So have there been any tits busted over this yet?

>>71201211

>inb4 MUH DAUGHTER tweets and much laughter by all

>>71201211
Shit this is an awesome cover.

Is this a female artist?

>>71201211
This is fucking disgusting I can't believe someone did this seriously, Like put this much work into it and DIDN'T GIVE GWEN BLACK AND BLUE CONVERSE. What a waste of paper.

>>71201211
B R A V O M A R V E L
R
A

V
O
M
A
R
V
E
L E V R A M O V A R B

Also your filename is wrong.

>>71201211
Dated reference, but a nice cover thanks to the web cables holding the ball up.

I don't even know if I like or hate this cover.
Miley Cyrus is awful and it doesn't fit the book at all. But look at that Gwen.

I don't know about busting tits, but it sure is doing something to my dick.

>>71201256
It seems so. witta . deviantart
>March 27th I posted a SpiderGwen sketchcover here
The client said I could do whatever I wanted so I made a little homage to the controversial Manara cover. (you know, for fun?)
>A week later, Frank Cho posts his SpiderGwen/Manara cover and Robbi Rodriguez voiced his opinion on it, ala The Mary Sue. Which has really sparked some debate across news blogs and social media. Actually, I think Rob Liefeld just joined the fray as I'm posting this.
>Well, as a female comic artist who also illustrates sexy, cute pinup art, I had to follow up with another sketchcover.
LOVE AND PEACE!
>...hahaha... double standards.

>>71201256
Mikey Cyrus wrecking ball reference

>>71201281
It could be because of the Anne Hathaway thing bringing it up again.

Thread needs more sexy Gwen.

>>71201357
oh my god, I knew that artist since she was working on a webcomic and then I totally forgot about her

File: gwen thong.jpg (130KB, 1034x772px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1034x772px

>>71201411
Ok.

File: gwen.jpg (57KB, 467x720px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 467x720px

>>71201357
Haha, wow

>>71201430
>>71201211
>>71201357

I like her.

Suck another dick Robbi.

God I couldn't possibly care less.

>>71201430
Anyone have a link to the big thread about Cho's Spider-Gwen cover?

What's up the incredibly dated reference?

File: tumblr_nmqe4onq9t1tujpr2o1_1280.png (795KB, 1280x1792px) Image search: [Google]

795KB, 1280x1792px

>>71201469
It's only been like two years, People still reference Back to the Future, it's not that preposterous is it?

>>71201508
This.

> read comic books about characters that were hip and fresh in the 60s
> complain about dated references

>>71201211
People please, there is an easy solution to outrage from over-sexualized female characters. And it's called the Hawkeye Initiative.
Won't you please donate some Male Smut to the cause?

>>71201602
If I didn't know better, I'd think this was all just an excuse to look at dude butts.

File: 1427838384240.jpg (122KB, 482x750px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 482x750px

>>71201429
Gwen Stacy, not Gwen Tennyson.
Although I suppose all Gwen's should be welcome.

>>71201613
Oh no!
It's a celebration of male empowerment.
Just as much as the depiction of female characters in comics is a celebration of female empowerment.
Nothing's more empowering to people, than butt-shots and skimpy outfits. I look forward to a future where all comic book costumes meet a standard requirement of sexiness.

>>71201602
>And it's called the Hawkeye Initiative.

But the HI has been around for a long ass while, and people still bitch about sexualised female characters

>>71201508

I dislike silk but I cannot deny she gets my dick hard almost everytime.

>>71201256
>Is this a female artist?
yes

>>71201211
Man, that sucks.
First an asian dude, now a woman. Good thing Rob Liefeld or Patrick Zircher are supporting Cho, otherwise western talibans wouldn't have any "white men" to blame for that.

File: 1386985999935.png (176KB, 707x350px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 707x350px

>>71201643
Being passive-aggressive and ironic isn't funny or smart, it just makes you look like a tool, which you are.
You know where you should go back to by now, buckle up and go.

>>71201645
That's cause it's a fan driven initiative, not an actually habit among the industry.
Let's face it, there is a difference in the level of female costume sexiness and the level of male costume sexiness.
Now there are 2 solutions:
1 - Make all costumes equally unsexy. (Boo, boring!)
2 - Make all costumes equally sexy. (YAY)
Now anybody with tech armor or the like can probably stay the same, but I fully expect everyone else to be rocking at least a banana hammock.

>>71201508
>>71201565
Those are beloved classics, the other is a trashy product for stupid people.
If you concentrate hard enough I bet you can see the difference.

>>71201357
This bitch seems okay. Is she hot? Cause that's all that really matters.

File: japanesesppidergwen.jpg (61KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1280x1024px

>>71201734
Damn anon, chill out. Regardless it's still not all that incredulous for people to reference something they remember.

>>71201739
She looks like Gwen. Go to her dA.

File: 1370119596325.png (564KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

564KB, 1000x750px

>>71201710
>>71201710
>Let's face it, there is a difference in the level of female costume sexiness and the level of male costume sexiness.

No.

>>71201710
It's distresing that so many people seem to wish 1

>>71201748
>Said nothing about body type
>Was talking about costume
How come Superman's still wearing a shirt?
Point of order, MCU's Thor definitely has the right idea.

>>71201746
>She looks like Gwen. Go to her dA.
Just post a picture, asshole.

File: 1396101060819.png (323KB, 480x882px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 480x882px

>>71201748
That pic is correct, we need more beefcake.

>>71201758
Prudes. What are you gonna do?

>>71201710
The problem with your thinking is that the complainers don't want things for themselves so much as they want the people they dislike to not have things.

So more sexy costumes for everyone isn't going to stop the complaining. There aren't enough "dudebro tears" with that route.

