online comms

>>8898148
Did she make this out of an old slip?

what were the comments?

>>8898158
People were saying they were too long, it was weird that they were plain, and she needed to get a lot better if she wanted to be able to sell them.

Glad people were actually giving someone a dose of reality for once.

File: image.jpg (86KB, 640x590px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 640x590px

Kind of had to post this after I saw it the other day. I'm sure the admin had a giggle bout this one.

>>8898183
Where's this from?

>>8898183
lol, wtf? if a group allowed things outside of the rules then what is the point of having rules, then?

>>8898148
Those things honestly look like cooked ham slices with lace on the hem. How can you look at brand wristcuffs and decide that this looks fine in comparison?

>>8898148
I thought this was some guro thing made out of skin

>>8898183
I'm one of the admins. We shared it in our admin group chat and had a bit of a laugh.

>>8898408
I thought they were ham too. Thus isnt the right shade of pink.

>>8898183
What's the context on this when it comes to what she posted?

>>8898408
I thought they were ham from afar too.

>>8898570
>>8898609
Yeah, context would be nice.
Looks like they just didn't tag their post?

>>8899183
OP asked for ideas for an "around the world" themed meet with a blue outfit. Literally the only rules of the group are to tag whether you're a higher or lower level of knowledge and to not be an asshole. All that girl would have had to do was add "Little Sister" before her post.

>that vault suit dress ita in lolita gamers
Can't wait to see her trainwreck coord in CoF down the line.

>>8899587
Somehow the price tag makes it so much uglier.

>>8899587
>marabou feathers
>Austrian crystal
Or they're just shitty cabochons and feathers from Michaels

>>8899600
Good sales speech. Too bad it's ugly af.

>>8898148
I thought this was some sort of WIP pic of shitty prosthetic hands....

>>8899355
Oh boy I can't wait. It's going to be beautifully horrifying.

>>8899587
>This pretty creation
stopped reading there because naw

>>8899328
Ah okay. Then the group is better off without her if she's going to get pissy so easy and quick. She should do everyone a favor and take herself out.

>>8899600
does she mean swarovski by austrian crystals?

>>8900646
Not quite. There are off-brands that mimic Swarovski's methods, and are advertised/labelled as "Austrian Crystal".

File: Screenshot_2016-03-08-10-16-40.png (417KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

417KB, 1440x2560px

IS THIS BITCH INSANE?

File: Screenshot_2016-03-08-10-16-46.png (2MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x2560px

>>8900817

>>8899587
She keeps on posting those ugly ass hats, will she ever stop

>>8900817
What are you on about? It's a simple busted button, it happens all the time. And in case you can't read, she isn't actually trying to sell it for 666 dollars.

File: 0e9a5817cc4f5d1609d24eff238dca5c.png (9KB, 495x126px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 495x126px

why do ppl use the comm as their personal journal

>>8901735
I don't get people who see their dream dress but don't have the money. Like if it's your dream dress shouldn't you have money set aside for when it pops up finally?
Though I guess this is a hypothetical question because I know most people are bad with money and every new AP print is their ultimate dream print.

>>8901735
Because they're lonely

>>8900819
I'm loving those rainbow sheets of hers. Would buy.

>>8902492
>>8902493
I know the pic is small but she looks way too fucking old for this shit

>>8902492
>>8902493
Why would she expect anyone to throw her a special meet if she seems like she's not really interacting with the rest of the comm? Seems super entitled.

>>8902492
>>8902493
Someone posted about her in the last online comms thread >>8893661

As was mentioned then, you're probably just feeding into her martyr complex by posting her here.

>>8902499
Yeah, I don't understand this either...in my comm people generally put their own birthday meets together.

>>8902492
I don't understand what the problem is...just have two separate birthday celebrations bitch?? One during the weekday for you and your man, another one for the comm? However it sounds like she has no friends or no good friends in the comm based off these posts? I'm assuming that because she sounds just so entitled and self-centered here. In which case, she probably has no friends in the comm who want to make her a birthday meet because she doesn't put the effort in to get to know anyone well enough. Plus, all this bawwing about people not catering to the fact that
>wah, my husband doesn't come home until this time and I'm too scared to take a taxi

so then...........make your own fucking meets? I can't stand people who complain about meets not meeting their personal needs. you can't cater to everyone and you can't cater to just one person all the time. if she really wanted to be apart of the comm, then she would find a way to get to meets. like fine I understand having that anxiety about uber I guess but there's plenty of safety apps and devices that she can take advantage of.

I agree with >>8902495 though, if she's as old as she seems in the profile pic for ants she seems way to fucking old to be this pissy (then again anyone beyond the age of like, 12 is)

>>8902492
>>8902493
Holy shit stop. No one wants to talk about her.
She's apparently not even posting in the comm or going to meets anymore either, so just unfriend her and move on. This isn't even online comm related, she posted these on her personal page.

You're obviously just trying to stir shit, you didn't even have the courtesy to censor her face.

>>8899869
ditto 2bh

>>8902493
Lol. Good, bye.

>>8902516
The other post is technically related because it was posted to her online comm. never heard of this girl before and I found it pretty entertaining so instead of bitching and moaning why don't you actually contribute?

Also this is cgl. No one gives a fuck about censoring tiny thumbnails.

>>8902574
I'm in that comm, senpai. She didn't post it there.
If you want to see entitled whining, go to tumblr, there's nothing special about this girl.

>>8902580
this. or at least post it to the cringe thread. if it's not in an ONLINE COMM it doesn't belong itt.

>>8902580
Have you evever actually been in an online community thread before? Half the damn screencaps are of dumb entitled comments and posts. Go away.

>>8902582
It resulted because of the status she posted in the comm...and it's in regards to the comm.

As if she would actually follow up on her claims about leaving, no one wants her around. She's self absorbed af and can't dress herself...

>>8902591
take it to the comm thread or cringe thread. this has nothing to do with online comms.

>>8902596
You sound mad

File: babies.png (88KB, 504x233px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 504x233px

>>8902596
>"this has nothing to do with online comms."
>Is about a comm
>is posted online

File: 1453022951144.jpg (24KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 250x250px

>>8902748
>>8902599
>2016
>not knowing the difference between the Comm Thread and the Online Comm Thread

>>8902779
There isn't even a comm thread up right now, this all started on an online comm, it's online comm drama. Get over yourself.

