> Following popular logic, sexuality is thought of as straight or gay. Bisexuality has only recently begun to be taken seriously. The idea of separate, static, and neatly defined sexual orientations is woven into the fabric of American society and is part of our cultural conception of gender itself;realmen are masculine and attracted to women.
>>734361112 That article taken out of context, looks pretty stupid.
But I think it is worth talking about, the effect society on sexuality. I mean, most who thought they were straight are now into traps, and wholeheartedly defend it. Now that it is slowly becoming normalized in this region of the internet, you see it more frequently.
I wonder what social and societal effect there is on our sexuality, just some thoughts.
>>734361112 Only a few people are 100% straight or gay. The rest is somewhere in between. I'm gay, I would never have sex with a woman, but I sure know it when a woman is hot and when her tits look nice. If I was an actor and had to make out or even touch a woman, I would not mind that very much, but her panocha won't be touched.
>>734362961 Basically this. Less people would think they're 100% straight if they weren't trained from fucking birth that it was morally wrong and carried the penalty of fuckin' death. That said, 100% straight and 100% gay people do exist, but most people are not biologically one of those extremes. Look at how many "straight" dudes suck mad dick in prison...
The biggest problem with how this is phrased is that it's at the same time both correct and wrong. It's not entirely wrong to say "no one is 100% this or that" because the way we measure sexuality is a spectrum, but the spectrum does allow for a complete placement on one end instead of the other. So it's wrong, but it's right in how it's fucking up.
>>734361112 All of it is bullshit, apparently your sexuality is determined by how much your pupils change. Guess they haven't figured out the difference between enlarged pupils from being sexually aroused and enlarged pupils from being enraged.
>>734364761 I didn't say that. But there's a difference between not liking a gender [for me it's women] and not being able to kiss someone of that gender, and not liking a gender but not having a problem kissing them. There are lots of men who would not want to kiss another man, there are also men, straight men, who don't have a problem with it. They're not bisexual in the sense that they would fuck another man, but they also don't think it's gross.
>>734365051 >Eye contact doesn't matter Dude, you are so gay. Balls on balls isn't that bad, but looking someone in the eyes is creepy, weird and very bent. It's even borderline gay if you do it to a woman.
>>734365326 Bisexuals are people who find males and females sexually attractive. Kissing a man in sexual manner would constitute bisexuality. Gay men find other men sexually attractive. Many never act on it, some do.
>>734366033 I heard it comes from inbreeding to stop the inbreeders to get funky kids nature makes them gay instead. And because we've been around for millions of years everyone is a little inbred so everyone is also a little gay.
LOGIC TIME 1. You cannot deny that most men are raised to be men. 2. You get raised to become a good dad. 3. Imagine if you had not been raised to become monogamous! MOST OF US WOULD BE FUCKING SOME OF OUR HOT GUY FRIENDS LIKE ANCIENT SPARTANS AND AT THE END OF THE DAY WE WOULD GO HOME AND IMPREGNATE OUR WOMEN. BECAUSE WE FUCKING COULD. And that's that.
>>734366480 Compared to the original people. Everyone is having sex with everyone at this point so you are likely to get down and dirty with a distant cosine instead of someone completely fresh. So nature has a switch to keep inbreeding spreading too much which is the whole gay thing. When you get too much of the same DNA in one person it turns full on gay to not spread any further. If you go back far enough you will have the same parents.This is why animals and insects have been found in the wild that are also gay.
>>734366738 Men are naturally more hairy than women. You only want to have sex with a man who has made himself more feminine. Doesn't this seem like proof you're just confused? Really, men are straight. But some of them are confused sissy retards
>>734366791 >it's normal to put your dick into hairy man asshole We're reaching autism levels that shouldn't even be possible
Does no one see whats really going on here? of course straight people and 100% gay people exist. The only problem is, a bunch of these raging dykes and homos have barely any sexual partners the fug, so they invested cultural phenomenons like, "bisexual", "sexual fluidity", etc to get a bunch of straights to fuck them. Its sick. Just further proof of how our culture is shifting from monogamous relationships to animal like polygamy.
Proove me wrong fags and dykes. Why else would you want a bunch of straight people to go gay other than you wanting more sexual partners available?
>>734361112 Well in the end gender is just a false idea and is just a term derived from a psychologist named John Money whose cruel and unusual experiments drove two twins to suicide. The current generation has all of it's shit fucked to the point of that simply asking people out isn't as simple as it has been since people have made 85,000 false sexualities.
All of life as we know it started out as bunch of horny micronisms fucking each other. There were no "partners" nor "love", just "mates" at most. This kept going on all the way up to fucking neanderthals. But soon, as human civilization was developing, there was more sense of relationships. Far from perfect, but you could see things such as a, "couple". And consider this:
As civilization became more civilized; moving from emperors, dictators, religious crusades, torture, the dating scene has also progressed. Soon, there would be only 1 man for every 1 woman. 1 King for every 1 Queen. As relationships became more founded on love than business connections, technology advanced.
If anything, monogamous relationships is the one thing that makes us human.
Gays and Dykes need to accept that their population will always be a minority and by inventing things like "gender fluid", were going to see a rise in a multile sexual partner dystopia where everything is based off sexual gratification than companionship. Gays are literally making "Brave New World" novel, a reality.
Your eyes dilate and that's all we looked at? For fucks sakes. Your pupil size changes all the time. You get a rush from seeing something sexual, even if it's gay, but repulsive? Nope! Sorry, your eyes dilated. God damn this study is shitty.
This is why psychology isn't science. They don't understand basic biology, physiology, and biochemistry.
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5 If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.