>>739299562 I mean, when a girl lets you record her sucking your dick, she is either dumb and believes you won't show anyone, or she knows you'll show someone and doesn't care or actually wants it to happen.
>>739299562 My dear boy, no woman is a genius. Women are a decorative sex. They never have anything to say, but they say it charmingly. Women represent the triumph of matter over mind, just as men represent the triumph of mind over morals
>>739299562 Maybe? They get away with too much so they have less incentive to not be stupid. That's the fault of men though, which is either stupid on our part or brilliant depending on how we use it. Every car accident I've ever been in was caused by a woman thinking she had the right of way when she didn't.
>>739299562 No, but I think they are less focused and ambitious than men. Look how many women are on par with the absolute worlds best in any category. Despite being the majority on the planet they consistently finish behind men. I don't think it has to be that way but it is how things are.
>>739299562 Men look at the sky and imagine great things. Women look at men and imagine doing the things men do. This is why women will always be inferior and why men will always be at the tip of the spear in innovation and progress.
>>739299562 Objectively, yes. National IQ stats collected by the American Psychological association consistently ranks women 2-5 points below men by aggregate.
On top of that, women tend closer to the mean, while men experience a greater quantity of outliers. This means women are more likely to be of "average" intelligence, while men produce a greater number of both geniuses and idiots.
>>739300373 Wrong. EQ is extremely important. The problem is that people like you confuse it with intelligence. There is only one type of intelligence - intelligence. Either you have a good brain or you don't. EQ is a measure of emotion - either you're in control of it or you're not. As for all those other "types of intelligence", they may be important attributes but they're not intelligence.
I know a woman in custody dispute with her boyfriend over their 1yo boy, judge and lawyers warn her not to leave the area. She leaves the STATE, then spends weeks on facebook begging for help with housing and job searching... court ORDER to return to the state, fines, custody suspension. She's a drama queen to begin with. Know a woman who frequently declares, "I am a confident, educated, independent woman", constantly crying about relationships, whining about her retail clerk job. Keeps hooking up with abusive men. AKA she's a snowflake (i.e. the exact opposite of what she says she is). Or we could mention these women: Carly Fiorina, Marissa Mayer, Andrea Jung, Meg Whitman, Sarah Palin, Nancy Brinkman, Marilyn Hewson, Carol Bartz, and Darleen Druyun.
Not really. smart and wise are to wastly different things. i would say men are wiser but not smarter. Women can be way more calculating than men. as long as they have atleast a 5/10 appearence they mostly get what they want and the know it.
Women are dumber than men in my opinion. It's hard to explain exactly why. I just don't think they have the ability to think on deeper levels. They are too concerned with rules, anger, and being accepted.
>>739299562 that is not a question for the cesspool of autism that is this board. It is the title of a paper you should write using primary data on the intelligence spread of men and women using a variety of measures of intelligence. Go do it.....fuckla
>>739299562 Women in general are stupid because even the most stupidest, ugliest, most retarded female gets the dick and spawns offspring. Infact, the stupider you are the more you get fucked.
For a female there is no competetion; being smarter than the man is not a perk. For a male to succeed he has to be cunning and smart to beat the other men AND to convince the female that he's the best.
That has always been the case.
On the otherhand very smart women don't procreate for the same reasons as very smart men don't procreate: they're not terribly smart but due to social reasons they spend their time doing unsocial things. If you're fucking ugly and you're not terrible at school chances are you'll get a good degree and do whatever but by the time you could get children it's too late plus you're still fuckin' ugly and your kids will be ugly aswell.
>>739302952 >even the most stupidest, ugliest, most retarded female gets the dick and spawns offspring Actually, among normies ugly men get married and spread their fucked up genes just like ugly women. The thought that ugly men don't get pussy is an r9k-tier meme tbh.
>>739303759 That's right. Trump may not know politics but he isn't an idiot. Infact, he doesn't need to know politics. Want evidence? He's your president.
>>739303748 And they keep on fucking until they're so dumb and ugly that they die off, hence leading to a point where the dumb and ugly no longer fuck. Unless they're females, but in greater picture they're still dead ends unless an alpha male fucks them pregnant.
Generally agreed, I would add 'more emotional'. I think that is why they're less ambitious and less focused. My wife will spend more time talking about her feelings than reality and until I understood that it was horribly frustrating.
