bonus points for powerful ladies brought low
>>7105883
Adorable. Cheerful submission is the best.
>>7105890
Absolutely agreed
>>7105953
The bow where they have their clothes neatly stacked next to them is the best bow.
>>7105954
>>7105954
I don't know the origin, but the fact that she's shaking and her clothes include a crown makes it ten times better.
Lucy from Fairy Tail.
>>7106458
Erza from Fairy Tail.
>>7106459
Wendy from Fairy Tail.
>>7106488
Hanauna does a lot of these actually.
Personal favourite.
>>7106527
>>7106529
another favourite
https://exhentai.org/g/870067/b3279edda1/
Any Final Fantasy/RPG girls bowing low?
>>7106534
>>7106538
>>7106539
Man, those hexagons give me a craving for civ 5.
>>7106547
>Any Final Fantasy/RPG girls bowing low?
https://exhentai.org/g/387730/b80f895e98/
>>7106547
>>7106581
https://exhentai.org/g/949338/51c6d501c2/
>>7106588
>>7106589
are you pathetic lot the same people who fap to ryona?
>>7106594
...guilty as charged, but that is that and this is something else.
>>7106594
Never heard of her.
>>7106594
>>>/reddit/
Go home.
>>7106542
>dogeza23.jpg
You got more, anon?
>>7106314
Sauce?
>>7105964
>not posting what happens next
>>7106522
>>7106504
>Tatsuta in submission
Makes me crazy
Bumpeb
>>7107318
Sure.
I wouldn't pay attention to the filenames though, I have them auto generated as a script for easy posting.
>>7109384
*by a script
This one might be a boy.
Sorry if I make you gay.
>>7109385
This is so much more satisfying when they're shown being arrogant and willful before submitting.
>>7109412
What about smug?
>>7109464
bit monotonous
>>7109479
The hanging might make people butthurt
>>7110370
I don't see why, it's largely painless when done right.
To the the guy posting the numbered pics, could you upload them all in a rar somewhere?
>>7106594
If you don't enjoy the thought of a girl cowering and trembling before you, you're not straight.
>>7105890
I'm a lesbian and this pic made me admit this is actually a strong fetish for me. I'm not sure exactly why, since I'm not necessarily sexually attracted to guys, but the idea of a man specifically treating me like that is strangely arousing. I don't have a foot fetish and actually find feet pretty gross, but I am a masochist so it's not like it's that much of a mystery I guess.
I have a small folder full of stuff like that, sadly mostly not relevant as it doesn't have people bowing per se. Hope this counts.
>>7105953
Any one have an idea what she's saying?
>>7111760
Khorne?
>>7113162
What the...?
Have some canon dogeza.
>>7112740
Cobb?
>>7113903
They're game related terms.
>>7109586
Do anon prefer resentful dogeza like this, or a more broken look?
>>7117060
Depends what you mean by "broken".
Fear is the best.
bampu~
>>7111475
I'll do it later. I would have kept dumping (goes up to 92) but I got banned for one of the pics.
>>7106542
Is that Esdeath?
>>7119013
Thanks, mang!
>but I got banned for one of the pics
Pourquoi?
I'm surprised at how cute this fetish is
>>7119909
Well, depending on their demeanour, it can be cute or delightfully misogynistic.
>>7120815
source?
>>7121153
>source?
[DL Mate] Onna ga Hirefusu Inrou wo Te ni Ireta
>>7122264
appreciated
>>7111760
The heart wants what the heart wants. No shame in that.
>>7111736
This, desu senpai
>>7111760
Women have been the traditionally submissive gender since the dawn of time. They're hardwired to the point that probably something like 90% of them feel that way toward men to at least some extent, and only in the past 50 yearsish have attitudes regarding that started to change. We've still got a very very long way to go before we're capable of overriding thousands if not millions of years of biological programming. Assuming that ever even happens, but given the weird and chaotic nature of evolution I wouldn't rule it out happening at some point.
It's why the BDSM community is overwhelmingly M/f. I've talked to my share of dommes about this subject and most of them admit they've given some thought about what life is like on the other side. Usually they've tried it before or are open to doing it at least once or occasionally.
>>7124166
>and only in the past 50 yearsish have attitudes regarding that started to change
I wonder (((why)))?
