/d/ meta thread

>>7531478
why are you always attacking cowgirl content?

>>7531478
The captions and that furry retard who couldn't find his own ass with both hands and a map is why the last thread was deleted. Stop. Captions, cyoa, and efg is gone from /d/. There's nothing you can do right now. Might change, might not but right now is a definite no.

And furries, fuck off back to your rabbit holes you STILL aren't welcome here and there is an obvious and important distinction between your stuff and monstergirls that allow them to be on /d/.

Cuntboy > Futa still my brother.

>>7531487
I'm trying to clean the board of furshit

>>7531496
Both belong on /y/.

>>7531495
Yeah, furries have no place here, even if they disguise their content by calling it monstergirl. Fuck those fags

File: 1497483291514.png (1MB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1024x1024px

>>7531495
Exactly, see this is a monstergirl. No brown skin so not a furry either. Checkmate

>>7531495
among those shitposters there was some actual good conversation about the problems with this board though.

>>7531497
cowgirls aren't furry

>>7531499
Even redditers can tell the difference.

>>7531478
Elzi was one of the biggest fucking attention whores on this board and I'm glad that the clarified rules make her shit unpostable, the people that worshiped her should be ashamed of themselves.

>>7531501
Agreed, but sadly they were the minority.

Personally I like Captions, because I like having context

>>7531495
Where did efg actually go?

>>7531478
Yeah you're really making sure your community leaves this board with dignity. Definitely not making sure we're going to remember you all as cunts after this.

File: 47434b0a7fe20b58cad91ac62d3ba376a8f4c8349ee129f8679f5f65ecfd04c0_1.jpg (102KB, 630x820px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 630x820px

>>7531497
You might need these then.

>>7531501
Too bad nobody in charge wants to do anything. We've had pretty good discussion for things that could change, ways to make places like /d/ and /aco/ less poisonous to each other and themselves, but nothing ever happens. It's a shame since we could probably broaden the boundaries of certain fetishes here, or at least refine things so everyone has some place to be instead of "quarantine zones" as some idiots call whatever board it is they don't like.

File: 20121128214425b82.jpg (392KB, 1600x1000px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 1600x1000px

>>7531519

>>7531523
Doesn't really seem like much difference between 50 and 70%

>>7531527
... the difference is 20%

>>7531516
>it's cuntish to try and discuss things
Spoken like a kid

>>7531527
Agreed, but my good one was either corrupted or not supported. That's fill in till I find a replacement.

>>7531532
No wait I see the difference. Extra limbs!

>>7531529
Yea, but there could still be more to it than just "it has more arms and is lankier'

>>7531530
More the constant backhanded captions threads comments, furry/monstergirl spam arguments, etc.

I agree with traps and other male only content being moved to /y/

Well, with furry porn being posted as an actual argument I guess we reached the point of 100% shitposting for these threads.

>>7531500
>animal head
>not furry
Try again.

>>7531553
Stop it, a girl having animal ears isn't the same as furry.

>>7531553
>a girl in a costume is now furry
Are you retarded?

>>7531520
The mods don't care either way. Not even the usual "The mods don't care REEEEE", but they couldn't give a rats ass about anything we say even if it is actually constructive or a good idea.

>>7531505
>Attentionwhoring to the mods
Go back to /qa/ autist

>>7531516
>acting like a cunt to other cunts makes me not a cunt
Did you not yet figure out that we're all cunts here? Why do you think we seek out so many dicks?

>>7531505
elzi produced a ton of high quality content, just because they got lots of positive attention for it doesn't mean their content should be banned.

>>7531580
That's what I said. Unless the entire board turned into a massive shithole of arguing with a thousand posts complaining about whatever, the mods won't care one bit.

>>7531539
If you give the extra limbs to 10% does the 10% go right to 70% or does it stay in the middle? Honestly that combo would feel less than 20% is, with the new head and new feet.

>>7531563
Honestly surprised they haven't yet, they've been wanting to for years.

>>7531586
>putting human hair on an animal makes it a human
If I'm retarded then goddamn you must be braindead.

>>7531605
>announcing trolls
We've reached a new level of shitpost here, folks. The Lupin wanna-be.

>>7531598
OK yeah it wasn't the best example.

>>7531606
>vague animal features make it furry, reeeeeeeeeee!
Says the autist

>>7531610
I think it's a decent enough example, just that the "issue" can sometimes be a little more complicated. Didn't mean it to come off as attack-ish if it did, though. Was actually more curious as to what people thought about it.

>>7531600
Shit so much for my other example.

>>7531611
>Vague
There's a head and tits. The head is very obviously an animal head. This is in no way, shape, or form even close to "vague".

>>7531616
Just photoshop the pony out, that was probably the problem.

>>7531618
Where? The OP pic? Because that's clearly a fucking human head you mongoloid.

>>7531622
Follow the reply chain. We were discussing this image >>7531500

>>7531627
Beyond the ears it's not even that furry

>>7531630
Ears and the animal-based face (you can tell by the animal-triangle nose and the overall shape of the nose itself; look at the glasses and how curved the middle bridge is, that wouldn't work on a human nose very well while it'd be perfect for a more snout-like shape).

It's honestly a very hot image, but it's very obvious that it's intended to be a furry character.

>>7531630
it's got the nose too, if the detail weren't so low it'd be obvious but, as per usual with furries, the quality is shit.

>>7531634
The face looks like a blob with the side-mouth. Even then, it's more humanlike than animal

File: Aisha upskirt.jpg (65KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 400x400px

>>7531637
Ears and nose still don't make it furry.

>>7531638
It really isn't.

>>7531642
They do, they belie the artists' intent that it is an animal-based character more than it is a true combination of the two unlike the image you posted, where it's given a completely human face (including human nose) just with animal ears. I don't even think Aisha would qualify as a monster girl, since it's just extra ears (maybe a tail? I never watched Outlaw Star and haven't fapped to her in years sadly).

>>7531645
Ears do not make them furry.

File: 822440ff95abb97bf1044c51a5c42ab13394bd4f_hq.gif (990KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

990KB, 500x375px

>>7531642
aisha has a human face with a human nose, are you even trying?

>>7531650
Just 2 attributes of humans. Barely 10%

>>7531650
No, we've reached pants on head snowflake retarded. There is no hope for them.

>>7531654
for the betterment of all mankind, please, kill yourself.

>>7531650
Wasn't implying her face was furry, idiot

>>7531661
>>7531642
?????

>>7531663
That post literally doesn't equate to "THIS is the face of a furry"

>>7531666
so you're a retard AND new to image boards, good to know.

>>7531649
No, the animal face makes it furry. That's the difference between the first image and Alicia.

File: 53qw8y-oCl8ngm.jpg (93KB, 903x1200px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 903x1200px

this triggers /d/

>>7531594
pretty much

It's sad. It used to feel like a community, now it's just shitposting and raging everywhere.

>>7531674
Nah, just one autistic troll.

>>7531684
People are still hot on both sides, it always happens when the mods ban threads like this. Eventually it cools off and things go back to relative normal, just takes time.

File: Scatond.jpg (1MB, 1260x4272px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1260x4272px

>>7531684
It's especially funny since the topic isn't nearly as big a hot button, yet now nobody can go a post without hurling insults. Meanwhile, pic related happened a ways back and was considerably more civil despite the subject matter being something that's largely hated to death.

