Art thread was really interesting. Here's another.

File: ANNAGIORDANOAlexandreCabanel.jpg (89KB, 859x519px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 859x519px

>>721460555

File: ANNAGIORDANOAlexandreCabanel1.jpg (101KB, 861x519px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 861x519px

>>721460864

File: ANNAGIORDANOArtemisiaGentileschi1.jpg (91KB, 727x520px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 727x520px

>>721460907

File: ANNAGIORDANOBotticelli1.jpg (164KB, 780x520px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 780x520px

>>721460978

Want more?

I like the esotericism of abstract art.

File: roerich.jpg (89KB, 1200x705px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 1200x705px

Roerich, one of my favorite artists

File: pink-sky-Roerich.jpg (46KB, 430x289px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 430x289px

>>721463029

File: procopius-roerich.jpg (142KB, 1000x674px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1000x674px

>>721463172

>>721463029

kids at deviant-art make better stuff than that

>>721463253
>i-if its not realist work it's not good!
>>>/ic/

File: 1468847205123.jpg (1MB, 5181x3076px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 5181x3076px

post up faglords

File: serveimage (1).jpg (158KB, 1000x671px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1000x671px

Manet, 1856
"Olympia"

File: cover.jpg (110KB, 960x606px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 960x606px

>>721463172

>>721463253
thats just like, your opinion man

>>721463253
>>721463357
fuck off pls...
99% of all renders have fucking flaws i can spot within seconds or just look like plain shit because alot of low skill faglet weebs are trying to make em so pls fk of painted(digital or manual) will always be king

File: roerich.jpg (113KB, 960x450px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 960x450px

>>721463517

>>721463357
idk, i wouldnt go so far as that other anaon but it is kindve 70s prog album cover

File: roerich01.jpg (207KB, 1600x1012px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 1600x1012px

>>721463610

File: Rodin Burghers of Calais.jpg (147KB, 640x499px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 640x499px

>>721463736
how do yall kids feel about sculpture?

File: Andro-Wekua-017.jpg (16KB, 445x600px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 445x600px

>>721460555

>>721460555
MODS!

File: Lady_Godiva_(John_Collier,_c._1897).jpg (1MB, 1440x1159px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x1159px

God tier- Pre-Raphaelites

File: 1479205721666.jpg (2MB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1200px

>>721463926
>>721463876
>>721463815
>>721463758
>>721463692
no photos plx

File: gatesofhell.jpg (89KB, 600x444px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 600x444px

>>721463876

File: the_lady_of_shalott (1).jpg (172KB, 800x609px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 800x609px

>>721464108

File: 1467432298571.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>721464078
nice trolling edge mcFaglord

>>721464176

it's a contemporary sculpture.

Good thread

File: manray.jpg (754KB, 3416x4475px) Image search: [Google]

754KB, 3416x4475px

>>721464176
>no photos plx
challenge accepted

File: joan-of-arc.jpg (862KB, 1522x2000px) Image search: [Google]

862KB, 1522x2000px

>>721464326

File: michael borremans angel.jpg (61KB, 664x1000px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 664x1000px

>>721464176
>>721463926
>>721464383

>>721464176
what are the pictures of the paintings then? actual paintings?
>i know what you mean, you want paintings

File: bf6d37b4f9d14bb133d91b0cc6be7999c0d1e26b.jpg (20KB, 216x287px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 216x287px

>>721464435

File: 1479859972940.jpg (1MB, 1817x1356px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1817x1356px

>>721464435
phrased it wrong
"no photos of artwort plx ecpect if the photo itself is intendet as a artwork"
pics that are meant to be art = ok

File: aea1ae314a54621929467710dc4120f3.jpg (293KB, 1390x1400px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 1390x1400px

Wayne Thiebaud

File: 1468382606952.jpg (676KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

676KB, 1920x1200px

>>721464475
oh god i love this

File: 8262161223_99ce3ab503.jpg (80KB, 339x500px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 339x500px

>>721464594

File: 1484627783391.jpg (538KB, 1920x1400px) Image search: [Google]

538KB, 1920x1400px

>>721464721
nice

File: Richard Diebenkorn_cityscape-i-1963.jpg (262KB, 1248x1500px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 1248x1500px

>>721464721

reminds me of this one by Diebenkorn

>>721464721
This gave me vertigo.

