As far as news sources go, how much do you faggots trust Breitbart?
>>721599518
no more than I trust fox, cnn or nbc
>>721599634
This, I find some good and bad points, but it is mostly just entertainment.
>>721599518
you can trust them into clickbaiting you to go to their shitty site
>>721599634
This.
You need to understand where they're coming from. Everything will be exaggerated and sensational, and obviously "from the right," but their real enemy is the MS Press, not any political party. It just so happens that the mainstream press are basically the worst people in America atm. So their point of view winds up lining up with the truth a lot. Worth a read.
On the technical side, it is the worst designed, slow, ad ridden, shitstain of a shit designed to wring every fucking penny out of your visit. Pisses me off everytime I go.
>>721599518
No one "trusts" any news source anymore, you just quote the motherfuckers who hate the same shit you do.
It's pure horseshit as a news source. The closest we have to impartial news today is PBS and Al-Jazeera.
>>721599518
Sometimes puts out some very good information that other outlets wouldn't although it is fantasticism bullshit a lot of the time and propaganda for the right to combat the left
>>721599518
Not at all.
>>721599518
it's slanted of course but they don't pull shit out their ass. it's real as any other news outlet, end of the day.
Pretentious fucks in the editorial dept, though, i tell you that. I do freelance work and have a bloody long resume and offered to do some free shit on the side for them and they rejected me for inexperience.
Reports on Soros so it isn't that bad
>>721600228
That's no lie. I watched PBS news the other night, and it was like seeing into another dimension.
>>721600038
Sounds like the ol' times at Gawker
>>721600228
NBC news is generally nonpartison.
>>721600516
Call them niggers and they'll hire you
>>721599518
About as much as >>>/pol/
They are legit. Not mainstream, so no fake news there.
>>721601221
/pol/ keeps being right so..
>>721599518
I trust a wet fart more than I do breitbart
>>721599518
it ok i suppose
>>721599518
No more than I trust CNN, Huffpost, or any other fake news.
>>721599518
This is the right wing huffing post. Garbage journalism for ignorant people
same level as aljazeera and russia today
>>721601938
/thread
Once you add bias to news, it stops being news and becomes an opinion.
>>721600038
andrew breitbart would be against the current state of his former company
>>721599518
as much as I'll trust RT, FOX or CNN, that means 0 trust.
>>721600228
>>721600608
>>721600714
>not watching c-span
and i mean orig cspan not that bs liberal cspan 3 shit
>>721599518
I dont' take anything at face value from any news anything. THEY'RE ALL FAKE NEWS. IF SOMEONE IS TRYING TO REPORT NEWS TO YOU ITS BECAUSE THEY HAVE AN AGENDA. STAY WOKE
>>721600038
>the mainstream press are basically the worst people in America atm. So their point of view winds up lining up with the truth a lot
Being opposite of bad doesn't mean its good faggot, it just a different kind of bad.
>>721602041
Puts al jazeera and RT is the same catagory. One is a worl reknowned and respected news outlet. The other(Russian Times) is the propaganda outlet for Putin. I see this on /pol/ and the_donald often. Face it, gents. The Russians are here and they are stupid.
Why does no one understand the difference between fake news, selective coverage, sensationalist news and objective news?
Fake news is objectively false and aimed at supporting or detracting from a specific person or group and almost always originates from sites like sketchyasfuck.ru/IfIClickThisLinkIWillGetAVirus, but is sometimes mistakenly picked up by mainstream media, who nearly always prints/publishes a retraction eventually.
Sensationalist news and selective coverage are not objectively false, but often stretch the truth. They cover only certain stories and frame them to make a person or group look good or bad.
Objective journalism is verifiably true and not framed to support or detract from anyone. PBS and maybe Al Jazeera are the closest things to this.
Breitbart falls into the extreme end of sensationalist/ selective coverage. They stretch the truth in any way they can to support the alt-right, and you will never find an article there that would make that movement or any people within it look bad.
Bottom line: Watch PBS. Breitbart uses the same framing and sensationalizing that the mainstream media just, just to a higher degree and in support of a different cause.
>>721600038
This x10.
Even if you use a news client that grabs articles and puts them in reader mode, they make you open a mini browser to read them so they can show you all their ads and bullshit.
My least favorite thing ever are sites that break up short content into mutiple pages so you're exposed to the maximum ads.
Breitbart is the kind of site with articles at the bottom about Obama's refinance program or how seniors are saving X% on insurance with this one weird trick
>>721599518
0
>>721602558
>al jazeera
>world renowned
i bet you are one of those dumb asses still spurting "NORTH KOREA BEST KOREA huehuehue"
ITT. The far, far left part of the bell curve for IQ talks about Brietbart.