>>7531703
I think it's more civil because Scat is clearly banned in the rules, and the vast majority of /d/ users agree it shouldn't be here. These threads were not clearly listed as banned anywhere, so when they got removed the users of those threads felt like they were being attacked, while others who felt those threads were nuisance were defending the mod's actions and trying to calm the first group down. Of course, there were the trolls who were smug and condescending in the second group and the ones in the first group who were overzealous in RAGE AGAINST THE MOD fashion, but that happens when arguments such as these pop up.

>>7531718
Still, it seems that nowadays you can't discuss anything, even allowed stuff without people just shitposting each other.

>>7531723
I haven't seen a lot of that in the threads I use, but most of them have been image dumps lately anyway with not much discussion. Didn't know it was that bad in other threads, though. That does make me sad.

>>7531718
I think the stupid part comes from the people still bitching, even though the mods clarified the fucking rules.

>>7531728
If it's discussion in a regular thread, then not much shitposting goes on. But if it's a discussion thread with some porn strewn around, it just seems to be nothing but arguing and trolling.

>>7531729
I wish they'd be clarified 100% so we don't have mods just popping things up and making it seem like these rules are being pulled out of their ass. And actually put up on the rule page as well. Lots of people said those threads were banned before but then re-allowed or something, but if you didn't know that they were banned before there was/is no way to find out without a situation like this happening.

>>7531729
Silly how they call the images "low quality" when the majority of them were anything but. Of course, the whole thing of "image quality" is just fucking stupid. Unless someone is posting porn from goddamn 98 when you didn't have the luxury of numerous size resolutions and whatnot, why should it matter? Quality is subjective for most people

>>7531738
>I wish they'd be clarified 100% so we don't have mods just popping things up and making it seem like these rules are being pulled out of their ass.
That's so people don't try and toe the line.

>Lots of people said those threads were banned before but then re-allowed or something
Not really re-allowed, just not acted upon.

>>7531743
>Not really re-allowed, just not acted upon.
Ah, alright then.

>That's so people don't try and toe the line.
That's still better and easier to stop than having people break rules they don't know about, it suddenly being acted upon again, then having this kind of huge shitpost uproar that lasts for a week +, which just invites other shitposting (like the monster girl = furry troll guy) with it.

>>7531753
>That's still better and easier to stop than having people break rules they don't know about, it suddenly being acted upon again, then having this kind of huge shitpost uproar that lasts for a week +, which just invites other shitposting (like the monster girl = furry troll guy) with it.
Eh, it would all be solved if people just lurked fucking more anyway. I think this way is better, because with the other way you still have people "discussing" bans that were technically not in the rules because they're so specific.

>>7531743
>>Lots of people said those threads were banned before but then re-allowed or something
pretty much this, mods were either lazy or not bothered by them. Those threads were never deleted.

>>7531674
this triggers muh /d/ick!

...sorry couldn't resist.

>>7531758
>Eh, it would all be solved if people just lurked fucking more anyway.
I don't think it's really something the average anon would learn while lurking, though I may be wrong. Besides the captions, I honestly forgot the other ones were banned myself. It doesn't seem like the kind of thing that would come up too often outside of those threads, and if nothing is mentioned about them for a while it could easily pop back up again once people who remember that they're gone leave and people who don't know come in. But, I never used those threads much (outside of the caption thread, but I hadn'd used it in months) so maybe they knew they were on sketchier ice more than they let on in the metathreads.

>>7502554
How is this thread allowed?

>>7531718
It would be nice if we could discuss things that aren't allowed as there have been decent arguments to changing things. Of course it goes back to the point that the mods just don't want to change anything.

>>7531777
The hell if I know.

>>7531478
YAWN. (meanwhile 5 new /r/ threads with 3 images or less cropped up today. Thats 5 threads with actual content pushed off the board for these selfish fucks.

But you just want to talk about muh captions threads.


Fucking PRIORITIZE, ALL OF YOU.

>>7531787
/r/ threads don't affect me so I don't care

File: 1394411183065.png (168KB, 500x647px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 500x647px

>>7531777
well if we're talking on the grounds of beastiality...

>>7531807
I agree, if captions can stay then we can focus on getting rid of /r/ threads.

>>7531807
>>7531820
Yeah. I don't get how mods are extremely diligent in removing the threads they hate, but don't care about request threads and the like whatsoever.

>>7531830
Some of it is probably people reporting the things for whatever. Can't say if it's trolling or just people being obnoxious rulecunts.

>>7531506
actually, they were the bulk of the thread until people started seriously responding to the "everything is furry" shitposter.

>>7531590
both her captions and shops are shit, she admitted as much in threads, and she even once said "people are dumb enough to like it and I get attention, so what ever" once. I'm sure you will accuse me of making that up.

>>7531839
Good joke.

>>7531841
>I'm sure you will accuse me of making that up.
This doesn't make that quote any less untrue.

>>7531841
>shops are shit
Uhh no, I feel writing is a little subjective but her edits are amazing.

>>7531845
I know I don't have any proof because of the nature of these boards but I assure you it is true, her stuff has next to no effort behind it, she always used the same fonts and variations of the same captions, and she would just slap a penis on, sometimes it looked good, but sometimes it didn't fit at all, and she really didn't care either way and she even said so more than once. I mean just read the OP's caption, if you think that is good then you have very low standards.

>>7531847
>her captions and shops are shit
>her
this there for is meant to be read as
>her shops are shit
lern 2 comprehend da english

>>7531856
>I know I don't have any evidence, but I assure you that this totally fake quote is true.
lmao, go back to your IRC channel.

>>7531859
nice to know her defender army is still here, she will probably come in here and whine and pat you guys on the back for a job well done like she always does.

>>7531847
>her edits are amazing.
I like how people keep saying this but won't say how the OP caption is any good at all.

>>7531865
>I like how people keep saying this but won't say how the OP caption is any good at all.
probably because it's been deleted.

I think we should ban ALL IMAGES with ANY text on them.

That will surely cure Cancer on this board.

No dialogue, no sound effects, just like nature intended!

But seriously, mods... You want to be hitler? You go FULL FUCKING FINAL SOLUTION. Non of this half assed shit. All images with content that had words should be b&'d, any gifs wor WEBMs should be b&... this is /d/ noy /gif/. All vore should be banned, as that's implied guro. All incest should be banned, as that my promote images with underage depicted characters. All rape threads should be banned, because someone might get triggered. No penis posted can be larger than a man's penis. All world building, global fetish, this is your body, COYA threads, or NSFW quest threads should be banned.

Man up, give the Curtain Call.

The Final Solution.

Let all scum fade away and let hope turn to ash.

>>7531830
and the million threads like "next is ur body" or "u have to fap to next pic" or "/d/ jack instruction thread", they used to be told to go to /b/ with that shit, but nope, not anymore.

>>7531868
Fuck off.

>>7531787
You try getting the mods to do something. It's like milking a stone.

File: 54647438_p0.png (390KB, 815x1063px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 815x1063px

>>7531867
it wasn't deleted when I made any of the other posts.

>>7531777
It isn't, the mods are just lazy fucks.

>>7531868
hi there tryhard newfag that hasn't learned that all of 4chan isn't like /b/ and /pol/ yet.