>>721464721
>>721464900

....although Theibaud seems much more naive

File: 1481046705625.jpg (2MB, 1920x1308px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1308px

last one , im out , have to get shit done
bread was gud bread
>also fuck this size limit greedy jap bish ass niggu that bought this site

>>721464653
this hurts my eyes

File: b-rodin-hand.jpg (40KB, 346x504px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 346x504px

>>721464721
this is dope
>>721464653
fuck youre limitations

check'em

File: Leonardo_da_Vinci_-_Saint_John_the_Baptist_C2RMF_retouched.jpg (100KB, 791x1024px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 791x1024px

>>721465137
forgot pic

File: Chimera_di_Arezzo.jpg (1MB, 2220x1984px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2220x1984px

>>721465124

File: Wassily Kandinsky Circle S.jpg (375KB, 1704x1350px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 1704x1350px

>>721465347

Nice guys.
Just post a pic
Say nothing about it
Great stuff.
*l like this bc it iz art. *)

>>721465172
I love this.
Definitely one of his best.

>>721465717
Most of the art in this thread is easily accessible. It's pretty obvious why people like it.

>>721465717

make up your own mind, dipshit.

File: gray-tree.jpg (284KB, 1100x804px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 1100x804px

>>721465768
More Mondrian

>>721465717
i can only fuck a girl if she tells me her extensive background too.

>>721465877
Yes accessible by merely looking.
Art isn't always what you can see.
It's what you personally see
Ik
Far out man.
I meant no offence

File: w.jpg (143KB, 1028x800px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 1028x800px

>>721464108
>>721464326
>>721464451
>721464451

File: IMG_4768.jpg (46KB, 399x482px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 399x482px

Portrait of God Emperor Sun King

>>721465892
Idk what you mean.
>>721466094
Hahaha.
It's always good to know she isn't riddled with disease.
I'd say this is about as out of context as what I just sayd

>>721465892
Idk what you mean.
>>721466094
Hahaha.
It's always good to know she isn't riddled with disease.
I'd say this is about as out of context as what you just sayd

>>721466317

why do you need people to tell you what they like about a picture? can't you figure it out for yourself?

File: 2012-04-11-DzimirskyDejaVu700px.jpg (156KB, 606x603px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 606x603px

>>721465877

>>721466441
I think he meant bg info

File: hv.png (513KB, 679x526px) Image search: [Google]

513KB, 679x526px

>>721466165
>I meant no offence
Do you say that after you slap your bitch, mamma's boy?

File: 2773454973_f566bbca9d_b.jpg (313KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 768x1024px

Source, 1856

File: dirk-dzimirsky-10.jpg (209KB, 1500x1111px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 1500x1111px

>>721466447

>>721461758
I don't think that word means what you think it does.

>>721466547
yes quite pedantic

File: Paul_Cézanne_076.jpg (1MB, 2536x3126px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2536x3126px

>>721466476
Another Cezanne. Like the texture.

>>721466526

and how yould you know that?
most of the paintings here don't need a background info to read their meaning. if you do, you've probably not thought about it.

>>721466441
Well if your posting why not say what you like about the piece? Or
Anything
It just makes thread more interesting I think

>>721466662
That's a better way of stating it.

>>721466659
I'm not sure who youbwere meant to reply too.
But is bs.
You can't understand say every piece of painted fine art and be able to understand it?
THIS IS MADNESS
*FRONT KICK*

>>721466853
Very true.

>>721466659
most of the paintings here are of you slapping your bitch's ass, or show you being fucked by your mom with a strap-on?
if not, then how's that related to the point in question?

>>721466662

I'd rather not. I don't think anyone should tell you what to like or find interesting in a picture. It's like explaining a joke.

>>721464653
I completely dislike this one for it's garish use of colors. If you'd turn saturation off on it and focus on gesture and composition, you'd see how awful the bench is and the allover composition is shabby.

>>721466973

nice! You can merely tell by the whites in the reflection that it's painted.

File: oLbSy8Xn.jpg (55KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 512x512px

>>721467016
Oo harsh.
I didn't say that.
I didn't say you need to be told what to find appealing in a piece.
You did that just now..

