Why didn't anyone tell me there's an Angry Birds cartoon

>>77988762
I refuse to believe you.

>>77988762

Because /co/ doesn't watch good shows. Or shows that don't have anything to say about it.
It's Angry Birds, the animation is good, the jokes work. It's meh. I'm not saying it's bad but it's not something that I'll watch the new episode immediately. I'll binge watch episodes here and there and enjoy them though

>>77989049
Yeah...wonder what they use for animation?

File: a80c373c02a0f5a5315b381d8c74e9ee.jpg (74KB, 475x356px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 475x356px

>>77988762

>>77989402

I have no idea.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_PQKd-2EOM

File: maxresdefault.jpg (142KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1920x1080px

>>77989586
You don't think it might be...hand-drawn?

>>77990269

They're using a mix of hand-drawn animation. Hand-drawn backgrounds and rigs that add new expressions as they see fit. They animate it in Flash, but the rest are hand-drawn.

>>77990478
Huh. They're really getting a lot out of it.

>>77991092

If I had spend so many hours on something I would've done the same.

>>77991183
Ah no, I meant they're getting some really beautiful stuff outta that technique.
Hambo and Terence the best

>>77991501

Ohh yeah. The cartoons are good and are one of the few, if not the only, series that are able to not rely on spoken words and convey what they want to say from expressions alone.

>>77991623
Love that. (Pingu manages that too) And damn if they don't make me laugh.