>>721603600
>butthurt cheeto lover.html
>>721603331
>>721603411
>>721603986
we get it. you hate kikes
>It's biased, but it's not left-wing bias, so I like it!
>>721599518
Zero, always cross reference and look into the information they present, l have to say a lot of the time it is real, although given a little twist to suit their agenda
>>721599518
LOL
>>721606082
But it's true. He gave what 250 million to palestine days before he left office?
>>721599518
Theyre factual but only cover stories that are good for Trump
>>721606222
Trips doesn't lie.
>>721606222
That is in addition to the billions we have to Israel Question mark?
>>721599518
You want real news? PBS, CSPAN, BBC. If you want your bias to be confirmed, read Breitbart or anything other propagandist source you want.
>>721606222
and don't support Israel is ''anti-semitism''?
>>721606569
I agree, uncut cocks are fucking weird looking.
>>721599518
>(((((((((())))))))))
>>721606552
BBC hires based on skin color, just like any "tolerant liberals" would.
>>721599518
100%
>>721606512
Israel has one of the top intelligence agencies in the world. We benefit from there abilities. At least we're seeing something from our investment.
What the fuck do the mudslimes in Palestine offer us?
>>721599518
It is basically the right version of a late night left comedy show. Entertainment, not really news. Both are selective about what they show so they can say the other side is sooooo wacky.
>ITT: Anons who have never read Breitbart discuss Breitbart
>>721607026
>big black cock news
What else do you expect
>>721607247
If they are so smart, they don't need our Shekels, save shitholes in USA first then Tel Aviv/Jerusalem
>>721608132
We help fund their intelligence community, we reap the benefits of more intelligence gathering. Stuxnet was either American or Israeli. That's fucking huge. What don't you understand about this?
>>721599518
as much as I trust mother jones and huffpo
>>721607429
except instead of left bias, they willfully fabricate entire stories and false conflicts devoid of any legit basis in reality. they have a paint by numbers approach to exploiting the psychology of fear to form a reader base.
>>721608412
Israel is like the 51st state of the 'murica
>>721608868
they also pretend to be news, where as the late night shows are OBVIOUSLY entertainment genre.
Breitbart tell truth
>>721608960
Only for the retards.
>>721600054
Holy fuck this
>>721609256
yea some of us have the ability to separate what the world owed(es) the jews after ww2, and the reality of what has been a shit history of human rights violations.
without being an extreme anti-zionist edgelord like many users here.
>>721607692
Bannon pls go
>>721608868
>unlike the left
CNN ran the story about Trump taking the MLK bust out of the oval office 3,700 times before they realized it was unsubstantiated. That was two weeks ago. But whatever helps push the "racist" narrative, right?
>>721609471
its not the same level of shit on both sides tho. we all should have the skills to differentiate the overly optimistic/sure biasing left media does from the inflated fearmongering, amazingly strong will to ignore reality, and out-right fabrication of stories and citations.
>>721600608
That's why the GOP always wants to defund PBS so badly.
>>721609860
>implying the left-wing MSM doesn't use inflated fearmongering every single day
Have you ever watched more than 20 minutes of CNN or MSNBC?
Keith olberman
Rachel maddow
Don Lemon
I could go on and on. In short, get real.
>>721609828
>minor bullshit story that shouldnt be headline news anyway
VS
covering up the makings of an unconstitutional splintering of offices and borderline coup wrapped up in an illegal and unmediated financial fiasco.
If you actually read breitbart you're a retard and large part of the problem with this country
>>721610204
tbh, no, not in the last 10 years. as far as news that i dont read, i pretty much only listen to npr..
This is best take down of Breitbart.
https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=E5fDGWREvU4
Breitbart is one of the only honest news sources. #MAGA
>>721610425
You clearly can't look at this from an objective POV.
It's not even a debate after the campaign. How crazy and willing to do anything to force their agenda the left is. Even after the election they've been caught fabricating stories and YOU could say it's a "minor bullshit" story, but we both know what the goal was in the end.
You'll also have to explain wtf you're talking about after VS, because I'm speaking rationally not going off on a conspiracy theory.
John approves.
>>721609860
>>>721609471
>its not the same level of shit on both sides tho.
It absolutely is.
Each side worships some religion and only reports on what sports their religious bullshit. For the right, it's Christianity. For the left, it's socialism.
0% it's the right wing version of shit like HuffPo or Slate.
Real news is BBC, Reuters, NY Times, PBS, The Economist
>>721610599
You're a faggot.
