You hear that? Canada says you're all fags. https://br

The comments on that twitter post are so cringe worthy. Saving for future threads.

>>734361112
That article taken out of context, looks pretty stupid.

But I think it is worth talking about, the effect society on sexuality. I mean, most who thought they were straight are now into traps, and wholeheartedly defend it. Now that it is slowly becoming normalized in this region of the internet, you see it more frequently.

I wonder what social and societal effect there is on our sexuality, just some thoughts.

>>734361112
Only a few people are 100% straight or gay. The rest is somewhere in between.
I'm gay, I would never have sex with a woman, but I sure know it when a woman is hot and when her tits look nice. If I was an actor and had to make out or even touch a woman, I would not mind that very much, but her panocha won't be touched.

>>734362484
>most who thought they were straight are now into traps, and wholeheartedly defend it.

that's some major projection and/or exaggeration.
the vast majority of people are NOT into that faggot bullshit.

>>734363917
Retard, read what I said.

Most people who are into traps, thought they were straight beforehand. Not saying everyone who was once straight now likes traps.

What a fragile person you are.

>>734361112
Vice is owned by kikes

>>734362484
>most
Also, being attracted to men who impersonate women just means you're confused by their disguise

File: 0.3.jpg (23KB, 480x363px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 480x363px

>>734364176
>most who thought they were straight are now into traps

>>734362961
Basically this. Less people would think they're 100% straight if they weren't trained from fucking birth that it was morally wrong and carried the penalty of fuckin' death. That said, 100% straight and 100% gay people do exist, but most people are not biologically one of those extremes. Look at how many "straight" dudes suck mad dick in prison...

>>734364203
>>734364264
Most who thought they were straight. Most of those who are into traps, thought they were straight.

Fuck, you guys are so delicate. Have fun defending your masculinity until the day you finally lose your virginity.

>>734364176
You literally said "most who thought they were straight are now into traps" then called someone a retard and asked them to read what you wrote...retard.

>>734364313
Shit, have you ever seen commissary pricing? You practically have to put out if you're planning to eat regularly.

The biggest problem with how this is phrased is that it's at the same time both correct and wrong. It's not entirely wrong to say "no one is 100% this or that" because the way we measure sexuality is a spectrum, but the spectrum does allow for a complete placement on one end instead of the other. So it's wrong, but it's right in how it's fucking up.

File: 1495736998922.jpg (35KB, 533x347px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 533x347px

>>734364176

>>734364508
Referring to those who are already into traps.

>>734361112
I am straight. I don't find men attractive. That's it.

>>734364176

>I mean, most who thought they were straight are now into traps

>Most people who are into traps, thought they were straight beforehand

I like how you rephrase what you said so it means something else, but call other people retards

>>734362484
he's right, you know that?

File: 144478.jpg (14KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x360px

>>734364421
Writes
>most who thought they were straight are now into traps

Means
>most who are now into traps thought they were straight

To be fair, it's not gay if you don't make eye contact.
Just do something manly afterwards like watching football and having a cold beer, or mow the lawn maybe.

>>734362961
Bullshit. Finding something aesthetically pleasing doesn't mean I want to fuck it. I find a lot of things attractive.

>>734361112
A country of fags run by a fag cuck who thinks that everyone else is a fag too? lol k

>>734364176

You wear a helmet to school don't you?

>>734364745
Wrong. It's not gay as long as balls don't touch. Eye contact doesn't matter.

>>734361112
All of it is bullshit, apparently your sexuality is determined by how much your pupils change. Guess they haven't figured out the difference between enlarged pupils from being sexually aroused and enlarged pupils from being enraged.

>>734364761
I didn't say that. But there's a difference between not liking a gender [for me it's women] and not being able to kiss someone of that gender, and not liking a gender but not having a problem kissing them. There are lots of men who would not want to kiss another man, there are also men, straight men, who don't have a problem with it. They're not bisexual in the sense that they would fuck another man, but they also don't think it's gross.

>>734365051
>Eye contact doesn't matter
Dude, you are so gay.
Balls on balls isn't that bad, but looking someone in the eyes is creepy, weird and very bent. It's even borderline gay if you do it to a woman.

>>734365438
Damn, you truly are a cucked beta.

File: enhanced-20080-1394547742-1.jpg (188KB, 625x625px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 625x625px

Everyone is bisexual.


Only some people are honest.


Combine the two, this is what reality looks like.

>>734365326
You talk a lot about gender, so you have not problem boning women that identifies as men?

Friendly reminder that Kinsey's sum contribution to scientific research amounted to nothing more than the single greatest act of voyeurism in history.

File: zelda-porn-86403.jpg (105KB, 640x443px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 640x443px

everyone is bisexual


we know this


nothing new here

>>734361112

Did you even read to the end of the article?

