually used. Gelbooru is a great example. Most people define bottomless as not wearing panties because fuck your attempt at telling us otherwise.

Telling people how a word needs to be used instead of accepting how its used is anti English and unamerican.

>>2100091
The other thread was hardly demanding anything, it gave the definition used by many boorus. Yet for whatever reason, the OP decided to be a cunt and demand that bottomless somehow means whatever it does in his tiny little head. It's like someone trying to justify their use of MILF when speaking of a woman who is not a mother of any child.

>>2100092
>MILF
>Mature I'd Like to Fuck

Ugh. Makes me want to fight.

Hi dick
I came from JAPAN but cool boy.
I think that guy's dick is 3mm .

File: __prinz_eugen_bilan_hangxian_drawn_by_kong_lang_skywave__b54bb50cc05a1e75ad027d639cb8076f.jpg (4MB, 2894x4093px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2894x4093px

>>2100091
>>2100093
fighting for dictionary usage of a word is not worth it, that just causes high blood pressure but will never change anything

>>2100093
There's a difference between fighting and just clarifying to some idiot what the proper definition of a term is.

File: 1500909899245.jpg (208KB, 729x1000px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 729x1000px

>>2100261
Oh yes, I know. If fighting seems like too strong a word, it's because this misunderstanding has persisted throughout the past decade or so and has had a pressure-cooking effect on my usually dismissive outlook on word/term/phrase misuse.

>>2100762
Do you happen to have sauce anon?

>>2101068
Bosshi

File: Jack_the_ripper_(Fate).jpg (183KB, 1000x940px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 1000x940px

>>2100762
better quality

>>2101335
>ringing artifacts everywhere
no, just upscaled, not better quality

oh hey bump limit

File: coatgirl-compare.jpg (773KB, 2550x3300px) Image search: [Google]

773KB, 2550x3300px

>>2066133

File: untitled.jpg (288KB, 1566x1078px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 1566x1078px

>>2101606

File: coatgirl-compare.jpg (773KB, 3300x2550px) Image search: [Google]

773KB, 3300x2550px

>>2101606
testing something