>>721612067
>NY Times
fuckin kek
>>721612235
Link me a bad article. I'll wait.
>>721599518
More then I trust an anonymous user of $chans /b/ board.
>>721612067
What about The Gardian?
>>721612323
Don't bother. It's all part of their effort to discredit respected news sources, so idiots turn to places like Breitbart to get indoctrinated with propaganda.
>>721599518
I t goes like this in terms of trust
bathroom stall sharpie gossip>infowars>breitbart
In short i dont listen to that shit, i do know this one autistic sounding guy who is always reading it. Hes weird.
>>721607026
Still better than breitbart
>>721612323
New York Times reporter Jayson Blair was investigated in 2003 for inventing numerous reports. He was especially prone to inventing news reports supposedly filed from other cities, while he was in fact working from his apartment in Brooklyn. The scandal that ultimately prompted his resignation involved accusations of plagiarism in a story he filed about the family of a soldier missing in Iraq.
>>721613152
Nice link you have there
>>721612323
http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/19/journalists-apologize-for-spreading-bogus-new-york-times-story-about-rick-perry/
>>721612918
You can keep your head in the sand if you want with your little liberal circlejerk. Notice I didn't say anything about the other outlets, NYT is well known to be a POS.
>>721613438
dailycaller lololol
>>721613305
You're implying they keep up fake stories after they're called out on them so there would still be an active link? Get real, pal. Even CNN is THAT stupid.
CNN and The Young Turks are among the only trustworthy sources.
>>721613633
tyt is a load of dogmatic horse shit
>>721613633
How trustworthy are tyt's sources on the Armenian genocide?
>>721613540
The New York Times reports Perry had no clue the energy secretary is in charge of safeguarding the nuclear arsenal when he accepted the nomination for the position in Donald Trump’s administration. Massive flaws in the reporting quickly became clear, however, as the sole source for the story told The Daily Caller his words were taken out of context, and journalists quickly dug up a statement from Perry on his nomination that explicitly mentions the nuclear arsenal.
I mean, you look kind of dumb laughing at the dailycaller when the news outlet you're trying to defend got debunked by that very same company.
>mfw people say "you can't trust any media anymore lol" as a way to completely avoid any news because they know their own side fucked up
>>721613698
>russia
>you have to go back
>>721613438
You didn't have to name any outlets. I can clearly see your kind coming from a mile away. Enjoy your alt. right circlejerk. I'll be over here laughing at both corrupt sides.
>>721613633
>CNN people literally fired for ethics violations throughout the campaign
>Donna Brazille among others fired for actively rigging the primary debates against Bernie Sanders
>They're a trustworthy source
fuckin kek
>>721613968
im kind of an obnoxious progressive.. tyt is just that bad at what they do.
its first person opinion handed down by the pseudo-intellectual brute at the center.
its bad journalism. its like a grumpy/jaded late night show that is pretending to be news.
>>irony withstanding, the NPR master race laughs at you and your media purity problems.
>>721614090
The only people who have to fall back on buzzwords like "hurr durr alt right" are people who can't defend their positions to begin with.
Here's another good one for you:
"Susanne Craig of the New York Times has once again stepped in to the limelight of dishonest and deplorable lame-stream pundits, slinging garbage about presidential candidate Donald Trump, with her latest prevarication claiming she is in possession of Trump’s 1995 federal tax returns.
On October 1, 2016, The NY Times published “Donald Trump Tax Records Show He Could Have Avoided Taxes for Nearly Two Decades, The Times Found,” which falsely claims that Trump has not paid any federal income tax in the past two decades after allegedly filing a loss of $915,729,293 in 1995."
I like how you try and assume you know what i'm affiliated with.
>>721613438
>NYT is well known to be a POS.
Its one of the most respected papers in the world you dumb fuckwad.
I trust them in the sense that they won't underreport, they will atlas give me all the information.
I can filter out bias , but I can't filter out underreporting- so it's an important part of my media diet
Remember that Breitbart got its start lying and doctoring footage to get ACORN defunded.
Why anyone would ever trust them is beyond me
>>721614094
>fired for it
This only further proves that you can trust CNN.
>>721614804
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/5/15/1299692/-The-New-York-Times-Busted-Lying-Through-its-Teeth
>Lied about net neutrality legislation
>respected paper
pick one.