>"Regardless of the sexual orientations of everyone reading this article, empirical evidence has and always will bolster the working theory that OP is a huge faggot."

>>734365644


friendly reminder that you are retarded and that was a waste of dubs

>>734365855
dubs confirms

>>734365807
this

>>734365326
Bisexuals are people who find males and females sexually attractive. Kissing a man in sexual manner would constitute bisexuality. Gay men find other men sexually attractive. Many never act on it, some do.

>>734365556
Wrong. Homosexuality and bisexuality are mental disorders, possibly caused by an infectious disease. If they were normal- they would be normal.
And we would probably have died out.

>>734361112
Watch a bunch of different kind of porn and get turned on? Also only in women, who are more likely to go both ways than dude by 10 trillion %

>>734366033
I heard it comes from inbreeding to stop the inbreeders to get funky kids nature makes them gay instead. And because we've been around for millions of years everyone is a little inbred so everyone is also a little gay.

>>734361112
ANY OF YOU FAGS TOUCH MY STUFF I KILL YA.

>>734365807
>>734365956
Brainwashed millenials. Do you really want to put your dick in a hairy male arse? If so you are not normal

>>734366241
If everyone, or the majority of the people, is bisexual, then that is actually normal.

>>734366033

Why would bisexuality be a mental disorder?

>Fuck Jared on Friday
>Fuck Jessica on Saturday
>Get Jessica pregnant
>She wants to keep it with you but still fuck Amanda on the side
>That's cool, so long as I can still hook up with Jared

>Having fun and still introducing progeny back into the pool

>>734366199
>I heard it comes from inbreeding to stop the inbreeders to get funky kids nature makes them gay instead
What

>And because we've been around for millions of years everyone is a little inbred so everyone is also a little gay.
What do you mean by inbred? Compared to what?

>>734366445
But I'm saying it's not normal

>>734366458
Because of how unhygienic and wasteful homosexuality is.

>>734366241
>hairy male arse

No, just the not-so-hairy ones.


Also would you fuck a woman who had never shaved her body?

>>734366686
>But I'm saying it's not normal


But you are wrong - it is normal.

LOGIC TIME
1. You cannot deny that most men are raised to be men.
2. You get raised to become a good dad.
3. Imagine if you had not been raised to become monogamous!
MOST OF US WOULD BE FUCKING SOME OF OUR HOT GUY FRIENDS LIKE ANCIENT SPARTANS AND AT THE END OF THE DAY WE WOULD GO HOME AND IMPREGNATE OUR WOMEN. BECAUSE WE FUCKING COULD.
And that's that.

>>734366480
Compared to the original people. Everyone is having sex with everyone at this point so you are likely to get down and dirty with a distant cosine instead of someone completely fresh. So nature has a switch to keep inbreeding spreading too much which is the whole gay thing. When you get too much of the same DNA in one person it turns full on gay to not spread any further.
If you go back far enough you will have the same parents.This is why animals and insects have been found in the wild that are also gay.

>>734366791
>/thread

File: 1495070601013.jpg (231KB, 1019x764px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 1019x764px

If you ever watched porno of a guy fucking a girl and wished the guys dick was bigger congratulations you're at least a tiny bit gay

>>734362484
>being brainwashed by schlomo.
Good goyim

>>734366445
>If everyone, or the majority of the people, is bisexual, then that is actually normal.

No, it depends on the distribution. The distribution of the spectrum in the case of humans is effectively binary, i.e. the curve is tall and thin, not wide and short.

In other words, ur a faget

File: 0.1.png (228KB, 342x354px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 342x354px

>>734366738
Men are naturally more hairy than women.
You only want to have sex with a man who has made himself more feminine. Doesn't this seem like proof you're just confused? Really, men are straight. But some of them are confused sissy retards

>>734366791
>it's normal to put your dick into hairy man asshole
We're reaching autism levels that shouldn't even be possible

>>734366959
The guy acts as a proxy. When you wish the dick was bigger, you are in effect wishing YOUR dick was bigger.

I thought homosexuals were statistically more intelligent, but you faggots tonight are fucking retarded.

>>734367541


Why does it have to be hairy? A lot of guys aren't hairy.

>>734366917
I'm trying to understand how it stops inbreeding instead of just reducing the number of people who are born
Is it a way of 'taking out' those who are overly inbred, so to speak?

>>734367541

>can't imagine masculine dudes fucking other masculine dudes
>probably had brown berry popped by dad in 10th grade

>>734367541
>confused sissy retards


Not confused, I just like fucking people that I fall in love with. It makes them feel pleasure, which makes me happy.


Also, kill yourself, nigger.

