[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | | Home]

Bottomless girls

This is a red board which means that it's strictly for adults (Not Safe For Work content only). If you see any illegal content, please report it.

Thread replies: 197
Thread images: 154

Since the old thread is impossible to open from the catalog, I have to make a new one.

Bottomless is:
>Wearing top, but nothing to cover lower half of body, other than socks and/or shoes

Bottomless isn't:
>Wearing a skirt with no panties
>Wearing a skirt, lifting it to reveal lowered panties
>Lowered pants/panties

Please follow these rules, true bottomless pics are hard to find due to all the other stuff being categorized with it.

Also, it would be nice if anons posted a bit about why they like this particular look, the appeal is a bit mysterious.
>>
>>
- Aren't you cold dressed like this?
- No, not at all.
- It's already February, why are you putting so much on?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1493370586784.jpg (58KB, 700x900px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1493370586784.jpg
58KB, 700x900px
>>
File: 62697926_p0.jpg (787KB, 1240x1754px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
62697926_p0.jpg
787KB, 1240x1754px
Couldn't upload at full resolution.
>>
File: 1420693510084.jpg (253KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1420693510084.jpg
253KB, 1920x1080px
I don't know what's going on in this image but it's sexy
>>
>>2067933
Bottomless sailor uniform is top tier.
>>
>>2067974
What is it that you like about that so much though?
>>
>>
The top part is usually pretty short so it lets you also appreciate hips and midriff.
>>
>>2068188
Forgot to quote >>2068169
>>
>>2068188
Wew, that's a really cute pic!
>>
File: 1494201842340.png (207KB, 1029x848px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1494201842340.png
207KB, 1029x848px
>tfw you didn't save her
>>
>>
File: bottomless1.jpg (384KB, 1000x1421px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
bottomless1.jpg
384KB, 1000x1421px
>>
File: 59719089_p1.jpg (154KB, 947x1386px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
59719089_p1.jpg
154KB, 947x1386px
>>
File: image.jpg (195KB, 627x700px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
image.jpg
195KB, 627x700px
>>2071471
Ah, a man of culture as well
>>
>>
We need more ;P
>>
>>2075050
Read the OP fuckface.
>>
>>2075054
That's why this thread is so shit, who wants to get yelled at for contributing?
>>
>>2075055
You didn't contribute and then started bitching.
As written in the OP:
"Bottomless isn't:
>Wearing a skirt with no panties
>Wearing a skirt, lifting it to reveal lowered panties
>Lowered pants/panties"

Do you think your image was supposed to be posted?
>>
>>2075055

What >>2075068 said. You aren't contributing if you aren't posting according to the guidelines the OP of the thread made. Of course people are going to yell at you if you aren't using the thread correctly. You complaining about this is like complaining about getting yelled at because you posted a confidant nude girl in an embarrased naked female thread. If you don't like the guidelimes this thread laid down, use the other bottomless thread.
>>
>>2075154
but then don't be surprised if people prefer posting in the other thread, which already has more pics relevant to what you want, but doesn't have an asshole like you driving them off
>>
>>2075199
Underage detected.
>>
>>2075154
>>2075068
dam I came here to fap but you guys are both retarded
quit bitching and start jerking off god damn
>>
>>2075276
Yeah, we are retarded because we read the OP while a random person completely ignores it and starts badmouthing people due to that.

Fuck off
>>
Literally the worst and most unfriendly thread on /e/. Where did you guys come from?
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: decens7.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
decens7.jpg
1MB, 1920x1080px
>>2075276
>>2075300
THIS SO MUCH
>11 new posts
>3 of them have images

>>2075298
>>2075229
>>2075154
>>2075068
>>2075054
where were you when >>2067962 was posted huh?

it seems like y'all are a bunch of evil cops and giant pixels are mochas or some shit
>>
>>2075300
Oh, come on now. I get that >>2075054 was being too rude by calling that poster a fuckface, but he wouldn't of said that if he didn't post an image that didn't belong. Name calling and rudeness is not unique to this thread, it's juet happening in this thread more because there's more to argue about.
>>
>>2075308
>where were you when >>2067962 # was posted huh?

