Imagine you had a smart and beautiful daughter that you really

>>738863518
yes

>>738863823
Tell me more about yourself anon

>>738863518
If he's with my daughter, he's not on /b/ that often to require worry, unlike me still here after a decade.

>>738863518
I'd be incredibly proud

>>738863518
If he was like me he would hate all women because they are all exactly the same

Ide be at odds with myself. On one hand my daughters fooling around with a shithead neet. On the other hand how else is that guy ever going to get that close to a girl.

File: 1468035918011.jpg (172KB, 736x737px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 736x737px

>>738864217

>>738864123
Even your daughter? Shit parenting, bro

>>738863988
Do you think you could be that person, instead of someone who spends too much time on /b/? What else would you change?

>>738864044
What qualities of that person would you be proud of?

>>738864171
That's good to hear

>>738864217
Many would suggest that you'd prioritise your daughter's wellbeing above this guy, what would you want this person to be like (lifestyle/personality)-- so that he'd be good enough?

>>738863518
>Would you honestly (honestly) be comfortable
>This isn't about you

>>738864588
>principaled
>good work ethic
>honest and direct
>down to earth, not easily off put
>good sense of humor
>dedicated to family
>giant penis

>>738864123
Lets assume, for this scenario, that your daughter is actually pretty special. Would you let this women hating man date her?

>>738864662
Elaborate: This isn't a thread about setting yourself up with your perfect dream girl.

Honestly yes not because i would approve of him but because her relationship/sex life isnt my business its her life she can make her own mistakes

110% yes. What luck!

I'd be able to ask him to take video of them fucking for me to watch and, because he's just like me, he wouldn't be all weird about. I'd love him like my own son.

So if he's basically the same as me he'd presumably have similar tastes in everything.
So I could ask him if he'd seen my favourite movie and if he hasn't and he watches it he'd enjoy it just as much?

That's be pretty fucken rad having my daughters boyfriend be a dude I could actually talk to and introduce cool shit to.

ITT: everyone ends up stealing their daughter's boyfriend

>>738863518
This actually happened to me. My daughter started dating a guy that was pretty much just like I was when I was their age. Problem was my daughter is just like her mom and he was too young to put up with her bullshit so it didn't last long.

File: tmp_1473-2301360163389.png (558KB, 900x702px) Image search: [Google]

558KB, 900x702px

>>738863518
Ahahaha

I'm a complete degenerate so....idk

>>738865200
I don't know what OP was expecting.

>>738864933
That good of you, but would you trust this person to be a good partner?

>>738865073
Yes on both.

>>738865582
Having the same sense of human is a pretty big plus too.
Get some fucked up funny banter out of them that my daughter/ his gf wouldn't get at all.

Here's a question, what if you over hear then fucking one fine evening and you can hear through the walls tour daughter moaning "daddy"?

>>738863518
I'd fuck him

>>738865530
I think it's great if more guys could be the kind of people they'd let their daughter's date.

But I'm also curious as to how many people are actively aware of the way they look, act, post/say comments in public, 4chan, Facebook, etc. and are able to honestly then say

"Yeah, I'd let her date someone like me"

I'm more curious to know how people view themselves currently, if so then great, if not then why?

>>738865582
Course not and id warn her but at the end of the day its not my business

>>738866073
Well I mean if he's anything like me he keeps the fucked up things separate from the regularly scheduled programming.

>>738866172
What about this person warrants you lack of approval?

>>738866073
As long as he compartmentalizes it its totally fine.

If he was like me I would fuck my daughter myself then whats the point of letting some 2nd hand clone do it

As long as the guy is white. I don't care.

>>738864044
agree. i'm rad.

Lol I have to get laid for me to end up with a daughter.

>>738866183
>>738866277
Would you feel comfortable with their relationship knowing that these are his inner thoughts? Is it more that they're not publicly acceptable, or that you yourself would rather not see these qualities reflected in him?

>>738866865
Well I dont harbour an urge to kill or anything.
It's a little more browsing the occasional Rekt thread or watching some porn that's a little on the odd side.

>>738866865
I think if he has the same emotional maturity I do that he will be able to come away from a place like this and still be mentally sound. I've been coming here since 2006ish when I was 16 and while I definitely have a dark sense of humor I don't think browsing here has made me a bad person or left me with any emotional baggage.