>>7531841
>Artists aren't satisfied with their works that means they're right
A lot of people who draw or edit say the same thing, you can even see it a lot in doujin after pages. It doesn't mean they're right (or wrong, for the sake of argument), but it's just a creative thing. It's like the old saying "You don't paint a perfect picture, you just paint until you're satisfied" or however it goes.

Also thank god you're not a mod, because with your shit taste we'd be up to our neck in fart threads and Shadman-tier reposts.

>>7531865
>Her edits are good
>BUT THE CAPTION
What does that have to do with the original statment?

>>7531860
nice to know the mod defender army is still here, they will probably talk highly about you in their ivory IRC room.

>>7531881
>"You don't paint a perfect picture, you just paint until you're satisfied"
I have to try that one next time I nut too early.

>>7531777
>>7531786
>>7531876
fictional creatures do not count as bestiality in the rules, and if you talking scally shit, there are a few, but most of the stuff is not anthromorphized. Also the bestiality rule isn't really enforced despite the fact it's still there, it was originally there to appease a company they used to ad partner with and moot just never bothered removing the rule from the list when said partnership was dead.

>>7531890
Just because it's not enforced doesn't mean it's allowed. It's just being tolerated until such a point where it becomes a problem like the caption threads. The fact that the rule is still there means it could be invoked at any time, so just be aware that it's still some level of thin ice.

>>7531890
>mods like it so it's allowed
got it

>>7531881
>having standards mean I have shit tastes and like things like farts and the like

oh ok
also, even though I hate them, fart threads aren't against the rules, so yeah, if I was a mod they would stay, because they aren't against the rules, also i don't know wtf a shadman thread is.

>>7531840
That's not a dick that's a fucking phallus shaped tumor. Hideous.

>>7531881
also, is not satisfied isn't the same as out and out saying they put no effort into their stuff and thinking it's funny that people like it.

>>7531896
>having standards
Your standards are shit because your taste is shit.

And nobody said anything about banning fart threads, I said they'd proliferate because you'd get rid of so much other good stuff because your idea of "quality" is fucking skewed to shit.

>>7531901
pfft lol

>>7531897
i didn't like that pic before, but now i love it, thanks ;)

>>7531900
Which, again, is something a ton of artists say no matter how good they are. It doesn't prove a single thing. Or you saying that artitsts like Van Gogh are also shit because they said their art was shit? (And before you use that fallacy, I'm not comparing Elzi to Vincent.)

>>7531910
I mean I understand where you are coming from, but she literally was just doing it for attention, not because she liked doing it, to me that's the disgusting part.

and if you actually want to compare her to some one, I'd use warhole, because the caparison is apt, to bring up that phalicy, and I like warhole. Maybe that in it's self invalidates my arguement, oh well, it doesn't matter, because the sort of stuff she made isn't allowed here anymore, there are other sites for it you know, hopefully she will find one of them.

>>7531891
it hasn't been a problem for many years, I don't see how it would be now.

>>7531920
I wasn't actually trying to compare them, just more that they're both in ways artists and that it's a mentality that seems common among artists no matter their actual skill level. Though, I never actually thought about the Warhol comparison, that probably would have been better.
On the other hand, are edits themselves banned now? Either I missed that or I forgot that in the between of then and now. And yeah, She went to another chan a while back but still posted here too, so the finding a new one has already been done I think.

>>7531928
Well, it was meant more as a friendly warning than an actual prophecy or something. Mod's whims can change at any time.

>>7531895
the Holy Rules, Clarified, right here

>>7531933
I understood what you meant and that you weren't comparing them, that was just meant as an aside sort of thought, sorry, the way i write things isn't always super clear.

File: superdude103194__s_commission_by_o0anoni_chan0o-dbbq5f7.jpg (143KB, 764x1045px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 764x1045px

>>7531901
Fartfag here. What's you're idea of a quality fart picture then? If you don't have the fetish I don't see how you can find any of the art in our threads appealing.

And what's being bumped off the board from one fart thread existing?

>>7531515
Mods sent it to trash because it has nowhere else to go. CYOAs found a relatively cosy home at /tg/, though.

>>7531552
Okay but if you move that to /y/ then can you move the lesbian shit to /u/. That's only fair.

>>7531933
the sticky doesn't mention edits at all, just captions, I think people are just over reacting and thinking it means edits too.

>>7531945
Alright, just wanted to double check, no hard feelings.

>>7531933
also, most her stuff recently has been captions I thought, so I didn't really think of her edits. Like I said before, the thing I really hate about her is that she is obviously just fishing for attention, even if you don't believe the things I said in my other posts the fact that she makes her own threads, where only she is allowed to make edits, instead of posting in the general edit thread is proof enough I think.

>>7531948
I'm ok with that.

>>7531946
It was meant as more of an insult to him than it was to fart threads, as in "your definition of quality would lead to you deleting so many threads that fart threads would take over", not as an actual statement that fart threads are or were going to take over.

>>7531957
Oh okay then man I don't have any complaints. Sometimes I see people saying yurishit can stay and I'm like 'you fucker' but futa should stay here I guess since /y/ is gay.

>>7531953
>>7531949
Alright, I was just making sure so that I didn't post an edit and get popped because I accidentially ignored something, thanks.

Also, I hadn't seen an Elzi-only thread in a while (not that I look super hard for them, though) and kind of assumed they did get rolled into the general edit thread a while ago, oddly enough. It's not a bad idea honestly.

>>7531959
not the fart person, but my idea of quality is not as strict and far reaching as you think it is, go to the trap thread to see my idea of quality as I posted half the pics there. Just because I think things like "oh baby what a big penis you have, looks like I have to get used to being rammed in my gaping ass all the time" is low quality doesn't mean I'm some Nazi, I mean I think anyone with half a brain would think things like that were bad.

>>7531970
also before "omg u r just expecting us to think was bad becase it was deleted", read >>7531840 it's also an elzi caption.

>>7531980
mods plz, let me make a point ;-;

>>7531970
It was an intentional exaggeration as to how bad I think your tastes are, not something I think you would actually do (or even could make happen, the fart thread people are actually very good about keeping to their own thread which I can commend them on). Sorry if you thought I was more serious than that.

>>7531948
>>7531962
different anon here, my issue with the trap threads is that it seems like the exact thing /y/ is here for, if they want have a /d/ related trap thread like monster traps or trap vore or something that /y/ wouldn't allow then sure, it just seems like a fair amount are pretty vanilla, same would go for vanilla lesbian threads though i can't say i've noticed any

>>7531964
oh, maybe she had been just going to the generals instead, really I haven't been in here in a long time other than to make that "normal trap" thread. I kinda avoided the rest of the board other than stuff I search for because the board as a whole has been utter shit for like... the past year...

>>7531987
As much as I love traps I kind of agree. Like, I don't use /y/ but I got linked to a Trap Link thread there and it seemed just the same as the /d/ ones (and /aco/ ones, for that matter), so while I don't nessiccarily want to see trap threads removed, if they are/were making a problem they should be moved to /y/.

>>7531991
>>7531987
i have to disagree, when ever I've been in a /y/ trap thread the "traps" are much more masculine than the ones here, and if they aren't the same sort of morons that post the "masculine traps should be the only traps" shit here pop up, yet they gain more traction because people actually agree with them and they derail the thread.

