Despite their difficulties with the bounty campaign, I think this has potential.
>>3514548
>recommended starting trading price
HURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
>>3514548
think we might see even $0.50 in a month or so after it gets listed on buttrex, I remain cautiously optimistic
>>3514548
>thinks their coin is gonna go 3x+ over the course of their ICO
Yeesh, people who buy in late are gonna regret the high ICO price
We have to shill the normies on plebbit once the FUD over bounties disappears.
>>3514548
SCAM can't even pay their bounties
scam. sage.
They lost their credibility completely.
The price will fall like a stone - no listing on any exchange will change this fact.
>>3514662
That's funny. Maybe you shouldn't have cheated.
>>3514752
Fuck off. I didn't cheat and still haven't been paid.
Fucking Peter was a disaster and acted like a child in the Bitcointalk and deserves to be fired.
I'll be waiting for my tokens.
You know what this is? It's people who got their tokens trying to keep the credibility afloat so they can safely unload and still get some profit. Fuck you guys, I know exactly what's going on.
>>3514773
Yes, Peter acted unprofessionally. But can you blame him? Did you read the thread? It was the worst kind of cancer manifested, constant spam and retarded questions from illiterate pajeets. I am not dumping, either I go to moon or I sink like lead along with it. It's a good project and I would be sad to see it die just because of a mishandled bounty campaign.
>>3514841
Honestly: I would stay away from this project as far as possible for weeks.
Not because their project is bad. In fact, it is far away from it.
But their referral-spamming clogged so many social medias, it NEEDED to attract such illiterate pajeets, because they smelled gains. This is basic knowledge.
So they made two mistakes:
a) attracting these cockroaches in the first place
b) they handled the situation in the worst way thinkable
This is a way to lose trust in their ability to manage their project. This needs to be pointed out and they need to think about a way to make up for it. Otherwise, they will fail.
>>3514931
Agreed 100%
>>3514841
I was watching the thread very closely for hours because I wanted to be paid. Peter constantly got into battles with users over nothing, even posting that guy's IP address to show that he's a scammer in some kind of personal vendetta, and sarcastically saying shit like "Ok we will pay the cheaters too. That's what you guys want, right? RIGHT?"
He completely ignored plenty of legitimate concerns from people just to fight petty battles with some users.
And when I even reminded him "Peter, you're representing your entire company right now. Do you understand that? Stop acting like a child," he actually responded something like "I'm very sorry, you're right. I will ignore them and be more professional now."
Regardless, I already know we agree on that.
The point I want to make is that while you may have been paid and will now shill for your tokens hoping the price will go up, and I can't blame you because I'd do the same thing and I wouldn't believe you if you claimed that isn't what you're doing, I can't trust that and I don't think anyone else should here either.