>>739299562 No, they really aren't at the end of the day. I'd say they're more prone to let their emotions get the better of them instead of thinking things through in certain situations like when something makes them mad. Men are more vulnerable emotionally when they start to feel something for somebody else.
women have a higher cluster of people in the "average" section and thus they have hardly nobody in the "extremely dumb" or "extremely smart" sections. They're all just average and that's why they appear dumb to many men. Mens cluster is much more spread out. We have less people around the average but we also have more people with genius level IQs and more people with room temperature IQs. This is the reason that all the top scientists and generall "smart people" are men, because there's statistically more of them >pic related
>>739299562 women have evolved in a manner that means they never really have to excel at anything. their survival mechanism is attaching themselves to the highest quality male they can and either whoring themselves out to him and having his children, and using them as their meal ticket, or manipulating men into doing their bidding. they've never really had to evolve to surpass their physiological or mental limitations in order to independently achieve what the men achieve for them, hence why statistically speaking they have average IQs across the board.
men however, have had to evolve both physically and mentally to surpass their limitations and defy all odds. but yes, there's a split. you have either extremely unintelligent men, or extremely intelligent men, there isn't much of an in-between.
I think this represents the two different paths men have taken throughout history in order to defy all odds and progress through the ages. some men focused on physical prowess and thus passed on their more physically able genes, and as such, ended up with descendents who also excelled in physical feats but lacked a certain amount of intelligence as a result. and some men focused on mental prowess, and as such, gradually increased the IQ of their descendents with each generation that followed suit while simultaneously lacking in physical prowess.
of course this isn't always the case, and there are many more factors to be taken into consideration because not everyone who lacks physical prowess is intelligent and not everyone who lacks intelligence is build like a brick shithouse. but I do think this kind of explains why there's such a rift between the two different sides of the spectrum and how it came about.
>>739307285 >you have either extremely unintelligent men, or extremely intelligent men, there isn't much of an in-between I know that my experience isn't a fact or anything, but most men I've known are intellectually average just like women. I have almost never talked with a really intelligent man unless you count teachers.
>>739307285 and also why women never seem to evolve past their base instincts and self-improve.
I also think this is why women don't really mature past the age of 16-18. because I've found that they don't, instead, they just learn to hide their immaturity, and they do so because they realise that the older they get, the less bullshit men will generally deal with, so they have to behave until they get their man where they want them. e.g. awaiting a child.
I mean, they've never really had to mature. why would they? they've been coddled and protected, they've been the wards of men since time immemoral, so they've had literally zero incentive to mature. men have always been the ones to take on all the responsibilities while the women stay at home and do the chores. and it's responsibility that matures people, it does so out of necessity.
look at how women react today when they get their so-called equality and are treated as equally as men and are given the same choices as men, what do they do? they cry about the responsibilities they have to take upon themselves, and they also do all they can to avoid them. like demanding abortions from the state. (ironic, even when they claim to be free from the clutches of the patriarchy, they beg the grand patriarch (the state), to relinquish them of their responsibilities and allow them to live like adolescent children with no parenting, drinking, fucking, taking drugs, doing the bare minimum.)
>>739307941 or perhaps what you're experiencing is the dunning-krueger effect.
I've come across a lot of extremely stupid men who appear to be intelligent and rather profound because they're so overly confident and talk so big.
maybe the men you've come across are above average, but because of their higher intelligence, they actually doubt themselves so much because they realise how much they don't know, that they make themselves seem a lot less intelligent than they actually are.
>>739308123 it's the same with women too. they can mimic higher intelligence by repeating complicated talking points that they've heard a million times before. because women are quite like parrots, they're good at repeating, because women's social circles are essentially echo chambers and they just repeat each other's statements over and over again (and we all know just how much women love to repeat themselves). Feminism is a good example of this. The ideology is completely logically fallacious and the majority of the talking points feminists brings up are equally as ridiculous but they speak with such fervor and passion that they make them seem valid.
No. They're not. There are many forms of intelligence. A woman who is true to her feminine nature, who embraces herself instead of destroying her gender with feminism is an amazingly emotionally in touch person, they can move mountains with the softest touch.
Men are biologically predisposed to logical and mechanical thinking. Women are biologically predisposed towards emotional thinking.
Both are valid and both serve a function within our society.
>>739308203 There are more very low intelligence men and very high intelligence men than there are women. Men beat women on IQ tests by a few points overall though, when you don't normalize the tests.
This is actually true for a lot of biological traits, women having 2 copies of the x chromosome appears to moderate against certain mutations, as well as there being a sex-selective adaptation effect to extreme traits not being applied to women, since their DNA is more likely to go to the next generation.
>>739308385 I should've said as well. they repeat these talking points without actually comprehending or understanding what they're talking about.
for example, philosophically speaking, there is no such thing as equality or equal rights.