>>738867214
And hey if he's really the same it'll be fun to have someone to have a drink with while awake at 3AM

>>738863518
I'd tell him to fuck off, and fuck/rape her myself.
Seems like she has big enough daddy issues already, so why not give her a real reason for that...

>>738863518
If my daughter wants to fuck my clone she can just fuck me instead.

>>738867743
>>738867801
What are your current relationship statuses? Curious

>>738863518
Well I'd have to use my future selfs time machine go back to the past to tell my younger self to use the time machine to go to the future to fuck our own daughter in order to make sure the the timeline is correct so that my grandson is born so he can go back in time to fuck my mother and ensure I am born and ensure the timeline is correct as told was my to me by myself from the future.

Yes, because she would only see the guy for like 2 hours a day anyway so why would it matter. I work too much plus I'm pretty rad actually.

Kill him and use his body to fake my death so I can be alone on 4chan. Forever

>>738865200
No, ITT: The people who say no, realize they are self hating wastes of space and probably should kill themselves.

>>738868288
1st, it is futile to receive sensible data on /b/ since most of us give half-ass'd bullshit comment anyways, or straight up lie.
2nd, since we are all anonymous, without any ID to tell us appart, you won't even get the chance to filter samefags / spam.
therefore your thread is pointless and will give you no valuable insight on the human psyche.

I could have told you that I'd be fine with him, or despise him / me in a heartbeat, and it wouldn't be anymore truthful than my first reply.

Even if I tell you that I have a girlfriend, that I'm a virgin, single, or married you'd be making a fool out of yourself if you'd even consider to take this response seriously.

tl;dr: set up a proper survey with IP-checks and fuck off, college-fag.

>>738869113
if that is your endgame, you forget a valid component in that thought process: we'd properly set up higher standards for the bf of our daughters than for ourselves, since we don't hold the women we fuck as dear as our own flesh and blood.
You just played yourself, moralfag.

>>738869408
>properly
probably / most likely
fix'd

>>738869216
This isn't a survey

It's an exercise for anyone who, if single, might be able to review into themselves as to what qualities about them are currently off putting by imposing them onto a fictional guy who's hitting on their daughter.

Sorry you didn't pick that up. Believe it or not, this thread is for you guys. It's as helpful as much as how anyone chooses to answer.

>>738869513
see
>>738869408
also, I'm >>738867743 and I have a girlfriend.
Besides that I'm working in an after-school club for 7yo - 14yo, and live by my own.
I come here to troll and shitpost, doing the ole' piss-in-an-ocean-of-piss-thing. If you think we are degenerates, then sorry to inform you, but we just come here to vent. Aside from the retards who take mlp & trap threads seriously, we've grown up since 2005 and mostly live pretty decent lives.
This whole place is a meme, it always was and you just outed yourself as a newfag. Welcome to /b/, and remember, you are here forever.

>>738869914
You seem way over-territorial and defensive over an online space that doesn't know who you are, ease up mate.

>we've grown up
>still saying newfag

I've got bad news for you

>>738869914
Op here, not >>738869113

But keep pretending like "you've figured it out"

Or, you know, feel free to try out the exercise instead of playing internet tough guy.

>>738866382
Underrated post

>>738869914

How would your girlfriend (also why not: parents, friends, colleagues) think of you if they knew you were like this? >>738867743

>>738868288
Honestly? I'm MGTOW, so single.
I do have a few lady friends who I "help out" on the regular though.

>>738870260
what, that you still don't get this place?
Do you think you are the first moral crusader to come here and try to "civilize" us?
tumblrites tried before
redditors tried before
and now we have the college-libtards who are incapable of critically thinking, trying the same.
do you seriously think you can help anyone with a half-ass'd "psychology 101" thread?

Topkek, but sure, it's your choice how you waste your time, just rest assured that we keep laughing about you.

>>738870593
Who is this collective "we" you keep referring to?

You're like the only person in this thread currently making these kinds of comments. I'm quite enjoying the discussion/comments so far.

>>738870593
I'm not sure where you keep making this "OP is probably some college educated person"

But I'll take the compliment, lol

>>738870549
That's pretty interesting, I've never really met other people who go this route. How's the experience?

