Prove to me the earth is round, globetards.

>>734311058
Look, Anon, I need to tell you something because I don't know if I'll ever see you again.

I... I was an orphan... and I was raised in a whore house in Philadelphia. I read about Milton Hershey and his school in a porno mag, or some crap the girls left by the toilet, and it said some kids had a different life there. I could picture it. I dreamt of it. The idea of being wanted. Because the girl who was forced to raise me would look at me every day like she hoped I would disappear.

The closest I came to feeling wanted was a girl... who made me go through her John's pockets while they screwed. If I collected more than a dollar... she would buy me a Hershey bar. And I would eat it... alone... in my room... with great ceremony. Feeling like a normal kid.

It said sweet on the wrapper.

It was the only sweet thing in my life.

Get in a plane. Fly in a straight line, where will you end up eventually?

>>734311058
No, you prove its not. Protip: you cunt.

>>734311151
/thread

>>734311058
These people don't actually exist, they just enjoy annoying people, we all know the earth is a sphere, go back to eating your cheerios kid.

>>734311151
Nowhere. No one has done it, so it's obviously fake. Everyone that has tried it has been killed by the government to try and hide that the earth is flat.

>>734311058
Why can't you see the United States from the top of Mount Everest?

File: 1494363695441.png (402KB, 556x312px) Image search: [Google]

402KB, 556x312px

There is another one of these threads active too. Go post in that one shitskin instead of making this one.

You can Google it. Fucking retard.

>>734311238
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutan_Voyager

>>734311317
Yet, google lies...

>>734311151
At the bottom of an ocean, most likely...

>>734311058
2012:
A rendering, not a photograph.
2013:
A new rendering, still not a photograph.

>>734311151
not OP or a flatfag, but I'm pretty sure that's impossible. The gravitational pull gets stronger toward the center of the earth so going straight would put you off course eventually

My new company is offering along the world cruises from next year

>>734311367
Dick Rutan was a NASA spy who pretended to go around the world to prove that it was round (which it isn't)

>>734311435
Ooh falseflagging thats fun

People who claim the Earth is flat are a waste of oxygen. They can't even explain what keeps our atmosphere from falling off the edge.

>>734311435
He should have said fly in a geodesic, but you have to simplify for flattards.

>>734311553
no one did any attempt to 'prove' that the earth is round since 2000years because only retards believe its not.

Already one of these threads going on.

>>734310512

Try to keep the cancer to a single thread at a time

>>734311226
>>734311058

These threads belong on facebook and twitter to litmus intelligence. not among the spaz autistic nerds of 4chan. Here it is just a forced meme.

>>734311058
People still reply to this?!!??!????

File: globe_comparison_with_distance.jpg (276KB, 1600x700px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 1600x700px

perceived scale of objects on a sphere is dependant on relative altitude of the observation point:

the same globe, from different altitudes:

>>734311591
What keeps our atmosphere from falling off a round earth? Smart guy.

>>734311667
Well, that, and we couldn't possibly have satellites or people orbiting the earth in a space station without it being a round 3-dimensional object.

>>734311754
And also the angle is drastically different in the first photo to hide south america to help make the point.

>>734311553
This is so stupid and ridiculous that you can say than about anyone that tries to prove the earth Is round even in this thread.
>inb4 "you are a NASA spy trying to prove the earth Is round"
>inb4 I actually am

>>734311800
Gravity, in a sphere gravity pulls from all sides equally as much on the atmosphere keeping it around the earth. Now you explain.

>>734311800
The answer is gravity – the same force that keeps us anchored to Earth. Yet, Earth does continually lose some of its atmosphere to space. This loss occurs in the upper atmosphere, over billion-year time scales.

>>734311978
But we have no proof to say he DID travel around the world. In fact, he "circled" it in 3 hours faster than a normal plane that speed could. Appeased yet, globetard?

>>734312222
That's not even my point I'm a different guy from the one that posted about this pilot man. My point is that your way of disproving him is stupid.

>>734312082
>>734312130
But what if the laws of gravity are a big lie? What if gravity works differently than what has been taught to us?

>>734311800
Gravity you dumbass

>>734311058
Are flat-earthers genuine idiots, or just dedicated with an Andy Kaufman-like intensity to a specific line of trolling?

Prove to me that the earth exists.

>>734312380
Climb a tall building then jump off, will you fall to your death?

Now, you can calculate how long it will take you to fall to the ground, and how fast you are traveling.

File: enlightened.png (326KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 640x640px

>>734312222
Oh, those wacky NASA conspirers. They sure done goofed up this time! Their agent was meant to circle the disc, but he messed up, and did it in 3 hours faster than an expert basement dweller analysist who knows THE TRUTH determines he should've.

Well, that's blown the whole charade wide open, hasnt it?

Couldnt possibly be that he had a tailwind that cut 3 hours off his estimated flight time? Couldnt possibly be that the plane was better than he'd thought?
Couldnt possibly be that over a flight of 9 days and 40,000 kilometres, there would be variables, eh?

No. its obviously all part of the "conspiracy".

get on a boat and try to sail around the world.

>>734312779
And we have no proof to say he did it. I can just as well say I'm Donald Trump. Do you really believe me?