>>8902492
>>8902493
S T O P
T
O
P

>sage for STOP

>>8902492
>>8902493
Seriously, stop.
Yes, we all know she's a whiny self obsorbed brat, but she's also the type of person who loves to bawwww to her friends because "those meanies make me cryyyy"

Posting her here will only feed into her victim complex.
Unfriend her. Block her. Ignore her at meets.
If you don't give her attention, she'll go away eventually.

Sage because fuck you and your drama.

>>8903284
>>8903617
samefag pls go

>>8903617
I hope you realize that by flipping your shit every time this girl gets posted you are only drawing more attention to her, you moron

File: 2016-03-09 20.31.39.png (50KB, 979x445px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 979x445px

>>8903706
Sorry someone shat on your brand

>>8903194
>There isn't even a comm thread up right now
what stopped you from making one?

>it's online comm drama.
it's specific to a regional comm. all regional comms have an online element, but that doesn't make them "online comms" since their purpose is to meetup in real life with local/regional lolitas. "online comm" refers to comms that exist only online, which could be more aptly described as discussion platforms.

i think given how many people make this mistake, the next OP should specify that it means places like daily_lolita, Rufflechat, LSC, etc., with a note to use the comm thread for regional discussion.

File: 31188_original.jpg (46KB, 360x480px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 360x480px

>>8904409

>>8904409
isn't that the chick that always has her kid with her in pics

>>8904719
No clue, but she tried to defend this choice in a thread on cgl a while ago. She didn't grasp why people found the decision insensitive/attention whore-y.

>>8904719
Yes.

File: 1429678791061.jpg (20KB, 436x333px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 436x333px

>>8904411

>>8903724
because, you know, it's so difficult to post from two devices. Admittedly, that would be trying really hard, but if the shoe fits..

File: Screen Shot 2016-03-12 at 2.08.01 PM.png (65KB, 503x281px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 503x281px

what the fuck is this shit

File: 008c1694a1fc653cb5605c2cf6592776364d88a5.jpg (139KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 600x600px

>>8907402

>>8907402
It's that 14 year old from the post about bringing children to meets where she whined about feeling unwelcome because she is a "child".

>>8907402
>newbies discovering 50s fashion in Nabokov's Lolita
It's happened before, it's almost funny: http://egl.livejournal.com/14452071.html

>>8907431
Say what now?

>>8907564
Someone made a thread about lolita moms and it ended up being a discussion on why a lot of lolitas don't like other lolitas bringing their (young) children/infants to meets and that even if a child was well behaved, they would be really bored. 14 year old pipes up and says something along the lines of "well, I am a 14 year old child and I really wanted to go to a meet but after seeing this thread I'm not so sure!"

Seems like she lacks reading comprehension skills because the comments were exclusively talking about very little children.

File: vrewtf.png (57KB, 367x763px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 367x763px

This temper tantrum was a wild ride.

>>8907738
'Temper tantrum or troll' is always a fun game to play in the online comms.

>>8907738
>>8907742
Holy crap. This lady is fucking insane, she's some 40 year old lady who doesn't even know shit about lolita. It'll take me a bit to find caps, but I remember I saw her post in that frilly-free-for-all group a few months ago...totally clueless.

File: Valera.jpg (45KB, 940x939px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 940x939px

>>8907738
Such a beauty. So rori.
Like what even was this bitch on about? She doesn't even wear lolita.

>>8907756
fb moms get bored and shit up various comms?

>>8907738
Kek and rekt

File: screenshot-www.facebook.com 2016-03-13 01-14-02.png (318KB, 507x817px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 507x817px

>>8907756
She really doesn't. I'm >>8907750, got distracted but here are screenshots of what I was talking about. This was her intro post, but I have another screencap of a weirder comment she made incoming.

File: screenshot-www.facebook.com 2016-03-13 01-29-18.png (195KB, 512x1340px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 512x1340px

>>8908271
Sorry, the app I use to cap stuff in chrome was giving me a hard time! This was her telling a newbie that she should wear a push-up bra, even though she admitted she doesn't know shit about the fashion in her intro post??

>>8908280
Holy shit. This reminds me of that crazy old lady "seamstress" from a year ago who was shitposting her awful advice everywhere

>>8908280
The fuck? Push up bras are a no 97% of the time.

>>8908322
Nancy?

>>8908322
Raleigh right? How many of these crazy old lady dress markers are there? Her profile says "Dress Maker at Lolita Fashion" any post that's not "God is wonderful!!" (oh the irony) is about mediocre sewing projects.

>>8908322
Ah, Raleigh Wood, that brings up some memories...

File: image.jpg (163KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 640x1136px

why god

Can it be that every comm has that one girl who will push herself into group or couple cosplays with a certain person?

>>8899587
Etsy at it again

>>8908271
>live long and prosper
Damnit i'm a trekkie but why?!?!?

File: Screenshot_2016-03-14-14-16-20.png (543KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

543KB, 1080x1920px

Looks like linda is still in her scamming ways. First selling her ex's stuff, now scamming people on LM.

>>8911011
Which Linda? The one the runs AP usa?

>>8908280
>>8908271
>>8907756
>>8907738
Quick. Someone ask her if she likes pantyhose and Mary Kay.

>>8911289
No, Linda Michelle

>>8911011
Terrible, I wish the mods would just ban her sjw ass already

>>8911348
Omg I've all but forgotten about her. Shh.
Don't say her name. It's like Voldemort.

File: Screenshot_2016-03-15-14-39-09_mh1458067623194.jpg (773KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

773KB, 1080x1920px

No

>>8912847
Deleted already? I'm not seeing it in the community.

>>8911728
She's a scammer?
She lurks here.

>>8908271
"I appreciate any feedback but only positive"

>>8908271
>I appreciate any feedback(positive) that people will give me
wtf

>>8911728
She's the one that sold her ex's stuff, right?

>>8915414
She's the one who stole her ex's stuff and then tried to sell it on, so yeah.

>>8900817
I guess she made it $666 because she wants to trade, not to sell it.

