What's more evil: someone who kills fluffies or someone who helps them?
No leggy fluffies are always bad fluffies. Only good fluffies keep their leggies so only leggy fluffies should get sketties.
If a fluffy mummah shows up on your doorstep begging to help her and her babbehs always make her trade at least half of them for one meal then boot her out the door.
Why are we still here? Just to suffer?
i was about to ask... arent you supposed to sleep by now? where are you from?
Just got off night shift, see fluffy thread, dump fluffy. I'm a simple man.
Anyone who gives food, comfort or shelter to a fluffy deserves to die in prison.
The one who kills them, obviously. No reason to pretend there's any kind of justification for the things we do.
What's up with this recurring thing of fluffies insisting that they're not toys, but "alive" when they're categorized as biotoys and not animals?
>surely there must be more to life
Because they really are living, sapient beings. The "biotoy" classification is hypocritical as fuck excuse to claim their emotions aren't real. How would you feel if court decided you don't have human rights since you're only a sack of flesh acting on hormones and nerve impulses?
Not complaining though, this is one of the most brilliant things about the whole fluffy universe. :)
I would argue. Everything created artificially in laboratories based on different experiments and treats pulled from other beings cannot considered a real, unique living being.
They breath, feel and live, that's for sure but they lack that natural right to be because they were designed and created by humans.
Hence they are called bio-toys, not so different from robots or other plastic things.
They cant be considered as such only because they can vocalize their thoughts and feelings.
now u're not so fast
It's a common headcanon to make life for fluffies even more miserable. Since they are not classed as animals they are not protected by any Animal Rights. Of course in real life such would not be the case, as fluffiies are sapient and sentient creatures with the mind of a human toddler.
This. I've always thought the reason the biotoy rhetoric works so well is that the plight of the homeless fluffies is too much for most people, so they gladly accept the biotoy expression as an excuse to ignore it. "I'm a good person and would never let innocent beings suffer. But the fluffies are just biotoys so it's okay for me to pass them by."
I just don't get it?
were you all abused as children?
I personally like it because fluffies are pests destroying the ecosystem and infrastructure. Its the same reason i like Rabbit hunting so much, noone gives a shit if you skin and gut a rabbit while its still alive, they're fucking pests.
I honestly have no fucking clue why I like these threads so much. I'm not fucked in the head, I LOVE animals and would never want to hurt them. But for some reason I get immense satisfaction from these shitty comics.
i was emotionally abused by my parents and class mates.
I remember when one of my bullies kicked my ass infront of my mom and she didnt give a fuck
i was just some shy kid
this is why i love fluffies, i love seeing the disbelief as they are rejected and die cold and alone
its a good thing my neighbours dont have pets
>Everything created artificially in laboratories based on different experiments and treats pulled from other beings cannot considered a real, unique living being.
>They breath, feel and live, that's for sure but they lack that natural right to be because they were designed and created by humans.
Would consider cloned humans to have rights?
It's because you see the stupidity of these "creatures" and they are the embodiment of human stupidity so it's very satisfying to see a grotesquely cute creature being destroyed. It's our God complex taking over in our minds. And yes, it is immensely satisfying. Not to a sexual level like outsiders think, but a God control level.
could someone give me the rundown on jellenheimers?
man I've been lurking /b/ for a whole week, and most of the reads are fairly self explanatory
but this shit?
makes even less sense than /ha/
do you like the fluffies or not; there just this strange blend and it's all non-narrative
there arn't recurrent characters per ce, just a blend of shit fur and sadism; but also kindness
What if you're a clone, right now?
I've always considered fluffies destroying ecosystem and infrastructure to be just an excuse to abuse fluffies. These things are stupid, weak, and it's a miracle they're surviving at all, so if people actually wanted to wipe them out they would do it easily.
The way I see it the fluffies are just a petty nuisance. Most people simply don't care about them enough to deal with them one way or another, but there are always some who blame them for everything from economy to global warming in order to gain support for their extermination.
Fluffies are for all kinds of feels. Hugbox, sadbox, weirdbox, abuse and cute
i llike fluffy threads and the thought to keep a loved fluffy as my prized pet and abuse the shit out of any other.
Really just lurk moar. fluffy threads are this way
well that would be answer to some things in my life
There's a lot of injustice in the world, and we've all suffered from it. For me the fluffies are a therapeutic way to feel like the oppressor instead of the oppressed for a chance, abusing something even more innocent and undeserving. It's like child abuse, except since it's just cartoons there are no real people getting harmed by it.