>>721614804
>nyt
>respected
This isn't a ylyl thread anon.
liberal media sports,cable, big 3 tv nets, democrat candidates have been sliding dowwwnnnnward for as long as obama was in office & before in the case of liberal run espn,some of those conservative sites have joined the rest,am radio guys like hannity rush levin, and savage,,all thrive because they REFLECT not make,or recruit their listening base,they do sometimes get former democrat regulars who bail on the party,breitbart is usually pretty good,,all watch out for AXIOS, a spinoff of POLITICO,in turn POLITICO hails from WAPO,
new media fellas,it;s gonna be around awhile,,new media pretty much alone,accompanied by the AM guys have brought 30 years of democrat lies to the surface. don; like it? tough
I prefer to read Reuters cause they take the time to make sure it is a neutral as possible without using strong language to sway an opinion from their userbase. Christian Science Monitor does the same but they lean a bit left. Still, it's surprising how well CSM can actually write articles on world events... You'd think they wouldn't cause of the name.
>>721614868
>ONLY fired her because Assange let loose the wikileaks emails showing collusion against Bernie and once it was in the public eye they had to save face
Keep pretending they have any integrity, kid. If it wasn't for the wikileaks dump, she'd still have a job today. Get real.
kek
you dipshits shilling hard af ITT, shit is just sad to be honest
fuck acorn squirrels shorosh runs it
>>721615255
>implying they knew of it before the wikileaks dump
Colombia college of journalism has a lot of quality stuff and they are very non-bias
>>721615155
this post was made by a bad AI right?
>>721614930
>>721614941
Everything is fake news if the god king says so right?
It cant be that Trump is wrong.
Seriously, you guys are getting really close to a cult now.
>>721614804
In stories about the recent release of Albert Woodfox, New York Times has reported Woodfox’s bank robbery partner and fellow “Angola Three Inmate” (and ALSO a black panther) Robert King Wilkerson was released from prison after his conviction was overturned.
In fact, he was actually released after he pled guilty to being an accomplice after-the-fact to second-degree murder.
I just get all my news from memes. If someone took all the time to make news into a meme, it must be true.
>>721615404
the left has to be omnipotent brah, while its okay for the right to push ideas which run orthogonal to objective truths around them.
>>721615404
Are you implying they didn't?
>>721614391
Whenever im driving and listening to NPR This American Life is never on. Why NPR? Why do you hate me so.
>>721615580
That's funny coming from the guy that thinks nyt is respectable.
>>721614868
>This only further proves that you can trust CNN.
your fingers should be on fire for typing that, Mr. Devil-LiarPants
>>721599518
hahahahahahah
News source and Breitbart in the same sentence!
my fucking sides.
>>721615774
even the syndicated, oped/investigative shows like radiolab/this american life etc are fairly accurate. they can be pretty optimistic about some subjects, but they are pretty good and make retractions in the event they are wrong.
and they are the least rigorous part of npr.
>>721615580
Seriously, I just posted at least 3 examples of NYT being caught lying just recently. You're the one falling back on buzzwords. What do you have to gain by defending some trash newspaper that blatantly lies and fabricates stories? And you have the balls to call anyone else in this thread a cult? Unless you work for one of those outlets you have literally nothing to gain for defending them. Yet here you are, for whatever reason, trying to tie Trump into this somehow. You're clearly a fucking tool who can't think for themselves.
I would recommend info wars or Joe Rogan experience or rebel media for real news all top notch info
>>721615820
i just think there is a difference between the fairly minor shit that nyt has done improperly and the vast gulf of blatant lies and fear mongering taking place on the right.
>>721615774
download the app. its just audio so the data use is low. planet money is a great show that doesnt get played on air a lot.
IIRC this american life has its own app and isnt on the npr app.
a bunch of the shows are also on pandora if that format suits you.
>>721616076
>infowars
Kikebart is pretty much mostly neocon to social libertarian alt light angle.
>>721616076
i knew rogan was a POS like 10 years ago when he started greatly exaggerating things about dmt which i knew were way beyond the scope of the studies he was misquoting.
>>721616296
>>the joke
>>721599518
I see a lot of people saying it's the right's version of Huffington Post but it's not even that. It's more comparable to The Dailey Show/Colbert Report in it's outlandishness but isn't written like it's a comedy and it wants you to think of it as real news. The fact that so many people rely on it as news is pretty astounding and really shows how fucking dumb people are. Bannon being in the Trump administration would have been like John Stewart being part of the Obama administration.
>>721616402
You know...I don't know if people troll in this crazy world
>>721615580
The New York Times is lying about climate yet again, claiming that last year was a record fire year at 10.1 million acres and it was due to climate.
"The 10.1 million acres that burned in the United States last year were the most on record, and the top five years for acres burned were in the past decade."
The level of fraud is off-scale. The New York Times reported in 1938 that more than twice that many acres burned in 1937. They didn't even bother to research their OWN paper.