>>71201748
Let's not forget the false equivalencies, like:
Female in bikini = male with sock on penis

File: JapaneseGwen.jpg (296KB, 1024x1280px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 1024x1280px

>>71201761
I'm not comfortable crossing that bridge of creeper, you lazy fiend.

>>71201357
>Rob Liefeld
W-What

>>71201768
read more mangas, I guess
as long as amerifags keep reading them on mangapanda instead of buying them, they are quite safe

>>71201759
>How come Superman's still wearing a shirt?
Why shoudn't he? Wondy doesn't go around barechested.

File: juice goose.jpg (113KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 612x612px

I would fug the shit out of this skeet meat.

>>71201778
>A picture available to all on the internet
>reposting it in another site makes you a creep

I hope you are a woman at least, it'd be embarassing if this level of pussyfication came from a man.

>>71201779
He made a FB post defending Cho and Manara.

File: MasterCylinder.gif (487KB, 250x188px) Image search: [Google]

487KB, 250x188px

>>71201775
The Penis Sock is a classic design.
Don't knock it till you tried it.

>>71201811
Then why isn't Superman rocking the Panties and Bustier?

>>71201820
Well, I blame my own laziness, anon. Back to the discussion

>>71201829
That show was clumsy and awkward in a lot of ways, but when it hit, it hit.

Aside from cool artwork, there isnt anything going for the comic that we havent already seen in some form.

This is nothing but a cash grab on trending social justice bullshit. I sincerely hope this along with fem thor bomb financially so we can make room for stories that writers actually want to tell and can take seriously.

Worst thing to happen to thor since thunderstrike and donald blake. And this is coming from a jason aaron fanboy..

>>71201841
He already has a costume.
No famous DC hero goes around particulary exposed, except for Power Girl maybe. But she had a male counterpart and they tried to change that anyway.

>>71201859
You do realize Donald Blake was there at the inception of Marvel Thor right?

Spider gwen has the thickest dick

>>71201864
>>71201864
>No famous DC hero goes around particulary exposed, except for Power Girl maybe. But she had a male counterpart and they tried to change that anyway.
>Completely ignoring Wonder Woman, whom you brought up
For the record, I liked Power Girl's New 52 costume, but what you gonna do?

>>71201859
>Worst thing to happen to thor since thunderstrike
motherfucker you better take that back

File: 339654.png (2MB, 900x1230px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 900x1230px

>>71201874
This is my fetish.

>>71201866
Classic marvel thor is literally ass. Thor didnt get depth until worldengine. The last jason aaron run of thor, the god killer, was the best thing we have gotten in fucking years. Fem thor is literally taking us multiple steps back.

>>71201469
idk my bff jill

>>71201905
>worldengine
>implying Walt Simonson's Thor run isn't among the top 10 cape runs of all time

>>71202039
>implying that moron has even read it

>>71201905
Lol even Fraction/Gillen are better than pleb Aaron

File: 11026021_882924921765532_7901538238862077683_n.jpg (60KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 640x640px

>>71201739
Yes.

>>71201211

Nah Miley Cyrus is the feminists Avatar so this gets a pass.

File: Favim.com-8240[1].jpg (32KB, 400x317px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 400x317px

>>71201211
>Marvel thinks pissing people off attracts customers
>The whole Cho ordeal that happened lately
>Mfw Marvel will go out of their way to piss off SJW because off better sales
god yes

>>71202039
>beta ray pony
>talking frogs

Nigga please. It wasnt nearly as bad as most golden age shitw but the cheese was as real as the villain of the week structure it relied on.

File: 1388282912413.jpg (71KB, 319x441px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 319x441px

>>71202074

Say guh.

>>71201710
While making everyone's costumes equally sexy would be pretty great, that won't stop people from complaining. Modern feminists just like to complain about sexualised female characters, even in works which have sexualised male characters

>>71202072
Aaron has been one of the only writers to actually write thor as "a god". It was one of the only redeeming arcs he got since richards used him as a meat puppet.

>>71201883
I thought her weird wedge heels being built into the costume and half-assed logo were lame, but liked the blue stripe. Made her poses stand out.

>>71201748
People tend to forget the important thing: The dude on the right has a sexuality while the dude on the left is only occasionally a sexual being, mostly during stories when his lover ends up getting killed.

Now I dunno about you, but most people don't dream about getting killed so that their former lover can now starr in a story about superhumans fucking up the planet.

>>71201602
But a sexy male is nothing but a power fantasy!

The HI ridicules male sexuality, just read jojo, man!

Someone just needs to draw her having Angry sex with Norman already.

>>71202296
What's Norman's role in that alternate universe of hers?
They could've made him his love interest, just for fun

>>71203391
>>71202296
This is next level cucking holy shit.

I'm not sure if cucking is the accurate term anymore.

>>71201430
BASED
A
S
E
D

>>71201211
Hot

File: zNar.jpg (104KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 800x1000px

>>71201778
Show your face.

>>71201211
So exactly why fags and sjw hate sexy women?

I don't get that part.

>>71201748
> on the right the woman is covered head to toe while the man is naked
> on the left the woman is wearing a miniskirt while superman is covered head to toe

I like how conservatards are often intentionally shooting themselves in the foot argument-wise.

>>71203539
>fags
Because sexy women aren't men.
>sjw
Because sjw's aren't sexy, but they're jealous of the sexy women.

Anon pls, it's not rocket surgery.

>>71201710
or 3 do what every you want and fuck anyone who says other wise

>>71203539
>So exactly why fags and sjw hate sexy women?

They don't. You don't understand their issues because you're an idiot.

File: 45561713_p0.jpg (181KB, 600x750px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 600x750px

>>71203539
>>71203574
Fag here. We dont hate sexy woman. We actually dont give a fuck. Blame SJW landwhales though.

