>>6553149 >have a fetish for dickgirl girlfriends getting stolen from you by other men >fetish includes the dickgirl's realization that you're not good enough because even they're manlier than you >can't search for it because basically all NTR involving dickgirls is them doing the stealing and there's no effective way to differentiate this
Maybe that's why, your ridiculous standards. They need to have enough money to buy you stuff? Are you there loving girlfriend or just some whore? If that's a requirement, may as well just pay for a hooker.
>>6557264 What I was referring to as pathetic were the guys willing to pay to talk to someone.
I'd date a guy, I'd date a girl, but an unpassable trap is just a complete turn off. There is nothing wrong with wanting someone you're attracted to, that's why I didn't mention you requirement of visible muscles. But the requirement of having stuff bought for you gives the impression you aren't in it for love, but rather for monetary gains. No different than the girls who only date rich people.
>>6557271 >>6557272 What you don't seem to be getting is that quality people have standards. It takes work to be "absolutely passable". If that is a requirement, then it is only fair that there is reciprocation, what are you going to provide in the relationship that also has taken a lot of work? Typically, that's a well-maintained body and financial success. Sorry you don't like it, but thems the brakes. I'm not going to tie myself to someone who can't meet my efforts.
>>6557282 "Love". I'll believe in that when the same dude who says they want the "absolutely passable" gf won't hesitate to introduce said gf to friends and family and won't hide that she's transsexual.
Until then, it's an arrangement. And if sex is on the menu, it has a price tag.
>>6557278 And these guys are telling you you're a materialistic whore. Because you are. No problem here, right? Unless, ofcourse, you're of the opinion you somehow aren't a prostitute, despite wanting to be in a relationship for material gain. You whore.
>>6557278 Also, why is it that you expect a "well-maintained body" AND "financial success", when what you yourself is providing in the relationship is only the first? Your double standards are showing.
>>6557306 The fact that you can have a different man fuck you every night is likely another reason. Like I said, I could look past not being passable, but I could definitely not look past such degenerative behavior.
We say you are materialistic because your main concern is having the man buy you things. The way you speak of getting into a relationship sounds more like a business deal. It's supposed to be about love, not what the other person can provide you with.
>>6557633 All that work, all that "improvement" just so you can get good looking men to fuck you. Bravo! You aren't just a common whore who takes nameless dick from a gloryhole. No, a whore that likes to look up at the face of a handsome individual while she gags on his dick. Otherwise known as a whore with "standards". You are TOTALLY above the fat, dorito stained neckbeards that wish to ravage your body. I don't think you realize just how pathetic you are, if you believe you are somehow above these neckbeards. Even THEY know that you are nothing more than a pretty hole to fuck and toss aside. It is you who thinks that you have some value in this world. As if it is YOU giving THEM a chance! That you are somehow smarter than those who fail to fuck you. Yet you still have yet to come to the conclusion that you are nothing more than a sex toy that simply does not matter as a person, but an object. Hilarious.
>>6557657 uh, what? I'm different person then who you were sperging out at.
and of course they wanna date someone attractive, even the "fat, dorito stained neckbeards" do. You think they'll just settle for anyone? Why do you think they're any better when they always complain about not having a "qtpi gf"?
>>6557667 You are missing the point entirely. My problem is not the natural desire to find someone attractive. My problem is the sense of entitlement and wierd superiority complex the troll has. Taking pride in whorish behavior and declaring yourself above these fat, sweaty neckbeards that are extremely fucking horny (Granted, this is /d/) is a lot like a dirty bum with a bar of soap declaring that he is better then the rest of the dirty bums solely because he has a bar of soap. Both are equally disgusting, with the only exception that this one anonymous poster might be moderately attractive. Believe it or not, i'm not actually taking a side, nor am i taking this at all seriously. I see a couple of dumbasses fighting amongst themselves with bullshit logic, so why not jump in for the sake of entertainment?
>>6557333 You dont choose who you're attracted to. You have your own ideas as to what is attractive.
Just because one of those reasons is incredibly shallow, gold-diggy and contemptuously bizarre doesn't mean we have the right to criticize this Anon, anons.
....but i'm going to anyway. I cant wait for when you're middle aged and you finally realize what being together with somebody is all about. I hope you dont die lonely and bitter, but it's looking more and more like this will be the case.
>>6557333 Because he might be more creative than you more thoughtful than you more artistic than you more outgoing than you more charismatic than you more intelligent than you and not a loser that browses /d/
Weldingfag here. Came back to fap to this thread again and forgot I replied to this BS.
Would would I provide that required years of effort? Do you know how much welders make in the USA? I started out at $20/hour when I was fresh out of training with the boilermakers. I'd piss on that now.
My point was, you are a materialistic bitch.
I am not the guy who said they have to be "absolutely passable". Was just commenting on your gold digging.
>>6557333 There are many types of relationships. People get married for plenty of reasons from Vegas, to political power, to simply being the right thing to do if you, say, knock up/get knocked up. Those are all things you may be able to live with, live happily even, but you'll always regret it in the end. The only kind of relationship you can be truly proud of and truly happy of when you're on your deathbed is one based on love. The standards you have set are anything but. You can live your life happily, but when you die, you'll die knowing you wasted your life because you found materials and dicks rather than someone you can really love.
