>>5837963 I like both, but I think I'd rather have a shrunken woman that can ride around in my pocket everywhere I go. She wouldn't exactly be a pet to me, either. I'd still treat her as a human being, and take care of her until she grew back to normal. If she ever does, that is!
Meaningful interaction. 3 inches tall is probably my limit. As for growth, 50 feet is my general limit, though I'm comfortable with up to 100 sometimes.
Gentle, of course!
Aware! It's no fun if they aren't freaking out while they shrink/grow.
Not myself, no. The only thing that I would find appealing would be if a woman shrank me. I prefer her to grow, instead.
I hate when they're wearing clothes. It just doesn't make any sense to me. Where the hell did they find clothes at their size? If the clothes grew with the woman, that's fine, though I'm not that big a fan of that, either. There's also crushing, vore, etc. that I don't like. I generally avoid the size generals like the plague because of that shit. I wouldn't even be here if I hadn't seen your post on the front page.
>>5837963 >Growth or Shrink? Shrink, but I could go either way. Depends on how well either is executed. >Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison? This is a tough one... Depends on what you consider "meaningful" and "microbe" really. I prefer very small sizes (between 0.25 and 1 inch, give or take), but I still like there to be some form of interaction, even if it is one-sided. This is further complicated by unaware scenarions (see below). >Gentle or Sadistic? Almost always prefer gentle, but I could be swayed to the other camp with a good execution. Descriptions of extreme gore are a turn-off, though. >Aware/ or non-aware? Unaware, with eventual discovery. Complete unaware is fine, too. Again, I could go either way. >Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy? Absolutely not. It's the equivalent of a heterosexual looking at gay porn or vice versa. >Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS. - Insane proportions (e.g. breasts larger than one's head) - The concept of the "foot slave." I know it's fantasy, but come the fuck on. - Vore/Insertion. Once you enter the body, it stops being erotic for me. HOWEVER, the teasing/buildup that may happen beforehand I'm alright with. - Braindead people in unaware situations. Most people can tell that an ant on the ground is an ant from standing height (unless they have sight problems), so mistaking a shrunken person for a bug should basically never happen. On the flip side, anyone that instantly runs toward a gigantic person is basically suicidal.
More and more lately. I'm actually kind of worried. It's one thing to imagine horrific sadism shit through these comics, distanced from it because I'm not imagining being the one doing it.. but lately I've started thinking about it and boy is it fucking easy to think up some grotesquely cruel/violent stuff.
Farts but I fully acknowledge I'm into enough weird shit that it looks exactly the same to the fartfags that don't like it. Gotta live and let live.
Shrink. Somehow seems more personal/meaningful to have a girl secreting away a bunch of tiny victims to torture and kill at her leisure, rather than having her grow large and just stomp around random city blocks.
Sadistic. The more extreme, the better.
Both are good and have their merits, it all depends on the scenario. Unaware ara~ ara~ milfs are gods gift to this fetish however.
No, I'm all about self-inserting as the victim.
The fascination with "foot slaves" and other retarded concepts.
>>5837963 Growth, meaningful interaction, sadistic if I'm looking for something arousing and gentle if I want something adorable, aware, I would absolutely love to be a giant, and I really feel like unaware defeats the point.
>>5837963 Prefer Growth, but okay with both. The former. Gentle. I do not like Sadistic at all. Prefer aware. Okay with unaware as long as it becomes aware at some point. No. Not at all. Plenty I don't like. I'm kind of squeamish so all the murderfag stuff really irks me. I'm not really into feet at all either. I find them kind of gross to be honest. I'm also not into vore and that sort of goes back to the squeamish thing I guess? I understand why people like them, I just don't.
Non lethal toying, like trapped in a sock/mouth play but no swallow
unaware or uncaring, uncaring as in not really going crazy with the whole WOW A SHRUNKEN PERSON I'M GOING TO DO THIS AND THAT TO YOU AND YOU CAN NEVER LEAVE more just seeing the tiny and treating it like a sex toy or an everyday event
I would prefer to shrink a girl, or shrink and watch someone who is unaware of my presence but only if I can switch back at any point.
I love feet to death but I hate it when people force the whole foot worship thing, i'd prefer the larger party to either be unaware or just really horny, none of that fake domination crap. I also hate when people draw stench lines, specifically green ones, it makes things disgusting rather then appealing like a fetish should.