>>71201759
Because for some weird reason that sort of thing went out of fashion with the artists. Martian Manhunter was one of the last holdouts until nu52 hit.

>>71203443
It would be some strange form of cucking. True Peter is dead in that world, but muliversally speaking his is alive and it's pretty much true in most of them that she's one of his great loves.

File: GET OUT GET OUT GET OUT GET OUT.png (262KB, 463x373px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 463x373px

>>71203615
Would you care to explain in a calm and reasonable manner on behalf of your fellow compatriots?

>>71201602
The Hawkeye initiative is retarded.
A) Agile comic characters do those poses all the time to begin with so you aren't making some great change. Aka see if spider-man can go 5 seconds without a provocative pose or showing off of the spideybutt.
B) Hawkeye would do all of the poses to begin with while being completely in character .When the Avengers get bored they probably bet that he can make X shot while cartwheeling off the side of Stark Tower in a pink tutu and doing a plie.

>>71203782
>The Hawkeye initiative is retarded.

I think it's useful when applied to moments like the genderswapped thor 5 (hell, gender swapping the entire thor would be a lulz mine, including having odin slap the shit out of freyja) or gender swapping that wonder woman page complaining about mansplaining

>>71203574

Fag here. We don't hate sexy women.
And we like "muh male power fantasies". Sexuallly

>>71204002

And I can also speak for a couple of lipstick lesbians I know that love cheese cake

>>71202074
More importantly, Devils Due are still publishing shit? I thought they went broke

Nice Cover but.....who is she?
There's a slight difference since Frank is bigger.
There may be a sexual double standard but I'd say there's also the fact nobody probably saw it in the first place.

Is this nontroversy not dead yet? Last I heard Frank Cho linked to some GGer's article and they're getting pissy about that.

File: Pimpin___Spanky_by_VivzMind.png (983KB, 900x1110px) Image search: [Google]

983KB, 900x1110px

>>71203539
because all sjw's are Jewish, conservative, pro-life, born-again, overweight, Asian Lesbian broads who cuts herself.

>>71204002
>>71204140

I am sorry for our
>muh evil sjwfemuhnazigayagenda

4chan idiots. Have a nice day .

>>71204846
I went through his FB, he linked to something called Reaxxion. They don't really seem to be GG, just anti-SJW. Which I guess nowadays does mean GG

>>71205123
Wait no I take that back they have a whole section dedicated to GG, I just missed it

DISREGARD EVERYTHING I SUCK COCKS

>>71205054
No one cares retard.

>>71205137
At least you admit it.

File: CCcJAv1WAAMJXH2.jpg (91KB, 565x885px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 565x885px

>>71205148
I gotta admit my faults

I also checked out his Twitter, he retweeted a picture of him and Liana K's ass. She was doing some GG shit months ago right? I can't keep track anymore. But on the other hand, Liana K's ass and Frank Cho

>>71201643
Mike Grell era Legion is calling your name right now.

>>71205186
>Liana K
>super model

no Frank. She's just a model

>>71205054
what a faggot

the gay guy can stay. you're too much of a faggot to be here, gtfo

>>71203558
>Superman
Skin tight suit that leaves little to the imagination
>Lois Lane
Dressed like a mom going to work

Are Americans so anti-sex even their left are against it? It's kinda hilarious.

>>71205267
He seems to think that gays aren't extremely common on 4chan.

>>71205282
Horseshoe theory

>>71201253
Why ISN'T that dude freaking out? Look how sexual that is

>>71205282
anon, her skirt is way above the knee. And her tits are covered, but you can still tell she has them. And...are those black pumps?

She's dressed like a whore. Complete and total whore.

>>71205335
Probably hasn't seen it yet. Cause he's blind and whatnot

>>71205335
Well he's going to have to come to terms with the fact that he had a daughter, and if she's even mildly attractive, she's going to have at least 20 dicks in her lifetime

>>71202074
>ugly tmblr landwhales throw hissyfits about female objectification while hot cuties celebrate feminine beauty

Shocking

>>71205338
Yea I read that article too. Pretty funny.

>>71205355
>37! My daughter's sucked 37 dicks!

>>71205529
I don't know the article. link.

>>71205540
In a row?

>>71205566
Simultaneously.

File: ALqoyB9.jpg (148KB, 620x1253px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 620x1253px

>>71201602
>the Hawkeye Initiative

You mean unhappy, untalented artists who barely read comics and are solely looking for asspats?

>>71205267
Oh, i am sorry, Mr. internetwarrior.

Did i insult your laughable, tiny worldview?

>>71205290
What happens on /co/ on every Nightwing thread boarders to a Sodom-situation.

>>71201469
Same decade m8.

>>71205630
That Miles one is always exceptionally lewd.

>>71205714
In this time of day referencing something more the a year old might as well be referencing the Magna Carta.

>>71205551
I don't have a link, but it was a fake article about a senator named "Richard Head" trying to get a bill passed that requires a dress code for the children of the president, citing that "their skirts were too short; you can clearly see above their knees!" and "only gogo dancers wear the boots they were wearing!".

>>71205684
okay baitmaster, here's your reply

>>71205684
*Tips hormones*

>>71205630
that boner on Miles though

>>71205786
>>71205810

Samefagging so obviously. Jesus, you are pathetic.

And then being so retarded to use the fedora-meme, while YOU are the the frustrated, fat teenies, that go
>Muhfemuhnazis
>MuhSJWeverywhere

in every thread.

What a loser.

>>71206416
or its that you're a faggot, and nobody likes you?

>>71206430
Ah, im quite fine with my social life and my family, mr. teen angst. Could you get any more edgy, pathetic loser?

Come on, be honest: How many posts whining about
>muh femuhnusts

did you do today to feel better? Loser.