>>7531987
That's also a pretty good solution and I wouldn't complain. Personally, I don't like vanilla gay so I don't go to /y/. If it was less vanilla then I would go there but I am stuck here basically. Also, I wish there were less fucking women on the board.

>>7531987
there is a lot threads that cross over to /h/ teritory too though, like I have seen brainwash threads both and /h/, yet people don't complain and say "go back to /h/ u brainwash fags", to me it's the same deal, maybe there is some over lap, but if you don't care about /h/ overlap then why the fuck would you care about /y/ overlap? I can tell you why, but I don't want to start that shitstorm even though it's true.

Okay but why the fuck are pic below you threads allowed but erotic fiction isn't. I'm not even an /efg/ guy I'm just baffled by how low quality circlejerk threads like that survive the purge but links to off-site oc doesn't?

>>7532015
this, also, if you want to made a general, themeless, /d/ thread, then fucking make it, people used to in the past, you don't need some fucking stupid /b/ like excuse like "u must fap to next pic" or "pic below is u"

>>7532010
Hey man I don't want overlap and I love dick (except futa which is an abomination).

>>7532024
0/10, would not be trolled again.

>>7532027
Man, I just hate women in all forms and futa are just women with dicks. Don't read too far into it. But that's why I want /y/ to not be fucking shit and in order to do that, it needs more allowed content.

>>7532023
Also, I might add, I'm baffled as to why they want to put a stop to pic threads that are also conversation threads NOW, I mean isn't it too late for this "/d/ isn't a community, it's just for pictures" that hasn't been true for years, and to force it now is just pigheaded, things evolve, why not just let them rather than forcing some dumb idea of the way things SHOULD be. I mean I understand getting rid of low quality captions, but this is a community, it has been for ages, to be like "no more chatting, pics only" is just idiotic. Shouldn't they adapt to what the majority of the people on the board want, rather than some out dated image of what the board should be?

>>7532029
maybe bring this up in /y/'s meta thread instead instead of whining in a board where it has no relevance?

>>7532034
>>7532029
also, you whining about futa and saying it shouldn't be allowed just because you want to turn this into /y/ is just dumb and is a pretty good demonstration of the idiots that whine about futa and why they should be ignored, thanks.

>>7532034
It does have relevance since I can post gay on /d/ and I can only post vanilla shit on /y/ which makes this the board for this conversation particularly since I am discussing why the fuck isn't trap banned. And we already had equally retarded arguments about furries versus monster girls and fucking captions.

Maybe ignore me?

>>7532035
You misunderstand. I want futa to be posted here and everything else that's gay to be on /y/. I want to ban gay /d/ and traps.

>>7532040
you realize that there is a search function right? that you can just search for a thread with having to see any evil "non-gay" thread that might make your delicate gay only senses tingle, right? this is what most people only looking for certain things do, why can't you?

>>7532040
>>7532046
also, I might point out that previously you said that /d/ needs less girls. Also, at least in /d/, there is a an overlap between people that sees it as a gay thing, and people that are straight that like it because they look like girls but have penises, why make some dumb distinction that you can only enjoy x thing if you hardu gay.

File: tumblr_o52xr2Bo3Q1uahauso1_1280.jpg (477KB, 1200x960px) Image search: [Google]

477KB, 1200x960px

>>7532046
Bru. Why do you want gay stuff to stay on this board? I thought it would be better for everyone if we can keep straight straight and gay gay like Jesus intended.

>>7532052
this board is about grey lines, the things inbetween, the things that aren't clearly x and y, it always have been, it always will be, it's why the board was created, get over it.

File: 1223330.jpg (49KB, 392x549px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 392x549px

>>7532057
Okay so I can post bara porn wherever I fucking want then right?

>>7532058
Sure, if it's alternative bara porn. The image you posted where homie was getting fucked by monsters is good. Regular gay shit should be taken to /y/

File: satsudorse.png (519KB, 1400x1100px) Image search: [Google]

519KB, 1400x1100px

I think we need more dorse in this board

>>7532058
no, becuase that isn't /d/, if on the other hand said bara had bondage or tentacles or they are cross dressed, or what have you, go ahead and be my guest.

File: tumblr_nc6mekXmxn1rhhffho1_500.jpg (152KB, 500x577px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 500x577px

>>7532060
You know what man, I disagree with you but I'm pretty anal about categorization anyway. You're really consistent and I appreciate that. Sorry for getting heated.

>>7532062
I'm guessing dorse is that elongated face thing, why used to have threads for that all the time, there is nothing stopping you from making one. The supposed "not enough x" thing is only being created by users not willing to make threads for it.

>>7532074
God damnit! You're right.

>>7531997
>>7532010
I don't frequent y so idk what the climate is like there, I do agree that there is some overlap that could return to h as well

>>7532084
you really think brainwash stuff is somehow not ok for /d/? are you serious?

>>7532092
I'm not the one that listed fetishes
/d/ is the place for alt stuff, if it's not accepted on h, sure, if it is, I honestly still couldn't give a damn if there's a thread now and then, I just thought we were talking about categorization here, stuff with more ideal homes might do better elsewhere, either way I'll keep rocking that hide thread button like I always have

Make fart threads bannable. They are not only stealth scat threads but the absolute lowest state this site has ever achieved. The people in them belong on Gurochan or in a fucking gutter somewhere.

File: 632912.png (808KB, 1024x759px) Image search: [Google]

808KB, 1024x759px

>>7532202
I like farts though.

>>7532202
bbuut they're high quality, anon!

File: ding dong ur opinion is wrong.png (97KB, 500x520px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 500x520px

>>7532202

>>7532246
>Putting text on an image is lower quality than taking an image of an anime ass and photoshoping a green cloud over it
Classic illiterate mods.

>>7532286
except there are no photoshops in the fart thread

>>7532291
I'm using photoshop as shorthand. Doesn't matter if it's done in photoshop or if they do it by hand, it's still just covering the picture in green tint which is low-quality as fuck.

>>7531500
>>7531519

mods on /d/ have traditionally use face shape as the standard for whether something is or is not furry (while not applying anything to reptiles and insects).

whenever people are done insulting a fetish because /b/ told them its bad, it doesn't matter that its not allowed as content here, the sperging out still violates the board's civility rules.

>>7532317
There are no edits

>>7532291
Yes there are
This is a fetish so fucking garbage that the best the people who suffer from it can do is take anime ass pictures and scribble green clouds in MSPaint onto them

>>7531868
They're trying to but even hitler had a justification for his shit.

>>7532476
We did that already two threads ago.

>>7532210
>is allowed
>>7532476
>is not

I think we've reached peak insanity here

File: 14 (1).jpg (281KB, 1075x1504px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 1075x1504px

I like /d/orses

File: team_skull_ganging_up_on_moon_by_lazei-daya8ji.jpg (121KB, 900x561px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 900x561px

I like farts

>>7532510
I will be waiting. In the meantime, check out the new games thread I created >>7532466
I'm sure everyone (especially the mods) will appreciate the initiative I've taken to uphold the communities standards on "high quality content"

>>7532506
I honestly don't get why you think fucking captions are the sign of the end-times. Just post them on reddit.