File: image.jpg (145KB, 640x807px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 640x807px

Checked my FB feed and this is the first thing I see. Couldn't stop laughing at "Misty Sky controversy"

File: cry moar.png (335KB, 1021x756px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 1021x756px

>I don't like this
>proceeds to make three comments in a row defending it

>>8917037
She was probably referring to the previous comments. Like saying she thought they were mean for calling the dress ita.

This whole Shaming! thing really needs to fucking die already.

File: screenshot-www.facebook.com 2016-03-17 22-48-49.png (381KB, 508x948px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 508x948px

lol wtf? it looks like she deleted it pretty quickly cause I tried to post and it said the owner removed it. I don't understand why she shared it to LSE - if you know it doesn't belong then why'd you do it anyway? Like how stupid are you? If you're trying to show it to the Atlanta lolitas, why the fuck would you post it in a worldwide group as opposed to, oh, I dunno, maybe, the atlanta comm's group or their event page???

>>8917185
kek, i have that same mixer... it's so rori

File: mqdefault.jpg (11KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 320x180px

>>8917185
Are mixers a lolita?

File: Screen Shot 2016-03-18 at 2.57.35 PM.png (46KB, 1079x203px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 1079x203px

(EGL still counts as an online comm, right?)
All I have to ask is why?

File: mfw.gif (1MB, 224x209px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 224x209px

>>8918208

>>8916997
...What? People think it's a controversy when it's just poorfags and newbies whining that a dress costs money? That's basically half of all the conversations on lolita comms and sales groups.
>>8917037
>You could explain it's not accepted as lolita and offer advice but just to shame them and call it ugly
Wtf? It's a company, not a person posting their handmade mostrosity. How is offering advice on facebook going to help them?

>>8918208
There's such an influx of idiots on EGL right now. Either shit spelling or this asshole.

Are "points" on lacebook seriously just comments + likes?
I don't really get why we need points.

>>8919477
Points? What did I miss

>>8908280
>
>"my clients like the look of cleavage"

Is she a fucking madam or something? This comes off super creepy.

>>8919627
if you read her intro post >>8908271 sounds like she sews ~gothic victorian~ dresses or something

>>8910418
Does anyone have caps on this? I saw there were comments but was too late with checking.

>>8919627
The fuck is a madam

>>8919787
A lady pimp for """"""high end"""""" escorts

>>8919787
A female brothel owner was the traditional meaning of it. Instead of men managing prostitutes, it was a madam who owned an establishment and rented rooms to prostitutes to live in and work out of for a cut of their earnings.

>>8919698
>gothic victorian
So Hot Topic with longer skirts and more shitty cameos sewn in? No wonder she looks like shit.

>>8920125
>We're adults!
>Can't handle mean anons on BTB

Lawl

>>8920125
>yelling at people for ~participating in btb~ when obviously who ever told them reads btb OR the admin that posted herself reads btb

File: Screenshot_2016-03-20-10-11-36.png (2MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x2560px

>>8907402
14 year old strikes again

Did anyone cap the shitfest on RC with the pedophile sperging out about how CP is normal?

>>8921196
You mean the dumbshit who has never heard of loli being used to refer to a young girl?

>>8921200
no the one talking about being a ''hepebophile'' and comparing pedos to gays

File: 3439fbabe03d67a49088fdd4c73e948c.png (72KB, 887x492px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 887x492px

This is from AANI. Clearly I missed the post in RC that she's talking about bc I don't know ANY lolitas that want to be associated with the word loli.

>>8921213

A couple of years ago people here didn't really care.

>>8921204
that lady pissed me off so much. she kept saying to some girls how pedophilia is normal, just like being gay. and homosexuality was deemed an illness once too. I had to turn Facebook off and eat a cookie.

>>8921204
Can somebody post it?

>>8921223
It is a natural thing for a lot of people. Finding attraction towards youth and innocence like that. For some it's an appreciation for things like "moe". For others, it seeps into their sexuality of no fault of their own. It's /acting/ upon the pedophilia that's terrible for obvious reasons.

>>8921213
Yeah some of this was posted in the AA thread but this is probably more appropriate here.

I don't go on RC anymore, and I couldn't imagine "a good chunk" of girls in RC would be okay with the word loli....

>>8921286
I unironically use the word loli. As long as you are not around people who might misinterpret it, I don't see the harm. But a lot of lolis hate it.

File: everythingwrongwiththecommunityinonepic.png (68KB, 509x724px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 509x724px

>>8920125
>>8920134
>>8920170

It got even worse...

>>8921196
i knew it was going to get deleted, but damn i wanted to read it all

>>8921321
so only the mod can read BtB? what a hypocrite.

>>8921305
Japanese also use rori often as a short form of lolita. it's not a big deal, it's just a cute short form of a long word.

what is a big deal is oujis who call themselves shota. please keep your unambiguously fetishistic terminology out of my meetups. if we don't tolerate sissies why do CP loving fujos get a pass?

I don't usually come to this board so I don't know if this is the right place to ask.
I'm getting a 3D printer soon and one of my friends wants a custom chess piece from Jojo. I made the 3D model and I'm waiting for the printer to arrive.
What do you guys think is a fair price to charge for a commission like that? Keep in mind all she provided was a picture of the piece from the book, I had to make the entire model by myself and print it.
I don't want to rip my friends off but I also don't want to do cheap favors since I had to do the whole thing myself.

>>8921353
Soo...what made you think the online lolita community thread was the place to ask this? Out of curiosity?

>>8921371
Because this is the commission's thread

>>8921373
Oh wait fuck
Shit I can't read I'm a retard

>>8901752
While ideallly you should set aside money for it, if you are someone who has a small budget to spend, it can be pretty hard to set aside the whatever hundreds you need for a 'dream dress' while actively building your closet up. And if you just spent money on a dress, it makes sense you cant just drop more money on another one right away.

>>8921213
The op there posted this in rc:uncensored, in which everyone told her to calm the fuck down about some anime tshirt.

File: image.jpg (264KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 750x1334px

LCB just imploded on itself I guess

File: 1420234401165.jpg (95KB, 595x394px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 595x394px

>>8921395

>>8921219
yeah, people here, on a website/board exclusive to the fashion

compared to facebook, tumblr and instagram, places which have a way larger set of general anime fans/weeaboos than actual lolitas

I see no problem with the word being used here or in any other lolita exclusive comms, spaces, groups etc. but in public it's bound to cause trouble.