It's a bit of an odd situation, I've uploaded things and added a translation request many times because that's simply the best way to get something translated that you want translated.
The alternative is paying someone to translate it for you(which is odd as fuck considering it's fetish material and also more money on top of the original product) or sending it to a known translator and asking them to post only the translation without the images(which they wouldn't do because it would make them look like a tool and get everyone upset).
This obviously doesn't make sense for something where we know someone like ydnkm is already working on an official translation, but unless it's ydnkm we don't have any clue what is or isn't getting a translation.
>>5837963 Growth, but shrink to include shrunken landscapes/ sufficiently scaled content is just as good.
I'd say right at the lower end of what could be considered meaningful interaction (1cm) and smaller.
Either, though not to the extremes of either cringe-worthy gore or SFW dialogue-fests.
Aware strongly. Unaware can work in a few situations, but only if it leads to awareness.
Nope, smaller party or literary observer status only.
Obviously don't like shit-tier dialogue. Absolutely detest stories or works which don't go anywhere. I actually find all non-explicit pieces to be pretty pointless, I prefer it to get to the point so to speak. So plot-heavy stuff goes here.
I dislike and also don't quite get clothed/shoe wearing giantesses, and find it pretty detracting when it shows up.
>>5837963 This poll has been very interesting, if only to see the wide variety of tastes (and distastes). Might have been interesting to put a gender question, but that may have been a bit of a can of worms. I think we did a poll once that ended up with like one of every six posters being female.
I don't want gentle or sadistic, actually. I think what I'm interested in is more... I guess incidental destruction? like, people getting stepped on and shit but no "HAHAHA SUFFER TINY FOOTSLAVE BUGS, PROSTATE YOURSELF BEFORE ME AND LICK MY FOOT FUNGUS" type shit, and no meek moe cutelumps either.
Aware I guess
the aforementioned thing about footslaves, get your goddamn s&m foot shit out of my big people
Both are fine. You can get really meta with the two so at that point there's no difference.
>>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison?
Meaningful, although microbe unaware can be awesome if done right.
>>Gentle or Sadistic?
Gentle. Teasing is fine too.
>>Aware/ or non-aware?
Mostly aware, although unaware works too.
>>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
I prefer to be the one shrunk. Reality tends to assert itself if i think of getting bigger or having someone smaller than me.
>>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS.
A lot, but i just shrug and roll with it, and if it's really grates then i just close it/quit it/ turn it off. It's a fantasy, and that usually reveals the depths of one's depravity, so seeing someone go the whole hog should be expected.
>>5837963 I lean towards shrink more, but both have their merits.
Gentle, though I see the upside of sadism as well
I used to be really into it at first. Though I was drawn to sizefaggotry as a concept since I was a kid, it wasn't until I stumbled upon The Minimizer's site that it actually took off. Now I'm more drawn to this side of the spectrum.
I would like to see less instances of women who are confronted with tiny people that automatically go nuts and demand goddess worship/destruction/sexual satisfaction. Maybe it would lead to the situation of too much plot in porn, but I'd like to see someone like that at least mull over the merits of her going down the sadistic route before acting. Especially if she starts off the story as a fellow human being of normal size.
Sometimes Gentle, but I prefer Apathetic, or the girl treating the tiny like a normal person
No, but I find tinies cute regardless of gender. I just wish I could be a cute tiny
Why aren't there many realistic pics that aren't shitty photoshops? Pic related, this is a fantastic realistic image. And I've seen countless girls online into male giants but none into male tinies. Why?
>>5837963 >Growth or Shrink? I prefer shrink, but I'd be up for growth too.
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison? Kind of depends on the situation. For fap material, I prefer it when the shrunken parties (mainly fap to shrinking stuff) are about as tall as an average fingernail. This way it's easier for them to be swept under unassuming butts and the like. For pathetic escapist fantasies, I'd prefer a height of about 4-6 inches. Small enough for fun stuff, large enough to be heard and felt.