>>7531873
>milking a stone
Pretty sure if anyone can do that, it's /d/

>>7532522
You're damned straight

>>7532522
Not this time, unless one of you fags stop being doormats and find and kill a couple mods. As /mlp/ and /co/ have shown, killers get their way

File: 38816c94493495571ffc4d16456606c7.jpg (697KB, 1000x1200px) Image search: [Google]

697KB, 1000x1200px

Very sorry if this has been previously mentioned, but under these new rules are /d/-style tutorial images banned? I'm assuming they are and I'm fine with that, but just want to be sure.

>>7531499
so if the horse has a human upper half for its head but your still fucking a horse pussy that is somehow different than fucking a horse? You /d/ morons and your logic are retarded. Monster girls are just animook furry. You just hate to admit it so you spazz out at furries.

File: e6b55480d431cf50a172186f582389e3fd9339086171c8f058d87350fc7d855f.jpg (212KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1000x1000px

>>7532714
If the horse is actually a penis with something shoved up it's ass, is it still masturbation fuel?

>D-horses are allowed
>Farts are still allowed
>Blueberries are still allowed
>Captions and all written smut is "low quality"


the mods should just come out and say they want to go full anPrim and that words make them cry because the quality argument doesn't make a lick of sense

File: skeleton.png (297KB, 393x309px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 393x309px

>>7531543
50% is still mostly humanoid and looks like she could still have a backbone

70% is enough of an insect that a human skeleton wouldn't fit inside

File: tumblr_o12xhqLBpr1rlqloxo1_1280.png (939KB, 653x857px) Image search: [Google]

939KB, 653x857px

>>7532714
How does this picture make you feel?

>>7532742
The mods didn't ban written porn. They banned threads made just for written porn. I bet you could go into a relevant thread, post an image and a link to smut and it'd be fine. Read the sticky better.

>>7532948
that's clearly a warframe

and yes, they did

>>7533073
But is it furry?

And no, they didn't. They banned captions and censor threads and they moved the writefag thread to trash (where it belongs) but they did not ban writing. If they did then we wouldn't have the globalized fetish thread still active which is literally just poorly written smut.

Fucking mods. Captions are the reason why I even came to /d/ in the first place.

>>7531856
That's really too bad, her early work was pretty good.

>>7532507
I don't know why but every time I see a picture featuring some fart fetish, I can't hold back my laughter. Don't get me wrong though, I get the whole domination aspect behind it. I just can't stop laughing whenever I see it, almost as if it were some YLYL thread.

Anyone else in the same boat, by any chance ?

File: c24c886693698de6f9d002e717f81947.jpg (66KB, 518x439px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 518x439px

>>7533083
Yeah, why couldn't there just be a universal ban on low quality stuff instead of laying the blame with caption threads ?

How about we impose some norms concerning the quality of images instead, wouldn't that be a more effective strategy ?

Ban dorse from /d/, it's infecting the dgg threads.

>>7533104
like what? images having at least some minor shading?

>>7533104
Seriously you fuckers are complaining about not being allowed to post poorly written erotica full of typos and shit when 'legitimate' OC (writefags, cyoa, erp) went with relatively little complaint.

You aren't special just because your put pictures on your shit. Go to /trash/.

>>7533142
90% of them was shit but 90% of everything is shit including /d/ in general

me personally, I just dislike a rule that amounts to 'whatever a moderator doesn't like is banned' because it's a pretty shit standard

but whatever, I'm sure I'll be told something about CLARIFYING RULES next, these threads haven't been going around in circles or anything

>>7533142
>Seriously you fuckers are complaining about >not being allowed to post poorly written erotica >full of typos and shit when 'legitimate' OC >(writefags, cyoa, erp) went with relatively little complaint.

>You aren't special just because your put >pictures on your shit. Go to /trash/.
>You aren't special just because your put >pictures on your shit. Go to /trash/.

*(You aren't special just because YOU put pictures on your shit. Go to /trash/.)

I mean I'm not criticizing your point but when taking a stance against poor grammar, you would do well to at least check yours.

>>7533119

File: fuckingdorse.jpg (160KB, 1000x835px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 1000x835px

>Bans CYOA, writefags and captions
>doesn't ban dorse
>mfw

>>7533119

Welcome to 4chan. Enjoy your side of trolling with every dish.

>>7533164
I don't care about the grammar in people's posts but you should proofread 'oc' before you post it in order to maintain some standard of quality. Also, caption posts weren't staying in caption threads and were being made constantly anywhere. There are still captions right now in the godawful trapformation thread. There was a period of time where the mind control thread was fifty percent captions and when people didn't like that, they made a separate spin-off to post just mind control captions.

>>7533147
There's no reason guro and scat should be banned except for the fact that the mods don't like it. This is the entire premise of the board.

>>7533198
^Correction. Caption posts weren't staying in captions threads. They were constantly being posted in irrelevant threads.

>>7531841
She so admitted people like the caption?

What made caption threads unwelcome? They were one of the first threads i looked for.

>>7533198
>There's no reason guro and scat should be banned except for the fact that the mods don't like it. This is the entire premise of the board.
Guro and scat have always been banned. The reason why they are banned is because the ratio of users who really don't want to see it to the ratio of users who do is not high enough to justify allowing it. Can the same be said of writefaggotry? Of captions? Of quests?

Here's something that may or may not be board related, as I only started having this problem recently after putting in my two cents worth on the meta thread.

Try to post a message, get banned message. Check to see what earned me a hammer to the face, and it says I'm NOT banned. Is anyone else here having this problem?

File: furshit in d.png (121KB, 663x542px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 663x542px

Yo mods, you missed these two in the monstergirl thread. Thankfully the guy isn't back

>>7533256
Holy shit, I finally got through.

>>7533119
Aren't dgg threads more banworthy than dorses?

>>7533257
The only good thing that came from Undertale fans was music covers.

>>7533256
Mods on /d/ are just dicks now. Not even worth arguing anything anymore. Your 2 cents? They don't care even if it was your 2 million dollars. They just want /d/ to die.

>>7532742
As we have all concluded mod can't into english and thus therefore ban them on sight.

File: 1466354019923 (1).png (216KB, 600x744px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 600x744px

is this ok?

File: Sakimichan-artist-Porn-Art--3450094.png (1MB, 811x1055px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 811x1055px

is this your card?

>>7533270
Well, since it has almost no words on it, pretty much. They couldn't give a rats ass about actual quality of the art or whether it belongs here in the first place to begin with.

>>7533246
There was a poll taken earlier where the majority of users wanted all of that stuff banned. If we're going to determine what gets banned based off what users then this is what happens. /d/ started off banning scat and guro and so there is already a precedent for banning shit that people don't like.

Whew, now this is a divisive thread, now isn't it? It seems you're all more focused on getting things you don't like banned out of spite than actually fixing any problems with /d/.

>>7533198
Ok, to be honest knowing the actual reason behind the measure puts it in a lot more perspective. Still a bit of a shame, in my opinion.

File: V0t5tCC.png (150KB, 1900x536px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 1900x536px

>>7533278
You mean the one the mods sabotaged because they could? Stop acting like you care, you clearly don't either.

File: Bear_and_Bunny.png (791KB, 640x800px) Image search: [Google]

791KB, 640x800px

is that your card?

File: scaleshit on d.png (405KB, 1687x699px) Image search: [Google]

405KB, 1687x699px

>>7533257
Who am I kidding. Hardly matters when they let blatant scaleshit stay. Reported this about a week ago.