>>8921389
not uncensored, regular RC (or maybe both I guess)

>>8921395
For someone who hates BtB and 4chan so much, she certainly guaranteed that they get posted for the next few weeks.

>>8921395
Oh man, keep us posted if you can, anon.

>>8921426
The poster is a guy. His gf is a lolita.

>>8921431
I just left the group because wayyyy too much drama for me for a tiny FB group like that. Some of other members seem fine and all and I've interacted with some in other groups but yeah. Not that I can't handle drama, but joining and then seeing all the drama at that point was the online equivalent of walking into your house in the middle of your parents fighting and so all you do is turn the fuck back around and walk out.

>>8921447
That's entirely fair. I'm sure if there's anything of note it'll probably be capped by someone else. Man the secrets are going to be crazy next week.

>>8921353
What do you think your labor is worth? Creating a 3d model is pretty skilled labor. Also, the materials aren't that cheap.
Decide what you are willing to charge a friend per hour and add on materials costs. I wouldn't charge less than $15/hr to a friend (free to a really good friend) and i'm really really new to this.

>>8921321

What is this, the Oceania Lolitas comm?

>>8921547
Lolita Chat Box

File: 2505D50400000578-0-image-m-10_1422141054152.jpg (35KB, 634x838px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 634x838px

Sage this toxic shit full of ugly bitches who got bullied in high school

File: 2016-03-21 10.52.10.png (846KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

846KB, 1080x1920px

This made me laugh so much.

>>8922887
Awwww did someone get their feelings hurt? The world isn't your safe space honey. Especially not 4chan.

File: image.jpg (85KB, 720x1197px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 720x1197px

This beautiful "romantic country Lolita" skirt can be yours for ONLY. €45+ shipping

I'm laughing so hard right now gulls. How is this not a joke?

File: bait.jpg (3KB, 124x125px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 124x125px

>>8922103

>>8920125
>>8921321
This moderator has since been removed.

>>8924670
Apparently he wasn't even a lolita?

>>8921395
Who the fuck is Jenna and why should I care?

File: 1426463844005.jpg (24KB, 460x288px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 460x288px

>>8921321
>if you don't watch what your enemies are doing, you invite them to catch you blind

oh my god

File: image.jpg (74KB, 638x390px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 638x390px

>we find this betrayal
could they possibly be more dramatic? y'all need to chill

>>8924579
desu I'm actually considering getting something from her shop since she lives in a nearby country, but that skirt is an absolute joke.
half of her product pictures are drawn too, which is a great sign I guess

>>8924579
This shop is shady af anyways. Looking forward to see her at Hellocon.

>>8921321
Why do they all type like euphoric fedoras

>>8899587
65 aus is only like 40 in USD right? right?

>>8921321
>mind your manners

Omfg no. That's the cringiest shit I've ever read. These bitches need to put on their big girl pants and live in the real world

>>8924579
>only had enough fabric for half a skirt but made it anyway

Lmao

File: cryingmoonbunny.png (168KB, 404x300px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 404x300px

>>8924579
before I opened this I thought it looked cute because I'm a slut for gingham

>>8924579
Oh wow.

>>8922887
is that a miss piggy tattoo!? it's actually rather nice...

>>8924819
Didnt she get banned from rufflechat for being racist?

>>8924888
Is this the post you think I made? I never posted anything from your group here and it's not cool that you blocked me without letting me respond.

>>8925879
tbqh your community seems a little insane and you're probably better off without them.

File: a'dnh.png (16KB, 547x299px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 547x299px

I thought my comm didn't have furries. I thought it was special.

>>8924973
i was wondering too…

>>8927370
this.

>>8927426
Haha, oh my god! When that person posted on the event page, I really wasn't 100% sure what to say to them.

Is it bad I feel relieved that we narrowly escaped having a furry at the meet?

>>8921395
Jenna sounds like a fun person from that description.

>>8924888
Has anyone noticed the overly fake engrish?

>>8925879
The fact that you are even here is embarrassing to your comm.

Does anyone else feel like CoF is kind of too big now? Before, you could post, enjoy the fake efame for 2-3 days, then it'd get buried. Now, I feel like shit gets buried in less than 24 hours. I've seen great coords get buried by itas in minutes because they don't get any comments and the itas do.

>>8928511
Yes, I definitely feel like it is too large of a group. I prefer the format of Daily_lolita on livejournal.
>>8927892
Pretty sure that is just how she types based on previous interactions.

>>8927619
Oh and just to clarify, I don't dislike furries, or anyone who identifies as one. The only thing I dislike is when people show up in fursuits to Lolita meetups.

>>8928720
I'm op that posted the pic...I don't dislike furries. Hell I have friends that are one, however I'd rather furry and Lolita COMPLETELY separate

File: rVVb0H5.jpg (56KB, 500x690px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 500x690px

>>8928720
>>8929073
I hate furries. I hate furry enablers.
It's a fetish is what it is, please tell your friends to keep it to themselves.

>>8928720
'Identifies as a furry'. What the actual fuck is wrong with people?

>>8929254
Sorry, I've legit had people tell me they 'identify as a furry" before. Didn't wanna hurt anyone's feelings.

I just wish they wouldn't show up to meets in their fursuits.

Is anyone else annoyed by body mod posts in RC? You can get your answer by doing a quick search. It quickly turns into some edgy hug box imo. Some of the responses just get painful to read.

>>8929260
Most furries refuse to "identify" as a furry, because the label is associated with the creepy NEET men who fap all day to hardcore furry porn. I wear and make fursuits, and I won't even call myself a furry - most girls especially won't.

I know it sounds weird to hear someone say they do or don't identify as a hobby description, but it's not like a gender or sexuality. It's a subculture that is extremely hated, so you only identify yourself as furry if you're really invested in it, really trust the person you're talking to, or have no social standards.

But wearing a fursuit to a lolita meetup is in bad taste just like wearing lolita to someone else's wedding or a funeral. Consider it a gracious red flag of a sperglord, and avoid. Believe me, there's far more furries in lolita than you think, we're just more subtle about it via animal-themed prints or wearing fur shawls/etc. Or the abject avoidance of animal-anything, depending on the individual.