The fact that it was a wrong image wasn't immediately obvious, and I wasn't interested enough in the image to click on it. That image shouldn't have posted, though.
>>
>>2075300
If you want pics of animu girls without panties, just go on Gelbooru. The reason we have this thread is so we can sort out the pics falling in this specific category, since there's just no way to find them easily just be searching.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>2075300
(You)
>>
>>2075308
>Hey guys, this guy also posted a wrong pic. It justifies me also doing wrong and allows me to harass people here
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 20090402.jpg (189KB, 791x893px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
20090402.jpg
189KB, 791x893px
>>
File: 4103141.jpg (77KB, 694x487px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
4103141.jpg
77KB, 694x487px
>>
File: 28040464_p0.jpg (123KB, 826x1047px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
28040464_p0.jpg
123KB, 826x1047px
>>
File: 29703425.png (885KB, 779x1200px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
29703425.png
885KB, 779x1200px
>>
File: 17600249_p1.jpg (104KB, 480x640px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
17600249_p1.jpg
104KB, 480x640px
>Wearing top, but nothing to cover lower half of body, other than socks and/or shoes
What about neckties?
>>
File: 46120673_p0.png (650KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
46120673_p0.png
650KB, 1000x1000px
>>
>>2075405
I'd say that's fine.
>>
>>
File: 37349769.jpg (341KB, 1400x2200px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
37349769.jpg
341KB, 1400x2200px
>>
File: 44050150.jpg (144KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
44050150.jpg
144KB, 768x1024px
>>
File: 1403623569094.jpg (61KB, 574x804px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1403623569094.jpg
61KB, 574x804px
>>
I'm with OP. Something's much hotter about plain bottomless.
>>
File: 51181815_p0.jpg (570KB, 840x1200px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
51181815_p0.jpg
570KB, 840x1200px
>>
File: Fio ass spread.png (765KB, 1164x1214px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Fio ass spread.png
765KB, 1164x1214px
Shame Fio's "bigger than it looks" butt isn't more popular in art.
>>
>>2075821
i do use both. I post images that don't suit the guidelines in this thread in the other thread, and I post images according to the rules in here.
>>
This is a big fetish of mine. Especially the ones where the girl has no bottom and only one piece of clothing on top (like a loose t-shirt with no bra or just a hoodie) get me super diamonds. I'm not sure what is so appealing about it.

Pic very related
>>
>>2075870
inb4 autistic screeching at your pic
>>
File: z10395743895.png (500KB, 623x1027px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
z10395743895.png
500KB, 623x1027px
>>
>>2075870
probably the seemingly normal appearance of it (a girl in only a long shirt or closed hoodie could walk in public without drawing too much attention) but on the other hand the possiblity of someone fucking her the next moment without really having to take anything off, or just being that close to being naked but still look normal.
>>
>>2075870
>>2075875
I mean, she's wearing a shirt, not a skirt or a dress, so the picture is fine in that sense.
>>
>>
>>
>>2075870
>>2075909

I think there's a sense of cuteness or casuality when a girl is wearing a tshirt/hoodie and no bottom. In the case of a tshirt, it's like she's in her sleeping clothes and has just gotten out of bed, and/or is planning on staying in her home all day and not going anywhere. And if the shirt is masculine enough, it's like she just had sex and is wearing her partner's shirt. When it's a (long) hoodie and no bottom, it's like she's planning on going out, but is too lazy to put on proper pants, and is only going to the drugstore anyway, so she just threw on something long enough to cover herself and went out.

Or it could be appealing because although you might not see any private parts if the shirt/hoodie is long enough, you can see a lot of leg, and it isn't a proper way to cover your lower half, so it looks somewhat indecent- and therefore sexy.
Or maybe I'm just over thinking it.
>>
>>2075875
Why though? To be bottomless, a person has to literally have SOMETHING on top. Otherwise they'd be nude. And wearing all but panties certainly isn't bottomless.
>>
>>2075999
I think he said that because of the length of the shirt. I mean, it is sort of a gray area. Anything to do with pants, panties, skirts, and dresses are clearly prohibited, but what about tops that are JUST long enough to cover the pussy?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>2076001
It's still a top though, obviously. If were a dress, that'd be a different issue, as most dresses go down at least the thigh level at the shortest.
>>
>>2076029
I guess so. I hope this is somethng most people here can agree on, because a lot of bottomless images that would otherwise be fine feature long shirts, so it would be annoying if those pictures were disqualified.
>>
>>
>>2075392
>Bottomless
HAHA
>>
>>
>>2076045
>no skirt, pants, or underwear on her bottom
>not bottomless

Are you retarded?
>>
>>2076066
That's a character from Katawa Shoujo. She doesn't have legs... She's bottomless.
>>
>>2076068
That's not how being bottomless works in any sense of the word. She'd have to have nothing below her stomach to be literally bottomless.
>>
>>2076068
Are
>>
>>2076073
Sorry, I posted that early, I meant to say:are you sure she's from Katawa Shoujo? Got it off Danbooru, and it said the image was an original.
>>
>>
>>
>>2076071
You're an idiot please KYS

