Remember when Eddie's casting call claimed "his past was shrounded in secrecy and he harbors a dark secret"?
Wonder what that was all about.
>>77545556
doesnt wash his hands after using a toilet
He's actually from Earth 33 and inadvertently fucked everything up by coming to the show's Earth to see his heroes.
>>77545556
stuff that got rewritten
The final chapter!
It's insane
>>77544314
Literally was in the process of creating this thread.
There are people that wanted to read this when it came out. For some reason. So let's go.
>>77545399
>>77545399
>Tieri
LOL
>>77545405
http://www.gamesradar.com/mark-millar-how-man-steel-traumatised-create-huck/
>You see, I love cartoonish ultra-violence as much as the next Glaswegian (see this year’s Kingsman: the Secret Service where Colin Firth takes down 100 fundamentalists in a Southern Baptist church), but at the same time I also feel we need a little balance. In amongst all these very dark, angst-ridden and sometimes very serious superhero movies that have made Hollywood a lot of money over the last fifteen years I’m sensing a need for a little hope too, a little LESS super-cool bad-assery. This really hit me hardest, I think, when I was watching Henry Cavill’s turn as Superman in Zack Snyder’s Man of Steel a couple of years back.
>Now let me preface this by saying that I’m an enormous fan of everyone involved in this movie from the director to the writer to Cavill himself, who I think is a terrific and enormously likeable Superman. I’ll also say that I’ve been there in the front row from X-Men’s bleak Auschwitz opening, to Willem Dafoe being crucified against a wall in Spider-Man, to Ang Lee’s introspective Hulk, to Batman officially stopping smiling EVER circa 2004. I’m all for it. After decades of campiness and often journeymen directors I fell to my knees and praised the level of talent we suddenly saw attached to these characters I’d loved my entire life. We had legitimisation! We were finally being taken seriously! But Summer 2013 as I sat there on Father’s Day and saw Superman beating the bad guy by twisting his neck so hard he broke it and murdered him I really wondered if we’d come to the end of that particular road.
>>77545299
>movie shows an unlikable character
>THAT'S IT! COMICS ARE DEAD! FUCK EVERYTHING.
I really don't know how people that make comics think that movies speak for the whole industry
>>77545299
We just had this thread.
>>77545360
Well, Millar's who shtick is that he's long since stopped writing comics for their own sake and is just looking to get stuff optioned for movies himself. So it makes sense that he'd care a lot.
Got a double dose for you today. New issue of BPRD, and a short Hellboy tale from Dark Horse Presents!
Well that's not great.
I've been thinking about what if Batman and Spider-man shared the same universe? This would exclude all over crossovers; no marvel heroes beside Spider-Man and his immediate allies and enemies, and the same for Batman.
What interesting stories do you think would come from this crossover?
What villains would team up? Or outright hate one another? Would Batman and Spider-Man be equals, or would Batman be the main with Spider-Man as the sidekick.
Would Spider-Man make for the best Batman sidekick?
>>77544826
>What villains would team up?
I can see Mysterio and Kraven teaming up with Batty villains, but the rest of Spidey's more super powered villains...it'd probably be more a case of people like Croc and Clayface teaming up with them
>Or outright hate one another?
Venom would probably be a nuisance to everyone hero and villain alike
>Would Batman and Spider-Man be equals, or would Batman be the main with Spider-Man as the sidekick.
That would probably depend on how you look at it, Spidey is a jerk but he respects true heroes as he himself is a giant moralfag...so he'd probably play second banana but wouldn't be a true sidekick in the sense that he could outclass Bats in terms of power....insert cheesey scene where Spider-Man shows his crazy strength and Batman is humbled for a mere second here
>>77544826
Would Punisher show up in his original context as an antagonist thinking one of the two heroes is a villain?
>It's a Wizard of Oz episode
>>77544762
Hey, fuck you buddy, the Phineas & Ferb episode was amazing
>its a sherlock holmes episode
>It's a Pokemon episode
Differences between the two:
>One has visible page numbers
>The other has interrupts by one creative team
>
>
Both of them have Galactus and Doom!
I mean, enjoy!
>>77544456
>>77544464
>>77544475
I'm officially done with this book.
It's fucked beyond any redemption.
I tout Wilson said it wasnt ourman?
SoP?
Hold out a little longer.
Dan Abnett is getting the title in January.
And hopefully Wilson gets the boot.
I almost cried laughing at the reason Jimmy turned super evil because it's so stupid
This book is pretty fucked, I doubt even Abnett can turn it into something worthwhile
Do you ever get tired of Marvel/DC writers using the same villains over and over again?
>>77544103
yes
>inhumans are using kang as a bad guy
>x-men mr sinister
At least the avenger tittles are doing new villains
>>77544103
No, honestly, as long as there's SOME buffer time between their appearances, like, Inhumans is too soon for more Kang after Uncanny Avengers.
>>77544143
>mr sinister
Is he really used all that often outside of 90s? In 00s/10s I only remember him in Messiah Complex and Gillen's X-Menthen I stopped caring about X-Men altogether
So why is she always teasing him and busting his balls?
He's clearly uncomfortable around her, so why can't she just leave him alone?
Why does she have to be all Kanker on him?
>>77544078
Maybe she's used to a different kind of courtship? Maybe she doesn't realize that he's a broken child trapped in a man's body.
>>77544078
DCAU Wonder Woman is a perfect waifu and Batman is a total fag for not jumping on that.
>>77544078
Because Dini and Timm had no idea how to write her or what to do with her.
I just finished reading Thor (the one with the cosplayer lady) and I have some questions for you experts.
>1. How the heckJanegot on the moon to pick MewMew?
>2. I still don't understand how the name "Thor" can be passed from person to person as it is a title. I read somewhere that was explained in there but I really still don't get it. I mean they spend like half an issue playing on the fact that she IS Thor, not "Lady Thorita" or whatnot... but a real... let's say logical... explanation is missing to me.
>4. This is just a curiosity and it is for whoever read the comics without knowing thatJanewas in fact Thor. Was that "obvious"? Or did you fall in theSolomontrap?
I had a question #3 but I think I answered that myself.
Please don't hesitate to send me to page N or dialogue X for reference, I have all the issues still on my tablet.
I really wish it had been Solomon, she was neat.
>hurf durf I'll go make a new thread although I have already been answered plenty in the original one
Faggot.
>>77544080
>the original one
which one? I searched for "Thor" in teh catalogue and found nothing related to my quest
Why do you always have to be so surly? And how is the page you posted helpful?
I hate Reed Richards so much.
>>77543984
how do i subscribe to your blog for more updates??
Show us on the doll where evil Richards touched you, Victor.
GO AWAY DOOM
https://uk.celebrity.yahoo.com/post/133119614879/christian-bale-shuts-down-fan-theory-that-hes
Did anyone really believed in the "Bale is Batman and Affleck is Deathstroke actually" theory?
Please tell me you were not this stupid /co/
>>77543951
Well, you know. Retards did.
>>77543951
>the "Bale is Batman and Affleck is Deathstroke actually" theory
Literally the first time I've ever heard of this, what are you even going on about?
>>77543951
Of course notKilmer is the real Batman/Bruce Wayne. Affleck is a clone created to continue his work