File: DEewNSjVoAAzZ5b.jpg (96KB, 1145x632px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 1145x632px

Given Hiroshimoot's recent twitter replies, he doesn't care either, and I should probably stop reporting things here too

Keep crying, captionwhores. That only makes it so much sweeter.

>>7533267
I'm not trying to imply or blame the mods(shocker I know), I'm trying to figure out if anyone else is having trouble like I am and if it's a site bug or if it's some kind of bs on my end.

File: 1499040780504.png (335KB, 1600x720px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 1600x720px

>>7533298
Great job on killing /d/ mod-kun. Though it's not good to leave a job half done.

>>7533299
Mods here decided to go on a ban spree couple days ago. Maybe you were a victim? Tweet Hiroshimoot for that.

>>7533134
Just an idea but how about an algorithm that checks pictures based on their color difference in a given area of that picture and then revoking or accepting an image based on the size of the largest chunk of pixels with the same color.

That way you could automatically check if an image has a certain resolution and if someone pasted a black chunk with text next to the picture. That way the only caption images that would be allowed would be either those using a gradient or those that have captions on the pictures themselves (you could even have the algorithm check if the font had a gradient or if it's just plain black text on a pic).

I do know that this solution is probably way overboard as it isn't particularly easy to implement. But it remains a cool concept nonetheless, at least in my opinion.

>>7533294
If you're going to pretend that everything that disagrees with you is rigged then just leave man.

>>7533301
So they have the ability to screw with the site to the point of "lol you're banned but not really?"

I doubt that. I'm not saying it's impossible but that sounds like a lot of work for nothing. I think it might be a site bug. And yes, I submitted to feedback and yes I'm aware the questions answered by mods on feedback are years old.

>>7533283
Would it matter?

>>7533104
>>7533134
>>7533302
Minimum resolution requirements like /w/ and /wg/?

>>7533304
See >>7533300
Plus, it's in the image, the poll was sabotaged and blatantly too, having more votes than actual participants of the discussion. Then again, maybe you're the mod that can't into english that well.

>>7533308
Surprisingly easy, just ban like crazy, and then remove all bans later. Happened in the past

>>7533304
>rigged
>not sabotaged
t. didn't even see the image

>>7533312
Wish I could be a mod then, in that case. If it's truly that easy I could really clean things up around here.

>>7533322
Same, too bad we aren't, and even if we were, the old mods would kick us out the moment we tried to make any sort of changes.

>>7533310
Having a minimum resolution should reduce the problem and it would be considerable easier to implement. So it looks like a good idea, in my opinion.

File: yvtvitktuyvk.png (391KB, 1189x617px) Image search: [Google]

391KB, 1189x617px

>>7533203
Wouldn't that just have needed a simple "captions may not be posted outside caption threads"?

>>7533288
Yeah. I really liked CYOA threads myself even though they weren't that good objectively (non-lewd, typos, low rez images, etc) and I'm sad to see them go but I understand why that happened. It wasn't really an 'imageboard' type of thread.

>>7533310
You know, accusing me of being a mod doesn't make you seem any more right. Furthermore, the amount of people voting and people posting being different is not proof of sabotage. Even if it was, where's the proof that the sabotage was not to get caption threads to stay?

And yes I saw the image in this thread and in a previous thread but doesn't actually prove anything. At most, it proves that lurkers vote in polls which isn't surprising. I answer every poll I come across regardless of whether I posted.

Finally, again I liked the writethreads. I write porn myself. Captions are not deserving of what? Five meta threads now? And at least two threads pretending to be meta but were again about this one particular guy's mommy fetish captions? Dedicated to how upset you snowflakes are at not being allowed to post them on this one particular board.

Post them in /trash. Post them on tumblr. Post them on reddit. Post them on a different 'chan. Post them on deviantart. The CYOA guys did. The writefags did. Some of the drawfags did too. Why can't you?

>>7533324
Great, now unless we can get Hiroshimoot to care, might as well put that in the pile of "ideas to improve board" situated in the trash can.

>>7533325
Yeah probably. I think that would have been a better solution but I'm not a mod and I don't know why they didn't. It might have been stupid it might not have.

I'm not really sure on my opinion on captions being banned but acting like it 1. Came out of nowhere and 2. Is unfair when banning things that people don't like is a /d/ precedent is stupid. And having all these meta threads just for captions is even stupider.

>>7533326
If you can ignore evidence just like that, then I doubt anything can convince you.

>>7533297
How about you only report rulebreaking content? The fuck is wrong with that thread? It's /d/ material, it started with plenty of images so it's not a request, and the images are at least decent quality.
No wonder mods are so slow if they need to wade through dipshits reporting fucking latex threads.

>>7533332
>meta threads for the people that felt wronged
Meta threads on /d/ like this wouldn't exist if there was no problem. /d/ was always a board where everyone minded their own business, and if the mods did that too in this case, there likely would have been no need for all the threads' creation in the first place.

>>7533334
Not mine, like I said, found it on his twitter.

>>7533337
My bad, not his, but a reply to one of his tweets

>>7533327
I think as long as we stay reasonable in our demands, that they are going to be reasonable too. I mean shouldn't implementing the same minimum resolution algorithm found in a different board, be like a "copy-paste" kind of thing ?

>>7533337
>Not mine, like I said, found it on his twitter.
Oh that's what you meant. I thought you were talking about 2 completely different things, Hiro's replies (which I thought you didn't post an example of), and to stop reporting. My bad I guess.

>>7533333
That wasn't evidence man. If you have posts from the discord/irc chat where people admitted it or you can show that most of the votes came from the same IP address or from TOR, I will believe you. I ran a poll earlier and it had more votes then original posters too. It isn't surprising and it isn't proof.

File: DEZ8y8MXUAUCTAX.jpg (174KB, 801x641px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 801x641px

>>7533339
>/d/ mods being reasonable
See >>7533332
Also, see pic related
Also see http://i.imgur.com/ZJyCeur.png since I can't put 2 pics in one post
If any of this looks reasonable to you, be my fucking guest

>>7533343
I already quoted to a post admitting that.

>>7533344
That's not proof that the poll was faked at all. This is a couple of people asking why captions were banned and from the sounds of it, they were never intended to be posted and the mods left them because they were lazy.

>>7533333
HOLY SHIIET DEM SWEET QUINTS

>>7533344
Maybe they didn't know how to solve the problem with low quality content and in a dire state decided to ban caption threads, which explains there avoiding attitude regarding the whole thing. In which case they should have at least some ear to the concept of introducing a minimum resolution algorithm to this board.

File: IMG_20170711_173813.jpg (202KB, 1079x1416px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 1079x1416px

>>7533312
It happened again!

File: Screenshot_2017-07-11-17-37-01.png (182KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1080x1920px

>>7533387

File: 15032094_1859776180975736_652064963240439863_n.png (371KB, 557x960px) Image search: [Google]

371KB, 557x960px

>>7533355
>never intended to be posted
Time for a history lesson, and my last post here for today.
Have you ever questioned why m00t never accepted donations for the site? Even from back in the day, he never applied cashblocks and there was never a donate button while he was around. This was very fundamental to him because the reason he made the site was to get people to create content, away from prejudice, away from societal restrictions, away from social status required behavior. He never made a donation system, he made 4chan passes. These were to encourage people to be more active with posting and to some degree it worked. There are content; stories, images, even entire series of threads, all made with no prejudice and a form of pure expression on the side of the poster. These all have entertainment value. The site was created with focus on OC, that's why /r9k/ was made as well, even if it failed, the rest of the site is a legacy of that.