>>2076074
Meh. Ponytails are a little short to be her but looks and dresses just like her. The girl runs track and has the same hair and face so meh
>>
>>
>>
>>2076077
No, you fuck off with your shit jokes.
>>
>>
>>
>>2076079
it's funny how it's okay if the area Is cut out of the picture but her wearing a skirt, even though you can see everything, is something that calls for sperging out
>>
>>2076747
Can you not start shit, please?
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: Akko going commando.png (374KB, 1321x1594px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Akko going commando.png
374KB, 1321x1594px
>>2076761
Seriously, why is /e/ of all places getting more uppity anons? This place is usually quiet as fuck compared to the other orange boards.
>>
>>2076857
maybe it'd help if OP didn't pretend that his definition bottomless is the only definition, or even the right one, and made it clearer that it's just his preference
>>
>>2076863
it's stated in the OP what this thread is about you dumb fuck, just because he used a word to describe it that you think means something else doesn't mean you just derail the thread until you get what you want. Who cares if he said bottomless in the OP, he then went on to describe what he meant, and what the thread was about.
>>
>>2076869
Why are you so aggressive though? Do you really think that'll get more people to contribute to your pet thread?
>>
>>2076872
it's not even my thread, but you've been starting shit the entire time. there's an entire website for you to shit up and you chose /e/. As for this being a pet thread, that's the entire point of 4chan, you make a thread about something that interests you and people post things that fit the thread. You might as well go to any thread on /e/ and start posting whatever, because having specific things in threads isn't broad enough for you
>>
Guys. You wouldn't call a girl topless if she was just lifting the top she's wearing. You wouldn't call her topless if she was still wearing a bra. You wouldn't call her topless if she shifted her bra. You wouldn't say she was barefoot if she was wearing socks, you wouldn't say she's not wearing a hat because she's wearing it funny, you wouldn't say she's bald because she buzzed one side of her head... A fucking 4 year old can figure it out.
>>
>>2076897
and btw OP didn't come up with those rules; I just threw that list out there in a thread months ago and it stuck. I didn't expect it to but I'm glad it did.
>>
>>2076863
How is it not the right one? Bottomless literally refers to having NOTHING on the lower half. There's no other way to describe it.
>>
>>2076897
Well of course not, topless would mean NO TOP, just as BOTTOMLESS means no goddamn fucking skirt/pants/underwear covering the lower half. It ain't fucking rocket science, /e/
>>
>>2077107
panties are bottoms too, therefore nopan is also bottomless
>>
File: Flannery sexy.png (596KB, 830x854px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Flannery sexy.png
596KB, 830x854px
>>
>>2077109
It can work in conjunction with bottomless, sure. But it can also be separate as plenty of pictures will show a girl going commando while still wearing a skirt/pair of pants.
>>
>>2065723
>Also, it would be nice if anons posted a bit about why they like this particular look, the appeal is a bit mysterious.
I'm only into it when they have shoes on. If they don't, it's just a state of undress. If they have shoes on, it's deliberate bottomlessness.
>>
>>2077109
Yeah, as long as there's not some other bottom.
>>
File: Lucy's ass.jpg (170KB, 695x900px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Lucy's ass.jpg
170KB, 695x900px
>>2076863
How is he pretending? Literally every booru and other image sharing site with tags describes bottomless as "The lack of clothing for the hips and nether regions, including underwear." I fail to see how this is a bad definition when it makes perfect sense.

Sure, you could have girls wearing long socks/stocking, but they can't have anything on their hips and covering their genitals. But if they have a skirt on, it's not bottomless. Honestly, why the fucking fuss and splitting of threads?
>>
File: IMG_6612.png (364KB, 640x909px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
IMG_6612.png
364KB, 640x909px
>>
File: Bombchu lady ass.png (577KB, 1400x1372px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Bombchu lady ass.png
577KB, 1400x1372px
>>
File: hanayo paint.png (458KB, 1190x1091px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
hanayo paint.png
458KB, 1190x1091px
>>
File: Videl booty.jpg (147KB, 1167x1000px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Videl booty.jpg
147KB, 1167x1000px
>>
>>2076857
cuz of autism
>>
File: 62854065_p1 (1).png (812KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
62854065_p1 (1).png
812KB, 1280x1024px
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: Kaya exposed.png (162KB, 403x731px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Kaya exposed.png
162KB, 403x731px
>>
File: Dawn's phat ass.jpg (80KB, 630x800px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Dawn's phat ass.jpg
80KB, 630x800px
>>
File: Sue-Belle no panties.png (1013KB, 1258x1920px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Sue-Belle no panties.png
1013KB, 1258x1920px
>>
File: 3.jpg (810KB, 2502x3253px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
3.jpg
810KB, 2502x3253px
>>
File: 24.jpg (1MB, 1900x2600px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
24.jpg
1MB, 1900x2600px
>>2075317
bottomless -panties -rating:explicit

Seems to work. See anything else you wouldn't count? like a skirt? Just add another -
>>
>>
>>
File: 1474929906593.jpg (286KB, 1161x840px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1474929906593.jpg
286KB, 1161x840px
>>2076077
>>2075392 doesn't really look anything like Emi. The eyes aren't even the same color.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 61016678_p4.jpg (434KB, 989x1400px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
61016678_p4.jpg
434KB, 989x1400px
>>
>>2065723
>90 days ago
lets get to 100
>>
>>
>>
>>2065723
I'm an ass man so anything that exposes the buttocks is a +1 for me, but I also like the implications of bottomless. What I mean is that, generally speaking, it appears to be a choice on the part of the girl to go bottomless, and I find that attractive. There's also an odd sense of impropriety; it would be one thing if they were just naked, but bottomless implies a sort of trickster-esque approach in which a girl might fool someone who can only see her top half into thinking she's decent when she really isn't. There's something very appealing about that.
>>
>>2096100
done
Thread posts: 197
Thread images: 154



[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.