>>738870512
they would properly laugh and understand the joke when they see it. Most of them had retarded women in their lives, too.
Do you really think I feel ashamed for my kind of humor?
Dude, we have school-holidays right now, which means that I go to the local pool with our little shitheads. One of the girls was sitting on my lap, right after I was eying on a nice girl in a tight bikini, giving me huge boner. So I grabbed the 9yo on my lap, lifted her up and sat her aside, while saying "You're far too young to sit on my cock", which send my boss in a laughing fit.
Outside of libtardtopia, the world can actually take dark humor.

>>738870730
He refers to the us.
The Anons who have been lurking and laughing.

>>738870869
>I'm not sure where you keep making this "OP is probably some college educated person"
because today colleges are the propaganda facilities that produce moral crusaders like you.
Keep denying it tho, whatever grinds your gears.

>>738870883
You seem really defensive/hostile over some simple questions.

If that's how your world currently operates, then all the power to you.

I'm more concerned that you seem to be immediately connecting ideas of "college education" "libtard" and "morality" almost seamlessly without any real effort on my end. On top of what reads as quite a lot of hostility.

>>738870938
hey you.
I like you.
Have a nice day.

>>738870938
Feel free to join in if you like, what's the kind of guy you'd like to see your daughter date?

>>738871192
>I'm more concerned that you seem to be immediately connecting ideas of "college education" "libtard" and "morality" almost seamlessly without any real effort on my end. On top of what reads as quite a lot of hostility.
Did you somehow miss this line, or are you just retarded?
>I come here to troll and shitpost, doing the ole' piss-in-an-ocean-of-piss-thing.
dude, even telling you that you get trolled, doesn't prevent you from getting trolled. This is hilarious.

>>738870869
It's pretty good. Peaceful. Not much stress. More money than I need.

I would have liked a family I think, but the legal situation with divorce and such is to big a risk. I don't want a sword of Damocles hanging over my head 24/7.

>>738871479
I'd like to order fo tree fiddy.

>>738871378
I'm not particularly minding of it, though I am more wondering where some of the other anons participated went off to. There've been some pretty good stories so far.

>>738871715
>stories
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

>>738871543
Do you reckon that relationships are something you'd revisit later down the line, or are you more or less committed going solo til the end?

>>738871922
A fiction is still a story, I'm pretty open

>>738871369
Employed. Committed. Good genetics for my grand kids. White or Asian. Generally sensible.

Honestly if we're talking about MY daughter (not that I have one) I'd want her guy to be sub servant to her. The kind of beta who would devote himself 100% to her and never leave. I wouldn't mind taking up the mantle of Strong Male Role Model for her kids. I'd just want her in a stable position for when she gets older and her looks fade.

>>738863518
of course i wouldn't

i have a daughter, also i've been mean to a few girls, not so many because i'm not exactly an alpha but still can act like one, the last thing i want for my daughter is a walking failure like me

>>738872124
If the laws changed dramatically and I met a woman in her early 20s who was head over heels crazy about me, then maybe.

But that shit will never happen. So I'm single for life and I've made peace with the fact.

>>738872142
Hows your current relationship status? Do you think your relationships would improve if you took on more of these qualities?

>>738872422
That's rough, but pretty cool that you're aware of these things. What qualities/features would you prefer this guy have instead?

>>738872445
Would you feel less concerned about divorce laws if you knew that you attracted the right partner? I imagine that'd be the ideal, which doesn't seem too unrealistic. But I don't know your full circumstances

>>738872497
Recently divorced. (without kids, thank god)
I have the top row of traits (if you change grand kids to kids)

Problem was I wasn't sub servant to her. I wanted my wife to be my partner not my boss. She didn't want a partner, she wanted a slave.

The relationship may have improved (i.e lasted) if I was her underling, but I would have been miserable until the day I died.

>>738872445
what laws are we talking?

>>738863518
If she was my daughter, I'd be assured that I raised her well to have good judgment. If she's interested in this guy, I would imagine that he's good for her unless I learn otherwise.

No daughter, but Im a generally handsom and educated guy. Im respectful and never had a girls parent dislike me, plus who cares what website someone browses for fun?
Yes, I'd be fine if my daughter found someone like me, probably have a good guy to drink with

>>738863518
I think I am a pretty decent guy. I treat my gf like she deserves, I take care of my loved ones, I live a pretty stable life with pretty much everything under control.
So yeah, I would love for my daughter to meet someone exactly like me because I know that he will never treat her bad or cheat on her, and he would do anything to make her happy.