In this case, captions were a part of that, so was CYOA, efg and censor threads. They were OC created by the userbase, a pure form of self expression, as intended by the original purpose of the site.

Maybe I care too much, maybe you'll say "haha copypasta meme", but even then I put my heartfelt feelings into this post, for a site that has given me much entertainment and is a grand part of what I cherish among things that exist. Maybe I'm just too attached and shouldn't be for this place after all that's occurred, the reddit invasion, the edgy kids in porn boards, the new owner who'd rather shitpost on twitter than give half a shit.

Guess maybe I just care for once.

>>7533387
I've never seen that, weird.

in b4 I start getting banned for 30 seconds at a time

>>7533366
I'd really have appreciated the min res thing during the days of caption threads. There was always this girl (or guy that wanted to be one) asking for captions. The problem was the images he or she gave were too low res for my standards. I still did one because the image held an interesting premise and I could think towards it in more than just sexual ways, but yeah, min res reqs please. Maybe then the shits in the futa balls thread that think posting thumbnails is funny will also get their just desserts.

>>7533391
Don't forget Voice threads. They had some stellar content among alot of the stuff in there.

>>7533387
>Mobile
Good chance you're picking up bans from other people.

>>7533391
I actually thought that was beautiful, anon.

We should remember how important places like 4ch are to human creativity as well as artistic freedom, even while we use them to bash people who tug their dicks to stuff we don't as faggots.

Bad art still deserves to exist.

>>7533391
>Guess maybe I just care for once.
going on for multiple posts/paragraphs how they don't care is some people's fetish, don't sweat it anon.

I agree with you for whatever it's worth. This shit's pretty sad.

>>7533391
totally agree, man

>>7533403
Seriously? Dammit, if it's not one thing it's another. I mean, I've gotten other people's bans before, but whenever I went to verify it that's how I knew something had fucked up.

And that one was someone screeching for a "barneyfag" to die.

>>7533391
You honestly have replied to all of these posts and haven't figured out yet that I write yet? Part of why I hate captions is because they're relying on someone else's work to be passable. Not only that but I liked CYOA threads and I appreciated writethreads and voicethreads. Even though I also think that they were incredibly low quality.

But conspiracy theories about rigged polls and users being mods, about acting like somehow this is different than banning guro/scat or all the suggestions of this board to ban the d-horses or the monster girls or whatever else, posting captions to inconvenience the mods, acting like this is a pure form of expression that can't be had anywhere else? It's pure melodrama.

You have a right to care about the captions and I have a right to care more about the rules than I do your feelings. The moderators also have a right to ban content that they think is damaging the site even if you disagree. You can come to terms with that or you can go to tumblr.

>>7531527
difference is in the limbs, four arms, and they're structured differently.

>>7533441
>The moderators also have a right to ban content that they think is damaging the site even if you disagree
Not him. But a funny thing about the rules if you actually read them is that they kinda works as a big red button. They can ban you for anything. And they don't have to give you or anyone else a reason. And if you take the rules literally, reaction pics are against the rules.
That's not a for or an against for your point but I feel it's a kinda funny thing about the rules on 4chan.

>>7533449
Well then you could go to a different site. I would.

>>7533458
I would but reddit and tumblr is shit so I guess I'm stuck here.

>>7533458
Why don't you suggest another site and also provide evidence that it welcomes the same kind of content. the only site that offer even close to that is F-List. But the Voice threads are still alone.

>>7533441
>Part of why I hate captions
Nobody cares.
Not only that but I liked CYOA threads and I appreciated writethreads and voicethreads.
Nobody cares!
>Even though I also think that they were incredibly low quality.
NOBODY CARES.

The very fact that we've gone like 5,000 posts into metathread after metathread is proof that everyone cares about the availability of their fap material, and they don't care if you or a mod dislikes it.

>You have a right to care about the captions and I have a right to care more about the rules than I do your feelings.
Wrong. You have no rights here. I have no rights here.
>The moderators also have a right to ban content that they think is damaging the site even if you disagree.
WRONG. Mod power is unlimited here, and because it was used so carelessly and ignorantly, site users are using every means they have to address it: feedback, metathreads, contacting mods directly, shitposting, tweeting nipmoot.

And what do the users have to show for it? Mods constantly dodging issues, dragnetting multiple communities into what was originally just an unspoken caption crackdown, shitposters galore, and the prospect of more metathreads and further community breakdown.

All because one mod couldn't get a grip.

>>7533475
>You have no rights here and I have no rights here. >Mod power is unlimited here and because it was used so carelessly and ignorantly.
This isn't about rights on the site and if you could read, you'd know that. Besides that, this isn't your site. If you want to control the rules for something, make your own. After all, you don't have any rights here.

>Everyone cares about the availability of their fap material
If you care about availability then I want to see you argue for scat and guro too.

>>7533471
I'm going to tumblr. You can too or deviantart or reddit or one of the chan spinoffs. Or make your own community. If you want more information than that, find it for yourself because I'm not Google or your mother.

>>7533513
>comparing communities banned for a literal decade or more with communities that were sorta kinda maybe a little disapproved of in an unspoken manner for a year or two until a mod went apeshit

I think the one being an obtuse fool here is you.

>>7533528
I'm comparing them because this is a precedent. You don't really care about mod power, you care about things you like being taken away. Right? You can't say this is a site for free expression and that the mods don't have a right to ban things that parts of the userbase dislike and then say that there was a right to ban those things in the beginning. It's hypocritical and its showing that it's not about the mods, it's about the captions.

>>7531478
Why the fuck did the mods decide that cyoa threads had to go? They were comfy as fuck, had a good community in them (pretty sure most regulars know tokhaar), and had mostly good content overall.

File: Meal_045.jpg (403KB, 1126x1600px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 1126x1600px

>>7533529
I care both about mod power and about the things I like being taken away. The issues in this case are intertwined. If the mods weren't thoughtless in their blanket ban, one would suppose not so many people would be posting in these metathreads, including myself. It's like saying "You don't really care about reuniting the country, you just care about freeing the slaves! Hypocrite!" No, I care about both, and the issues are side by side.

As for the perennially banned scat and guro (and furries), one would assume there was an overwhelming user backlash that got them shitcanned in the first place. Moot didn't one day say "yuck, no thanks, fuck off guys ;)", it was bunch of discontented users (hmm, where have we seen this before?) saying "get this literal shit out of our board, moot!" And moot did so.

Where is the overwhelming user backlash to captions, CYOA, writethreads, voice threads, and censor threads? Where are the overwhelming majority of users who are completely repulsed on a visceral level by this content?

Oh, that's right. They don't exist. Overwhelming user feedback only began once a mod starting fucking shit up.

>>7533554
The. Poll. I don't care if it was taken before or after, it's still proof that several users didn't want those threads. People being nice to you doesn't mean they actually like you. And there was backlash to the captions threads when they got posted anywhere but specific caption threads. There was also backlash to making separate threads of captions instead of a caption general.

