Archived threads in /co/ - Comics & Cartoons - 7805. page

I posted the original link in the old thread, but ya.. this is interesting..

Now if that OP guessed, got lucky, or was telling the truth.. he sure did get a gift with this interview.

Can someone compile screenshots of all the questions he answered?

File: giphy.gif (461KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

461KB, 500x281px

>>78160592
>this might mean that one spoilers guy was right
>beautiful inspiring justice league montage with no shit music or cringe dialogue just saving people and hope
Aaaaaaaand I just came

File: i-think-i-love-you.jpg (16KB, 373x161px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 373x161px

>>78160361

>>78160361
Sounds like a contradiction.

>changing himself
>not committing to an identity

Clearly, he ISN'T about commitment

>>78160046
>for some reason
It's iconic. People would be upset if he wasn't nasally.

>>78160046
Biggest mistake IMO is turning Adam into a 16yo greenhorn. I think the target audience is supposed to identify with the character, but this concept hits a creepy note everytime he changes into his adult he-man form.

>>78162252
how would you have done it? just have Adam and He-Man as pallet swaps?

>>78159861

>Pacific Rim is a rip off of Transformers.

>Marvel is better than DC

>I ship Harley with everyone

File: p184711_b_v7_aa.jpg (101KB, 480x720px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 480x720px

>>78159792
It's a shame. This was a really funny show.

>>78159792
It was OK, but I'm super glad it floundered and we're not living in a Fantagraphics Cinematic Universe.

>>78159792
>shows that were too ahead of their time
In what way? If you're talking about the liberal stereotypes, those have been around for ages.

File: cyclops.png (29KB, 431x270px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 431x270px

I don't know what's worse, the way Marvel has been shitting on him for years, the way every casual thinks he's just a wussy boy scout whose only role is to get keked by Wolverine, or the cancerous "rightclops" meme, but I still want to see him recover from all this bullshit.

>>78159335
>loki
>have been ruined by casuals
Please explain.

>>78159224
Damn, Betty Boop got fat.

File: TootStoryboard.png (118KB, 408x587px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 408x587px

Because the storyboards were awesome !

File: T H I C K.jpg (25KB, 244x294px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 244x294px

>>78159224

Nope, I'm watching South Park marathon.

>>78159079
Stuck at my sister's.
Think its be onDemand afterwards or should i just search youtube?

>>78159158
Its a movie so ondemand might be unreliable.

>>78157531
Once upon a time, anon.

Once upon a time.

So, are these movies dated?

>>78157859

I'd say yes and no. They have some timeless elements like the feel of the romance and chemistry of the cast. But there's no denying many of the jokes will fly over people's heads in the years to come.

Seriously, nobody will probably connect the nod to Spiderman in the opening montage of Shrek 2 by 2058

>>78156748
The I in IDw must be for irony

Sweet.

The Ghostbusters and TF ones sound good too.

>>78156748
Both deviations comics coming in march?

I don't have a trailer for you to watch because I'm not sure what I would put in it? It's more about the overall gestalt anyway, which is hard to grasp in a minute and a half. But I know you're not going to want to download some anon's mega link based on little more than that OP, so here's my notes and changelist (which are also included in the DL):

>Short explanation:
GARGOYLES IN “HUNCHBACK” = JAR-JAR BINKS

>Long version:
Jar-Jar Binks is only one of many, many problems with the Star Wars prequels. Even without him, those movies are just horrible.

HOWEVER, “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” (1996) is a pretty great movie! That is, it WOULD be great if it weren’t for those pesky gargoyles.

>>78156613
>Long version (cont'd)

They serve little-to-no narrative function; their actions have no real consequences. Their cartoony nature contrasts so sharply with the tone of the surrounding film, it’s like they’re in the wrong movie. And most of what they say, apart from inappropriate fart jokes, is to EXPLICITLY describe the movie around them in the simplest, most insulting terms possible.

If it isn’t obvious, the gargoyles were shoe-horned in as a hackneyed attempt to make sure the kids don’t get lost or bored. I think the execs pushed for the movie to be more “adult” and “edgy,” and the gargoyles were a last-minute back-pedal after preview audiences with kids complained or something. But, without the back-pedaling, what this pedigree gives us is a Disney movie with RACISM, CORRUPTION, LUST, TORTURE, and a heaping helping of NEAR-RAPE EXPERIENCES. So, FUCK KIDS.

...I didn’t mean literally “fuck kids.” There’s enough creepy shit in this movie already. I mean, like, let’s not worry about making sure kids like this movie? Especially since the gargoyle plan clearly didn’t work. Kids have never liked this movie. I sure didn’t when I was an idiot kid.

So what happens when we get rid of the gargoyles? Well, since they’re mostly a superficial band-aid, removing them is often surprisingly simple. There’s a few bumps in the road (especially toward the beginning), but overall we are given a beautiful, operatic, gothic, epic, mature... well, still not “masterpiece,” but goddammit it’s a lot closer!

>>78156647
>Long version (cont'd)

So yeah, not perfect by any means. Some issues are technical and can’t be helped, due to the raw materials I’ve been given. A better editor might do a marginally better job, but mostly there’s not much more that can be done under these restrictions. Other issues are embedded in the imperfections of the film itself, and may be made even more apparent without the distraction of the gargoyles.

But mostly, I’m telling you man, it is SO MUCH BETTER NOW. The overall momentum and pacing is probably the greatest beneficiary to these changes; i.e. no more stops and starts. The emotional engagement can get a bit deeper. Quasimodo himself feels richer and more relatable -- an endearing eccentric, instead of a legitimate schizophrenic. Not to mention, obviously, the tone has been smoothed out, and the movie no longer treats you like an idiot child. Which is nice.

Maybe the best part: that stupid song is cut. You know the one.

And the gargoyles? Well, they’re still in there. But they have become mute watchers, physical representations of the “eyes of Notre Dame;” usually still, but occasionally brought to life out of the corner of your eye.

File: inSTOCK-12-9-15.png (70KB, 726x493px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 726x493px

Latest purchase

File: Comic shelves 12-12-15.jpg (742KB, 616x1000px) Image search: [Google]

742KB, 616x1000px

I attempted to start a shelf thread and it didn't last long hahaha. Guess I should leave it to you anon, and Cream to start these things.
Here is my updated shelves.

I still don't believe Gillen ever wanted to use him. He just made up an excuse so he could use his Latina waifu in Patriot's role instead.

>>78156811
You, I like you.

What with all these damn kaffir in my muslim comics?

File: 1449814905706.jpg (2MB, 1988x3056px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1988x3056px

>Admit that the feeling is mutual

>>78154766
>I'd better keep repressing my feelings for dumbass reasons

>>78152605
>"i'm pissed off at dipper"
>i'm going to break this thing dipper had in his backpack because i'm angry
>my brother plays with and investigates supernatural stuff
>nothing bad could possibly happen by destroying this probably supernatural object.

>>78152739
tbf Blendin seemed trustworthy.

>>78152605
>dipper was being selfish
So Dipper gets the selfish grief but not Mabel, not Mabel who forgot staying for the summer only lasts a summer, wanting to drag her brother with her for her own comfort as he's excited for a possible new direction for his life.