Very clearly an agenda to force the climate change narrative from the left even if it means outright lying. Making up facts. Making up numbers. Respectable?
>>721616079
Not to mention that the NYT runs corrections and retractions in print and on the web every day like actual journalists, instead of just doubling-down on them or sweeping them under the rug.
>>721602879
kek
>>721616549
https://www.dangerandplay.com/2016/05/16/megan-twohey-of-the-new-york-times-caught-in-a-media-hoax/
>>721599518
>Breitbart fuck off...
news networks msnbc, cnn, fox, abc, ect... print media... the list go's on and on... read one media outlet look at the next saying the total contrary... just don't have the time in my life 4 this shit.. guess they won... just dont give a fuck anymore...
>>721599518
CODE RED. CODE RED. BRAZIL IS IN A PURGE:
>>>/pol/111469140
>>>/pol/111469140
>>>/pol/111469140
>>>/pol/111469140
NPR has a minor liberal tilt but its the closest to the pure facts.
>>721616923
I mean, political outsource is trustworthy as fuck
>>721616079
cite examples of "vast gulfs" of blatant lies and fear mongering from the other side.
I've posted specific examples of them a) lying to influence a presidential campaign b) lying to push a fearmongering global warming-alarmist narrative c) fearmongering with lies about net neutrality legislation
I think it's clear who here can't substantiate their claims. Keep your head in the sand if you want, you're choosing to be ignorant so don't act like you're being objective about this topic at all.
>copy and pastes things from right wing blogs
>See, here's totally unbiased proof!
>>721599518
That kind of talk right there is why Trump won the election.
And there is no "real" world. There is just living and trying to be happy.
If we want to argue the real world, you city folks have no clue what it's like to live like I do.
I've got 50 chickens, 15 hogs, three dairy cows, and 6 acres of land I farm for my own benefit.
Aside from internet(which I can live without), I have officially become 100% self sufficient last month.
I live on a well, my power is drawn from a homemade windmill, I have plenty of iron to make the tools I need, I have a foundry, and soon to have a wife.
You city folk only know life by living off of others, you know nothing of struggle and hardship that isn't self inflicted.
You city folk think you're so high and mighty, so important, like you run the world.
Except you don't. The earth runs herself. You folks in the city keep addressing self inflicted problems, and making them worse. You city folk have an opportunity to make millions of dollars with your big corporations.
I don't care about big corporations, I don't care about getting the most updated things. I only care about the things I can make, and the means of surviving in the most natural and humane way as possible.
Go fuck yourself, yellow belly.
>>721616832
http://www.capoliticalreview.com/capoliticalnewsandviews/fake-new-hq-new-york-times-caught-again-with-fake-news/
>>721599518
clickbait. i feel so sorry for ppl that take it seriously
>>721617326
>There is just living and trying to be happy.
is the irony of you posting this on a computer over the internet lost on you?
>>721599518
the stopped clock is right twice a day.
there click bait rag but they're also dead on target on some subjects.
>>721617344
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tom-blumer/2016/12/04/ny-times-falsely-claims-no-soldiers-died-due-bergdahls-desertion
>>721617095
every single story that conveys anything conway has said in the last two weeks without criticizing it.
basically every story about trump or his actions that doesnt in some way deal with how detached from reality and borderline illegal his actions are.
basically every story fox has run in the last two weeks.
>>721618165
>can't name one
>>721599518
100 most trust worthy to 0 not trustworthy
Breightbart rates about 93
and the mainstream media rates about 5
CNN for example is ZERO
Huffing PO Zero
Buzz feed Zero the list is endless
>>721618165
sources, nigger.
conway doesn't represent any media outlet, newspaper or otherwise, so stop changing the subject.
examples...sources....not just your random ass rambling.
Could it be you don't actually have facts to substantiate your claims? Because I've posted plenty ITT to support mine.
>>721599518
>>721618493
i get what you are doing, and i normally do the same, but this is 4chan and i just dgaf, but seriously. to not know what im talking about at this point, you have to be being willfully ignorant/pedantic.
>>721615901
it a good conservative site unlike your liberal fake news propaganda and brainwashing BS
"The story, by Sheryl Gay Storberg, ran in Monday’s edition of the Times. It was originally titled “Ben Carson Lived in Public Housing, but Critics Worry Over How He Will Lead It,” and stated that Carson grew up in public housing. Its source was Armstrong Williams, a friend of Carson. The problem is, it wasn’t true. After the statement was widely circulated and then discredited, The New York Times had to backtrack."