More importantly, the reason why captions and the censorship shit were banned != the reason why writethreads were banned. Writethreads were banned for not posting enough images along with the CYOA and voicethreads. Captions were banned for being low quality.

If you don't like it, fucking leave.

>>7533539
I agree, but tokaar has popped up in the cyoa refuge thread in /trash/

>>7533564
Everything but dorse and blueberry threads should be banned. If you don't like it, fucking leave

File: b8.png (13KB, 308x293px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 308x293px

>>7533573
>b8 troll detected

File: 23 (1).jpg (214KB, 1075x1504px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 1075x1504px

>>7533564
Game threads post little to know hentai images....but now they are being run by the dorse :3

>>7533554
This is all escaping the point anyway.

There was a reason for banning the caption threads and the other ones. You can not like that reason but you can't pretend it doesn't exist when an anon posted screenshots earlier about the IRC where a mod that isn't identified as the mod that hates captions says that they were supposed to be banned a while ago.

Taking advantage of lazy reporting/janitoring/mods is why these threads were ever a thing in the first place.

>>7533576
Under these rules, game threads should also be banned and I am unsure why they are not. Lack of reporting? Not as prominent as the other ones? I don't know. Again, not a moderator.

>>7533397
For what it's worth, I posted in /feedback/ to request a minimum resolution feature to circumvent the problem with low quality without removing caption threads. We'll see how it goes through.

The one and only major problem with /d/ is and always has been moderators fucking with it to ban things that much of the community enjoys.

Yes, furry gets to be banned because they have like 500 other places for their fetish and because fuck them. That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the attempt to banish all "western" art to /aco/ (in many cases like 80% of what a particular fetish has to offer, and all but the most autistic of us are here for fetishes rather than art styles), and the recent ban on all the text content (a.k.a. "the good content that is the reason I even come here"). This is the one and only reasonably active and inclusive place for all the weird shit you don't get elsewhere, and inflicting some arbitrary set of restrictions on what it should and shouldn't be does the community a disservice.

>>7533513
>Besides that, this isn't your site
This isn't the mod team's site either, but they act like it is. Your point?

>>7533595
I still think "Shortstacks are a western fetish" is the funniest goddamn thing I've ever read, honestly.

>>7533564
So now that we've agreed that the mods retroactively instated a rule that never existed in the first place just so they could cover their asses (not enough images! /d/ is an imageboard after all!), can we agree that the mods aren't perfect and that criticism of them should be encouraged when they screw up?

>>7533595
the creation of /aco/ really backed /d/ into a corner. Oh well. See you guys on the other boards

>>7533610
It was really more the mod team deciding that people asking for a western /h/ meant that they were actually asking for a western /h/, /e/, /d/, /u/, /y/, and whatever else all crammed into one board.

>>7533607
Well I don't think the moderators screwed up and they didn't 'retroactively' instate a rule. Lazy moderators not doing their job and then suddenly doing it isn't the same thing. The text rule is a new rule that I have repeatedly said that I don't agree with but understand.

You can criticize the mods and I can criticize your criticism. Meta threads aren't your safe spaces and neither is 4chan.

>>7533603
My point is that 4chan is a right not a privilege. If you don't like what's happening, leave instead of expecting the moderators to bend to your whims.

>>7531527
50% is just a human in a green suit of armor.

>>7533671
> leave instead of expecting the moderators to bend to your whims.
I don't actually have to, since there's other boards on the site that I use and aren't shitfucked six ways to sunday every half a year. Really amazing how apparently the same people who mod other boards that, while no board here is truly well moderated for reasons bot valid and invalid, at least aren't degraded by the mod actions are the same team that treats this place like a backwoods hillbilly zoo. Just show up every so often, throw some rancid meat in, and laugh while everyone argues if it's bad that they only get rancid meat or if it's good that they get meat at all.

>>7533671
>Well I don't think the moderators screwed up ... Lazy moderators not doing their job
You heard it here folks, people not doing their job isn't screwing up.

>>7533708
If this is what doing their jobs looks like, I for one think they should be as lazy and ineffective as possible.

>>7533708
I'm glad that we agree that we're both happy that the moderators started to do their job by banning low quality threads that were never supposed to be a thing.

>>7533707
If they really didn't want this board on, they'd just deleted it you know.

>>7533788
>I'm glad that we agree that we're both happy that the moderators started to do their job by banning low quality threads that were never supposed to be a thing.
You mean like /d/orse threads, beastiality threads, and other threads banned by the rules? Or the off target stuff like NTR (which is allowed on /h/ and belongs there), the butthole thread (which can be on both /h/ and /y/ and isn't deviant in the slightest) or Traps (which are /y/ and belong there)? Or the low quality transformation threads (which, though I like the fetish, are always filled with the same proto-deviantart shit colored in with actual fucking markers), fart threads, blueberry threads, and those Nazi threads which the mod has all but given up on deleting?
Yeah, they sure are starting to do their job by instead deleting stuff that isn't listed in any rulebook besides the one the mod keeps behind the counter where nobody can see it (or may not even exist) AND aren't hurting anything by existing. Good thing two wrongs make a right!

>>7533788
>If they really didn't want this board on, they'd just deleted it you know.
I've been told the adult boards pull in decent ad revenue for Hiro, so it's probably that the mods want to get rid of it so they don't have the hassle of modding it but they know if they do then Hiro will actually start to give a shit because part of his money is missing. So instead they'll just run people off in waves so that it looks like the board had a natural decrease in usage, reached the end of it's lifespan, and can be deleted without any such complications.

File: just-to-suffer-why-are-we-still-here-4088483.png (75KB, 500x307px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 500x307px

>>7533788
>>7533829
They can't. There is actually a revenue stream here. Whether for ads or people wanting to buy jewpasses, boards like this get money. Hell, one of the main reasons for people to get a jewpass is to imagedump in boards like this. The mods simply CANNOT get rid of /d/ because it is probably one of the more active porn boards. If they change the level of activity, by the next year, they'll probably have a reason to delete /d/ and get rid of this place. So far, they've been doing a dang good job at that.
They ban all western art, decent or not, eastern styled or not, and send them to /aco/ only to ignore them now and they ignored the thriving caption community only to acknowledge and ban them when they started having decent traffic.

They also let shit like >>7533257 and >>7533296 slide. So anyone that tells you the mods are doing their job, doesn't know jack shit.

How about putting something about request threads in the sticky?
Requests are everywhere lately.

>>7534328
The sticky isn't a substitute for the rules, it's just a clarification because some people wanted it.

>>7534393
Literally nobody did. At this point, while furshit, scaleshit and westshit is left untouched by mods, the sticky is the only REAL set of rules for the board.

>>7534422
>Literally nobody did.
It was literally the only reason people were freaking out in the beginning. They just shifted when the explanation didn't suit them. You're an idiot.

>>7534607
>Everyone was freaking out anyway dipshit.
That's literally what I said.

Ban fart threads.

>>7535394
This.

>>7535394
Diaper threads need to go too

>>7535706
Diaper is just scat in disguise

>>7533529
>making a slippery slope argument that literally ends in scat

>>7533564
>treating an anonymous straw poll like it has any sort of representative validity
>acting like disrupting informal norms with arbitrarily sudden and rigid enforcement of formal rules is something people will just be okay with

Mysides.jpg

>>7533564
>the poll
You mean the one that has been proven to be sabotaged?