File: ss+(2016-03-26+at+01.41.08).png (5KB, 412x55px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 412x55px

c r e e p y

I want to call them out but I'm afraid the mods will invoke the no bullying rule or some shit

Not really a comm thing, but I REALLY hate when people post searching for really specific things in cosplay sales groups. Just scroll through or search and see if there is anything you are looking for instead of taking up space!

>>8928600
>I prefer the format of Daily_lolita on livejournal.
it is also way easier to find coords there. you might not get the instant gratification of likes, but your post will be easily searched and used for inspo.

>>8930763
I thought it was creepy too anon...

>>8930763
Yeah that was pretty weird.

>>8898148
Most of the things in the 'Lolita sewing groups' look like this. There are actual Lolita patterns and pattern books for things and they have been published for many years now. Translation software for scanners exist yet this 'loliable' shit and trying to lolify subpar western costume-quality patterns continues. Why, God, why?

>>8901538
Where is she posting them? I'd report the posts cause that shit's not lolita. I can't think of anything lolita that this would even coord with.

>>8931108
Because that shit requires actual effort

>>8907681
If she lacks the native wit to figure that out then yes, she is too young to come to a meet. Remind me to hold most future meets in cute pubs and bars. Sick of younglings whining.

>>8931121
Then I guess they get what they deserve if they can't manage to buy and translate a pattern. Not invited to tea in that shitty costume handmade though so they better not cry about that either. Waste of time and materials to produce most of the shit I've seen. Sure there are exceptions, but they are few.

>>8930763
Just report the post.

>>8898148
>seem

>>8931127
report to what? facebook? they don't give a fuck. mods? will probably say it's none of my business.

the poster apparently bought shit from milanoo, too (which I found out because apparently they need to reply to every single thread on rufflechat)

>>8929565
At this point it's considered bullying to say you don't like body mods, so I'm not at all surprised it turned into a hugbox. The people who don't like body mods in lolita can only post their opinions here, anonymously.

>>8931108
Because actual lolita patterns are for, like, impossibly small Japanese girls and not real Western women with curves! Why would anyone buy a mook that bodyshames them just by existing?

File: image.png (52KB, 444x287px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 444x287px

I have an odd question.
Over the years on cgl, I hear a lot of drama stories. They blow up and the person either doubles down in bitch town or says Sorry, I'll change.

Has anyone seen one of these people actually change for the better? Or do they all just leave or shut up. Really curious desu. Not sure I've ever seen someone become liked or respected after drama. In lolita anyway.

>>8931861
The only time I've ever seen drama whores get slightly close to transitioning into normal people they always end up saying some shit like "You aren't allowed to judge me on my past! I've changed and if you try to bring that stuff up you're bad and i'm the victim!" and the drama starts all over again.
So I've only ever personally seen these people leave or fade away.

>>8931866
I often see drama whores slink away and then try and come back half a year later hoping everyone forgot what they did. If you bring it up, what you said happens.

Although, I did see one girl start drama years ago and get full karma'd by a new girl drama-ing her in the same way recently, which was kinda poetic. I guess that's kind of a happy ending.

>>8898148
They are ugly and poorly made

>>8931861
I can only think of one who changed for the better and doesn't bring up her past. On the very few chances it is brought up by others, she takes responsibility, but doesn't make excuses for it. She is a much better lolita now than she was then, but keeps a very low profile online now.

>>8901735
Oh god this. Our comm has this one girl who frequently blogs about her life in the group. Somebody needs to tell her to stop

File: image.jpg (42KB, 509x385px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 509x385px

>>8931923
>>8931861
>>8931923
>>8931861
I actually know someone like that. She did a total 180 and is now kind of a mentor to new lolitas. In fact, if you ask her about past drama, she will take full responsibility and use herself as an example of how not to be a shit. She did her best to make amends to not only the wronged party, but the whole comm.
I wonder if they are the same girl?

Either way, it's nice to know that people can actually change for the better.
>Bit scary how the internet won't let you change, though...

File: image.jpg (74KB, 530x380px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 530x380px

>>8932097
>>8932097 #
>quoting: how does it work?

Kind of off-topic:
Sometimes I wish we could permanently delete stuff online. Like, for example, the girl that turned around. She'll forever be known as a terrible person and everyone involved gets reminded of it no matter how much they want to move on. They are just kind of...stuck with it forever.
I didn't have the interwebs as a young'n, so all my shitty mistakes weren't dissected. I'm glad no one was there to remember me being a dumbass growing up. Shit's embarrassing, yo.

>It's scary when you think about it, man. Hope I never get like really fucking drunk and fuck up (or worse, go psycho) or it'll stare me in the face
>...forever.

On topic:
Anything you wish you could erase from cgl? Or your weeb past? That you released into the void of the net?
>Like, imagine if your first con were recorded online.

TL;DR- The existential horror of the Internet never erasing shit... Your ita photos, shittalking, and crappy 11 year old YuGiOh X Tenchi Muyo fanfics are out there...
>Sleep tight.
(Sorry for late night rambling)

>>8932139
Post this question in the ita thread, or the weeb horror thread. It's really not suited to the online comms.

So on the topic of past dramallamas, I just found out that a certain sour grapes lolita is apparently moving to my country and joining my comm. All I know about her is that she's been kicked out of several communities in the past for being a nasty two-faced bully, but if course now she's claiming she's changed for the better. Should I give her a second (or third or fourth or whatever) chance or keep my guard up?

>>8932222
Given she pleaded 'I can change I can change!' repeatedly then just last year kicked off drama again, no don't give her a chance.
Tl;dr version is she banned a girl from CoF for no reason other than being friends with the girl she bullied. Girl asked why and got no answer, got over it. Fahr posts a coordinate to CoF that also has aforementioned banned girl in the image. She also gets banned without warning, as do several others who simply commented on the picture. Fahr being Fahr calls it out, Sour grapes immediately adds a bullshit rule that you can't post pictures of banned members to cover your ass, gets called out and quits the group and declares she's left the fashion forever due to how triggered she is by it all.
Check the Rebecca Black Tech archives to see it in full with caps

>>8931861
Wasn't princess Skye a drama llama? At least minorly? People love her here

>>8932197
Yeah, I'm sorry about that. Not sure what I was thinking, really. Not sleeping: the worse kind of drug.
>>8932252
Going to read this despite bitching about the Internet.
>>8932323
I'm not really sure who the drama llamas people care about recently are. I guess the farm knows.