>>721618761
He's calling you out for being full of shit, just like I did. It's funny how you far-left fucktards just pretend like it's not important anymore when you get caught in your lies.
fucking pathetic kek
>you don't know what i'm talking about though?
>hasn't posted one source or citation
>oh you're just being pedantic
No. You make a bullshit claim, people are going to pull your card. It's really that simple.
You just tried to talk about conway when the topic is media outlets, derailing the whole fucking thing because you know there's literally no way to defend liberal MSM. They've been caught in lie after lie after lie and no one respects them.
>>721619335
i am not the nyt guy...
"The New York Times told us several times that they would make sure my story that I was telling came across, they promised several times that they would do it accurately, they told me several times and my manager several times that it would not be a hit piece and that my story would come across the way that I was telling it and honestly and it absolutely was not,” Brewer Lane said. “They did take quotes from what I said and they put a negative connotation on it. They spun it to where it appeared negative. I did not have a negative experience with Donald Trump.”
>>721617326
>living off of others
Us here in cities specialize in things so that we can provide our specialized services to others in the cities. We then each work together to move forward.
It's nice that you can live out on the land like you do, but 80% of the US population lives in cities because the quality of life is just better. Nobody wants to take care of animals and have to do manual labor for food.
>>721619469
i never implied you were anywhere in that post
http://yournewswire.com/new-york-times-censors-norway-pedophile-ring/
I put Breitbart somewhere in the middle between Fox News and Clickhole.
"The New York Times notoriously slimed, in both news and columns, three innocent Duke lacrosse players, falsely accused in March 2006 by stripper Crystal Mangum of rape at a house party. The players were prosecuted by Michael Nifong, district attorney for Durham County in North Carolina. But Mangum's tale was plagued by inconsistencies, and two of the three players had bulletproof alibis. The allegations were soon shown to be completely false, and Nifong was later disbarred for fraud and misconduct. ... Yet throughout the ordeal liberal Times reporters and columnist Selena Roberts, threw out the presumption of innocence and routinely slimed the players, assuming them guilty of at the very least the sin of white privilege."
breitbart emerged from nothingness by breaking the james o keefe expose of planned parenthood
they had both the full video and the one he edited to make it look like pp was all about scamming taxpayers and supported pimping and drug use
they enthusiastically ran the edited one and enthusiastically supported james o keefe in the future
not even pretending to be journalism but if you already hate [liberal thing] because another totally not mainstream media source convinced you too then you will gladly add breitbart to your totally not mainstream media politically aligned pseudo journalism repertoire
99% of scientists and 95% of the
worlds population might be in agreement over something but you know better because "everybody knows"
>>721599518
They're sort of like the HuffPost but not a bunch of SJW fags. In fact they are on the opposite end of the spectrum, which is fine by me. You just have to keep in mind whenever you read a piece by them, there may be spin. When this does happen, its typically embellishments of the left's stupidity in a playful manner.
An example is their piece on Brown University putting tampons in men's restrooms. See pic related. Though Brown students did go through with the act, it was to try to make feminine hygiene products a staple of university restrooms, much like toilet paper or soap. However, having actually take a gender studies course myself (it was to satisfy some stupid gen ed, faggots), I can tell you first hand that the academic left is so delusional that many of the students and faculty in the anthropology and social sciences departments DO indeed reject there are any differences between men and women - what we perceive as biological constructs are actually just social in disguise. So they really are that retarded and deserve every bit of ridicule they get. They treated the term "sexual dimorphism" as if it were a naughty word. I'm not making this up.
>>721620185
Specifically, Times reporter Matthew Rosenberg distorted and falsely reported comments made by Frank Gaffney in the course of two recorded interviews conducted in December 2016. His article and an accompanying photo’s caption respectively asserted that Mr. Gaffney regarded “Islam” and “Muslims” as “termites [that] hollow out the structure of the civil society and other institutions for the purpose of creating conditions under which the jihad will succeed.”
Actually, as transcripts of the two conversations spanning roughly 2.5 hours make clear, Mr. Gaffney was characterizing the modus operandi of the Muslim Brotherhood, not “Muslims” or “Islam.” The misrepresentation serves the interest of the Brotherhood – which has long been determined to silence him and the Center for Security Policy – but not the interests of the New York Times’ readers or the paper’s responsibility to report the facts.
>>721621143
http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/265637/fake-news-new-york-times-lies-about-syrias-daniel-greenfield
>>721620948
>Sesame Street
>>721599518
Shit tier
It's news by Nazis for Nazis... Make of that what you will
>>721600228
>PBS
>>721622112
OP wasn't talking about CNN, keep up
Lol, Breitbart has no real journalistic integrity, their reporters have such a narrow view of the world. Its mostly bait towards readers who already believe in the alt-right conservative ideas.
