Is full bodypaint cosplay a thing? Is it allowable in conventions? Thinly painting over nipples counts as clothed technically right?
>>9280928
I think basically everywhere wants you to have on stick on thongs and pasties, but I've seen some mostly naked people at cons before. It depends on the con.
Yes, but no. There's no way you'd be able to do this anywhere other than an 18+ con, which are very few and far between.
Alternatively, the technical dick route would be to go to a con in a city that allows for public nudity and just not enter the actual con itself and take pictures outside.
I wish it was more of a trend, though I doubt prudish cons will allow it.
Queensland Body Artists Society at an OZ convention
>>9284910
>Buff bro with muppets painted on him
Don't mess with this madman
Bodypaint is mainly used for pretentious art but barely for cosplay, It's the only way to get the tightest suit for cosplay accuracy and I love it.
>>9280928
why dont you just put this in with your "skimpy bikini allowable" thread to confine your obvious thirst to one thread? and learn that the word "allowed" exists whike you're at it?
>>9280928
>>9285814
Holy fuck. Fucking saved
I wonder if she looks good all the way around, or if it only works at a certain angle
>>9285820
it relies on being viewed from certain angles
>>9286165
Thanks for the heads up, I think the webm works well in >>9285814, not so much the paintmanship, because it actually sucks quite a bit. It is mainly the lighting or some sort of filter applied that pops the colors out making it appear 2D, it's quite mesmerizing.