>>8932899
>what is sarcasm

>>8932323
Not so much a drama llama as capable of turning the mob on. She frequently referred to other lolitas (and wank comms especially) as ogres. The implication being that only she and her frilly followers were the true lolita princesses. So she has some rabid fans who were nasty.

I'm honestly kind of tired of people looking at the past with such rosy tinted glasses. There wasn't "more of a lifestyle element" to the fashion back then like people keep insisting. Anyone calling themselves lifestylers got made fun of for being deluded, and usually for not having any clothes, ffs. The most popular/envied girls in the online comms were also the biggest bitches that everyone was scared of crossing. They made the lolita fucks comms, and also made eatfuckingcake in response to the lifestyle push for "lolitas should be lovely and ladylike!"

And just a note, I'm not saying their picking on convention itas or making people fear they'd be posted to wank comms was a good thing. What I AM saying is that everyone remembers this period where lolita was about having tea and being nice to your fellow frill-wearers, and it really didn't exist except in small, individual pockets. The overall situation was almost never about "the lifestyle" unless you were someone who didn't have any lolita clothes to begin with.

>>8932139
Tbh I've been thinking about this for awhile and the best thing you can do if it happens is just own it. I get drunk a lot and say a lot of stupid shit and when people ask me about it later I just double down and act like it's not a big deal and everyone moves on.

I wonder how many times people are going to ask about the ikea hoop skirt from now on

>>8936213
fuck me i just saw this

File: wut.png (19KB, 511x139px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 511x139px

??
alright I can understand asking advice in regards to being trans and lolita, that makes sense in regards to fit, silhouette, flattering clothes, etc. but like...ok, what does your diet and personal taste in music have to do with anything...

>>8940253
That person has asked about 50 dumb questions in the last 24 hours without taking the time to read anything or listen to what has been said.

File: screenshot-www.facebook.com 2016-03-31 11-02-23.png (409KB, 505x1923px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 505x1923px

>>8940260
what the heck, I went back to go look. is this person a troll or are they really this daft?

>>8940284
I know people this stupid so it's possible

>>8940284
I'm almost equally as bothered by that girl telling her those "could" work. No. Stop encouraging it.

>>8940410
In her defense, she was saying just the bows alone without the skulls could work, and since this is LFM it seems like she was just trying to be polite.

>>8940424
The second girl. I guess she did add the "if you have to ask" qualifier. Still though...

File: april.jpg (44KB, 492x280px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 492x280px

>nofunallowed.jpg

I don't get lolita humor sometimes. Much of it is actually funny, but it seems like lately, I'm seeing also a lot of childish jokes like the pussy bow blouse and Lolita the Orca. Idk if I'm getting old and the lolitas are getting younger or what.


>>8933135
>eatfuckingcake
>lolita fucks


good times.

To be real though, while in my opinion, there was a lot more closeness among lolitas back then, I'm fine with the way things are now. I don't want to go back to the days when there were only a handful of English sites and willing shopping services, and seeing a lolita at a convention being a general rarity.

>>8940701
This is so fucking stupid

>Shop in Wonderland is brought up in Lolita Updates
>Everyone tells to stay away
>one of John's asskissers defends the place
>lel

>>8940967
>there was a lot more closeness among lolitas back then
I feel like maybe it was an artificial closeness, really. I'm still friends with the lolitas I knew back then, and I have even more lolita friends now, but there are just so damned many followers of the fashion now that it FEELS much more distant.

We were a lot more niche than now (not that lolita has gone mainstream), and I think that created a false sense of intimacy, maybe? But yeah, would not go back to the days of unreliable shopping services or crappy translations.

>>8940701
Talk about completely ruining the point

File: 1435050398714.jpg (58KB, 400x534px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 400x534px

>>8941355
I like the idea of lolita shenanigans being so out of control that they just had to cancel april fools

File: 00.jpg (253KB, 615x806px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 615x806px

>>8940284
>>8940253
Here's more. I just saw this in a fucking sales group.

>>8942517
Oh I hate when buyers go "I wish I could buy this but siiiiigh" and even more so when they drag in something completely irrelevant that I as a seller give no shits about. In fact, if someone dragged in something so pointless as "I'm saving for transition / moving out / name change / new car / etc" then I'll make a special note that if they ever comment on another post of mine with the intention of actually buying, I make up an excuse not to sell to them because odds are, they'll either flake or string you along with "Something came up, could you hold this a few more days/weeks?"

>>8942517
>wish I could have it but I'm saving up for a transition
Ok love, that's some very relevant information

>>8942645
god, seriously. Like, that's great and all, whatever, do your thing, but no one fucking cares. I don't know why people bother posting shit like that on sales posts. No one fucking cares if you can't afford it for one reason or another. If you aren't gonna buy it, don't post.

>>8942643
This, besides it being totally unnecessary and the fact that no one cares, it reeks of the commenter attempting to get the seller to lower their price or make an exception for them or something.

>>8942517
I wish more groups would ban these kinds of comments.

>>8942645
>>8942648
But but they said they wished they could HAVE IT. They don't want to buy it, they want the seller to pity them and gift them a beautiful dress otherwise they're transphobic.

No, seriously. I had someone pull this shit on me years ago. They'd comment on items I was selling they wanted and never once mention the word 'buy', they'd simply talk about of how pretty everything was and oh how they wished they could HAVE it, especially since their first convention was in a few weeks and they'd love to cosplay for the first time. When I told them they were welcome to purchase what they liked, they got all huffy and told me "I haven't got the money for this, I just paid for a convention ticket!" They never had any intentions of actually buying my items, they just hoped if they lamented hard enough that I'd take pity on them.

>>8940991
Is the post already gone?

>>8936213
What's that?

>>8943214
ikea sells a decent hoopskirt in the children's section, that can easily fit most waists and can be made suitable for lolita pretty easily

File: image.png (179KB, 481x600px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 481x600px

>>8942517
Guys I'm laughing so hard. They got fucking rekt.

>>8943428
el oh el. seriously though. "sorry I'm just trying to build a wardrobe" so then you admit this was a lame attempt at trying to get the seller to lower the price out of pity or just give it to you?

