>Batman 66' and Green Hornet >Shazam and Power of

>>77794700
Ah, the Isis show. That's what awoke my "nerd girl with a sexy superpowered alter ego" fetish. And then there's She-Hulk...

File: 4248023-isis.jpg (86KB, 305x640px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 305x640px

>>77794721
Funnily enough, despite being a "creation" of the network, Isis went on to become an actual DC character. And not in the public domain "Isis is an Egyptian god" kind of way, but with the actual show history and everything.

File: smallville-isis3.jpg (112KB, 432x305px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 432x305px

>>77794736
Isis also appeared in Smallville, kind of. Lois got turned into her by an amulet in the same manner as the Power of Isis show.

>>77794736
wow we didnt knew that, what obscure comic is she? You are such a nerd. No one had ever heard of 52.
Faggot.

File: 2472941.jpg (28KB, 348x381px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 348x381px

>>77794819
Most people don't know about the show, fagtron

>>77794700

Was Captain Marvel a DC property at that time?

Green Hornet isn't a DC show...

>>77794872
Yes, but they already could only use Shazam as the name on merchandise

>>77794819
no one reads anything that isn't nu fiddy tu these days.

>>77794861
By most people you mean 15 years olds? Fuck, theyshow has been refferenced several times in Archer,

>>77794964
>watching meme shows
>calling me the faggot

File: Isis_Cover7.jpg (98KB, 400x614px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 400x614px

>>77794819
Bitch, please.

File: Archer-ISIS-logo.jpg (83KB, 800x500px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 800x500px

>Isis
Guess her present-day name would be Cia.

>>77795266
>Cia.
Her name is Banned?

>>77795323
Some sand fucks fucked up the name.

>>77795266
She uses torture to get information. If you don't give her what she wants, you won't fly so good.

>>77794891
Because they never, ever held the Captain Marvel name themselves.

>>77794872
To be perfectly honest I'm not sure they ever had a clear plan for using Shazam. The fact is, even by the 70s he was fairly obscure. Paying a lot of money for the reprint rights, then buying them outright five years later, alongside having a huge legal bill for an unwinnable case... these are not the actions of the sane.

>>77795225
That'S A TV tie in. Not a real introduction of the character

>>77796243
>Because they never, ever held the Captain Marvel name themselves.

Can you elaborate? I thought they'd have the name by having the company that made him.

>>77796351
They threatened legal action against Fawcett, the company who originally published the character. AFAIK, Fawcett just stopped publishing superheroes, and for years nobody held the "Captain Marvel" trademark. Eventually DC licensed the character, but nobody owned the trademark. Marvel in the 60s took the chance to buy the trademark, and as so created their own Captain Marvel character. It isn't until the 80s or 90s when DC actually buys the rights to Fawcett characters, but by then Marvel already owned the trademark.

>>77796047
Daesh will get normalized for them soon enough. Just have to wait it out.

BTAS and STAS too