>Gentle or Sadistic? Again, depends. Right away, I don't like outright sadistic stuff. If not because most stories can't write sadistic people worth a dime, then because the attitude doesn't appeal to me. Playful maybe, or slightly rough, but not all out sadistic. Again with sorry ass self insert, I'd go for gentle, or tomboyish. Where they never actually mean to hurt you, and even when they do, it's never serious. Nothing to go to the hospital over.
>Aware/ or non-aware? This kind of ties in with the above question. Like the ones above, whether I'm fapping to it depends on the answer. For fap, unaware, because it allows the girl to maintain a certain innocence while simultaneously gobbling her friends or trapping her boyfriend in her underwear. For >tfw you will never times, unaware, then chase, then aware. I think my favourite part in stories like that is when the shrunken has been found, cornered, and isn't sure whether to come out, or stay hidden. Guilty pleasure I guess.
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy? Not even a little.
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS. >Obligatory your tastes But seriously, I actually like some 3DPD renders, but I'm annoyed the overwhelming majority of them are the same fucking generic "foot crush" picture from the same fucking perspective with the same fucking scale.
>Growth or Shrink? Shrink. It's more personal. More intimate. Growth turns one into a spectacle, an oddity or attraction. Shrinking can be kept private, hidden like an affair or some other indiscretion. The secrecy involved in shrink scenarios is also a turn on for me.
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison? Action figure/doll sized. Roughly 4in - 12in
>Gentle or Sadistic? Gentle, if somewhat teasing.
>Aware/ or non-aware? Aware and consenting. Even if they didn't consent to whatever misfortune shrunk them, that they consent to be taken under the protection of their big is enough. Consent is important to me.
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy? Not particularly, no. But I've had dreams involving tiny naked faeries so I suppose I'm at least a little bisizual.
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS. Where to start? The cliche'd plots? The hackneyed performances and monotonous line readings from some of the "actors" in content videos. Feet? Vore? Crush? Furries? The self-loathing? The stupid factionalism between all the different subcultures?
>>5837963 >Growth or Shrink? Shrink, though i am not opposed to growth as it still appeals to my tastes at times. I just prefer shrink more.
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison? Meaningful interactions, though once again i can go the other way if it is done the right way (to my taste).
>Gentle or Sadistic? I can go ether way here so long as its nothing really graphic or gory (i don't mind the odd "red stain" thing or similar, but i absolutely hate the really graphic like ripping off body parts or extreme blood and guts shit).
>Aware/ or non-aware? Ether one can be good, but i lean more toward aware.
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy? Kind of, but I would more so like to be in the shrunken position or someone else growing, though i can get the appeal of the other side (just not my cup of tea. It feels weird thinking of myself dealing with tiny people, i think its more so an awkward situation like "if they knew what i fap to..." thing. It would just make me feel awkward as hell though i would be gentle and try to help them as much as possible. On the growth side i would just try to be a super hero or try to make as much use of my size as possible, but id be quite embarrassed).
>Thing you don't like that is common in GTS Futa, scat/ piss/ any bodily fluids really, things like going in the ear or nose and dealing with the icky things inside, gore, stank smells and the like, same as >>5838206 about vore/ insertion and foot slave (i like feet but only to a point).
>Things you don't understand that is common in GTS One thing i dont understand in general is futa things, to each their own though with that. Another is extreme gore shit, that's the point where i say screw to each their own, that's like people who like to watch lobsters or big bugs or animals get stomped out, you can just fuck right the hell off you mentally unstable excuse for a person.
>>5839442 i dislike giantesses standing next to buildings for the same reason i dislike planet scale. "standing next to gray boxes or blue circles doesnt count as stimulating interaction" says my penis.
>>5837963 >Growth or Shrink? Shrink >Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison? Meaningful interaction >Gentle or Sadistic? More towards gentle, but how about playful? >Aware/ or non-aware? Usually aware >Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy? Nah. I'd resent both. >Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS. Girls who whiplash into genocidal monster the second they grow/ see shrunken people. Also footfingers. Japs need to learn to draw feet.
As small as possible that still allows for interaction so about an inch/half an inch.
Toughest question. I love it when the girl is forceful and demanding, but in a kind of gentle way where they treat the shrunken person like a toy or a servant. Pic related is what I mean. The idea of a girl getting a tiny guy to do things like feed her or do other simple tasks that she could do in seconds while she watches in amusement gets me diamonds.
