Can we have a thread for style sheets? I love looking at these.
>>84524411
Welp, here's part 2
I still don't understand.
Where is this character from?
Hell.
The Amazing World vs the Forces of Steven Falls
The Amazing Adventure of Star vs. The Forces of Gravity
Hey, /co/ I'm looking for quality series runs outside the obvious and usual. (I.E. Sandman, Lee's FF, Claremont's X-men)
What's your favorite series run on any book that you feel like no one talks or knows about?
Let's give each other some quality runs. I submit my own of Roy Thomas on Conan.
>>84523278
I lke RT on Conan, but not mich else.
Both Marvel Team up and Marvel two in One are full of quality but rarely mentioned.
Simonson Get's alot of love, Lee/Kirby Thor is awesome.
Over at DC I'd say the first 38 issues of Kamandi deserve to be more widely read.
Badger is the best comic ever.
>>84523278
Alan Moore's run on "Supreme"
the first four years of "Lady Death" by Brian Pulido (yeah, I fucking said it)
"Battle Pope"
Thor by Walt Simonson
"What If?"...all of the classic series was comickino
So far I have been using http://www.readcomics.net/ but their layout isn't that friendly or intuitive.
What do you guys recommend/use?
>>84523209Readcomicsonline.to
CDisplay and dont read online.
download your fucking comics
What are they going to do to them?
>>84523143
Vore
register their hypercam
>>84523143
>unregistered hypercam
>3
If I were to spend 20 dollars on a Nick series to re-watch, which should it be?
>>84523093
Angry Beavers.
>>84523093
Guess Rocko since I watched Hey Arnold like a year or two ago.
>>84523093
You Can't Do That On Television
ITT we speculate the penis sizes of certain male /co/characters.
>>84523017
Does his dick have two faces as well?
>>84523071
He has two dicks
The half he decided to leave uncut I'd longer. He circumcised himself
You are the worst board I know You constantly pirate from companies. They provide comics and cartoons for you and are always trying to cater to you, and this is how you repay them? And to add insult to injury, you shit all over their works first chance you get. And you're such a sponge. You pay for nothing. You always say, "Oh, I'll buy it later" but later never comes. And what really bothers me is you pretend you're this deep board who loves comics and cartoons for their lore when all you do is shitpost memes. Yeah, I shitpost, but at least I'm honest about it. I don't buy a copy of Batman Year One and then lecture casuals with some seventh grade interpretation of how Batman is some profound, intellectual. He wasn't! He was a spoiled brat! And that's why you like him so much...he's you! God, you're pretentious! And you delude yourself by thinking you're some great board, even though you're terrible! You know, I should have know /lit/ didn't write me that note. They would have known there's no "a" in the word "definite." And I think what I hate most about you is your textbook liberal agenda, how we should "Make a capeshit board, man," how big the movie industry is crushing the comic industry, how Creator Owned Titles failing is the biggest tragedy in America. Well, what have you done to help? I work down at the local comic shop Sundays, /co/. Never seen you down there! You wanna help? Buy a fucking comic! And by the way, reading Graphic Novels doesn't make you noteworthy critic! Oh, wait! You don't believe in Cirtics or any professional criticism for that matter, because "Muh Conspiracy!" Well, who the hell are you to talk down to anyone? You failed CalArts twice, which isn't nearly as bad as your failure as a writer! How's that script of yours we never see? But you know what? I could forgive all of that, all of it, if you weren't such a bore! That's the worst of it, /co/. You're just a big, sad, alcoholic bore. Well, see ya, /co/! Thanks for the fucking storytime
>>84522897
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rk4TMKcJF54
>>84522897
but I'm here for the cartoons
>implying anyone on /co/ actually reads comics
>expect awesome animation with outlandish demonic characters and situations
>get 3 seasons of WANDAAAAAAAAAAA
Season 1 was the best and closest to the comics. It rapidly got worse and worse from there.
It wasn't supposed to be a straight up action show, it was supposed to be dark, gothic, and atmospheric
If you want straight up action watch the live action movie
>>84522826
>WHY DID YOU SAY THAT NAME!?
>WAAAAAAAAAAANDDAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>I MISS WAAAAAAAAAAANDAAAAAAAA
>>84522851
it isnt any of those things most of the time, it's just the protag angsting endlessly over his ex. if that's what he's gotta do to take his mind off his predicament, then whatever, but let him do most of it off-screen.
Is IDW going to grab the oportunity and make a crossover between the old and new Ghostbusters?
Do they even have the rights to do it?Also, anyone has that MEGA file to the Ghostbusters comics?
>>84522739
They'll probably make a few jokes about it at some point since they've established that a Multiverse that contains all the different variations of Ghostbusters and related busters of Ghosts is in fact a thing.and no I don't have the mega, sorry
I'm sure they'll do something with it.
>>84522739
Im really hoping they can keep ignoring the new movie
Any Cloak & Dagger fans on /co/
What are your hopes for the tv show?
For Dagger toinflate like a balloon.
>>84522682
For it to get cancelled mid-season.
>>84522682
Black female Dagger
White male Cloak who is her gay best friend
One week.
We all have one week to get ready for whatever may come.
On the bright side there is no way anything this year could be worse than Warmachine 2.0, right?
>>84522512
Warmachine 2.0 again
>>84522599
Please no.
>>84523366
Warmachine 2.0 again, TWICE
So how long till they become a couple?
>>84522508
Never. Kamala's gonna be his side ho.
>>84522564
true
They don't have to be an official couple. They just have to be in enough scenes to make shippers spread the characters around.
Has anyone ever seen "Romeo and Juliet: Sealed with a Kiss"? I just discovered this movie exists, and based on what little of it I've seen, the animation somehow looks simultaneously good and bad at the same time? Like, the motions are really fluid, almost like a DIsney film, but the colors are extremely flat and the characters clash with the backgrounds in weird ways. What is up with the making of this movie? It's ratings were abysmal; is it some unfinished and sabotaged mess like Food Fight was?
clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-3HKLLJW9U
>>84522329
It was animated by one person, if I recall.
>>84522377
Yep. Just look at the credits:
>Directed by: Phil Nibbelink
>Produced by Margit Friesacher, Phil Nibbelink
>Written by Phil Nibbelink, William Shakespeare (play)
>Voice credit: Phil Nibbelink, Chanelle Nibbelink, etc
>Edited by: Phil Nibbelink
>Production company: Phil Nibbelink Production
>>84522329
I saw this a while ago and I thought I remembered the animation looking better. Maybe I saw it in low quality.