>mfw Flynn had to resign because of keeping secrets about his contact with the Russians
>mfw Sessions also had to resign for the same reason
How much of a red flag do Americans need? Does the red flag have to be waving from the top of the White House before they get it?
Sessions isn't resigning. The only people calling for it are the imploding minority democrats.
Sessions also did not lie as he was not being questioned about himself at the time.
Continue pushing your obviously false narrative though. Sore loser.
Shit's crazy. This is going to be bigger than watergate.
That's such a tired argument. Be honest, at what point would you begin to admit what's going on without deflecting? Would it take them all coming out on stage like the end of an SNL episode and admitting it in unison, or would the brainwashing be so complete that you'd just call it fake news? I really wanna know what the cutoff point is. Where's the line in the dirt drawn? You have to understand that you're the minority here, right? The "sore losers" aren't going away until the illegitimate dictator does. I mean, you can keep spouting that argument over and over, hoping that all of this is just the result of a bunch of sadsack feminists who wanted that cunt Hillary in office, but at what junction would you stop and say "You know, maybe there's some fuckery going on here"?
lrn2 thread statistics, cuck
>using inb4 in attempt to avoid being disproved
typical trumpfag, doesn't like to be proved wrong.
two of them are me, and i'm also op. deal with it. there's no 4chan conspiracy plot against you.
Trump won't 'drain the swamp',
trump won't close corporate tax holes, trump won't close wage inequality gap,
Trump won't fix infrastructure without either 1. Raising taxes or
2. Increasing the deficit.
Trumpfags voted for an elitist billionaire asshole who doesn't pay his taxes because the wanted to believe his lies and liked his hat.
>Trump won't 'drain the swamp',
Of course he did! How do you think he found the members of his Cabinet?
He has already shot US citizens. Women and children. Not even Her Reptilian Majesty was that quick to kill.
I'd rather fight the enemy than endorse their takeover of my country. Republicuck.
>Implying the Republican party doesn't know what it's doing.
Trump was the only way to get the Republicans in the White House. Now all they have to do is get Trump impeached, and get someone less insane in the office. If they handle it right, they look like heroes for saving America from Trump.
>THEY GET PAID PER REPLY
i kek'd. where's my fucking pay?
maybe it's the 5th thread because trump's gang is falling one by one because of their involvement with the russians.
what a fucking idiot. you are the type of person that causes everybody to think americans are stupid.
... calling somebody who disagrees with you a "sore loser". fucking ignorant.
>approves of being cucked as a nation
>implies his voting choice makes him immune to being called a cuck
TOP FUCKING LEL
>I did not meet with Russians
but he totally did. twice.
>somehow not a lie
it's not even illegal for senators to meet with foreign ambassadors, if his meetings were on the up and up, there was no reason to say he hadn't met with them.
1. Show me one piece of evidence that shows that the Russians hacked "the election". It didn't and can't happen.
2. Show me one piece of evidence that shows that the Russians hacked the Podesta emails.
3. No one knows for sure who hacked the server.
4. It was a gmail account, why in the fuck would a high ranking party official use a gmail account for his communications for a presidential campaign?
5. Whoever dumped those emails showed us just how corrupt that the democrat party is at its inner-most workings. We should seriously be thanking them (whoever they are) for exposing this deep corruption.
6. All of this "The Russians, The Russians" shit is making the left look like a joke.
>... calling somebody who disagrees with you a "sore loser".
Its not because you simply disagree with us, its that you continue to shill an obviously false conspiracy theory to undermine the winner of the election. This is all after democrats had a nation wide riot in the wake of their lost in the election which is ironic considering your arrogantly thought you would easily win and fear mongered about Trump supporters throwing a shit fit "when they lost"
>Julian Assange continuously shuts down all claims that his source is russian
>Says numerous times it was a DNC insider who was disgusted with their party who leaked it
>democrats just out right ignore this and continue to shill the russian hacker meme, even attributing this to info from Assange despite him saying the exact opposite
Do democrats not realize shit like this just makes them more detestable?
1. you're not privy to that information
2. you're not privy to that information
3. 17 intelligence agencies do know who did it, and have said, but you're a retard who's in denial.
4. fake news af, it was a DNC server.
5. you're an idiot. do you always put criminals up on a pedestal?
6. all of your denying blatant facts is making you look dumb.
>obviously false conspiracy theory
everything is a false conspiracy to you dumbasses. telling you trump signs executive orders without reading them probably qualifies as a conspiracy theory to you.
>democrats had a nation wide riot
some idiots did some "rioting". stop having a one tracked mind and thinking that everybody who disagrees with you is a sjw anarchist crybaby.