Spider-Gwen is apparently one of Marvel's top sellers right now. Is it just because of MUH GWEN? Because personally I find it a boring, dull, uninteresting experience. There just aren't enough differences between Gwen's universe and 616 to make for interesting new stories. It's just the same shit retread again.

>>71206484
then why are you crying so hard on the internet?

>>71205338
These puritanical values are really starting to become annoying.

>>71205630

The difference is that one is objectification. The other is a male power fantasy.

>>71201691
And that is the answer for the thread. She could have obvious nipples and toe but hey its drawn by a woman so its okay.

>>71201211

It needs Spider-Man in the corner going "damn baby, nice ass"

>>71206514
its puritanical values for guys, whatever you want for women

>>71206492
>It's just the same shit retread again.
Maybe the majority of people buying it haven't read them before? Maybe between Spider-Gwen and femThor the old adage of "SJWs don't buy comics" isn't strictly true any more?

>>71205254
Yea not skinny enough to be a "super" model.

>>71206518
I dunno, I've never had a fantasy about spreading eagle in a tight suit for all to see. But I mean, maybe someone has.

>>71206492
Hyped up, tons of variants, tied to a big name, and yeah pretty teenage girl is a thing to be right now.

>>71206416
I'm gay.
Stop being an annoying faggot.

>>71206578

It's a bit of both. Thanks to the Nolan Batman trilogy and the series of Avengers movies more people are getting into comics, a bunch of which are women. They aren't the ones complaining because some sexy girl drawing isn't enough to piss off most level-headed people.

File: 1394071695993.png (1017KB, 848x900px) Image search: [Google]

1017KB, 848x900px

>>71205368
>miley cyrus
>feminine beaity

>>71206600
try not famous enough

why are you being such a faggot today?

>>71206484
Haha you are fucking MAD.

>>71206645
Eh, I would.

If she went back to long hair and dropped the wigger schtick.

>>71206691
>wigger schtick
she's a redneck

its not a schtick

I kind of want to read Spider-Man but I stopped after issue 300.

How do I get back in? Issue 700?

>>71201256

I'm getting bored with girls being the only ones in comics allowed to draw sexy girls

Male artists need to grow their dicks back and draw bangin' sluts the way Cho does and laugh it off when the feminazi mob turns up to bitch

File: witcher 3 made of rape.jpg (111KB, 578x702px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 578x702px

>>71205186
>Liana K

Fuck that disingenuous pandering cunt is no better than Anita Sarkeesian.

File: Rhe-Hulk Dom.jpg (165KB, 809x1160px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 809x1160px

>>71206827
To be fair it's not like guys aren't still constantly drawing hot chicks, this is just a case of tumblrtards trying to flex their muscles for no reason.

>>71201469
>dated reference
>September 2013
Kids these days

>>71206663
Said while you rage at women for not giving a shit about you, buddy? :^)

>>71206762
>desperate twerk attempts
>not a wigger thing

I suppose the redneck genes could be a part of the problem but still.

>>71205566

I like you buddy.

>>71206827
What's truly appalling is that Cho draws banging sluts AND they're anatomically correct, one of the biggest issues actual feminists have with cheesecake covers. It's just these false feminists that care more about being offended.

>>71207607
Hasn't that always been the case? People just going out of their way to get offended? Sounds just like tumblr...

>>71206910
>made of rape
Why? Because "Sephiroth-with-scars-and-stubble" Geralt ploughs women who want him? Yeah. Sure.

>>71207237
>she admits women are terrible people

>>71207452

The point the previous anon was making is that redneck and wigger go together like shit and flies

File: Brassica_napus_2.jpg (2MB, 1204x1936px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1204x1936px

>>71207741
She means the game is made of rape.
The development team was very green that way.

File: 4253580-5+the_unbeatable_squirrel_girl_lettered_preview_1.jpg (1MB, 2199x3338px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2199x3338px

>>71207607

What's really appalling is when SJWs are given the chance to make comics and the comics look like this, proving SJWs never even slightly gave a shit about anatomical correctness

>>71206484

Does calling people a loser on the internet make you feel better about the problems in your own life?

>>71207741
She has zero history with games and made those tweets around the time of The Witcher 3's E3 trailer or something, she panders to GG and now writes for The Escapist.

>>71206827
I wish I was that guy. I totally like sexy characters, but for some reason I like to draw meek girls with cloths and small breasts. And it's not even sexual, It's just what I like. Portal, Korra, stuff like that.

I suppose if I was into drawing sexy women, I probably would try to do it without fear of SJW. I would just keep doing it and ignore them. A lot of issues people have is that they keep logging into social media sites. No respectable artist or writer should be on twitter or tumblr. Maybe facebook since that seems to be somewhat good for promotion.

But I really wish most of these guys would stay off tumblr and ignore bullshit bloggers like salon.

File: If you dont like unbeatable squirrelgirl its because you cant fap to it.png (1MB, 998x1395px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 998x1395px

>>71207838
Wow don't be such a shitlord pissbaby, you just hate Squirrel Girl because you can't jerk off to it!

>>71206518

>objectification

The hawkeye redraw is closer to objectification than the Spider-woman one.

Spiderwoman isn't arching her back with her ass sticking out while making a kissy face. That is a decent pose and the focus of the picture isn't her ass.

>>71207741
A lot of women get raped in the Witcher books and games, but there's nothing wrong with that. Some people have some weird thing about how you shouldn't write about rape ever because women are emotionally children or something.

>>71207838
>>71208008

It's because she's badly drawn and fat.

If she was badly drawn and skinny then that would be like 8000 rapes on the oppression scale.

File: 1428920398012.png (164KB, 500x279px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 500x279px

>>71208008
>muh strawmen
those whores don't know shit.

>>71206762
Yes it is.