>>7124166
And admittedly as a submissive male I have dominant thoughts myself a fair amount though I wouldn't consider myself a switch, and on one occasion dom'd a domme at her request. I'll admit I enjoyed it, but it's not something I'd do regularly. And of course I'll freely admit the pictures in this thread of women bowing to men are titillating, hence why I'm in here. As a man I'm programmed to enjoy seeing women prostrate themselves before me.
Conversely I've had that same conversation with male doms and female submissives. Very few said they've given any thought to the other side or would like to try it.
There's no shame in what you're feeling. Sometimes you just can't fight nature no matter how hard you try. Not that I'm suggesting you go and bow before a man if you don't want to, just that there's no harm in thinking about it or getting aroused by it. It's in your blood.
>>7124171
yes, I wonder (((who))) can be behind it
>>7115132
fairy tale?
>>7124231
Yep.
>>7109393
wtf i'm gay now
>>7124166
Except that isn't true at all. There is no submissive biological programming, in fact most anthropologists agree that before agriculture matriarchal societies where a lot more common, since the women brought in the more reliable food source. It was only with the advent of agriculture that women became baby machines.
Women being submissive is not inherent, its a social construct.
>>7106459
Wow, that pair of tits has hair
>>7129263
>in fact most anthropologists agree
*most 19th century anthropologists and 1970s feminists agree
t. anthropologist
>>7129263
>>>/tumblr/
>>>/reddit/
>>>/suicide/
You don't belong here.
All shitposting aside, women are inferior to men in every single way other than their core maternal functions.
>>7130850
ofc, testosterone and estrogen and other hormones have absolutely zero effect on beahviour, brain activity, brain developement, or anything else that directly effects personality or function. same with female physical features, all just social construct, when will men stop bullying women into being shorter than trhem? #ImWithHer #SocialEquality #EqualLifeEqualHeight #ScienceISracist
>>7130869
I said none of those things. Biology does have an effect; I should know, I'm fucking trans. I'd be the last to say biology does nothing. But the thought that certain roles are innate was disproven by the actual kind of researchers who, unlike you, have expertise in this stuff. You aren't smarter or more knowledgeable than they are. Not all of this stuff is necessarily all socially constructed, but it's certainly socially mediated, and your biological determinism is grade-school bullshit compared with actual research. So... shut the fuck up.
Oh, and your ironic hashtags make you look like a fucking moron.
>>7130861
You're an idiot.
POST.
FUCKING.
PORN.
>>7130974
Why don't you post porn yourself, instead of filling this thread with your feminine drivel?
>>7130861
>All shitposting aside, I'm a shitposter
>>7130850
>>7130974
>Post porn
Even though it triggers you? Back to tumblr with you.
>>7131017
>feminine drivel?
Nothing wrong with being feminine. This tumblrina however, is being feminist, and needs to go back.
>>7131023
He's right, though.
>>7131017
Because I came to this fucking thread to collect this specific type of image, of which I have none other than what was posted in this thread, you intransigent fuckweasel. If I had content, don't you think I'd be posting it? I'll happily fill other things with feminine drivel, though. You can start that up by sucking my dick.
>>7131148
I like this genre of porn, you unbelievable fucking moron. I wouldn't be in this thread if I didn't want to save almost every pic. And I've never been to Tumblr, so you can save your dumbass shit about that.
Being a feminist and liking D/s porn aren't incompatible, you obstreperous fucking nimrods. How the fuck is there only one of us here who wants to get off to subby women without having to hear all manner of scientifically illiterate regressive garbage from overly-sensitive whiny jizzrags with grade-school educations and insect-level intelligence?
>>7131149
He's not, though. But good effort nonetheless.
>>7131929
Even shitty women had a good chance of passing on their genes and being subsidized by a man, hence they have not undergone the same evolutionary pressures males of the species have.
Consequently, they are poorly optimized and maladaptive in many ways.
>>7131938
Then how does that explain you? Were your male ancestors as shitty and maladapted as you?
Fuck, I hate teenagers who think they understand evolutionary biology better than experts. Just fap quietly, can't you?
>>7131947
Typical overemotional response of a woman.
>>7131929
>reddit spacing
My sides.
>IRL women
not even once guys
>>7130869
Testosterone also encourages us to be more competitive wage slaves for our supervisors. Testosterone also limits the formation of inter-hemispheric brain connections. Estrogen grants minimal body hair
Phenotype is genotype + environment; there's no right or wrong personality, no best or worst combination of hornones. As culture and environment change with the ebb and flow of history, our physiological foundation will produce different outcomes.