>>721606552
if you want news, go watch the house foreign affairs committee on youtube. place is a fucking ghost town. the Illuminati does not want people to know about this yt chan. only brainwashed morons think that news is actually trying to inform you.
>>721602662
This.
You fuckwads shouting "fake news" sound like our orangutan in chief.
>>721599518
i trust this site more than sheitbart
>/b/ - Random
>The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
>Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
>>721610500
I tuned into npr one day back in summer. they were running a anti trump porn, a short story someone was reading, regarding the future, claiming that the agriculture industry was failing because 'no one knew how to grow the oranges' after kicking all the foreigners out. apparently only foreigners know botany and agriculture?
i heard tomi lahren is "dating" a black guy
>>721618680
what great sources!
What is hilarious though is according to this, the most objective news source is the huffington post
>>721602662
Exactly this. Most folks don't want to take the time to critically think where their favorite news source lies on that spectrum though. America the willfully ignorant, right?
Rebel media, now there's some journalistic integrity.
Buzzfeed for paranoid conservatives? Clickbait combined with Glen Beck "invest in gold now before you die next week" and Alex Jones tin-foil "the last 17 presidents have been alien lizards from Blekton"...Prior to the internet, there was a thing called public access TV, which is where all these weirdos would have been...
Here's my personal favorite on the other side; total exploitation and snake oil salesmanship...from a video where he debates a white NWO/Freemason Jones-type guy (though not shown here)...meant to do nothing except stoke fears and emotions and, most importantly, donations...Not unlike Beck, Jones and the rest....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biadSUyWr0A
>>721625692
Samefagging, but holy fuck, can you believe this existed? On tape?!!?!
>>721599700
Yeah i know some guys that run a shitty knock off breitbart. the whole business model is:
1. create a facebook page and just post a bunch of obama is a muslim memes for racist hicks and backwater idiots to share and jerkoff over.
2. write the most absurd headlines you can think of. maybe not even absurd, but just try to piss off and / or validate as many people as possible so they can't help themselves from clicking
3. funnel facebook traffic to your shitty wordpress site, every fucking pixel of which is an ad that makes your site nearly unnavigable >>721600038
4. Profit.
writing for breitbart is so fucking easy an ape could do it and plenty do. but it's worth keeping an eye on, just to see what bullshit their feeding people today.
>>721600516
I don't believe you, not cause I don't think their editors are pretentious, but I don't believe that someone with "experience" would be doing shit "for free"
>>721626528
>>721626528
how do you get money though?
>>721599518
The reality of the situation is that you literally can't trust any big source of news whatsoever. You can't. Breitbart has a good attitude though, but once you get so big, it just should be regarded as entertainment.
>>721606222
Anyone who doesn't suck Israels dick is 100% anti-semetic.
I'm laughing my ass off that he didn't veto that last UN resolution against them.
That was fucking pro.
>>721600714
lol you faggot
Don't make me sick. They're all partisan.
>>721626715
>Breitbart has a good attitude though
>>721626715
Breitbart was literally created to be a right wing HuffPo.
That comes from one of the founders. Hope that puts it in perspective.
>>721599634
>>721599700
>>721600038
>>721600054
>>721600298
>>721600516
>>721601704
>>721602268
So who do you trust then?
>>721617326
>herself
>city folk x100
It just got too cucked and I know you're full of shit even if what you say is true.
>>721602558
Its russia today
>>721626829
yeah but not necessarily to the left. They tore the shit out of Bill Clinton. Before that no one gave a fuck if the president banged some side girl.
During second iraq war they all sucked Bush's dick so they could keep access. Those "ride along" units were a fucking embarrassment.
They are on the side of the corporations that own them. Sometimes that means left, sometimes it means ignore massive left issues. It means no coverage for Bernie, or any other 3rd party candidate.
>>721626901
Yeah I like their attitude, never said I read or said it was a legitimate news source. There are none.
>>721627084
gotcha.
What is their attitude anyway? It always was just "Obama sucks" "immigrants are stealing everything" "white people are the best"
Fake News. Just like CNN.
>>721617326
>I live on a well
haha, enjoy your poisoned ground water supply.
>fracking
>Trump repealing EPA regulations on agriculture
>Trump repealing energy regulations
>>721612749
Guardian is pretty good too.
>>721626616
honestly, and it's sad, but i think you do. I hate it, not because it's conservative, but because it's just shitty journalism. they don't investigate, they don't do anything but get stoned all day and editorialize news articles. it's just two of them and they can really crank it out. i think they make good money. but it's just sad.