Most of my stuff is randomly named, but I'll dig through and see what I can find, keep dumping friends.

File: hoii.jpg (118KB, 800x970px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 800x970px

>>721467216

File: marinetti2.jpg (533KB, 966x660px) Image search: [Google]

533KB, 966x660px

>>721467345

>>721464108
Ah, m'lady Godiva

>>721467185
>>721466982

>Nice guys.
>Just post a pic
>Say nothing about it
>Great stuff.
>*l like this bc it iz art. *)

especially last sentence made me think that.

>>721466902
I disagree. You can understand any kind of art piece, if you spend enough time contemplating on it. It helps to know art history and the circumstances of the artists life, but at the end of the day, you bring your own interpretation. it's not necessarily right or wrong.
You can like a painting and still not know it's implications (political, social or whatever).

>>721466902
Oh my life.
Did I type this?
*you cant look** at a piece and expect to understand it.
Especially if you did not create it..

>>721464721
>>721464900
Ah yes, love both Thiebaud en Diebenkorn.

Did you know Diebenkorn was heavily influenced by Matisse? Sometimes the resemblance between their works is uncanny. Pretty cool.

File: 7.jpg (785KB, 1755x2126px) Image search: [Google]

785KB, 1755x2126px

Asger Jorn

Listening to bright, cheerful baroque music when this never-before-seen thread appears.

>What are the chances?

>>721467564
Oh my god.
No matter how much you gaze at a say painting you aren't going to understand it if you didn't create it.
You can try
But art is opinions and conjecture
Do we really know what Mona Lisa is really smirking about?

>>721467690

I saw Diebenkorn in London, Royal Academy. It was a pretty great insight into his work. I usually can't relate to constructivist and Bauhaus style art, but Diebenkorn has a very organic way of painting. It never gets old. He even painted on ciagar boxes, the silly bastard!

File: f1b4e0da492722156598023648b4adcd.jpg (484KB, 1000x1287px) Image search: [Google]

484KB, 1000x1287px

Kittelsen

>>721467564
>You can like a painting and still not know it's implications (political, social or whatever).
I'd argue the implications are almost entirely irrelevant. What makes a painting effective isn't its historical context, but what's in front of you.

>>721467857
Do we even know she's smirking? Even that is up to interpretation imo.

>>721467857

Art is meant to be appreciated, not "understood". We're not talking mathematics or biochemistry, here.

>Enjoy the art, absorb all of it's subtle flavors, textures and nuances and let it transport you. That is the purpose of art.

>>721467997
Exactly
Interpretation
Not complete understanding
For instance
What do you "know" about Mona Lisa?
Probably a lot less than adderation
Right?

File: early mona.jpg (91KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 800x800px

>>721467857

hey pleb, fuck the Mona Lisa. It's a great painting no doubt, but don't jump at the big ones that have become clichéed.

I actually prefer the early version. earth tones and high contrast

>>721467901
Exactly, he somehow is able to make the pragmatism that defines works of others working in those genres come to life. Is the Diebenkorn stuff in the Royal Academy part of their collection or was it in exhibition?

File: Georges_Seurat_051.jpg (893KB, 3200x2022px) Image search: [Google]

893KB, 3200x2022px

Seurat suggests

>>721467985

Not everything is made to express politics, you simplistic Leftist moron!

>>721468143
There is meaning behind art!
Also
Art is many things
Youve listed 2 of them.
Nice green text.

>>721468299
>Not everything is made to express politics, you simplistic Leftist moron!
So you're disagreeing with me by agreeing with me?

File: IvanBilibin - Michael.jpg (718KB, 1328x1600px) Image search: [Google]

718KB, 1328x1600px

>>721460555
It took me so long to find this image. Every other picture of this piece of art is low quality low res. Enjoy.

>>721467857

how about it doesn't really matter too much what the artist was intending?
many great artists actually worked from paintings of earlier artists (Bacon took Velasqeuz Pope painting and created his very own rendition).
the vast majority of artists would rather not explain to you in every little detail what they were getting at.