>>738872898
>What qualities/features would you prefer this guy have instead?

strength
determination
loyalty, what is very different and much more important than faithfulness

>>738863518
im going to kill myself if i have a daughter in the west (usa)

relationships are totally fucked up

>>738863518
Of course she deserves a better man than me. Though her mother barely deserves me.

I'd never let my daughter date a nigger

>>738872898
How would I know I attracted the right partner though? People change over time and who can read the heart of a person to begin with?

It's a massive gamble that could easily ruin my life. Divorce rates are over 50% and 80% of them are initiated by the woman. Like 90% of custody cases side with the woman. Child support, alimony. That's just what she can do legally. Never mind if she lies (divorce lawyers encourage that too) then you have restraining orders and sex offender accusations and all sorts of problems.

Flip a coin, if tails your life is ruined beyond repair. Do you flip that coin?

File: 1496418863466.2.jpg (151KB, 388x443px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 388x443px

>>738873341
lol wouldn't that fuck up your relationship with your daughter?
>you being dead and all
Everything is what you make of it.

>>738863518
I mean, I'd _let_ her, I just want her to look around and make sure the other options aren't preferable first.

>>738873362
>Though her mother barely deserves me.

I agree. She's a cunt and I'm her punishment

>>738873625
He gets it

>>738872948
No fault divorce for a start.
There's also a law where the police remove the man from the household in the event of being called for domestic disputes regardless of scenario (Your wife tries to stab you and you call the cops? Congrats, they drag you from your home)
The entire family court system is fucked frankly.
Women are blatantly favored in any court really. (at least in America)

You can look up men's rights activism for other specifics.

>>738872937
I wouldn't equate a longer lasting relationship as being more successful necessarily. Sounds like you guys had really different needs. You seem alright

>>738873047
What are some qualities that you'd be put off by?

>>738873101
The website question was more to draw into what this guy's personal/genuine thoughts might be like. 4chan is really interesting to bring up, since depending on what threads each individual goes to, some anons may find themselves dealing with a fictional guy that frequently talks about gore, or raping women and the question would be: is that guy okay for your daughter?

>>738873270
That's interesting, what is the difference between loyalty and faithfulness?

>>738863518
I will feel a little weird with my daughter dating someone who is so similar to me while spending some of my time reading Freud.

>>738863518
Yeah. I think so. I dont really think im an asshole. I was raised by a religious family, so i treat women really nicely (inb4 white knight. No fgt, im just not an asshole). I just think i would be sorry for her because my dick is average.

>>738873394
>People change over time and who can read the heart of a person to begin with?

This one is tough, because nobody can really predict the future. However, you could measure your odds of all these things happening by the strength of your relationship, as we 'assume' no good relationship ends in divorce.

Personally, I would flip that coin with the awareness that relationships take work-- and I'm personally into that. But I get that it's not for everyone.

>>738873362
What kind of guy would he have to be to fit this description?

>>738873751
I'm in Australia, so I wouldn't know for certain the exact similarities. Most people here though are fairly aware that the laws are such to correct a difference in power (Men often bare a higher power in households, so women are compensated with higher power in courtrooms in light of higher reported abuse cases).

Is this your experience in the US, and/or what are your thoughts on this?

>>738874424
>you could measure your odds of all these things happening by the strength of your relationship

You have a DBZ style Scouter to detect relationship strength? If so I'd like one.

More likely your talking about how you perceive your relationship. For instance you could think it's quite strong because you don't know that she's been cheating on you for the last 2 years.

>>738874721
Men report domestic abuse less than women. Who wants to be the man who gets beaten up by a girl?
Power in the household is an assumption. Power in the courtroom is measurable.
Your laws are sexist and favor gender over the other.

Side note: Lesbians have higher abuse rates than gays, and woman are more likely to use weapons in cases of domestic violence.

>>738875155
*favor one gender over the other.

>>738874753
>More likely your talking about how you perceive your relationship.

More or less. Anything that can happen could happen, but the probabilities are largely influenced by my/your inputs. Based on this, a healthy perception of your relationship seems realistic.