>>7131938
This is pure conjecture. Besides, if men wanted women to be better optimized, maybe they shouldn't have spent so many years training them to see themselves as subservient and lesser.
I don't understand why these (ostensibly) lonely, resentful young men come to espouse these views. They're not true, they won't make you feel better, and they won't help you get laid either (which is usually what all the invective boils down to anyway). In fact, I find that these views tend to assert more traditional gender roles, and that actually means less sex for everyone since women are told to close their legs more, lest they be seen as sluts.
Here's a newsflash for every virgin dude buying into this garbage: the more you try to police female sexuality, the worse your chances are of getting laid.
Ironically men are genetically inferior to women they have a much higher chance of being born with physical and metal disabilities. When a female's egg get fertilized the most of the time it becomes male embryos dies off easy son under normal conditions she will birth the same amount of males a females. Under bad conditions like the woman isn't in the beast of heath like illness or living under horrible conditions she will have more female children. it's better to put the energy in a girl that has a more of a grantee of passing on her genes if weak due to the mothers health, then a weaker boy that has to compete more to have children and had a higher risk of dying.
Because of this I like to think a women with a submissive life style like a slave or a pet or just a sex toy will naturally give birth to more female children. This mean more females that can be made/trained to be submissive.
>>7133480
Also I do have this fantasy about a world where a group of females have this belief kind of like their religion that women are perfect and because of this god is this omi-women. They figured out that if they live a humble submissive life style their bodies will birth more perfect females then unwanted males
In this world instead of marriage men become care takers of these women. In return the men can use them for sex and house work even some field work and he gets to keep the male children. Technically he does part ownership the female children can do something like selling a trading his daughters to other men like one does with marriage, But the woman's temple that has the final say and put rules in place to protect females.
Since the female form is perfect all females women and children (If can) spend their lives striped naked and is consider a bad omen or sin to cover and hide a female's nipples and pussy. Females act like their master's pet often staying next and sit on their knees. They also control what and how much they eat specially made slop called "Pet chow" this is suppose to increases the chance of having female children.
Women who can not longer have children can retire from this life style, The temple makes sure their females are well educated so retired females often become scholars or politician and can go from being a basically a slave/pet to one of the rulers of the country. (Side note retired women give up their womenhood and puts on clothes.)
>>7133143
Source?
orz
>>7133143
Source pls
>>7133143
>crippled guy able to make the jump
>that "uughhh so that's so sexist" gesture
women is a mistake
>>7134580
>trying to virgin-shame
>on 4chan
>>7113162
The fucker best be apologizing for cuckdgel aria bullshit
>>7135245
I just want to help you guys. :)
>>7133480
You're mistaking your own fetishes with scientific accuracy
>>7129263
I'm gonna need some source on that
>>7136139
Nah, you're just as bad as the folks you're attacking.. which is 4chan in a nutshell
>>>7131947
Well thank God your personal sexual fantasy has that one progressive element in it. I was almost offended.
I've been developing this fantasy where I have psychic powers that can plant suggestions into people's heads, but not mind control them or anything per se. If I get into trouble with some violent guy, there would not be a lot I could do - I'm 5'0 and 98lbs irl (not significantly underweight) but in this scenario, I could basically read his mind, see an urge to kill and transform it into something nonlethal, without changing the violent emotion. Ergo I could convince him he was raping me of his own accord, rather than just killing me outright. I would have some degree of influence, but still be in danger due to lack of control.
And I'm a painslut IRL...so no, I'm not talking about being ravished by a hot stranger.
ITT: dumbass motherfuckers ruining a good porn thread.
>>7124171
>>7124199
That's the opposite of a (((coincidence))). What's your angle?
>>7139318
This is my board. I'm not going "back" anywhere, especially not at the behest of a small child whining.
Also, I'm using the emoticons to piss you off. Glad you noticed. ;)
Please note it's really, really not my fault you're stupid and don't know anything, and I really don't have time to help you with that.
Anyway your post appears to be Western art and as such belongs somewhere else. :)
More bowing girls in collars?
I have... Just so many because it is my fetish
>>7140644
Utter, utter cancer.