The company that made them lobbied to get them classified as bio-toys rather than animals because else they would be subject to animal protection laws and that costs money
Its actually based on shit corporations already do to get out of paying damages and reparations and avoid lawsuits
The joke is that this clashes with the cartoony mentality of fluffies.
Read the hubris series at the booru it really goes into all this
>fluffiies are sapient and sentient creatures
Are they? common HC is that they are programmed and use parrot genes to talk but the company half assed it and thats why they talk weird
So basically fluffies don't think like a human they just repeat shit from memory when something happens, thats why all fluffies talk the same and say the same phrases and don't actually need to learn how to talk which is why foals start talking even without parents around
Think of this: octopi are super smart and have a high brain-to-body ratio but they aren't SENTIENT like humans because they don't need to be sentient to do what they do
You know thats a bullshit meme made up by lawyers to get their clients off jail right? most psychopaths didn't have a bad life
That richfag kid in texas that ran over a family didn't have a bad life, he just didn't give a fuck
I just find it very funny how a massive corporation went bust trying to make a IRL little pony pet and ended with these furry-pig-looking retarded horses that shit everywhere and are so fragile they are broken by all
Fluffies have the English language and core concepts like hugs and playing programmed into their genes, but beyond the basics they still have to learn things on their own. All creatures are born with certain innate instincts, fluffies just have the stock vocabulary on top of that.
There was a origin story at the booru where the company had made this actual talking horse pet that had a mind of its own and could talk right but it wasn't cute or tiny like fluffies so in the process of "fixing" it they had to scrap most of the brain to make it smaller which is why fluffies are programmed instead of actually learning
Did you just assume this fluffy's gender ?
I think the tragedy is that the white fluffy took the piano and cannot play it. And since the rules allow only one fluffy per toy the white fluffy cannot show how it's played either.
so stuff like this is what creates future ferals.
I see we have a newcomer fascinated by fluffys.
Anyway what happens with most mummahs is they know they are pregnant but sometimes they don't know they are giving birth. Often times they only know when it's coming out, not ready.
so she is aware its babbehs and not poop, but she calls it poopies becasue that is her word for it.
is this her secound litter? what happened to the first, can babbehs survive to maturity without human care?
Ya pretty much. They call it big poopies but some people have it where they think it is real poop until they look at the babys.
It is not known if it's her first or second litter but fluffys tend to breed like rabbits when conditions are right.
Often time fluffys die easily in the wild or streets. Often times one or two fluffys survive to maturity in the wild. Depending on the area fluffys can survive seven months or two-three years.
Babbys can survive without human care as long as the mother is around. Fluffys though are made to want love from humans so they will seek them out as long as they are not traumatized from being abused all the time.
One thing I noticed about the picture is the fluffys are born with fur. Often times it take one or two days for the fur to start to grow.
>Babbys can survive without human care as long as the mother is around.
is that so?
Typically they need mummahs milk in order to survive. Some people have it though where they can be weaned off the milk the first week or so. Sometimes they find mares to steal milk from when they are sleeping.
Still as you can see they are getting wrecked and probably just lost their herd. They won't last long.
>Often times one or two fluffys survive to maturity in the wild.
yeah. that's the bit I am not buying. say the average litter is 8 foals, mares are prone ot still births, so lets take two, now you have the feeding and mare pecking order fo the best babbes to the worst in terms of allocating milk with the browns, alicorns and runts basically dying hands down. now we are down to five. the mare only has two teets meaning the two best babbehs get the most milk and are the best nourished, leaving the others to grow less well fed. factor in disease, predators, exposure, stupidity, the death of the mom, the brittleness of the fluffies and all that, best odds, you lose ONE of the two healthy faols and the other 3 undernourished foals are dead guaranteed. most realisitic that the only one who survives is the mammah who has to start over again is not dead already.
its really hard to believe these things CAN survive in the wild unless these things are like the seasonal designer fluffies whom don't get sold and are abandoned.
>Typically they need mummahs milk in order to survive. Some people have it though where they can be weaned off the milk the first week or so. Sometimes they find mares to steal milk from when they are sleeping.
well that still requires human intervention to survive...
well A, that is no how cloning works, you would get a carbon copy infant of the person you clones, but they would not be adult, nor will have any knowledge or experience of the person they are cloned from as they would lack the experiences that contained that knowledge. example, you can clone hitler a hundred times and give his clones different occupations, opportunities, cultures, exposure, education etc, and end up with 100 individuals cloned from hilters, that are nothing like hilter save fore genetics and probably would be too much like eachother either. cartoons may want him to come back as he was, but that's not how reality works.