Only if it's giant couple stuff. Never on my own.
Confusing tiny people for bugs. It's just stupid when you can easily recognize the humanoid shape even when they're super small. Also when a girl thinks they're bugs then she starts standing on them with bare feet and eating them.
>>5839653 Yes and yes, though not as frequent in number. Also a great majority of women, just like men, seem to be macrophiles as opposed to microphiles. You could chalk it up to female tastes or whatever, but I honestly think macro is simply way more common in both sexes. I know if a girl wanted me to play giant, I'd be a little uncomfortable.
>>5839532 >Girls who whiplash into genocidal monster the second they grow/ see shrunken people.
For me it depends how the story is and what the personality of the girl is to begin with. I usually like the girl to already be messed up in the head. Just as long as they don't turn into Katelyn Brooks 'YOU LIKE THAT LITTLE MAN'. Alternatively, a sort of slow corruption works for me too.
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison? Meaningful. Sometimes microbe is fine, but I strongly prefer meaningful
>Gentle or Sadistic? Depends on the mood.
>Aware/ or non-aware? Aware
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy?
Early size thoughts were me kidnapping girls i had crushes on and covering them in cum. I prefer to be the non giant though.
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS. Scat, piss. I don't mind anal vore, but I don't understand the thrill of being shat on. I have masturbated to it, but I don't really get the appeal.
>>5840301 Depends. Generally, it's your body hair that allows you to feel such small stimuli. Also, some parts of the body are more sensitive than others. Furthermore, some people are more sensitive than others in general, so it's a various thing. Personally, if an ant is crawling on my hand, I don't notice it unless it's brushing against my arm hairs or whatever. YMMV, but what you described isn't really beyond reality.
>Growth or Shrink? Growth will always be first in my heart I think. Slightly more exotic for lack of a better word. And as it's been said around here before, a big part of the appeal is having this powerful giantess who, for the power that size brings her, chooses to share her affection with you in particular.
>Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison? Meaningful. Too small or too big just doesn't do it for me. I think it's partially autism that giga sizes ruin the narrative I mentioned above.
>Gentle or Sadistic? I've found myself to be a dom by nature so you can imagine how this clashes with the giantess fetish. I know I'm in a big minority but 'dominant tiny' makes my dick diamonds. Though if I had to pick between the two it would be gentle with light to heavy teasing. Sadistic ranks pretty low.
>Aware/ or non-aware? Again, unaware clashes with my main draw to the fetish though I can understand it's appeal. Aware all the way for me.
>Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy? There was a time long ago. I think part of the fetish evolved from, when I was younger, thinking how fucking cool it would be to be giant. But as far as the fetish is concerned, nah.
>Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS. How crazy people go for feet and how they can ignore every other single aspect so fervently. I have and understanding of foot fetishes though I don't have one myself. But it just seems so ... boring. Also giant lolis and fart. And loli farts.
>>5837963 >Growth or Shrink? Enjoy both, prefer shrink. >Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison? Both. I even like some crazy stuff where the tiny is a microbe in comparison, but they're still able to communicate somehow, like Gigamite by HIK. >Gentle or Sadistic? Gentle >Aware/ or non-aware? Aware >Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy? Yes. In fact I self-insert as the giantess most of the time. >Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS. Incest. Why are there so many mom/sister pictures and stories?
>>5840754 Even within that demographic you're still 1000000X more likely to find normal, chill, well adjusted people with the complimentary side to you're fetishes than me. You'll never have to endure the crushing despair of tfw no giant gf.
>>5840821 But even if you play pretend, the reality is still there that they're all still men. Gay macrofags never has this problem thats my point. Its never "fuck this, all these niggas in chat are a bunch of women"
>>5837963 >Growth or Shrink? Either is fine with me, but I guess I like growth more. >Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison? Meaningful about 95% of the time. >Gentle or Sadistic? Always gentle. >Aware/ or non-aware? Either is fine, but aware is slightly better for me. >Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy? I'd prefer to be tiny to a giant male or female for all things, to be honest. >Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS. Farts, scat/piss, breast vore, and any hard. gory, fatal stuff. I don't mind the fatal stuff for giga settings, which I like, but not with so much gory detail, I guess.