While it's not unheard of to hear a story about "Wife cheats on Husband who did nothing wrong" I feel like these stories are often overstated as being some kind of norm. This seems somewhat unrealistic, though I wouldn't know for certain

>>738875219
Woman also commit infanticide more than men.
and
"According to the National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect there are more incidents of abuse of children (including both physical abuse and neglect) perpetrated by women than by men."

File: image.jpg (60KB, 750x1000px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 750x1000px

good fucking question.

I'm a mans man. I've travelled the world, done some crazy shit, and have an abundance of stories to tell.

Stories almost too good to be true.

But no, I know my flaws as well.

I know how much of a cold hearted asshole I am.
I know how much I break the hearts of the people who care about me.

If I have a daughter, she can choose what she wants. But, she'd life a life of heartbreak with a person like me.

>>738863518
If he's me, and I am him, we are effectively the same. There is nothing unspoken between us because we commit the same actions and have the same reactions; he is the perfect candidate for my apparently beautiful and smart daughter. Because he is me, he will have a daughter almost exactly like my daughter, as our lives and consequences will be exactly similar beautiful and smart, and a man almost exactly like him will go out with her, and the cycle will repeat. And there will be an endless self-perpetuating line of "me", so until humans stop existing. That's immortality if I ever knew it.

Imagine. A thousand lifetimes of the exactly similar life compounded over thousands of years, speeding up the process of personhood. Thoughts run through the fine grain mill over countless millennia. The culmination of a man many times over, with minor variations to broaden even more the complete picture of what it means to live as a human being.

What you've done in this fictional scenario is give me permanent permanence for the rest of human history, effectively. Now I am a working, living god.

>>738869513
>for you guys
Go suck dicks, you made a thread so people would post in it under the veil of a thought exercise. This is for (You).

>>738875155
While I can easily accept men reporting less cases for the reasons you described, in order for it to be equatable to the number of cases reported by women; there would need to be similar data which suggests that the number of totaly abuse cases in general are 50/50 split in order for the laws to be irrational in their attempt to fix imbalance. Current public records by both progressive and conservative administrations in Australia don't reflect that kind of 50/50 split, or something even close.

>>738875711
I do like the immortality spin, good stuff

>>738875663
What's made you cold over the years anon?

>>738876149
>there would need to be similar data

How would you gather data on something unreported?
Let's flip this from gender to race. Women will be replaced by white and men will be replaced by black.
What your saying is it's okay that whites are favored in court because blacks commit more crimes.
So rather than looking at each case individually the court just looks at whatever group you were born into and makes it's judgment regardless of measurable bias.

>>738863518
Just go to Rhode Island.

It's 100% legal to fuck your kids there.

>>738876566
>How would you gather data on something unreported?
Bodies such as the Australian Institute of Criminology often gather data similar to census collection. While we can question the precise accuracy of these studies, enough people seem to trust it in terms of whether it can spot a 50/50 split or not.

While I agree with addressing each case individually (and I just assumed that they do over there) the analogy seems off. In this situation, assuming we accept current records that suggest power imbalance favours whites outside of court more: then blacks should be (by analogy) the ones compensated in court.

In order for each element of the analogy to match, they'd have to be switched around such that women are blacks and men are whites.

Or am I misunderstanding?

>>738877334
Okay then let's say women are Asian and men are Hispanic.
So your in favor of courts having racial bias? That's my point.

>>738864701
This. this anon.
You might be step dad or my step son. I can't figure it out but something is working here

>>738877334
The courts shouldn't have bias based on how you were born is his point dude.

>>738877905
I'm not in favour of courts having racial bias, but I think that you're mistaking it to be as such because it obviously looks like it.

The system looks to be correcting imbalance wherever it sees it. Whether it's the case where an entire race is being favoured over another is a reaction/symptom to whatever has caused that imbalance in the first place. (Rather than because the system just decided to hate whites, love everyone else etc)

To bring it back to the initial topic, the system is fixing an imbalance: and it only looks like gender bias.

Not even sure OP is here anymore

>>738873364
Kek

>>738878761
So in the courts eyes you can be born wrong.
Nice.
Such justice.

Think OP left, I'm leaving too.

>>738873960
you are faithful if you do not cheat upon your spouse, but you are loyal if you are always by her side