File: Gosickep01c.jpg (41KB, 854x480px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 854x480px

Does no one see whats really going on here? of course straight people and 100% gay people exist. The only problem is, a bunch of these raging dykes and homos have barely any sexual partners the fug, so they invested cultural phenomenons like, "bisexual", "sexual fluidity", etc to get a bunch of straights to fuck them. Its sick. Just further proof of how our culture is shifting from monogamous relationships to animal like polygamy.

Proove me wrong fags and dykes. Why else would you want a bunch of straight people to go gay other than you wanting more sexual partners available?

>>734367841


You're one of those niggerfaggots who always automatically assumes that change is a bad thing.


Protip: you are retarded, and history will leave you behind in the dirt

File: thisthat.gif (446KB, 300x186px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 300x186px

>>734367841

>>734367679
Men find hair unattractive, but men are also hairy. I'm trying to show how ridiculous it is to say all men are bisexual.
You can get around it by shaving, but not as easily in the past

>>734367722
Yes exactly, that's what it said. So the overly inbred can't continue and get funky kids.

File: 1494405474548.gif (607KB, 800x792px) Image search: [Google]

607KB, 800x792px

>>734367961
I think you're just confused...

>>734361112
Well in the end gender is just a false idea and is just a term derived from a psychologist named John Money whose cruel and unusual experiments drove two twins to suicide. The current generation has all of it's shit fucked to the point of that simply asking people out isn't as simple as it has been since people have made 85,000 false sexualities.

>>734366959
I only watch lesbian porn. I am obsessed with vagina. The only dick I like is my own.

>>734368303
Well technically lesbian porn is homosexual porn, therefore it's 100% homosexual.

>>734368098


Pretty sure knowing that I am sexually attracted to both vaginas and penises isn't confusion, it's being on the top of the sexual food chain.

File: 8c638921aa472a5e2133d54043073e2c.jpg (507KB, 800x703px) Image search: [Google]

507KB, 800x703px

>>734367961
>change is bad
wrong, dyke.

All of life as we know it started out as bunch of horny micronisms fucking each other. There were no "partners" nor "love", just "mates" at most. This kept going on all the way up to fucking neanderthals. But soon, as human civilization was developing, there was more sense of relationships. Far from perfect, but you could see things such as a, "couple". And consider this:

As civilization became more civilized; moving from emperors, dictators, religious crusades, torture, the dating scene has also progressed. Soon, there would be only 1 man for every 1 woman. 1 King for every 1 Queen. As relationships became more founded on love than business connections, technology advanced.

If anything, monogamous relationships is the one thing that makes us human.

Gays and Dykes need to accept that their population will always be a minority and by inventing things like "gender fluid", were going to see a rise in a multile sexual partner dystopia where everything is based off sexual gratification than companionship. Gays are literally making "Brave New World" novel, a reality.

File: 14.jpg (69KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 600x800px

>>734368051


I'm sexually attracted to hair.
I'm also bisexual.


Kill yourself.

File: 1494413407862.jpg (27KB, 316x286px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 316x286px

>>734368658
>getting dicked as a man
>top of the sexual food chain
Pick one.

>>734368303
>The only dick I like is my own.

That still means you like dick, bi-faggot.

>>734368788


But I'm always the top, idiot.

File: implying.gif (2MB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x168px

>>734368837
>implying that matters

>>734368965


It literally does, given what I just responded to, fucking retard.

>>734368729

You're not really making much sense there desu. Monogamy isn't necessary for survival or greatness, nor is it strictly found in humans.

>as relationships became more founded on love than business connections, technology advanced.

What kind of shit are you smoking nigger

>>734368285
Gender is a false idea?
John Money was a sadistic lunatic with unscientific ideas based on his own bullshit ideology - you know, a SJW.

Poor David Reimer, early casualty of modern leftists.

>>734361112
God damn fucking bullshit.

Your eyes dilate and that's all we looked at? For fucks sakes. Your pupil size changes all the time. You get a rush from seeing something sexual, even if it's gay, but repulsive? Nope! Sorry, your eyes dilated. God damn this study is shitty.

This is why psychology isn't science. They don't understand basic biology, physiology, and biochemistry.

>>734368756
I find this woman attractive despite her hair. Not because of it. That's probably what you're feeling.

The idea of a hairy man as a sexual partner physically disgusts me

File: 1495800155928.png (152KB, 325x277px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 325x277px

>>734369060
>being dicked by a man
>dicking a man
it's almost the same thing. stop thinking it matters faggot. the world needs less of you homosexual libcucks.

>>734364730

God, his writing is obviously meaningfluid. Stop being such a meaningqueerphobic racist bigot.

Sjw garbage.

>>734366241
They want to put it in so deep, that they would be crowned King Arthur when they pull out.

Sjw fuckery at its finest

>>734361112
>vice

>>734370616
Interestingly VICE is not controlled by Jews