>>738863518 This actually happened to me. My daughter started dating a guy that was pretty much just like I was when I was their age. Problem was my daughter is just like her mom and he was too young to put up with her bullshit so it didn't last long.
>>738866183 >>738866277 Would you feel comfortable with their relationship knowing that these are his inner thoughts? Is it more that they're not publicly acceptable, or that you yourself would rather not see these qualities reflected in him?
>>738866865 I think if he has the same emotional maturity I do that he will be able to come away from a place like this and still be mentally sound. I've been coming here since 2006ish when I was 16 and while I definitely have a dark sense of humor I don't think browsing here has made me a bad person or left me with any emotional baggage.
>>738863518 Well I'd have to use my future selfs time machine go back to the past to tell my younger self to use the time machine to go to the future to fuck our own daughter in order to make sure the the timeline is correct so that my grandson is born so he can go back in time to fuck my mother and ensure I am born and ensure the timeline is correct as told was my to me by myself from the future.
>>738868288 1st, it is futile to receive sensible data on /b/ since most of us give half-ass'd bullshit comment anyways, or straight up lie. 2nd, since we are all anonymous, without any ID to tell us appart, you won't even get the chance to filter samefags / spam. therefore your thread is pointless and will give you no valuable insight on the human psyche.
I could have told you that I'd be fine with him, or despise him / me in a heartbeat, and it wouldn't be anymore truthful than my first reply.
Even if I tell you that I have a girlfriend, that I'm a virgin, single, or married you'd be making a fool out of yourself if you'd even consider to take this response seriously.
tl;dr: set up a proper survey with IP-checks and fuck off, college-fag.
>>738869113 if that is your endgame, you forget a valid component in that thought process: we'd properly set up higher standards for the bf of our daughters than for ourselves, since we don't hold the women we fuck as dear as our own flesh and blood. You just played yourself, moralfag.
It's an exercise for anyone who, if single, might be able to review into themselves as to what qualities about them are currently off putting by imposing them onto a fictional guy who's hitting on their daughter.
Sorry you didn't pick that up. Believe it or not, this thread is for you guys. It's as helpful as much as how anyone chooses to answer.
>>738869513 see >>738869408 also, I'm >>738867743 and I have a girlfriend. Besides that I'm working in an after-school club for 7yo - 14yo, and live by my own. I come here to troll and shitpost, doing the ole' piss-in-an-ocean-of-piss-thing. If you think we are degenerates, then sorry to inform you, but we just come here to vent. Aside from the retards who take mlp & trap threads seriously, we've grown up since 2005 and mostly live pretty decent lives. This whole place is a meme, it always was and you just outed yourself as a newfag. Welcome to /b/, and remember, you are here forever.
>>738870260 what, that you still don't get this place? Do you think you are the first moral crusader to come here and try to "civilize" us? tumblrites tried before redditors tried before and now we have the college-libtards who are incapable of critically thinking, trying the same. do you seriously think you can help anyone with a half-ass'd "psychology 101" thread?
Topkek, but sure, it's your choice how you waste your time, just rest assured that we keep laughing about you.
>>738870512 they would properly laugh and understand the joke when they see it. Most of them had retarded women in their lives, too. Do you really think I feel ashamed for my kind of humor? Dude, we have school-holidays right now, which means that I go to the local pool with our little shitheads. One of the girls was sitting on my lap, right after I was eying on a nice girl in a tight bikini, giving me huge boner. So I grabbed the 9yo on my lap, lifted her up and sat her aside, while saying "You're far too young to sit on my cock", which send my boss in a laughing fit. Outside of libtardtopia, the world can actually take dark humor.
>>738870869 >I'm not sure where you keep making this "OP is probably some college educated person" because today colleges are the propaganda facilities that produce moral crusaders like you. Keep denying it tho, whatever grinds your gears.
>>738870883 You seem really defensive/hostile over some simple questions.
If that's how your world currently operates, then all the power to you.
I'm more concerned that you seem to be immediately connecting ideas of "college education" "libtard" and "morality" almost seamlessly without any real effort on my end. On top of what reads as quite a lot of hostility.
>>738871192 >I'm more concerned that you seem to be immediately connecting ideas of "college education" "libtard" and "morality" almost seamlessly without any real effort on my end. On top of what reads as quite a lot of hostility. Did you somehow miss this line, or are you just retarded? >I come here to troll and shitpost, doing the ole' piss-in-an-ocean-of-piss-thing. dude, even telling you that you get trolled, doesn't prevent you from getting trolled. This is hilarious.
>>738871369 Employed. Committed. Good genetics for my grand kids. White or Asian. Generally sensible.
Honestly if we're talking about MY daughter (not that I have one) I'd want her guy to be sub servant to her. The kind of beta who would devote himself 100% to her and never leave. I wouldn't mind taking up the mantle of Strong Male Role Model for her kids. I'd just want her in a stable position for when she gets older and her looks fade.
>>738872422 That's rough, but pretty cool that you're aware of these things. What qualities/features would you prefer this guy have instead?
>>738872445 Would you feel less concerned about divorce laws if you knew that you attracted the right partner? I imagine that'd be the ideal, which doesn't seem too unrealistic. But I don't know your full circumstances
No daughter, but Im a generally handsom and educated guy. Im respectful and never had a girls parent dislike me, plus who cares what website someone browses for fun? Yes, I'd be fine if my daughter found someone like me, probably have a good guy to drink with
>>738863518 I think I am a pretty decent guy. I treat my gf like she deserves, I take care of my loved ones, I live a pretty stable life with pretty much everything under control. So yeah, I would love for my daughter to meet someone exactly like me because I know that he will never treat her bad or cheat on her, and he would do anything to make her happy.
