Just imagine...

does this song play when he strikes?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iinog53XidM

I've seen pterodactyl porn. It was pretty entertaining.

I'm amazed there's barely any threads for this movie

the movie was formulaic as fuck, they decided to go to safer and familiar way to tell the story with such an interesting premise.
And more disappointing is it came from Pixar

File: dinosaur-rodeo-15492143[1].jpg (45KB, 400x340px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 400x340px

Shit start
Amazing Middle
Good Late-
-Shit End

Correct?

so is it safe to assume this was ______________shit

Story was shit
But the whole fucking movie was adorable and well executed so idec
Also it's the best 3d animations I have seen, period. The movie was beautiful

>>77750465
They needed to do more with the humans. Replace spot with a dog and you could change barely anything.
>>77751673
It's a mixed bag. For every good scene you get a bad scene. I liked when Arlo and Spot were "talking" about their families and the Rex ranchers.

The drunk scene was the worst though, feels like something they should have cut out.

File: tumblr_mo1cswu8hE1rk929lo1_500.jpg (73KB, 442x640px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 442x640px

Friendly reminder that there was an actual badass pterosaur species Pixar was too retarded to actually use.

File: You freaky old bastard low res.jpg (141KB, 750x1313px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 750x1313px

Friendly reminder there was yet another pterosaur specie Hollywood is toos craed to use.

File: andrew.jpg (78KB, 800x1600px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 800x1600px

Moar

File: Nyctosaurus_sp_by_jconway_d019.jpg (177KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 800x800px

Real Thunderclp

File: Gerogia and Tupandactylus Witton 2013.jpg (67KB, 633x640px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 633x640px

Evil

File: 1411275534200.jpg (15KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 500x500px

>>77746734
My prehistoric autism is acting up

>Pterosaurs (not fucking pterodactyls)
>scales
>bat-like wings
>grasping feet
>teeth in a species that doesn't have teeth

>>77751875

Also no fingers. Seriously, Nyctosaurus is like the airplane of nature.

File: quetzalcoatlus.jpg (286KB, 1174x1500px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 1174x1500px

>>77751907
Yeah, I was going to say that too.

How the fuck did they walk?

>>77751770
What species is that? It can't be nearly as badass as this giraffe-stork from hell.

>>77751875
They clearly went "fuck it" with regards to accuracy. Which I don't mind, but the Raptors looked terrible.

File: The_Good_Dinosaur_87057.jpg (70KB, 600x300px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 600x300px

>>77751960
They look diseased.

>>77752069
I guess they were going for the "hick" look but they look so stupid. Like even from a toy standpoint they don't look appealing. Definetly one of Pixar's worst designs, especially if you compare it with the other times they depicted predators.

>>77751949

Thalassodromeus sethi.

>>77751875
>bat-like wings
But those aren't batlike wings. This is one of the few movies to get them right.

File: Egoisaraptor.jpg (157KB, 866x569px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 866x569px

>>77752069

I can see why the trailers didn't have any dialogue

Arlo was annoying

>>77752191
Too thin, not enough chins.

>>77752191
He needs some chins.

>>77752191
Never has Egoraptor been more true.

>>77751875
>Pterosaurs (not fucking pterodactyls)
Except calling them "pterodactyls" is inaccurate you fucking eejit

>>77752823
That's what I'm implying you dork. Which is why I said "Pterosaurs" instead of pterodactyls. I can see why you thought I meant otherwise, but my original intent was

>Pterosaurs
>Scales

And stuff like that. I only added "not fucking pterodactyls" because I was tired of seeing that name.

Did anyone actually see this?
No one in my family even knows a pixar movie just came out, but they totally know about Finding Dory of all things.

This should've been made in the early 80s

>>77753262
I saw it. It was decent. Best part was the CGI, it was amazing.

>>77751861
Is there more of that?
Do they do stuff?

>all these "muh realism" fags
I would agree with all of you if not for the movie taking place 65 million years after any of the species you are talking about was around. Seriously, calm thine tits.

>>77751875
This is millions of years after the dinosaurs went extinct IRL. They've had plenty of time to evolve, it makes sense that they'd look different.

>>77755159
>>77755148
True, but it would be better if all the dinosaurs/prehistoric animals were completely fictional and made up, and not called "Apatosaurus", or "Tyrannosaurus", you know what I mean?

>Sam Elliot voicing a scarred t-rex rancher.
My dreams have finally came true.

>>77755348
He is probably the best part of the movie.

>>77755323
Yeah, good point.

>>77746734
Why would I imagine that

>>77755424
I have yet to see it. How much of his character is in it?

>>77755530
A good chunk. I can't really give an exact measurement. I think it's a bit longer than Bruce and the Sharks from Finding Nemo.

File: frodo.jpg (52KB, 400x399px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 400x399px

>Claims that he doesn't feel fear since being high-elevated
>Reacts in fear when his wing gets punctured

>>77755132

See Mark Witton's pterosaur book.

>>77751766
That was the point. Spot was the surrogate mammal character. Behaviors were modeled off multiple kinds of them.