To all you fags criticizing CNN and the like:
Just because they are liberal and opposed to Trump doesn't make them "fake news". What a fucking joke, enjoy the fourth reich.
>>721629401
Cuck detected.
>>721630084
they are a serious right wing activist media org. taking direct action against leftist media. efficient propaganda, as rt news is for russia
>>721630390
>>721612938
Alex Jones is the only journalist brave enough to report that Hillary Clinton is an actual demon who smells of sulphur. It's amazing that not even real demons can stop him
>>721599634
This.
You people comparing Breitbart to Buzzfeed are literally retarded. I'd bet both my nuts that not one of any of you factors has read one paragraph of a Breitbart article.
>>721631143
Faggots, not factors. Fuck autocorrect and fuck you willfully ignorant occupy fucktards.
>>721619335
I'm really glad Alex Jones had the bravery to report the true story of Hillary Clinton being an actual demon who smells of sulpher
>>721630656
It would be a straw man if leftists DIDN'T compare right wingers to Hitler every minute of every day.
>>721631302
Would you prefer it if we call you fascists?
>>721631143
I read the one about Hillary Clinton being a doddering old lady about to fall over dead from multiple diseases and also the one about her being a criminal mastermind that runs a child trafficking sex ring by day and plans multiple assassinations by night.
>>721631429
It doesn't work anymore. You've all overplayed that card. And besides some elements of fascism were not so bad and it varied a lot within different nations and cultures. But yeah I know you just want a boogie man to demonize the opposition.
>>721631653
>We're not fascists! But fascism is a really good idea!
The right wing is literally schizophrenic.
>>721631653
There is no desire for that on our side, conservatives need villains to rationalize their internal dissatisfaction. That's why they had to demonize Obama, and why they elected Trump. Conservatives project their own bullshit on to their opponents.
>>721631653
>some elements of fascism weren't bad
>>721631554
No you didn't, because Breitbart never got on board with the Clinton sex trafficking bullshit. Lying puss.
>>721631429
I'd prefer it if you didn't make it embarrassingly obvious with every post that you don't have the balls to be honest about your opponents.
>>721631749
Because gee you can't acknowledge some good ideas from a historical movement that has come and gone and everything is black and white bla bla bla. Autism leaking.
>>721631770
Oh man you are too funny. You guys really believe your own lies don't you. As if you're all morally superior. Rules for radicals by Saul Alinsky. We're aware of your bullshit tactics. Keep autistically screeching hitler and fascist though if it makes you feel better.
>>721631834
>They only report SOME completely bullshit stories get your facts straight
Kek, you right wing retards are hilarious.
>>721631836
Dude just own. Stop being a pussy about it. If you like fascism just say so.
>>721632112
Yes I like some elements of fascism. I already said that. Aaand?
>>721632174
Lol and which elements do you dislike?
>>721632014
Вы наш друг!
Sensationalism and politically skewed news, with some fake news being published as factual from time to time...
Well, just like any other mainstream news outlet... I mean, they got and agenda and they push it, end of story.
Breit = wide
Bart = beard
Breitbart is German forwide, or Broad Beard.
Who wears a wide beard? Those Islamic Jihadis
Breitbart is a Jihad Catfish site.
Trump has been Phished, and if you unzip Steve Bannon's skin, you see Osama's reanimated corpse!!!!
>>721599518
On the same sort of level as RT.
That is to say not a whole lot.
>>721632225
It can work quite well depending on the historical context and nation. In germany for instance National Socialism could have worked out quite well and they did a good job of purging the communists and getting rid of degeneracy. Hitler got a bit carried away with invading Poland and Russia though and this is where it can fall apart when there is so much power concentrated in one person. But I think something like that was necessary to get rid of the communist menace that was spreading like a virus in Germany at the time. It should have just stayed National though. And something similar, some sort of authoritarian right wing movement is becoming more necessary in our times in western nations to deal with the radical leftist sedition that is going on.
>>721632715
Fuck off Hitler.
>>721632715
The free that revolution died to the virus that infects "impatient" Communism.
Communism would have died out even if it wasn't opposed.
What calls itself Communism is fascism with Marx
Pathetic. Beard, Bart. Father's, breitbart
>>721600516
Not inexperienced
They are making the shirt up and linking to shut already out there on agitprop sites.
Ha! Like they need more people who can testify to the their conspiracy...,
>>721599518
At least the major news outlets get called out on their lies. No one gives a shit enough to call breitbart out. It's bottom tier along with many others, incl liberal shit like naturalnewsnow or whatever. gmos are going to save the world.