>>5839653 I'm a girl that goes through this thread, even though I much prefer giant male things (since I'm straight). These pictures may not necessarily be sexually or romantically appealing for me in particular, but more aesthetically appealing, I guess.
>>5837963 >growth >both >both >both >hell no, ruins the fetish aspect for me >loli, scat, giant guys, futa, giantess wearing shoes, LACK OF POV PICTURES FOR CHRIST'S SAKE STUFF LIKE PIC RELATED IS THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS FETISH
why are people in this fetish so fucking retarded, including myself >watching an mmd video on youtube >finish fapping >think 'golly gee, i'll have a look at the comments section and see if anything said anything worthwhile!' >first comment includes '... but in my opinion, planetary sized GTSs don't usually count because there's no real possible interaction.' >next several lines are people explaining that that isn't an opinion statement and him getting angry at them i wanna call the fetish hotline i don't like mine
>Grow or Shrink? To be honest both have their appeal, depends on context I suppose >Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison? HAS to be meaningful. If it's "microbe" comparison it ultimately becomes a case of "Why does this even matter any more." Plus, at those scales my suspension of disbelief gets shattered. >Gentle or Sadistic? If I can be honest, both? I just don't like how sadistic seems to innately lead to wholesale murder and manslaughter. Stuff like tormenting and teasing is great if handled well. >Aware or Non-Aware? Eh? If the girl is aware that lead to more interesting interactions. If she is not that makes her more an event to be experienced. >Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if it is a part of a different fantasy? Sure why not? >Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS. Vore/Foot/Crush sub-fetishes. At the end of the day the size change itself and how people react to that is the most appealing, so it's painful for people to turn the quick buck with some easily pounded out POV foot or vore picture and not really doing anything unique for a giantess.
>>5841894 19-year-old male that has no intentions of ever growing a beard again after that disastrous one in high-school. Ugh. But when I did have it, it was basically full-on neckbeard slapped on a generic image of a hippie.
I know the motto of this board is >tfw no giant gf and as someone who enjoys a 'dominant' role it kinda kills me that I wasn't born female. I'd cream my knickers to think that there are people who would happily let me plant my feet on their face while I watch tv.
But yeah, in short it's more >tfw no mini bf/gf for me.
I dunno. Please say if you'd be happy to have a guy roleplay giant scenarios with you irl. It'd make my day to know you actually exist
>>5841894 25yo/M/TX. Openly Communist long haired Latino. General artsy fartsy type. Cartoonist, playwright, actor, director, sound designer, carpenter. Jack of all trades, master of none.
Work a shitty dayjob as a wageslave in a gas station where I sell the working class everything that's killing them (literally everything; big gulp sodas, cartons of cigarettes, malt liquor, lotto tickets, energy drinks, etc.), then live a bohemian life with actors, artists, writers, dancers, and the like by night drinking heavily and doing all the drugs to help numb the dichotomy of my existence. Shameless propagandist and passionate political activist.
My apartment is small, but there's always a party in it. I garden in my back yard to try and be as independent from the system I and my comrades are trying to topple as possible and I practice kung fu for health and sanity.
Neatly trimmed mustache and goatee. Sometimes sideburns when I don't feel like shaving them off.
Also poster of: >>5839228 I have two deviantart accounts which I keep seperate, the public one is more active, the private one hasn't been updated in a while but here it is: socialistfreakboy.deviantart.com/gallery
>>5841956 Dude that's me with like every Youtube video. I finish watching then start reading the comments and 99% of the time it's filled with ignorant retards arguing about something, half the time it's religion. I don't know why I read the comments section honestly. It's like an impulse.
>Imagine a world where males were finger sized and females were normal >Mating worked like sort of the way an angler fish does. When you want to make a baby the female stuffs the male up her vagina where he's digested for his semen and DNA >Unsolved murders are endemic due to the females ability to just swallow a male and reduce them to bones
Currently taking a degree in nursing. Despite my forced academics (my mum's a real Hitler when it came to school and college) I'd much rather sit and play games/smoke weed all day with my friends. Very musically orientated, played guitar since the age of 5. Very close to my small circle of friends (They know about my size fetishes through drunken inquisitiveness) I am a complete nutcase around them and get called a fucking weirdo a lot (We've been friends for almost a decade now) but round my uni friends I act like a completely normal social robot.