I think everyone deserves to have nice things in their life but there's certain times where you need to choose. If transitioning is important to you, but you don't have the money for both that and a luxury fashion hobby, then you need to pick. You're not always gonna be able to do both. Sometimes you need to wait that extra month (or 2, or 12) in order to afford your next purchase. People need to face the facts that while yes, everyone *can* be a lolita, not everyone will be *able* to.

>>8940701
Lmao that group sucks so hard, I had to leave it because their posts were triggering me. Literally no fun allowed

How did nobody post that ridiculous rant in lolita humor recently about how we can't make fun of how people look or we're "as bad as 4chan?"

I was on mobile or I would've printscreened it

>girl in my comm has said on her fb profile she's doing a moving sale
>tfw she's plus sized maybe I can score some cheap blouses because her JSKs would gape on me
>she starts posting in normie sales groups
>$70 for an ugly bag she bough second hand
>$200 for a second hand leaver's dress
>cheap lolita will never happen oh well

Everything is labeled as an urgent sale, too. Everyone where I live is cheap as fuck, pretty sure I've seen second hand bags similar to the one she's selling for about $30 at op shops, which probably means she's marking up her prices.

>>8931861
>doubles down in bitch town
top fucking kek

>>8942657
Teenagers seem to do this (spam sales posts with "I want it but have no monies"), too, but not necessarily because they want to stir pity, but they want to hold some sort of conversation with the older lolitas. It's pretty normal when you're in your teen years that you have little to no money of your own to control, or if you are lucky enough to have an allowance, you have to scrounge up to save. And they don't really realize this behavior on comm posts is actually annoying as fuck for the adults who have jobs that pay (especially for the adults who have jobs that are hard work and low pay).

Once those teenagers grow up and get a job, though, they will usually put those moments on their oh-god-why-was-I-so-cringy-back-then-list that we all have.

This person looks old enough to know better, though. Yes, transitional surgery is expensive, I'm sorry you were dealt a shitty hand of fate. But literally nobody cares about what financial state it puts you in now. If you have no money to bid on a sales post, then butt out, nobody gives a damn I'd be fucking ECSTATIC if I was given a Monet painting out of the blue, but that doesn't mean I'd go to art auctions and say about any Monet piece I like "I want it but can't afford it."

>>8942657
why are you namefagging you newfag piece of shit.

Why are there so many retard namefags ITT?

>>8944154
>being this retarded

>>8944156
It's an April Fools thing.

>>8944154
>>8944156
>samefagging and newfagging
oh dear.

>>8944163
that's not what samefagging is you idiot...

>>8944154
>>8944156
>newfags calling other people newfags

is it this time of the year already?

>>8944164
Yes it clearly was, they posted only minutes apart with the exact same complaint.

File: image.jpg (100KB, 636x1028px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 636x1028px

Oh boy...

>>8936213
kek, is this from the post I made somewhere about finding one? desu im a cheap ass so anything i find elsewhere is useful

>>8944196
I'm not sure what's cringier, this, or WTBs for replicas.

>>8944196
This was the same cunt that wanted the Fallout diner dress with added rachel lace for lolita.

File: tumblr_luvhhhwDBI1qat36jo3_500.gif (219KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 500x281px

>>8944154
>>8944156
How fucking new are you that you didn't even browse this board two days ago?

File: image.jpg (162KB, 640x969px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 640x969px

$200 for an infanta dress that's still sold by infanta for the original price...what
I don't understand why people expect their bog-standard second hand Taobao to have the same price inflation as brand. This isn't KL

>>8945347
This was also part of an 80 dollar lucky pack back in january.

>>8944196
>Im usually a size xl
No surprises there.

File: 1458187685587.png (205KB, 545x519px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 545x519px

>>8944154
Good to see summer has come early this year.

File: screenshot-www.facebook.com 2016-04-04 16-46-21.png (211KB, 502x823px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 502x823px

Holy shit, she did it AGAIN.

shut the fuck up! no one cares! jfc. there's literally no good reason for this stupid bitch to keep bringing up ~omgz i'm mtf transz~ unless she's an autogynephile or she thinks someone is just gonna give it to her for free for being trans. like stop.

>>8946198
>she

>>8946198
I'm tempted to ask it to please stop doing this. Like it's annoying, irrelevant, and they come across as a whiny as fuck teenager who can't manage their money.

>>8946250
do it please
I will deem you saviour of all facebook groups if you do

>>8946198
I called her out on it.
Maybe she'll stop, maybe I'll be cried at for being a bully

File: screenshot-www.facebook.com 2016-04-04 17-42-55.png (78KB, 510x567px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 510x567px

>>8946275
i went to go look, funny shit. the last comment though...what do they even mean by that? it almost sounds like they're saying "i'll stop commenting this on random shit once i get a job" although i'm hoping they just meant "i'll save up once i start working" or something??

>>8946317
Is this person legit autistic or something?

File: screenshot-www.facebook.com 2016-04-04 17-50-00.png (22KB, 485x170px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 485x170px

>>8946317
right when I posted this they added more lol. m8 who cares, stop talking. no one needs to know this? like, whether or not these are valid concerns and real things literally no one cares, this is not the right place to be talking about that. maybe on your personal profile but not some person's picture. this dumbass got called out on it by 2 different girls and they still can't get a clue.

File: screenshot-www.facebook.com 2016-04-04 17-53-37.png (7KB, 345x126px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 345x126px

>>8946330
went to their profile just for kicks but actually yes, yes they are. kek

>>8946338
I will never understand this. This is personal medical information. Why broadcast it unless it is literally a grab for attention. I hate people nowadays.

>>8946338
>>8946331
>>8946317
he/she must be a troll
nobody can be this retarded
right...?

>>8946345
i thought so too when i posted >>8940284 but nope, i'm guessing because they're autistic >>8946338 this is why they're apparently so far removed from social norms

>>8946344
tumblr.
like everybody has the urge to plaster their "sexualities" all over their profiles.
I don't care what you're into and what's in your pants.

>>8946198
>>8946317
I was going to make a comment about her coord, but I would also say something about my HL JSK arriving in the mail. This would be a snide comment at the person with money troubles since I'm a brolita.

>>8946338
People like this give autistic people who aren't fucking morons a bad rep.