Oh no.. The Russians!
Would rather have Russian influence than Islamic. If they brokered a deal to take down the democrats for the good of the United States and global stability. GOOD.
It's not unusual behaviour and the demorats are guilty of greasing palms and talking to unfavorable countries behind closed doors too. The hypocracy is so deafening that people literally don't want to hear it. Ffs just shut up. The guy has been in office for one fucking month.
He hasn't face fucked and intern, overcharged for healthcare, or supported militants. The demorats all did.. So stfu about a "phone call" of all things.
>>Julian Assange continuously shuts down all claims that his source is russian
>>Says numerous times it was a DNC insider who was disgusted with their party who leaked it
>implying that the russians didn't tell him to say that ...... or else
>implying that the russians didn't tell him to say that too .... or else
>being this delusional
Oh look everyone, another ass pained Trumpette that dismisses any valid criticism of his precious Traitor in Chief because it doesn't fit his political narrative.
In other news, it snowed in Antarctica today, and water is wet.
How many of these threads do you faggots need to make? The election ended nearly 4 months ago. You can't change the outcome there snowflake.
not an argument
>everything is a false conspiracy to you dumbasses.
Not an argument. Theres been investigations into these claims and it has yielded zero evidence
You continuously just call people names instead of backing up any of your bullshit claims because you have nothing to back them up. Are you even aware that the DNI reports came out a few months ago, and that they yielded nothing? Or are you just completely unaware of all of this because Stephen Colbert didnt mention it in his le ebin monoluge?
Also, Hillary actually was bought about by Russians, along with Saudis and Wall Street.
Putin literally said that the USA may be the only legitimate superpower left in the world. YouTube that shit.
He doesn't so much want it strong and interfering in Russia.. But Russia along with much of the world need the US stable and not overrun by rampant false socialism. It would be the Stalin years all over again, except that nobody could oppose the US arsenal. Global stability Trumps any one countries interests.
>He proved my conspiracy theory wrong, which means hes obviously in on the conspiracy himself!
Did your brains really break from getting cucked so hard? lol
provide ANY evidence for your claims
Thank you for proving my point, chuckle nuts
>not an argument
>You continuously just call people names
how dare you say that? you just called people that disagree with you shills. how dumb are you? yes, i am calling you names, but the names im calling you are warranted.
who the fuck cares about hillary?
Hillary and Pelosi are worth hundreds of millions of dollars. From careers in politics. They care about money.
Fuck yeah Trump is worth a shit ton. He's not making deals for money though. When there's evidence that he is, then I'm ready to call him out. Maybe his ideologies are a little fucked up, but he's not fucking funding the Middle East to be at war with itself. He wants to be friends with Russia. Wtf is wrong with that?
>No evidence at all to support your conspiracy theory
>the DNI reports contain no proof
>The House Intel Chair says theres no evidence
>the guy from wikileaks outright denies it all and says it was a DNC insider
Seriously, why do you continue to shill this retarded theory for any other reason than you are supremely butthurt at Trump and want to try and meme a controversy into impeaching him?
again with the buzzwords. snowflake, cuck, libtard.... this must be the first presidential campaign in history run solely based on buzzwords and memes.
The fact that people still defend his insane bullshit is really borderline impressive.
>Now all they have to do is get Trump impeached, and get someone less insane in the office
Pence would be next in line and he's worse than Trump. Hope you enjoy your porn and weed now because if Trump is booted out for whatever reason Pence and Co will turn america into a puritan colony in less than a year
>in Yemen terrorist compound, being used as human shield and already brainwashed into Islam
I love the idea that because the women and child didn't have time to grab a weapon, they were innocent civilians
Trump's presidency in a nutshell:
Muslim Ban...... reversed!
Repeal ACA....... blocked
Tax breaks....... blocked
Keystone pipeline...... suspended until federal hearing
Supreme Court pick......... not confirmed
Total disaster...... check!
Except for Assange's blatant political slant, even outright saying that his intent was to ruin the Clinton campaign. His evidence is suspect at a minimum and his personal agenda against Clinton shouldn't be ignored.
Assange is not the standard here. We have numerous intelligence agencies for this, and they all agreed on the same conclusion. These are (mostly) nonpartisan agencies and we should be more quick to trust them than a guy who has literally said he has a bone to pick with a candidate.
No they didnt. You are LITERALLY making shit up
Heres the DNI report, I want you to quote the exact part that proves your batshit conspiracy true
>The dispute began two days after the Nov. 8 election, when Sergei A. Ryabkov, the Russian deputy foreign minister, said his government had maintained contacts with members of Mr. Trump’s “immediate entourage” during the campaign.