>>738872898 How would I know I attracted the right partner though? People change over time and who can read the heart of a person to begin with?
It's a massive gamble that could easily ruin my life. Divorce rates are over 50% and 80% of them are initiated by the woman. Like 90% of custody cases side with the woman. Child support, alimony. That's just what she can do legally. Never mind if she lies (divorce lawyers encourage that too) then you have restraining orders and sex offender accusations and all sorts of problems.
Flip a coin, if tails your life is ruined beyond repair. Do you flip that coin?
>>738872948 No fault divorce for a start. There's also a law where the police remove the man from the household in the event of being called for domestic disputes regardless of scenario (Your wife tries to stab you and you call the cops? Congrats, they drag you from your home) The entire family court system is fucked frankly. Women are blatantly favored in any court really. (at least in America)
You can look up men's rights activism for other specifics.
>>738872937 I wouldn't equate a longer lasting relationship as being more successful necessarily. Sounds like you guys had really different needs. You seem alright
>>738873047 What are some qualities that you'd be put off by?
>>738873101 The website question was more to draw into what this guy's personal/genuine thoughts might be like. 4chan is really interesting to bring up, since depending on what threads each individual goes to, some anons may find themselves dealing with a fictional guy that frequently talks about gore, or raping women and the question would be: is that guy okay for your daughter?
>>738863518 Yeah. I think so. I dont really think im an asshole. I was raised by a religious family, so i treat women really nicely (inb4 white knight. No fgt, im just not an asshole). I just think i would be sorry for her because my dick is average.
>>738873394 >People change over time and who can read the heart of a person to begin with?
This one is tough, because nobody can really predict the future. However, you could measure your odds of all these things happening by the strength of your relationship, as we 'assume' no good relationship ends in divorce.
Personally, I would flip that coin with the awareness that relationships take work-- and I'm personally into that. But I get that it's not for everyone.
>>738873362 What kind of guy would he have to be to fit this description?
>>738873751 I'm in Australia, so I wouldn't know for certain the exact similarities. Most people here though are fairly aware that the laws are such to correct a difference in power (Men often bare a higher power in households, so women are compensated with higher power in courtrooms in light of higher reported abuse cases).
Is this your experience in the US, and/or what are your thoughts on this?
>>738874721 Men report domestic abuse less than women. Who wants to be the man who gets beaten up by a girl? Power in the household is an assumption. Power in the courtroom is measurable. Your laws are sexist and favor gender over the other.
Side note: Lesbians have higher abuse rates than gays, and woman are more likely to use weapons in cases of domestic violence.
>>738874753 >More likely your talking about how you perceive your relationship.
More or less. Anything that can happen could happen, but the probabilities are largely influenced by my/your inputs. Based on this, a healthy perception of your relationship seems realistic.
While it's not unheard of to hear a story about "Wife cheats on Husband who did nothing wrong" I feel like these stories are often overstated as being some kind of norm. This seems somewhat unrealistic, though I wouldn't know for certain
>>738875219 Woman also commit infanticide more than men. and "According to the National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect there are more incidents of abuse of children (including both physical abuse and neglect) perpetrated by women than by men."
>>738863518 If he's me, and I am him, we are effectively the same. There is nothing unspoken between us because we commit the same actions and have the same reactions; he is the perfect candidate for my apparently beautiful and smart daughter. Because he is me, he will have a daughter almost exactly like my daughter, as our lives and consequences will be exactly similar beautiful and smart, and a man almost exactly like him will go out with her, and the cycle will repeat. And there will be an endless self-perpetuating line of "me", so until humans stop existing. That's immortality if I ever knew it.
Imagine. A thousand lifetimes of the exactly similar life compounded over thousands of years, speeding up the process of personhood. Thoughts run through the fine grain mill over countless millennia. The culmination of a man many times over, with minor variations to broaden even more the complete picture of what it means to live as a human being.
What you've done in this fictional scenario is give me permanent permanence for the rest of human history, effectively. Now I am a working, living god.
>>738869513 >for you guys Go suck dicks, you made a thread so people would post in it under the veil of a thought exercise. This is for (You).
>>738875155 While I can easily accept men reporting less cases for the reasons you described, in order for it to be equatable to the number of cases reported by women; there would need to be similar data which suggests that the number of totaly abuse cases in general are 50/50 split in order for the laws to be irrational in their attempt to fix imbalance. Current public records by both progressive and conservative administrations in Australia don't reflect that kind of 50/50 split, or something even close.
How would you gather data on something unreported? Let's flip this from gender to race. Women will be replaced by white and men will be replaced by black. What your saying is it's okay that whites are favored in court because blacks commit more crimes. So rather than looking at each case individually the court just looks at whatever group you were born into and makes it's judgment regardless of measurable bias.
>>738876566 >How would you gather data on something unreported? Bodies such as the Australian Institute of Criminology often gather data similar to census collection. While we can question the precise accuracy of these studies, enough people seem to trust it in terms of whether it can spot a 50/50 split or not.
While I agree with addressing each case individually (and I just assumed that they do over there) the analogy seems off. In this situation, assuming we accept current records that suggest power imbalance favours whites outside of court more: then blacks should be (by analogy) the ones compensated in court.
In order for each element of the analogy to match, they'd have to be switched around such that women are blacks and men are whites.
>>738877905 I'm not in favour of courts having racial bias, but I think that you're mistaking it to be as such because it obviously looks like it.
The system looks to be correcting imbalance wherever it sees it. Whether it's the case where an entire race is being favoured over another is a reaction/symptom to whatever has caused that imbalance in the first place. (Rather than because the system just decided to hate whites, love everyone else etc)
To bring it back to the initial topic, the system is fixing an imbalance: and it only looks like gender bias.
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5 If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.