>>7142524
Cry moar, smoockhiekins. ;)
Why does every thread on 4chan turn into /pol/ cancer these days? Is there any Chrome extension that removes the text from posts and just shows the images, or am I going to have to write one myself?
I think this is all the eastern stuff I have. Shame these boards are divided by art style, I've got a lot more western stuff and 3dpd.
>>7143174
You could start a thread like this on /aco/!
I need more! This is amazing! Think I could get my husband to do this with me?
>>7137545
>Do your own homework.
The study you're probably referring to assumes male dominance equals to a community with a high amount of blood related individuals packed together. It was a very controversial and weak claim when it was published and it still is now, hence why I asked if you could provide the source for yours in the hopes that it wasn't this one I'm thinking it is and there happened to be new and fresh data.
Since you refuse to answer (in a very rude manner I might say), there isn't much more to be said then.
>>7137545
>Not really, because I have the virtue of being correct, which they do not.
This is but your version of the story
>>7143067
Damn bruh you fuckin got him
This makes me diamonds
>>7143981
You need to read more than one study, and if being schooled makes you think I'm rude, well, so be it. I'm not gonna spoonfeed you. I'm just here for porn, man.
>>7143983
Yes, the correct version. Not everything's a value judgment and not every story has two sides.
>>7143999
Trips, so it's truth.
>>7145791
Yeah me too.
>>7145914
You're a very arrogant individual
>>7146831
I don't care.
>>7111760
A girl on MY /d/? I'm so happy =,)
>>7109393
Oops I'm gay now.
>>7147272
good that you're aware then
>>7140644
>>7147272
You sound like the kind of person who wants everyone to think you're dominant and powerful, when in reality you're just a normal guy. Clever enough to know you're inconsequential, stupid enough to think it'll change one day. Your façade of arrogance exists as a way to make others feel like you're not on their level, when really, you're on the same level as almost everyone else in the world. You're not a bad person or a good person. You're just a person. One day you'll accept that. And maybe you can just kill yourself when you do. Thanks.
>>7145914
>boasting about trips on /d/
You're not very familiar with this board, are you? I'm guessing you're a summerfag that decided to stay. Here's a tip; lurk for another six months before you post again.
>>7129263
Explain how pre-agricultural women brought in more reliable food sources. Go on. Tell me how gathering is somehow impossible for men and how women are better hunters.
Thread ruined by a mentally ill narcissist who's too autistic to realize how much of a joke he is.
>>7124231
Yeah, it's pretty much softcore porn these days.
>>7149962
The divisions weren't absolute, obviously. So it's not necessary to indulge your scenario. Women tended to be gatherers, which was in fact the more reliable source of food, since hunting was and is (sometimes literally) hit or miss. Gathering accounted for more of the calories eaten in such societies, more recent research is showing.
>>7150306
I'm a girl, you chucklefuck. Thread was ruined by people posting /pol/ bullshit and not porn, sweetie. I just came here to get off to something I like seeing and doing. Then people were dumb. If you think that makes me a narcissist, maybe remedial psych courses would be more your scene. I just don't suffer fools well. Sure seems to be pissing you off. Cheers, luv. ;)
>>7129263
yeah i'm sure men being much physically larger, stronger, and more aggressive has absolutely nothing to do with it
>>7129263
>pre-agricultural societies were all matriarchies
I'm kind amazed that people still believe this. That theory was spread around during the 70s and 90s by people like Jared Diamond, but most anthropologists have pretty much realized that the theory is, for the most part, incorrect. Not all HG societies had easy access to plants and edible vegetation, especially in colder climates and/or areas that tended to have more snow or rain. The warmer areas were able to access both, but in a lot of cases people had to hunt for meat for the majority of their diet if they had no other option. That's not even mentioning the archaeological evidence that suggests that female infanticide was prominent in a good amount of smaller tribes of hunter-gatherers.
The only people who still believe that theory are biased feminists and stubborn anthropologists who refuse to update their work, or who in general are just dogmatic and untrustworthy.
Not denying that there were matriarchies before agriculture was a thing, but it depended more on seasonal/environmental changes as to how the social order went down. Most modern day anthropology students and teachers realize this, at least the ones that aren't attempting to promote a "everything was better before we could grow our own food" ideology.
I know we're all here to jerk it or whatever but the case for HG societies is a complex one. Generalizing all of them doesn't really get us anywhere.