LITERALLY moving the goalpost
>LITERALLY moving the goalpost
not moving any goalposts. you are saying that theres no evidence or no precedence for people to be saying these things, but there is as shown in the article.
Soo what are these Russian ties even insinuating? Rigged cyber brainwash to get Trump elected? Unless the Russians hacked the electoral college votes, I call utter BS on this narrative. Like who cares if any of these guys had "contact" with "Russians".
Russians leaked the podesta emails, and revealed what a witch Hillary was, how corrupt the DNC and the Hilary foundation was. While apperantly with holding RNC leaks?
Theres no RNC leaks because Trump is his own entity, Trump has grabbed her by the pussy and not showing his tax returns, like please, trivial grasping at straws critiques at best.
Dems are in a death spiral and are just trying at anything at this point, just like republicans claims that Obama wasn't a true US citizen. It was unfounded, Russian ties are dems version of this. Liberal tears so sweet.
Lol people that loved calling and would openly acknowledge media as"fake, corporate, and corupt" maybe only a year ago. Now liberals are defending CNN, Huffpost, and Buzz feed as some bastion of journalistic integrity and honesty. Keep digging your own graves libtards. Can you feel the paradigm shift coming?
>Lol people that loved calling and would openly acknowledge media as"fake, corporate, and corupt" maybe only a year ago. Now liberals are defending CNN, Huffpost, and Buzz feed as some bastion of journalistic integrity and honesty.
as we all know, everyone that called the media "fake, corporate, and corupt" is now calling that very same media "a bastion of journalistic integrity and honesty" nowadays.
that was just some sarcasm to showcase how dumb your logic is. you are very simplistic if you really think its like that. all sorts of people have been calling the media ""fake, corporate, and corupt" for years. thats everyone, including your dear old dony, who calls everything but fox news "fake media".
What did you even green text from my post?
Unless you honestly think they influenced electoral college votes (and they didn't) Russians had 0 to with it.
Shill your fake news harder
>Unless you honestly think they influenced electoral college votes (and they didn't) Russians had 0 to with it.
you sound so certain. are you some sort of psychic? anyway, you are moving the goalpost. in the other post you said that even if they had something to do, their motivate is meaningless. i already told you how thats a dumb thing to think, so now youre jumping to the certainty that they werent involved at all.
>What did you even green text from my post?
to really emphasize how dumb what you said was
>Shill your fake news
this is how you spot a retard; every time you have a differing opinion, theyll call you a shill and will use meme phrases like "fake news", phrases that really jog your noggin
Here's a fun little quote from the exact source you just gave:
"We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.
We have high confidence in these judgments."
The entire report reads like this, enumerating different incidences and methods they believe the Russian government took to influence the election. Did you read it?
They hacked the vote count centers in many of the states. But more specifically those blue states that somehow magically went red, like PA, MI, and WI. Sure MI uses paper, but they get counted at vote centers. These centers especially the rural ones are susceptible to hacking more so than the urban ones due to budget constraints.
Why don't you go look this up and educate yourself just a little bit before you post more ridiculous shit, that only serves in making you look foolish and uneducated.
>1. you're not privy to that information
If information like that is being held from the general public, that just shows that the intelligence community has strayed from their true purpose to serve the american people.
He's not triggered. Faggot conservatives or operatives of faggot conservatives are deliberately jamming threads. I don't give a fuck, but it does indicate some pussy ass butthurt behavior on behalf of the commie sympathizing fleshlights for Putin.
Lmfao, the tinfoil on your hat is glistening to brightly
Im a strong supporter of imperical evidence <spoilers he has none>
vote center "hackusations" ? They recounted votes, they didn't find fake people or like double voters.
Only way to "hack" the election would be to tamper with electoral college votes, theres 0 evidence of this.
For any sort of sensitive information held by intelligence agencies, it remains confidential until its confidentiality no longer serves a purpose. If they never release the information or release it at the wrong times time, then you might be right. Until that time there is nothing abnormal about being careful when it comes to international investigations
>Only way to "hack" the election would be to tamper with electoral college votes, theres 0 evidence of this.
Right, because the most glaring evidence would be that the outcome didn't match the election night outcome.
To be fair, that applies to most 4chan users, but at least they keep to their respective boards.
We need to build a wall around /pol/ to stop the autism overflowing into /b/ again.
That doesn't matter if their votes are based on their respective state's votes in cases where the state vote counts were compromised. They believe that they are acting in good faith, which technically they are, but they are only carrying forward the bad state voter data, causing the entire election to be faulty.