Alright, GTS thread. Size difference/mini GTS is fine. - No

File: 1473288168628.jpg (1MB, 1600x1064px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1600x1064px

The superior option.

File: 186820.jpg (314KB, 850x1141px) Image search: [Google]

314KB, 850x1141px

>>7552582

>The guy who lost the argument from the other thread is so mad he's dumping easily-reportable images.

>>7552582
>He put GTS thread as his name
Wow, how new are you?

>>7552649
Take your derailing/arguing/drama elsewhere, please.

>>7552649
Better than shitting up a thread because you made yourself look stupid in another.

>>7552655
>>7552656
>he's not getting it
I know you're still assblasted, but please realize your thread will die if you don't have a proper subject title. Common sense on /d/

File: 178577.jpg (946KB, 1061x1500px) Image search: [Google]

946KB, 1061x1500px

No giant males? That's just mean.

Mods pls.

File: 192393.gif (556KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

556KB, 960x540px

Whew, thank you based mods.

>>7552741
haha m8

>>7552582
kys

>>7552582
>All these limitations and exclusions
How about you go fuck yourself.

>>7552582
a giantess only thread would be awesome but you cut out at least 2 of the most major genres

Why are these threads so fast lately

>>7552582
I'm into all of those but giant males and cuckoldry, do you intend to fragment GTS threads even more?

File: 1498074367292.jpg (584KB, 1920x1253px) Image search: [Google]

584KB, 1920x1253px

>>7552582
Newfags shouldn't create threads

>>7555652
Its not the main thread if that helps, its meant to coexist with the main thread, this guy essentially wants to start series of gentle vanilla giantess threads in the same vain as the vore , growth, and mini gts threads. You're free to create the new Giantess General

>>7555724
His point went over your head.

>>7556358
But There would be no other reason to protest the op unless this were the main general thread but its not. Rather than muck up the main thread by complaining about lack of specific preferences , he made a separate niche one for those preferences. No harm done.

>>7556431
1. no subject title
2. posting subject title as your name
3. not posting at least 5 images to start the thread off
4. too many restrictions

All things newfags do. You must be new here.

I'm not saying its a well made thread I'm saying it's not worth protesting because it's a separate thread that has no bearing on the main thread. Threads can be as narrow or broad as an OP wishes but it's on them to keep their thread alive. If they boxed them selves in a corner than no harm is done because the general thread lives on and the OP will be a little wiser.

I'm more referencing the posters like previous guy who are protesting this thread by posting male content simply because he made his thread about females which is silly since a both separate giant male and a SW/fairy thread(with an M/f preference) already exists. The OP definitely could of done a better job, but all he did was make what essentially translates into a "gentle giantess" thread. There's been tons of more specific threads on , /d/ like "futa in pink underwear only " etc. So specifications are not the worst thing in the world. If you can make thread with a narrow scope and still keep it alive , hey go for it. But posting breast expansion in a foot thread just because an op says they "only want feet" is frankly being worse than anything they ever did.

>>7556507
You're focusing on a single troll from the previous thread who wanted to annoy the OP. Great job.
He's still a newfag though.