Which is better, /co/?

>>77551681
I love dinner

>>77551701
I'm so hungry, i could eat an octorok

>>77551681
No dinner

>>77551681
Very hard to say not seeing it in motion.

From the still image, I have no major preference.

>>77552277
Agreed. If you look close enough, DNR makes it look blobby

File: 0.jpg (17KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x360px

>>77551681

>>77551681
What are you going to have for dinner, /co/?

>>77551681
I don't like how grainy it is without DNR, but it's still better than the ugly lines and smudging/disappearing of small details you get with DNR.

>>77552416
i was thinking about SPAGHETTI

Why does DNR give Uncle Scrooge bedroom eyes?

>>77552657
A good dinner can do many things to a man. Duck. Person.

I like no DNR.

The DNR version just made it blurrier, and seems to have made the colors much less vibrant.

DNR looks like complete shit honestly, why do this?

Why do I feel like the only person who enjoys grain? Is it really that bad? I enjoy a little grain in everything. Not an unholy amount. Just enough. When an old movie has grain, I feel that it is a nice rip an looks high quality.