Post results faggots
did it a week ago and too bored to do it again.
for accuracy, I had 100% in mind and nature, and 85% in the two other, as for the indentity I don't know what the fuck it's supposed to mean
I'd advice you to read about MBTI on this : http://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-personality-type/mbti-basics/home.htm?bhcp=1
it is much more interesting than taking some shady test
and finally MBTI is a tool to point out your weaknesses and strengths, it's more about the role you're more likely to serve best than who is the greatest edgelord or fag
about pic related, well y not
meh, looks like a regular MBTI with another bullshit category added for no reason
even if they didn't suck, you're not supposed to take the test only once and without counceling
Your Test Results
Thank you for completing our personality test! Here is a copy of your results:
Personality type: “The Debater” (ENTP-T)
Individual traits: Extraverted – 98%, Intuitive – 69%, Thinking – 66%, Prospecting – 88%, Turbulent – 69%
Strategy: Social Engagement
yeah, no shit it's used wrongly everywhere
it's a tool that is quite ineffective without counseling and further learning and someone making sure you're not lying to yourself
and it has to be repeated multiple times to factor out moods and temporary changes in personality
i test for INTJ or INTP
my observation is that i usually make decisions based on intuition but only really value external information based on facts
or maybe everybody's type is just DIPSHIT
I have many friends. I have a normie life but im not chad. I wish I could be this guy who is loved by everyone because he's creative & funny or whatever.
Feels wise I don't focus on my own feelings much and more so about otherwise and being afraid of offending them since I'm shit with people. Logic wise I just like things to be consistent, I hate inconsistencies.
I know it's bullshit, but I've gone from INTJ to INFP over the years, which is actually sorta accurate
not the guy you were referring too.
1. the test doesn't meet scientific criteria
2. you can't compare that to a horoscope
the original test was developed by one of the most important psychologist of the former century. so you gain some insight.
it's like a sun clock. it is not precise enough to be scientific. but you get a idea about the thing you wanna know.
>it's been discussed for decades and still has a lot of proponents, kiddo
Lmao it was a survey created by two female writers with basic understanding in psychology to be used by 1940's women for job placement in an industry that was lacking male workers.
It's a glorified astrology chart.
ISTJ master race signing in.
>the original test was developed by one of the most important psychologist of the former century
The original studies of Jung were good, but the Myers-Briggs test, which is what this website is based on, is a completely separate interpretation of his basic understanding of human psychology, a.k.a. two women read a book or two about it and decided to make their own thing. It was meant to help women in the 1940's find jobs during the war, not a definitive instrument to measure human behavior.
>>741781193 this >>741781258
>mbti stands on jungs shoulders
Not that guy, but to associate Jung with the Myers-Briggs test, which, again, is what this website is based on, is simply faulty. The creators of the test did base it on Jung's studies, but it's not a tool to define human behavior, it was a work placement survey to help women in the 1940's.
If I were to define a new model for quantum physics based on my foolish understanding of feynman's works, it wouldnt make my model true, because I'm a fool and I don't understand Feynman
Same thing for MBTI, Jung and those two cunts
Also INTP. I like writing, photography, and hiking in remote places where I know I won't run into anyone else.
Where did people get the idea that there is "truth" to learn about your own psychology? Human existence doesn't work like that. Take inspiration and start thinking for yourself. A test that's not scientific can still give you the right idea to come up with a realistic concept of yourself.
Until biology gives us better tools, accept that there are things right now we can't measure or know. Smile and live a little.
And if you're wholly uninterested in yourself, leave those alone that are. They're probably better people than you by now.
Can't tell you how they are similar, but they differ in how your "traits" are aligned. While MBTI has a two-way trait rating where one end is introvert and the other end is extrovert, which measures how you react to different environments and situations. Rather the Big 5 is more of how much of an extrovert are you, rating from 0 to 100, 0 being not extroverted at all and giving you a not necessarily a negative trait but rather you're just less susceptible to certain situations, i.e. do you feed off the energy of others in a party or do you just go for a little while until you're spent and go home. MBTI sorta affixes you to a trait, while the Big 5 tests your malleability in a certain situation.
>member when MBTI threads lasted for whole nights and were generally enlightening?
You can still find value in tests like these, and they serve best in determining what you want in a career, but not what career you're "built" for. It's like that thing you do when you have two decisions to make, so you flip a coin to decide but in the middle of the flip you realize which one you actually want.
Still, you shouldn't be all like "Wow, it says I'd make a great poet! That's what I shall be!"
you actually believe anyone here posts their ((personalities)) to determine what they want in their careers?
everyone here is attention deprived,looking for the slightest bit of approval
when i first MBTI tests i also signed up to an email list of other people of the same type.
i stayed in that list for 10 years it was really fucking interesting.
the other people felt like some sort of relatives with many matching personality aspects but vastly different perspectives.
by that experience, i'd say it has great uses as a communication and counseling tool.
Human resources said I should be a human resource manager.
I got Logician on this one. I've had architect on others though, which I think fits better.
Cultivating my porn collection. Masturbation. Watching football. Building 3D model houses. Dungeons & Dragons (online of course). Prostitutes when I can hold on to money. Painting miniatures. Recently I've taken up painting abstract art. I'm pretty terrible.
Its preety boring in romania so /b/ is the best thing i can do.
I learned something today:
"Logician" and "Logistician" - These two personality types may sound alike but they are very different.
If you are a logistician, you are a sentinel personality. You belong to what is thought to be the most common personality type.
Logisticians are known for their integrity and dedication to those they care about.
They are reliable and traditional with high ethical standards that can sometimes lead to a certain intolerance of other personality types - so they have to be careful about that particular weakness.
If, on the other hand, you are a logician, you are an analytical personality. You prefer to work alone although you can often tolerate working in small groups.
You're drawn to abstract, scientific concepts and you have a strong entrepreneurial spirit. You love your privacy and you have a good imagination with a keen ability to think outside the box.
You have to watch out that you don't appear condescending to others due to your tendency to use people as "sounding boards" without taking their needs into account.
Is this bad or not, I have no clue tbh
This guy looks like such a smug faggot. Not me at all.
Am i good yet?