>>71208033
Is it used cheaply?

>>71208033
most SJW's haven't heard of the Witcher, because most of them don't play games.

Once the handfull that DO tell the rest to get pissy about it, you'll see the outrage. Not before then though

>>71208033
Can you imagine how much classic literature would be banned and censored if these SJWs had their way?
People like them hold back the progress of society and thought.

>>71208196
It's a matter-of-fact part of the setting along with other kinds of violence.

>>71208351

>People like them hold back the progress of society and thought.

I think arguing that rape is an overly-used narrative cliche for hack writers who can't figure can't figure out more interesting or complex way to show defeat or trauma is a perfectly legitimate grevience.

I think it has less to to with MUH SOGYNY then just being a shit writer in general. I mean Christ women do it too, there was that whole shitfit about Mary getting raped on Reign and that has a female showrunner.

>>71208008
>because you can't jerk off to it!
You don't know shit about men do you? I've jerked to stupider, uglier shit than this.
Like your mom

>>71208618
I jerked it to Moon Over June once

>>71208638
The machine right?

>>71207747
>for not giving a shit about fat, teeny losers.

>>71208638
If I ever read MoJ I'd probably end up rubbing one out to that chink that does self fisting.

>>71208638
Liar

>>71208638
>once
step yo game up playa.

>>71208699
I did it just to see if I could.

I could

It hurt like shit, had to go at it for like two hours

who cares

>>71201211

She's not sticking her ass out like on the cho/minara cover

Girls sticking their asses out = feminazi rage

>>71208729
Does it still update? I suppose I could try it again. Not like I have anything better to do right now

>>71208231
To be fair to SJWs (And I may actually vomit from typing that), the Witcher 1's attitude toward sex is incredibly juvenile. You collect women as trading cards for fuck's sake. Not that being juvenile is a bad thing, necessarily, as long as you cop to it.

>>71208744
>not edging for at least 2 hours per fap session

Get a load of this pleb.

>>71206827
trust me, i'm trying.
i'd be drawing huge tits 24/7 when i get good enough.

>>71206492
>There just aren't enough differences between Gwen's universe and 616 to make for interesting new stories.

There are enough. Matt and Kingpin working together, Stacy being alive and having his own daughter be a costumed vigilante and Punisher working for NYPD.

The only weak thing about Spider-Gwen is Spider-Gwen herself.

>>71208784
and there was literally no complaining about that because like I said: they don't play those games. Just like they don't read these comics. They only get pissed off when one of the few that DOES says "hey guys lets rev up those outrage machines"

>>71208793
This was more of an angry fap. Kinda trying to beat it into my penis that this would work even though everything kept fighting it. I think I raped myself

>>71208826
I've been wondering for the longest time how they find out about this shit when they don't even play/read the relevant material.

File: Cho2.jpg (300KB, 1006x1520px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 1006x1520px

>>71206827
I'd love Frank Cho so much more if he didn't have such a terrifyingly irrational hatred for Superman and everything about him.

>>71208862
the handful that do fire it off to their twitter and tumblr leaders, the leaders get pissed, and the unwashed crowds of dyed hair, fedoras, and desperation follows

>>71208862
Because some of them DO play/read/watch this stuff. And nowadays more and more probably do play/read/watch just to look for stuff to shit themselves about.

File: Yes!.gif (1MB, 444x250px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 444x250px

>>71208797
>Black Cat swaps minds with Spider-Women, and we get a Superior Spider-Gwen arc

>>71208901
>liking amerijesus unironically

No.

>>71208901
are you really demanding that he like everything that you like? so you're not 100 percent alike anon, what does that have to do with you enjoying his art?

>>71208952
yes

So back to the OP question. Did anyone tweet this? I want to see if sjws reacted to the artist's double standard comment.

>>71208929
Going out of their way to get offended as usual I see.

Great.

>>71208995
They would claim she has internalized misogyny or something.

>>71208901
Agreed. It's not easy have these torn feelings toward Cho. I want to be on his side, but Superman is my favorite hero.

>>71208952
Congratulations, you outed yourself as a tremendous faggot. I'm sure your parents are very proud of you.

There's nothing wrong with liking or disliking a character, you dumb little puddle of wasted brain matter. The problem is when people like Cho develop an unhealthy obsession with their hatred of a character, and make it taint everything else they do. That picture up there? It wasn't something Cho did for shits and giggles, a fan commissioned it. And it didn't ask for that at all, it just said something with Batman and Superman. And Cho decided to turn that into a two-page, prolonged rant on why he absolutely DESPISES a character for having a decent moral center. It's the most juvenile shit you can imagine, and it comes from a "professional" in the industry. If you can't see the problem there, you're retarded.

>>71208949
That sounds really good actually.

>>71208966
My problem isn't that Cho dislikes Superman, it's that he's so fucking crazy about it. It's autism on a scale that would make /r9k/ balk.

>>71209023
The old stand-by. Works for any woman who doesn't agree with them.

>>71209026
You can think he's an asshole for hating his views on Superman but think it's dumb that he's getting hassled for fan art.

>>71209029
Cho can draw what ever he likes.

>>71209067
I really want some white knight sjw to cry interalized misogyny to a woman just so she can fire back that he has externalized beta faggotry.

>>71209163
Yeah, and I can call him a gigantic sperg for being a gigantic sperg about fictional characters he has rage issues towards. Welcome to freedom of expression, numbnuts.

>>71209195
and we can all laugh at you for being upset enough to call him anything for not liking a fictional character

>>71209029
>getting this mad because anon doesn't like your favorite mary sue(perman)

There is literally zero appeal in a character with a powerset that can be summarized as Godmode.

>>71208008
Is that travesty cancelled yet?

>>71209190
I want this to happen. What would the traditional white knight response be, though?