I am not equal to who I was a second ago, nor will I be equal to who I will be a second from now. because the human condition is constant growth, constant evolution. if I can't be equal to myself, then how can I be equal to anyone else? I can't. therefore nobody is equal, ever.
and as for equal rights. they aren't rights. what feminism wants is more state privileges. rights are inherent and come from natural law, philosophically speaking. the state cannot, has not, and will never be able to give or take away natural rights as we are imbued with them from life to death.
if the state can give or take something away, then it's a privilege, and if the state has the ability to take something away from you by force, that's essentially slavery.
so what feminism wants, is more privileges from the slaveowners of the plantation.
but they claim that these privileges are rights and that they're entitled to them.
slaves aren't entitled to anything.
and nobody, whether slave or master, is entitled to a privilege.
so across the board we have logical fallacy after logical fallacy in relation to one of the core tenets of feminism.
they literally do not understand what they are fighting for.
like I said, they just repeat talking points they've heard others repeat in their echo chambers. whether they be political or social.
>>739308766 actually, I'd prefer it if western men became men again and stopped allowing women to dominate them, saw that rigid traditionalism benefits women and not men and figured out how to get the benefits of relationships with women without the whole "men are disposable" bullshit.
and just for kicks, send all non-beneficial migrants and their half-breed spawn back to their own countries.
>>739309304 I agree with you on this. I said nothing which would suggest otherwise. Men are supposed to be the leaders of their tribe or society. That is a given. I only said that women possess their own type of intelligence.
Men certainly are not disposable. We're the backbone of society and we deserve the respect that comes with that position. We're the strong arms that hold our people up, we're the brains which lead our people forward and we're the pillars which support our people when times are bad. That is 100% correct.
But Women have their place too, and women who allow themselves to be women, who embrace their feminine charms instead of acting like soft men add to society and possess their own talents.
Working in Customer Service for about 2 years, I've discovered that women are more likely to ask you to do everything for them. Including telling them what to get because they can't make up their own minds.
Let's put it this way: 1. Ancient China had the "4 arts" where women were encouraged to involve themselves in the arts and produce. 2. Female musical schools existed since Ancient Greece with the longest surviving building being in Italy from Roman times, and women were still gifted pianos and other instruments throughout all the centuries of AD.
All the best music ever produced ended up being produced by men. Even today, pop star whores are basically copycat attempts of Michael Jackson and Prince.
Does that explain some things to you?
You can include painting in the discussion. Women were always allowed and encouraged to paint. Men ended up advancing the field instead and producing masterpieces.
I think a woman's purpose is to be a supportive figure for a man. A woman's love can do wonders for a man in a cold world such as this. And I think that's the whole point. We need that supportive role and that love to give us incentive to push our limitations so we can continue the species. Without it, there's not really any point, unless we just dominate them, force them into submission, take them as we please and force them to bear our children. But then, in the long term that benefits nobody, because everyone will grow up in a world where pain is the norm and there is almost no relief except inflicting more pain.
And this is why a woman's role is so important. What do we have other than a woman's love to balance out the equation? Nothing. Meaningless distractions maybe. But nothing of substance. Without that emotional support and that love, we grow cold, our worldview grows even colder. And with each generation that passes by, we suffer more internal turmoil because we have no relief, no support, no love.
>>739310876 the problem is today that this has been turned on its head. instead of women thinking "what can I do for my man, to make things easier for him while he creates a better world for us all", women simply think, what can this man do for me? while simultaneously looking for another man who can do more. using men as utilities. and it's been that way for far too long.
>>739303759 >a man who manipulated two sides of the fence, one to vote for him and the other to incessantly give him free marketing by whining about him 24/7 and thus spreading his brand name and keeping it afloat >anything but smart >a man who became rich, lost his wealth, and then regained it in ways that are still a mystery to most businessmen >anything but smart
You are the typical example of a person whose brain is clouded by emotions.
>>739299562 Law of averages. There are, guaranteed, women with double the IQ than most kids on this site. PLENTY. They just don't talk to your dumbass cause you're a child living at your mom's. Step up your brain game, kids. Smart chicks are where its at.
>>739311989 probably because men have never really networked and discussed these issues before. but they are now, and perhaps that's why feminism is making such a big noise now. perhaps it's because women intuitively sense that men are waking up to their BS.
No one in this thread will like this answer, but women are clearly smarter. You are all completely right that they are able to skate by "sucking dick" and a host of other things, meaning they need to engage in traditionally intelligent thought less often.
But, therein lies the genius. We're being played, and they've won because we enabled them to reach a level of admiration that lets them do whatever while we men are busting our asses.
Who's smarter: the one that solves the problem, or the one that gets some chump to solve it for them so they can get an easy ride to success?
>>739310790 Throughout history, and even nowadays in third world cultures, out of necessity women have submitted to men. This would likely not work unless women were less smart and hence less individualistic. Girls are smart but then fall behind as the boy matures into a young man full of ambitious dreams and superior will.