>>8946317
>>8946198
He needs to be banned already.

>>8946344
or when people do ask

>>8946198
I hope the RC admins accept it into the FB group, I want to say how inappropriate bringing up your trans issues is so irrelevant. 'I want that dress' without even asking what the print is. I doubt it has been in lolita enough to recognise what it is.

>>8946344
It's because of the push for better treatment of people with invisible disabilities (eg: people with colostomy bags using disabled toilets often get dirty looks since they're not in wheelchairs, even though they frequently need that extra space to deal with their situation). Instead that it's going in reverse.

Rather than people actually just being more considerate overall, it's causing people to be up-front and out loud with conditions previously left unvocalised due to embarrassment or social stigma. Some advocates are saying this is a good thing, and will end up improving living conditions for people with these conditions, but many people take it too far. You also get people who are undiagnosed or hypochondriacs claiming to have anything from depression to OCD to autism to whatever physical ailment.

>>8946874
being autistic isn't exactly an 'invisible disability' anon. plus the kind of thing you're saying doesn't fucking apply online.

>>8946364
Are you autistic too?

>>8946330
Did we just discover the Chris-chan of lolita?

>>8946874
Unrelated but has anyone ever actually been sneered at for using the disabled toilets? Like unless you storm in in front of someone in a wheelchair I really don't understand anyone caring enough to give you dirty looks

>>8947005
They aren't toilets specially reserved so only a disabled person can use them, they're just large enough to accommodate disabled people. If there is a disabled person waiting behind you in line and they can only use that one toilet stall then it's kind of a dick move to take it, but aside from that aren't they just regular toilet stalls, just slightly larger?

File: 1eew.png (220KB, 497x529px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 497x529px

plz keep your fetishes out of lolita holy shit

>>8947024
gross. he needs to be banned/not accepted into any facebook groups

File: kaitlynsorori.jpg (613KB, 1186x944px) Image search: [Google]

613KB, 1186x944px

>>8946945
Certainly looks like it.

>>8947009
>>8947009
Some toilets in the US (and I believe I saw one in the Keio line of shinjuku station) have a large private bathroom that's just one sink and toilet labled "family room/ handicap priority" usually outside the men's or ladies room. I know nearby malls have them around here and actualyl where I work, the big stall has a photo of a wheelchair stick Figure image. But if I can recall, most malls now don't put it on the largest stalls door anymore.

>>8947005
A friend was waiting in line at the pier in SF and happened to get the handicap stall. When she came out the assisted was glaring at her and said something like "thanks a lot, she peed herself" but my friend was in and out within a minute. It would've taken longer for her to transfer from the chair to the toilet. I think assister was just salty because the assister took too long in general.

>>8947024
The gift that keeps on giving. Me cancer.

>>8947024
Was this actually posted to a Lolita page? That's just wrong and I don't care how autistic this person is or how hard they will scream discrimination. Fucking ban them.

>>8946887
Not who you're replying to, but for many high functioning people it is. I can 'pass' as relatively normal in everyday life and most people around me have no idea I have autism, but it takes up a fuckton of energy to do so. I do enjoy lolita meetups and certain other social functions but I need several hours to mentally prepare myself beforehand and then another few hours to wind down afterwards, otherwise I might go into meltdown mode and turn into a crying non-responsive mess. It's impossible for me to enjoy multi-day events if there's no quiet place for me to recharge and get my mood under control. From talking to several other autistic women, this actually seems to be very common. We 'pass' much better than autistic men but it comes at a price.
I do appreciate the increased attention for 'invisible' illnesses for this reason since I'm pretty sick of people telling me that since I appear to be perfectly normal at first glance, there can't possibly be anything wrong with me and I just need to suck it up. On the other hand, tumblrinas who think that autism is a get-out-of-trouble-free card really get on my nerves.

>>8946893
Nah. I didn't make a post. I'll watch from afar. :^)

File: maxresdefault.jpg (45KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 1280x720px

>>8947029
Is all I kan think of when I see this person

>>8947072
keep up anon. Just another fetishist trying to get into lolita 'fashion' while really wanting to be a crossdressing sissyfag.

>>8947072
No it was posted on there own wall. I still don't want them in any of the lolita groups though.

>>8947029
>that second picture
Did they post a child giving a priest a blowjob because those definitely look like priests robes.

File: FB_IMG_1459864640028.jpg (35KB, 480x474px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 480x474px

>>8947186

File: Screenshot_2016-04-05-14-55-35.png (662KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

662KB, 1080x1920px

>>8947029
Who the fuck thinks this is ok to put on facebook.

>>8947205
Well that's.. definitely something I wouldn't post on my FB for all to see.

>>8947206
A BDSM kinky autistic MtF fetishist?

>>8947206
>tfw my large hips/pubic bone make me look like i have a bigger peen than that person if i took a picture like that
>tfw i am grill

>>8947005
At con, someone with a leg brace came in and immediately banged on the door (I said almost done, be right out) and her friend started shouting angrily about people who don't need it using the handicap stall. I just finished quickly, got my crutches and hobbled out, because making her wait longer for being an asshole would mean others would have to wait and some other ladies needed that stall too.

No one else I have encountered has been that way about someone already being in that stall, physically abled or not, as long as you use a reasonable amount of time and get out so they can use it.

>>8947220
Please tell me the looks on their faces were priceless.

>>8945347
Lol this girl was trying to sell it at a swap meet too.

>>8947206
WOW, definitely a fucking autogynephile. I feel bad for actual trans people that have these kinds of assholes leech off the community.

>kaitlyn

I can't wait to change my name. Cause the trend of using any combo of Caitlyn is being used for trans for trend or lifers it's making me salty

File: Screenshot_2016-04-05-17-21-47.png (323KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 1080x1920px

It never fucking stops.

>>8947694
>I'm trans
>I'm MtF trans
>HEY I'M TRANS
>I'M MTF TRANS EVERYONE

The only reason why I can think that they're doing this links back to them sharing a BDSM/DDlg group photo on their page and they're trying SO HARD to make sure everyone knows they're trans and not an outright sissy because I'll bet you $10 right now that they're sexually aroused by lingerie and frills given that they HAD to post panty shots.

>>8947694
>my style of lolita

I thought this person hadn't actually *bought* anything yet.