>>6574128 >implying these so called brave men aren't just indoctrinated fools fighting the rich man's fight >implying you should take pride is the strip of land your mom just so happened to pop you out at >implying our freedom has ever really been endangered at all since the revolutionary war and we aren't just trying to fix other people's problems >implying this current war is about anything other than oil, lithium and money
>>6574198 >>implying these so called brave men aren't just indoctrinated fools fighting the rich man's fight Typical hippie response. That doesn't change anything, though. Whatever caused them to go fight, whatever inspired them, doesn't change the fact they still went out there. >>implying you should take pride is the strip of land your mom just so happened to pop you out at That's where the whole rest of your life comes in. You know, the part where you grow up and learn to love your country. Nobody loves their home because they were born in it, they love it because of their experiences. >>implying our freedom has ever really been endangered at all since the revolutionary war and we aren't just trying to fix other people's problems I guess you didn't hear about the World Wars. >>implying this current war is about anything other than oil, lithium and money I'll give you that one.
>>6574470 I never said they weren't brave for doing it, I said they are dumb. Is it brave to risk your life, even if you think it's to defend your country? Sure. But is it smart? Definitely not.
Except we have it shoved down our throats that our country is the absolute best and we HAVE to be nationalistic about it. It's pushed on us from birth. That's why we are one of the only countries (the other countries that do this/have done are ones under dictatorship like north Korea and nazi Germany) that has kids pledging allegiance to a flag when they don't even understand the concept of what they are doing.
Except our freedom wasn't in danger in the world wars. WW1 was mainly set in Europe, we chose to enter. As for WW2, we didn't enter until the end and only because Japan bombed pearl harbour (which we were warned about). We chose to enter WW2 at the end, we could have nuked Japan and called it a day, there was no reason to join in on the fight against Germany.
>>6574497 >WWI was mainly set in Europe. We chose to enter. You're right, we chose to enter AFTER Germany attacked ships with Americans on them AFTER being warned to stop. We joined AFTER a telegram was intercepted saying Germany would help Mexico attack the U.S. and reclaim the land we won from them. As for WWII, Germany was a crippled armpit in the middle of Europe during the 1920s. Then suddenly its giving the allies a run for their money as one of the greatest military powers in the world? Doubting them was a bad idea. Their abilities, combined with hate for capitalism and history with America (read: WWI), combined with Japan's imperialistic nature and unwarranted attack, were plenty of cause to jump into WWII. Now, why we didn't just nuke Japan at first is probably because they didn't exist yet and nobody thought we would have to resort to that. They were a last ditch effort to save millions of Americans and Japanese before we landed on their mainland. We also dropped millions of leaflets warning them about the bomb, where they would be dropped, when, and that they could be stopped if Japan surrendered. Do you think anybody wanted to drop those things? We saw what they were capable of in testing. Everybody involved up to the man who dropped it regretted it. You don't just start a war with any old Joe and drop a nuke on him because you don't like him.
>>6574920 They never attacked us though. We were never in any immediate danger. >>6574924 Had we stated from the beginning we want nothing to do with the war in ww1 nothing would have happened. Had we done that the second time around instead of throwing threats at other countries we wouldn't have been attacked in ww2 either. Had we become a neutral isolationist nation like Canada we wouldn't have ended up in most of the wars we did.
Sure, but it was more complicated than that. Fascism was as much a threat to capitalism as communism was, and we had been hoping that Stalin and Hitler would destroy each other. More than that, lend-lease was an opportunity to break Britain's colonies away from it and pave the way for American supremacy in the latter half of the 20th century. When the US got involved, it was the end of Great Britain as a colonial power of any relevance.
I'm not sure if you know this, but they sent soldiers and materials in both World Wars long before the US did. They were neither neutral nor isolationist.
Hitler declared war on the US in the hopes that the Japanese would help him against the Soviets, who were at that point, destroying the Wehrmacht on the Eastern Front. He was desperate, and that declaration gave Churchill the opportunity to convince Roosevelt that taking out Hitler was of more immediate importance than Imperial Japan.
And in some ways, Churchill was right, since NATO grew out of the war as a way to check the USSR.
Polite sage for discussion and partially relevant pic.
/fit/ here I take a shitton of time to work out on the gym. i learned how to cook and count calories.
i spent ages making sure my form was good on all exercises
i think that puts the part about you trying to look good at equal to mine.
now for some reason you say i also have to buy you tons of things. even though we both try our best to look good. could you eleborate on this ?
i only work 3 days a week, by choice. i make enough to eat, live, pay rent for the small room i have. and go out sometime. i dont want much more. i dont need much more. i like doing stuff. and dislike being at work.
I'm not sure if we're allowed to look for RP on /d/ anymore, but I'll take the risk.
If you're interested in a long-term RP using this theme note me at - https://www.f-list.net/c/d%20ntr/
I've been RPing as a dom for years and I'd like to believe that I'm a pretty good writer. I'm capable of providing detailed paragraph to multi paragraph entries. I'd appreciate a partner who could provide the same quality.
I don't have a preferred setting, and I don't really have any kink limits. We could do anything from simple humiliation of the husband/boyfriend, or something more extreme like castration.
It's not much information to go on, but we can discuss the finer details later when I get home.
>> Having this much NTR collection (100gb+) >> Having about 50-150 gb of NTR stuff still not categorized (from all the past years of collecting) >>Still short on filling my 5tb external drive Don't Dissappoint me /d/ share some of the good stuff that have escaped my NTR radar
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5 If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.