Is Twitter undervalued?

>>1719140

Given that they instituted a 'thoughtcrime' mod team, no, it really isn't.

It's useful as a marketing tool, but I wouldn't actually put money on it for investing purposes.

>>1719142

No it's overvalued. Twitter is dead.

>>1719140
I think they have yet to have a profitable year

https://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ATWTR&fstype=ii&ei=xWRzWOmMKNWWUN63vMAM

twitter is trash

No, it's worthless

>>1719140

I really don't know.
It's mostly a marketing tool.

Trump and other presidential canditates, businesses.

However when it comes to getting the latest news, the turkey coup for instance, it was on twitter first. Twitter is much better for getting the news coop than facebook.

During the turkey coup, what did BBC pull up on screen to read out loud? Twitter.

>>1719678
Yeah but how long? Twitter is one of those services which will lose any momentum once the new hyped service comes and people start moving again, Twitter does not have any environment which would be irreplaceable.

>>1719678
Didn't erdogan go on facebook live?

I agree Twitter gets new out faster, but I wouldn't call it "news" exactly.

Twitter still hasn't found out a good way to monetize all the data they collect, which is why no one will buy them out.

Trump will eventually dump his Twitter acct and then talk mad shit about it. The backlash against the platform has been underway for a while now. I'd steer clear.

>>1719140
There's no such thing as a stock being undervalued or overvalued.

>>1719801
How?

>>1719801
Retard alert

>>1719875
Not really he's saying the open market and what people are willing to pay for a stock at any given moment sets the price. So nothing can actually be undervalued or overvalued. Sorry thats too complex a concept for you bud

>>1719924
Price!=value
Sorry that's too complex a concept for you bud