>>734311435
>believes in gravity
>still thinks a flat Earth is even possible

kek, god damn it you tards are funny

>>734312380
>But what if the laws of gravity are a big lie? What if gravity works differently than what has been taught to us?

then perform multiple experiments. Record gravitational constants. produce a hypothesis of what you beleive gravity to be, which does not contain conspiracies, unknowns, or other blank areas.
publish the hypothesis for peer review.

Other scientists will peer-review your work. They will discolver that your experiments are correct. the observations will conclude your idea of gravity is correct.

you win the Nobel Prize for physics. You make a million dollars. you become world-famous.


Or, you do the experiments, and you will rapidly discover that gravity is exactly how they have said it is all along.

I know which is more likely, but in the event that a miracle happens... congratulations on your Nobel Prize, give 4chan a mention in your acceptance speech for having inspired you to your life's work. Good luck.

>>734312380
Gravity works the same way, every single time. No matter what you do, your object will always gravitate to one with more mass. the inner workings of the force are still mysterious, but our observations of gravity has never changed and the evidence is irefutable.

Ok so maybe the earth is flat, how is it actually laid out?

>>734311435
>The gravitational pull gets stronger toward the center of the earth so going straight would put you off course eventually


and your evidence of this is what, exactly?

Because that one is pretty easy to debunk.
get a light gate, and set up a drop experiment. record the rate for gravity there. (it'll be 9.81ms/s).

go to Alaska, or Tromso. Repeat. it'll be 9.81ms/s there too.

go to New Zealand, or Patagonia. it'll be 9.81ms/s there too.

In fact, you could even go to the north pole, and do it there, and your light gate drop timer will show the same thing. 9.81ms/s.

So your claim that gravity is stronger toward "the middle" is verifiably false.

It is, after all, a gravitational CONSTANT.

>>734311404
Underrated post

DURR DA URF ISH FLAT!!!1!!!112 XXDDDDDDDD AMIRIT GUIZ??!?!!1!!@ fucking autistic OP as usual

>>734312934
>And we have no proof to say he did it.

Except for the air traffic controllers and radar tracking that tracked it every mile around the entire globe for those 9 days in 1986 that he did it in?
You're a special kind of stupid, arent you?

>>734313480
Not true.

It is, after all, a gravitational FIELD.

Fields fluctuates.

>>734312082
>>734312130
>>734312538

Reading is hard, isn't it?

I meant flatties can't explain the phenomenon from their wild theories.

Of course the Earth is not a disc and of course I know how gravity works. People with IQ's of 135 and up actually do science...

>>734311058
How? If you believe this shit in the first place I could take you to space and youll say its just a hologram when you see it with your own eyes.

That or take a torpedo level on a plane and claim that solves it like that basketball player did with apparently no regard to how gravity works.

>>734313747
>Not true.
>It is, after all, a gravitational FIELD.
>Fields fluctuates.

And your evidence for fluctuation in the gravitational constant on this planet is....

Oh, no, you have none.

>WHAT IS AN "ARTISTS CONCEPTION"?

>this thread

>>734313209
See thats just it.. Mysterious. No one knows, so the knowledge is hidden.

>>734311058
Cause you just slapped a date on 2 pictures and said they belonged to nasa

>>734313480
Do you even physics? The 9.8 m/s^2 is a local approximation of gravity as a constant vector field to make newtonian physics easier. In reality, we are in a gravitational field that is definitely non-constant..... use newton's universal gravity equation.... as distance changes, g changes....
https://www.mansfieldct.org/Schools/MMS/staff/hand/lawsgravaltitude.htm

Daylight.

If the earth were flat the entire planet would either face the sun or away from it at the same time.
There would be no time zones, places like the arctic of Canada and Greenland and Scandinavian where they have incredibly long night wouldn't exist and there would be no reason for days to get longer or shorter as the seasons change since thats due to the angle the planet is rotating

>>734313931
new guy here, my source is vsauce, different parts of the earth have subtle changes in gravity

>>734313931
The gravitational constant is 6.67408 × 10^(-11)
And is used to calculate force of gravitational pull.

But it requires mass which can change, if you stand on top of an iron deposit you can see a difference on gravitational pull than if you stood on less mass.

Your calculation is based on the entire mass of the earth as a generalization of earths gravity.
Earth's mass isn't uniform and Earth's gravitational field will fluctuate depending on where you are.
Not noticeably for a human but it can be measured.

>>734312373
Well said, anon.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_ewCQnJSEkM

nothing more needs to be said

>>734312629

The world may never know.

File: 1495208046706.gif (2MB, 288x288px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 288x288px

>>734312961
fuckin' saved!

>>734311226
Nope the sad or scary part is that these people actually exist and they're fucking stupid.

>>734314376
>new guy here, my source is vsauce, different parts of the earth have subtle changes in gravity

Yes. different areas and in fact, on a 5.9 year cycle, different chronology DO have a different gravitational constant - measurement values analysed range from approximately 6.672 × 10−11 N·(m/kg)2 to 6.675 × 10−11 N·(m/kg)2, which is a percentage variation of about 10-4.

However, that 10-4 variation is, in realistic terms, roughly equivalent to the measurement variation in running a tape measure from NYC and Indianapolis, and coming up with a difference of 1 metre, between all your measurements.

This is not a significant "field" variation.

>>734312961
So that's how Battle Tendency ends

File: conspiracy.jpg (94KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 600x450px

>>734311058
die cunt