>>739313840 also. that will never work, because women aren't equal to men, they have a different purpose. a different role. we need to go right back to traditionalism. reintegrate gender roles. but make it so men are no longer considered disposable but rather given the respect they deserve. from the top to the bottom of the dominance hierarchy.
This is exactly what I'm talking about. I'm not even a woman and you guys are clamoring to try and see some tits. Stop giving them the power.
>>739314430 This is also a load of shit. Traditionalism is just a other form of control that hurts men as much as you think it reins in women. The only solution is to stop fawning over women and judge their worth based on their own individual merit.
They just think differently in some ways, most women tend to be more intuitive with emotions and produce hormones like estrogen thats why they are instinctively more nurturing than men. Men tend to think more from a rational and logical standpoint, we produce testosterone and have more muscle mass making us the ideal hunter/provider. We are great at planning and figuring things out, and making objective decisions. But you see fathers run away from responsibilities like raising children more often than a mother abandons her child.
>>739314711 lighten up ffs, it's called humour, you should try it sometime
it's possible, it could work, but I doubt it, because women will default to using their bodies to get what they want and if that doesn't work, they'll play the victim, the poor helpless woman that's weak and needs a man to take care of her and her responsibilities for her, the same bullshit that's played out for god knows how long. and it'll work, again.
so maybe, just maybe, one day, that shit will work, but not yet, for now we need to take the best deal we can get, which is traditionalism, highlight the issues within it, make it more beneficial for us. make it so we're treated fairly, raise awareness of female manipulation and how they tend to operate etc. so men can more easily navigate in and around their relationships.
and then maybe we'll get to the point where we have enough leverage to say, listen ladies, it's about time you pulled your own weight because we're sick n tired of doing all the work. but until we've accomplished all of the above. I can't see it working. we need traditionalism for social cohesion. right now, society is crumbling, it's falling apart because there is practically no foundation. the family unit is crippled. we need to get it back so we can regain control of the direction society will take and move forward from that.
>>739315193 the most important part of that being enlightening men on these issues, because most men are absolutely cluess when it comes to women and how they're actually contributing to their own downfall and pretty much the downfall of society too, with allowing their libido to control their lives.
>>739315518 yeah and no society has ever fallen apart and resulted in the death of millions has it hahaha?
it's happened consistently within pretty much every single generation somewhere on the planet.
pretty much everytime a civilisation collapses, it degenerates slowly because of a lack of social cohesion, which is usually rooted in a break down of the family, a degredation of whatever form traditionalism takes in the society / civilisation in question.
>>739299562 As a potential smartness, nope. Problem is muricafags usually treat them like princess or whatever monarchy shit so bitches don't do anything, don't develop intelligence, bitches can't solve any problem. lol
>>739315783 Let me be clearer: society can fall apart, but it won't be the end of everything.
Sure, a specific society can fall apart, and in its wake, something else develops and evolves as a result of the constant change we literally can't escape.
Sure, society may be changing as a result of the dissolution of the nuclear family, but I say bring it on. That shit is stale, boring as fuck, and doesn't hardly work anyway. Nobody I know that's successful came from a traditional background; if anything, they provide too much safety and stability for anything worth a shit to be formed.
>>739316309 oh yeah I agree with that, societies falling apart aren't the end of the world (not yet anyway), but y'know, that doesn't mean we should just let it happen. it needs to be averted if it can be because a lot of people die when that happens.
and yeah destruction is a form of creation but tbh I think we can learn a lot more and advance in a way that's much more beneficial if we see the warning signs, avert the negative outcome and learn the lessons that are to be learned. which is why I say what I've been saying.
and it might be state, boring as fuck etc, but like it or not, it's been the glue that's tied pretty much all cultures and civilisations together.
of course, there are always small deviations away from the norm that work in the minority, and traditionalism itself has different forms in different cultures, but the foundation is always the same at its core and that's what's necessary for society to survive.
>>739299562 The correct answer: yes and no. More men than women are found at the right end of the bell curve (geniuses) and at the left end (morons). So there are more dumb men than dumb women, and more genius men than genius women.
>>739316412 every male on the face of the planet is susceptible to female manipulation because of his instincts.
has little to do with intelligence on his part, and a lot more to do with instinct.
but of course, intelligence does help, and experience. if you learn to quiet your instincts you're a lot more likely to make informed decisions that will work out well for you. but you're still susceptible, and you'll still likely end up falling into one of the many traps women set for you. that doesn't make you stupid though, or weak.
Not only are girls dumber, they have stronger sex drives resulting in poorer concentration. Men need recharging time in that respect, but girls are always lowkey horny. When they drink half a glass of wine they turn into sasha greys. On the other hand men don't lose their minds like that, thus we went to moon and shit.
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5 If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.