>>71209029
i smell a new copypasta.

>>71209195
>Welcome to freedom of expression, numbnuts.
If that's the case, why are you so mad?

>>71209190
>>71209257
you have to understand the SJW hierarchy. Only a woman is allowed to say internalized misogyny to another woman.
Also, the woman making that claim better be a minority of some kind or she's still in trouble

>>71209238
Not yet its sales went up a little

>>71209305
>better be a minority

Or if she's famous for doing something retarded, right

>>71209236
>thinking superman is godmode
>being this casual

Just stop.

File: pepe ackbar.png (407KB, 680x544px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 680x544px

>>71209320
Brb, going to my LCS

>>71201211
Is she going to come on top of people like a wrecking ball?

>>71208437
Rape is no different than murder and war and other negative aspects of people as far as writing goes why should it be held in a different category?
It is regularly used in warfare in Africa as a weapon of fear, it happens trying to create this barrier or aversion to sexual violence in fiction that really does not exist in to regular violence its unnecessary and merely used for political ammunition for social issues like "rape culture" and other such nonsense.

>>71209305
>you have to understand the SJW hierarchy. Only a woman is allowed to say internalized misogyny to another woman.

I sorta realized this before I posted, but I couldn't pass up an excuse to post "externalized beta faggotry". I guess if it were a woman crying it to another woman, she could shoot back "you have externalized cuntiness" or something.

>>71209286
Because there's nothing wrong with being mad over someone being such a faggot they let it taint their work.

File: tumblr_ni13yms2kN1rhg6yso1_400.jpg (43KB, 332x332px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 332x332px

>>71209361
#1 41,693
#2 24,621
#3 26,586

>>71209350
Then how come any Superman vs. X thread always ends up becoming a circlejerk over how hard superman would win?

inb4
>vs threads
>relevant

>>71209403
>let it taint their work.
How?

File: 1428932385531.gif (52KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 500x500px

>>71209458
my schadenfreude is going into overdrive.

>>71203743
Not a SJW and I'm like 90% sure they don't exist, but Male characters get to be sexy without sexy being their only redeeming quality.

For some reason though you end up with stuff like that ugly as shit she hulk run, or people tracing pornstar poses everytime a girl is on panel. It's getting better but there wasn't much inbetween for a while.

No one is against the sex appeal, just keep it out of the forefront until we get some good stories in and you can justify a character as something that isn't eye candy.

File: 1267727622819.jpg (214KB, 424x600px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 424x600px

>>71209458

Are those considered good sales in American comics?

>>71209458

I have no idea how anyone can like that travesty.

>>71209591
>, or people tracing pornstar poses everytime a girl is on panel.

Not every artist is Greg Land, and most people hate Land.

>>71209610
not really. for Marvel, most books that drop bellow 20k are in danger of cancellation

>>71206910
"Cause it means unfairly bashing someone as the price of inclusion"
Completely lacking in a sense of irony.

>>71209591
>Wasn't much inbetween for a while
I'll agree there was a lot of shit art in the past but I don't think there was apoint EVERY artist was Greg Land.
>90% sure they don't exist
Really people flipping their shit over Frank Cho's fan art doesn't count as SJW?
>>71209610
Not especially but not cancellation tier plus it may be one of those "we want this here" books like Captain Marvel so.....

>>71209591
Not the same anon but I have issue with that, the male characters who's only redeeming quality is sexiness absolutely exists but in women's fiction like romcoms, romance novels, erotica and such.
No one gives a shit though because that doesn't create a problem for anyone no one is actually harmed or affected negatively by these things other than those that like to bitch about made up shit aka feminists, there is no harm in having some characters like that and don't give me that objectification bullshit, or people can't tell the difference between pure fiction and reality and therefore it influences real life in negative and problematic ways even though I have no proof crap.

>>71205368
That's all this ever was

File: slobpool.jpg (213KB, 663x580px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 663x580px

>>71208008
I'm a chubby, ugly guy I wouldn't read a comic about a chubby weirdly drawn guy. There's always an unconscious appeal with comics where I'd like to see a good looking guy. And I ain't gay hopefully

At least deadpool is drawn with a healthy build even when he's obviously a slob.

>>71207838
I feel the insane need of redrawing this shit.

>>71209591
>but Male characters get to be sexy without sexy being their only redeeming quality.
So do female characters. It's just that you don't realize when they have depth because *you* as an individual can't look past their cleavage.

Objectification is an action done by the observer.

>>71209970
>I'm a chubby, ugly guy I wouldn't read a comic about a chubby weirdly drawn guy.

>i am insecure as fuck

Fixed, no need to thank me.

>>71210303
Please name one female character that ever had any character depth beyond look at my tits before last year.
Thought as much.

>>71210416
Wonder Woman.

>>71210416
Polaris.

>>71210416
Batwoman

>>71210416
Jackie Chan.

>>71210425
Bull shit
>>71210433
Who?

>>71210462
Why do you pretend to know about comics when you talk about them when you don't know about comics?

>>71210462
>Bull shit
Then she doesn't need a movie.

>>71210416
Huntress, Black Canary, Supergirl, Batgirl, Scarlet Witch, Batwoman, Renee Montoya, Phyla Vel, Dove, Wonder Woman, Mera.

>>71201357
>guy draws a sexy girl
YOU MISOGYNIST SHITLORD!

>girl draws the same thing
How empowering!

>no board for western adult comics

why?

>>71210595
Because they have western lawyers and tend to be lazy enough to spend half their day googling themselves to see who's pirating their stuff. It's not worth all the takedown notices.

>>71201211

my NUTS have been busted.

>>71201602
>Hawkeye Initiative
Kill you are self.

File: guuuurl.png (365KB, 493x488px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 493x488px

>>71201602
right now we need the inverse

>>71211708

Just as ugly.