>>5842088 It's weird. In most things, men are an instant turnoff for me. I am not interested in other men even a little bit. Except when it comes to macro/microphilia stuff. Giant/tiny men are every bit as much of a turn-on as women are.
I guess it's more the idea itself than anything? Or maybe I'm just circumstantially bisexual.
>>5842592 I lived with my mother, who acted like she was a queen and requested everything with an immediate response or there would be consequences. Who here thinks the fetish started with dominant mothers?
>>5842667 This right here alright. All this let us look deep into your childhood blah blah shit is dumb. In general the strangest part of this fetish to me is why people care as in at all as to why they have it in the first place. It changes nothing and informs you in no meaningful way.
It would be like asking my girlfriend why she likes to keep her hair short even though most girls like it long. She just feels its more comfy, but instead of taking that as an answer I went into how no its how she wants to be long her dad since men have short hair commonly.
It is needless and in my opinion rather annoying to see so much self pity and self diagnosis about what you like to jerk off to.
To be blunt there are worst things in the world then jerking the gerkin to really big girls.
I worry about my taxes or my heating bill during the winter. My dick can worry about my jerk off material.
Also, boobs are sorta great. So making them bigger via shrinking or growth is sorta great.
>>5837963 >Growth or Shrink? Shrink. >Size that allows for meaningful interaction, or microbe in comparison? Meaningful interaction. >Gentle or Sadistic? Bossy cruel femdom bitch, without death/mutilation/serious injuries etc >Aware/ or non-aware? Aware. >Do you find the idea of growing yourself / shrinking someone appealing, even if as a part of a different fantasy? No. >Thing you don't like/understand that is common in GTS. Murderfaggotry and such Vore Scat Feet
The 90's were the best times for vore, it was fucking everywhere.
Yeah most giantess fetishes come from mother complexes in some form and since they have both a dominating aspect and a nurturing aspect you dont have to be on any particular polar end to develop the fetish. Personally I prefer gentle giantesses and unaware vore, like she's sweet and protective but you know her body has the capacity to fuck you right up.
They do a similar thing. The male is almost a seperate creature the sexual dimorphism is so vast, the angler fish we know of is the female, the male is a tiny pathetic little goldfish-sized thing. When the male finds a female it bites onto her and eventually its mouth fuses with the females body. After a while the males body is basically digested/absorbed by the female until only its balls remain which become a peripheral attachment that the female can access anything it wants sperm. The female can also have as many males do this as it wants so it has a whole gallery of balls to choose from.
As far as nature goes humans got a pretty sweet deal as far as sexual dimorphism goes.
>>5842717 you need to change your system locale to japanese before unpacking them. After you change your pc settings and re-extract the files it should work. http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/change-system-locale#1TC=windows-vista
for mimosa, click "Mimosa.html" for Eternity, go to the folder marked "package" and click "永遠も半ばを過ぎて.exe"
>>5837963 I enjoy both, but growth will always be the best for me. Women in power, the very best.
I guess I like Meaningful a little bit more, but I honestly live by bigger is better. Love me some intergalactic girls or goddesses outgrowing entire planes of reality. Honestly, my very favorite part of this fetish is growth competitions and multi-size, so I guess "both" would be more accurate.
Gentle is best easily, but I can dig a bit of carnage.
Aware is best, but unnaware is also fun in its own way.
Not at all. I wish every female in creation was bigger than me, and I'm not TOO hot on shrinking. I'd rather be normal and have the women grow around me.
I like giantess vore well enough until it goes inside the stomach. Exploring the insides is hot in theory, but looks disgusting. Also, not sure why scat/futa/piss/farts are so popular in general. Finally, in a meta way, I'm not sure how so many girls become insane mass murderers when they become giants.
>>5841894 26, Southern US, small business owner. Only ever grown a beard when I had to spend a winter up north. Thankfully I get well-rounded growth. Downside is that it's different than my head's hair color (blonde hair, auburn/reddish beard), which led to constant questions that got really old, really fast. Yes, that's the natural color. No, I don't know why it's a different color. No, my pubes are not also red. They're light brown (i.e. blonde that never gets exposed to sun).
Made me sympathize with busty girls who get "Are those real?", "Can I motorboat them?" questions.
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5 If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.