They got ways to survive but often times they have to stay in herds. I like my fluffys litters to be around 6. Got to remember that fluffys mature fast so they can technically survive to adult hood within a month and a half but can die soon afterword. Also what the hell are those redish brown things?
>Also what the hell are those redish brown things?
by since smarties rule heards, don't they make babbehs or enfng babbehs into fodder for their bullshit? smarties are pretty abusive and dumb as hell, I am think that herds are that advantageous when they max out the stupidity problem...
Yup the smartie puts himself first. The bodyguards or "toughies" get second spot and everyone else is fodder.
The Smarty has to balance with being an asshole and being a good leader though like claiming land and finding sources of food or the others could revolt or leave. If the smarty could find food and land the others will look at the smarty in a better light.
That's a hellgremlin headcanon. Proper fluffies love all their babies and everything else equally, and the whole hierarchy thing was made up by the hg-fans who wanted more things to hate about their spinoff fluffies.
More predominantly hellgremlin bullshit. Fluffies were designed to be the epitome of friendliness, and raping babies is not something a creature that lives for love and huggies should do nonchalantly.
Here's Fluffy Lake again. Long story, but pretty much every single sentence is golden.
Nevermind, looks like we're reaching the bump limit before I could get it all in one thread.
The idea is that fluffies were made to be sold sterile and only produced at hasbio so they made mares have big litters year-round (unlike rabbits and other animals that have seasons) to increase production
They didn't care about mares being able to take care of the foals because the foals would be taken and put in incubators or something
And they didn't care about fluffies being able to survive in the wild because they were supposed to be this expensive house pet
So fluffies got out, some canons say peta others say industrial accident, but they managed to live in the wild because they were made to breed all the fucking time and at record speed: mares get pregnant and give birth in 2-3 weeks with up to 10 foals. There are no animals of that size that can breed like that IRL
So even a fragile piece of shit that can't compete with real animals (fluffies) can survive since as long as 2 of those 10 foals reach adulthood their population will be stable
Hugfag pls go
One of the more interesting transitional phases for the foal raping headcanon that The Enfening was a part of was that fluffy stallions had no overarching desire to rape foals right off the bat, but that if they were accidentally or artificially introduced to sex with a foal in some way it would become overwhelmingly addictive and essentially "ruin" the fluffy (maybe because foals are so tight?). I recall a pretty popular story about a fluffy that had been ruined through foal rape being displayed at a pet store and tortured because it couldn't help but try and copulate with other foals.
Not sure if I'd take it on myself as a full headcanon but it was a neat exploration.
I think it's strange that even though fluffies are designed as childrens toys I don't often see any children involved in most comics and stories. we rarely see fluffies filling their intended purpose.
Hellgremlins. It's the term for the sub-fandom of people who want to hate fluffies, ironically making them the opposite of everything the primary fluffy fandom is about. People who want to justify their desire to abuse fluffies in some way came up with the idea of mothers treating their babies unequally so that the heroic abuser protagonist could swoop in, kill the evil fluffies and save the poor poopy-baby from its abusive family.
>So even a fragile piece of shit that can't compete with real animals (fluffies) can survive since as long as 2 of those 10 foals reach adulthood their population will be stable
that's BEST case scenarios assuming there is no additional variable since ANY variable tend to be lethal to fluffies.
the breed like rats thing really doesn't work or make sense with the two-teet resource limit UNLESS these things get a genetic payoff for all their breeding, AKA mutations and evolution.
wasn't that also the standce fore the unrealistic breeding rate or ferals dispite their unrealitic survival rates? weren't ferals supposed to be pests that it was heroic to harm and hurt?
then I start brining up how these things are such shit, even with the rat-rate-breeding excuse, the altrition is too insane to make them a viable pest, and any continued wild fluffies beyond the PETA incident would have to be totally human caused. but people fight that all the time, once again, it take the heroism out of the abuse and puts the responsibility on the humans, but... whats wrong with that?
Ha ha ha ha.
Once again the rabid Trump haters have to needlessly bring politics into a discussion. Once gain it's shit flinging and no real constructive criticism. This is why everyone hates you.
honestly, there are a billion names to choose from when saying 'not smart, but manipulative.'
Trump is just the most relevant today and easiest to reference. I wasn't aiming for a nerve, i was trying to make sense of how smarties are smart.
its like frat boys who get great jobs after school, while not learning anything, they make it through connections and hyping how great they are without actually being great, verses the anti-social dork who is actually intelligent. the alicorn verse the frat boy as it were (since Trump seems to be a tender sport for you. )