>>71201464
Anyone?

>>71211951

Right this way. >>71048434

>>71201211
>why aren't people fitting into my narrative for me

>>71212094
I think they might be.

>>71210416
You don't end a statement with a preconceived conclusion.

It makes it incredibly evident you don't actually wish to have a discussion and just want to say you're view is the only one that is right.

>>71201691
That mattered to the sort of busy bodies that bother with this sort of stuff?

>>71206518
>feminists actually believe this

>>71206518
The most bullshit counter-argument of all time.

>>JUST TO PROVE YOU WRONG I'LL TELL YOU I DON'T FIND MAN ABS SEXY

>>71208008
>>71207838
man what the FUCK

They turned her into a bigger meme character

>>71206518
Then how do you obectify a male character?
And what is the female power fantasy?

>>71210416
Silk
No, really. She's great in her own book.

File: SpeedO-O7-daniel-craig-765169_803_1000.jpg (1MB, 803x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 803x1000px

>>71213765
Samefagging tryhard

>>71208008
>EricaFails
She certainly does.

File: mirror pic.jpg (156KB, 867x1079px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 867x1079px

>>71213765
Females objectify me pretty often
It's not as fun as it sounds

>>71201829
master cylinder pants are best pants

File: 7bhnYrMS_400x400.jpg (18KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 400x400px

>>71214237
I can't believe i used to think this guy was "buff".

>>71201430
can this be a running joke now with people drawing the covers.
like, ever con, everyone should ask people to draw the main character in the manara spiderwoman pose

>>71208008
I don't even mind ugly characters but there's something grotesque about those faces that just seem off.

>>71214376
I don't like the faces either. I can hardly believe that Wolverine dated her.

File: sss.jpg (475KB, 546x824px) Image search: [Google]

475KB, 546x824px

>>71214301

>>71201211
>>71201430
>>71201746
>>71201778
>>71203529
>>71205186
>>71211973
With great power comes great assponsibility.

>>71208008
It took me forever to figure out this wasn't a webcomic, as it's one cut above like, Questionable Content in terms of artstyle.
It doesn't help that I don't really like squirrel girl.

File: blomf =3.jpg (3MB, 4128x2322px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4128x2322px

>>71214416

>>71214521
The vacuum cleaner makes it so perfect.

god you guys are fucking pathetic. you just confirm every stereotype "SJWs" have of dumb nerds.

File: staymad.jpg (10KB, 288x306px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 288x306px

>>71215898
Who gives a fuck what SJWs think about nerds. They're landwhales and cucks, they've already removed themselves from the genepool.

Holy fuck this cover is awesome. Is it a legit variant or just commission?

File: 670px-Make-Marijuana-Tea-Step-7-Version-2.jpg (102KB, 670x503px)

102KB, 670x503px

>>71215975

And who gives a fuck about what you idiots think? Because you have such valuable NEET genes to pass on. Is being a fuckboy a genetic defect or just a calling in life?

>>71215898
You see, I really don't care what creeps vilifying sexual expression think.
You can like sexy things or not like them. Find them appropriate or inappropriate for any given situation.
You can say you don't like how a character is portrayed. But smearing entire genres without rhyme or reason is just bizarre.
How dare you portray attractive characters in suggestive poses!? Waaaah!
How dare you make your protagonist a goddamn sexual tyrannosaurus!?

As friend Anita showed us last week, what they want is non-representation of anything.
They want no story, no artistic decision, just blank space to project on.
Which is only logical. If your aim to to have everyone to have no possible way of feeling underrepresented, the moment you show anything a person identifies with (relationships, social behavior, character motivation, race, gender), everyone not associating themself with that will obviously feel unrepresented.
Therefore a barely human shape will do until someone starts taking otherkin seriously.

File: spider_kiss_by_darkereve-d8kghga.jpg (182KB, 720x1110px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 720x1110px

This was also drawn by a female on DA and no negative comments no negative nothing.

>>71216579
I'm really hoping someone is forward this shit to Rodriguez

>>71208949
Black Cat get's powers that would actually help any thief become a better thief but has never realized how much she relied on her luck powers in breaking in to places and avoiding cops.

Gwen is far to timid and guilt ridden over her part in Peters death to see the bad luck she spreads to others as anything but a curse and hesitates to seek help from anyone else out of fear of what might happen to them.

File: 1416362582669.jpg (33KB, 460x642px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 460x642px

>>71216356
Did your handler help you type that out, spergo? I'm happily married and don't give a fuck what some cuck thinks about "my-sore-gina privledge" or whatever. Cry about it

File: on_the_edge_by_darkereve-d7zrlm5.jpg (461KB, 1500x2045px) Image search: [Google]

461KB, 1500x2045px

>>71216579
>>71216245
Variant.
She also neglects she's not really anybody in the industry.
She's a pro but she's very new and hasn't been on anything big so it's not surprising she didn't get harassed by a bunch of SJWs.

>>71216356
you sure seem to quite obviously :^)

File: 6543.jpg (62KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 540x960px

The girl in this photo is 17 and she drew this cover for herself.

SHE DONT GIVE A FUCK

>>71216875
They'll probably just call her edgy and emo

>>71216875
>Gwen
>With Hobgoblin
Fake ass bitch.
>>71216698
Shit, stupid.
I mean commission.

>>71216875
>Hobgoblin
>not Green Goblin

>>71216875
wrong goblin

>>71210416
Nina The Barricade Girl

>>71216917
>>71216933
>>71216948
>>71217063
Yes, okay but the point is she's not offended and she's a female so according to all the people who got the variant pulled she should be very offended.

>>71217349
Internalized misogyny

>>71215898
>>71216356
Someone call the trigger police!

>>71201357
Huh. She seems cool. And she's pretty good. I'd say that's a winner

>>71214521
>sale

>>71216579
>>71216698
>>71216875
Somebody tweet this shit and watch the hypocrisy sizzle.

>>71220615
It's pretty much over isn't it?
And everyone who wanted to think what they wanted to think is already thinking what they want.
I'd say move on but no one can seem to do that until it's REEEEEEALLY overstayed its welcome.

>>71220615
Actually there have been many females, including some in the industry for awhile, who are on Cho's side. They get blocked immediately from the guys trying to protect them from themselves.

>>71220714
>Some in the industry
Who?

>>71220778
Joyce Chin was pretty vocal about it on Liefield's post

>>71220876
Got a cap or something?

>>71215975
Fuck you are fuck your bullshit infection of a comic board dedicated to the appreciation of the craft into your bullshit excuse to rant about "those guys" who you dont like.

Fuck you, die in a fire you are a cancer on /co/ and this fandom and you represent the antithesis to everything this site is about.

You dont care about comics, you just want to fucking talk about and rage on your enemies in the massive comicsalliance/themarysue/gawker/sjw/twiiter/tumblr hive. Fuck actuallyd iscussingw orks ont here merits, no it's all minorities this, and feminists that and sjw this; fuck actually assessing content on it's own merit "Oh this article comes from [insert enemy site here]" well fuck you if it's information I want, I'll read it all right, as long as it's not from THE EMENEMY.

You are using an artform as an excuse to act out petty tribal feuds, you are a blight upon this site and if the mods had any sense they would purge you and your filth from this site for all time

File: 1410213270441.jpg (22KB, 265x308px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 265x308px

>>71205054

>>71214521
So is female objectification an issue because you suck cocks? I just don't get why it'd matter. In any case you are certainly handsome.

File: power fantasy intensifies.png (2MB, 637x1027px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 637x1027px

>>71206518

>>71206518
You have never watched Free!, have you?

>>71221189
>You are using an artform as an excuse to act out petty tribal feuds

They are the ones doing that. All we're doing is calling them out on their stupid shit.

>>71222239
Its copypasta, m8.

>>71221189
I FUCKING LOVE PASTA IN THE MORNING.

>>71221189
>>You are using an artform as an excuse to act out petty tribal feuds

hey look, it's literally the entire history of art

congratulations on noticing the Iliad, bro

>>71215898

You confirm every stereotype "dumb nerds" have of SJWs

>>71206910
>Hero that prevents rape makes it made of rape

Wow

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJlkMAZTEPI

>>71217349

So she's the Queen of All Girls & Women, and can speak for all of them?

>>71201748
You do know that the two guys that are being compared are wearing different clothes right? And that's not even the point of the image.

>>71221992
What's the context of this one anyway? Like Arnold being naked in Terminator doesn't make me think "oh this is just sexualization".

>>71216875
>>71202074
Now these are real women, not irrational shitbag retarded hypcrites like the ones condemning sexuality.

>>71225606
>condemning sexuality and violence.

I mean.

>>71225606
Why? I disagree with them but the whole "this is a real woman" mentality is pretty bullshit. Besides one drew Hobgoblin with Gwen

>>71225606
You also mean "hypocrites". Now why is anyone who voices an opinion regarding tastefulness in an industry that's trying to court them through tastefulness a hypocrite?

>>71225810
Period needs to be in quotations.

And they're hypocrites because they eat up all the other violence, sexuality and garbage that men are subjected to with smiles.

>>71225893
>Period needs to be in quotations.
Thought it's only when you're quoting someone.

>And they're hypocrites because they eat up all the other violence, sexuality and garbage that men are subjected to with smiles.
You're assuming a lot.

File: IMG_0057_large.JPG?3461957693194147932.jpg (90KB, 312x480px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 312x480px

>>71225810
Standards of tastefulness seem pretty arbitrary.
An artist creates a sketch on his own time some how became a big fucking deal.

>>71225976
>Thought it's only when you're quoting someone.
Nope.
>You're assuming a lot.
Nope, I highly doubt they condemn the vast majority of fiction they claim to be fans of. You can look on all their blogs and see it, this argument is moot and you have no ground.

People exist to be toys and playthings in fiction. Many more men have been brutalized throughout fiction than women ever will be and the corrupted worldview of women being "special" when they are not has allowed this sick interpretation of anything negative happening to women as some sort of super-crime against humanity is absurd.

Go rant about how Star Wars evil for blowing planets or something.

>>71226100
Star Wars teaches us that it's okay to destroy planets, it trivializes the destruction of Earth, our most vital resource!

STAR WARS IS EVIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

File: 1387572406622.jpg (530KB, 1280x2043px) Image search: [Google]

530KB, 1280x2043px

>>71210416
The irony is that the 08 run of Power Girl fits that description.

>>71226100
This is all sad and true. There's no blog posts for all the covers where men are completely disgraced or destroyed and how horrible it is...because people understood it was a story and what was happening was for drama and entertainment.t

>>71226012
It was a big deal because it seemed like a passive aggressive move, though Cho's intentions will be unknown. Doubling down makes it look like he's doing it out of spite.

>>71226241
To be fair those typically had something to do with the comics and weren't just variants.
Except the ones that weren't.

>>71201778
>>71203529
Considering who the artist of these is, Robbi is very lucky

>>71226281
Why must it be some passive aggression? He said he had artist's block and hadn't drawn in a while.
So he drew a Spider-woman who was blowing up at the moment in the Manara pose.
The Harley Quinn one was definitely making fun of the outrage though.

>>71226294
>To be fair those typically had something to do with the comics
>typically
Covers have been bullshit for decades and you know it. They're just eye catches, nothing more.

Joker holding a wounded Batgirl was a great eyecatch, period.