I've read a way of interpreting Lost Highway by David Lynch and thank fuck I forgot about it. Totally ruined it in that moment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifEA-24cF94&feature=youtu.be

File: tumblr_od3lsd9OAb1rtynt1o1_1280.jpg (742KB, 1280x974px) Image search: [Google]

742KB, 1280x974px

Forgot who the fuck this is, I think Max Ernst

I love it

File: james montgomery flagg the fencer.jpg (106KB, 523x1113px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 523x1113px

>>721468432
Another of my favorites

>>721468242

totally. It was a one-off show I think, Diebenkorn retrospective. The catalogue is pretty great.

>>721468200

What I know of Mona Lisa is that Michelangelo painted it as one of the World's First Successful Trolls. If you study the Mona Lisa carefully then compare the facial features carefully with other self portraits done by Michelangelo you'll see it's actually him.

>Michelangelo: 10/10. First master troll.

>>721468143

word!

File: f3fd3bda-53a4-4d5f-8880-fb29e04c7ec9.jpg (737KB, 1280x1144px) Image search: [Google]

737KB, 1280x1144px

Munch bitches

>>721468220
Oh no!
You said the word!
How could you say it!
On random too!
You fucking traitor!
Well you don't know me but
I'd say I like renna period fine art.
Leo
Duhr
Mich
Raff
Boti
Especially Leonardo

File: MontyPythonsFlyingCircus.gif (933KB, 384x384px) Image search: [Google]

933KB, 384x384px

>>721468333
nice trips

>>721468580
>michelangelo
>mona lisa
K

>>721468258

Seurat, my man! Terrible photo/scan, though. IRL, Seurat is just overwhelming

>>721468665

>Scriptfag.

File: 1280px-Georges_Seurat_-_A_Sunday_on_La_Grande_Jatte_--_1884_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg (409KB, 1280x852px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 1280x852px

>>721468258
I really like this one, but none of the online representations (including this one) do it justice. The actual painting is huge, more than 10 feet long. If you stand close it it just turns into dots, and only resolves into a painting when you step back.

File: 1471235293776-2.jpg (537KB, 2000x1645px) Image search: [Google]

537KB, 2000x1645px

i'll drop a few

I am shocked this thread actually is full of proper art instead of the usual neckbeard CGI pictures and Deviantart shit posted in these threads.

>>721468607
looks like Darth Vader kneeling down

>>721468439
the vast majority of artists would rather not explain to you in every little detail what they were getting at.
Sorry about the copy paste I hate doing
But youre right.
Not many artists will explain the meaning to many people.
Thus the mystery is created
And the meaning lost.
And no matter how much we look upon the work and believe we understand the meaning
Perhaps we do not.

>>721468518
The way the colors of the face and body don't match make it look like a pre-computer photoshop.

>>721467985
>You can like a painting and still not know it's implications (political, social or whatever).
>I'd argue the implications are almost entirely irrelevant. What makes a painting effective isn't its historical context, but what's in front of you.

Well that's the thing. Paintings change as we and as generations change. Just take this obvious example of Selfie-culture: We can't look at baroque paintings the same way people did before all the common narcissist attitude of our day and age.
biographical info does help understand how the painting came about. And it's very interesting to put into consideration what things have influenced the painter at the time and how he branched out from there etc.

>>721468844
kek, never realised

File: 1474234456645622597488.jpg (340KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 1920x1080px

>>721468964

>>721468299

thank fuck it isn't, but some paintings are. you can't deny that.
generally, politics in paintings can be so fucking tiring and boring

>>721468879
The more an artist says about a work, the more they limit the possible interpretation. Great art is great because everyone can look at and see something different. If the artist tells you it means THIS, then all those possibilities collapse into just one.

tl;dr artists should shut the fuck about their work

File: 1474235071791-1122440861.jpg (1MB, 2048x1362px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1362px

>>721469122

File: yves tanguy.jpg (282KB, 1641x1080px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 1641x1080px

>>721468474

I hope you already know Yves Tanguy. And the contemporary equivalent would be Paul Noble.

>>721468580

rofl. Michelangelo? No wonder you got it all wrong!
If you study her long enough, she might look like Kim Kardashian

File: freer.waves-at-matsushima-126.jpg (1MB, 3600x1609px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3600x1609px

I've got a huge folder full with google-art public domain stuff, but most of it is too big in filesize. there's a torrent for it on the webs.

>>721468612

Why do I picture you as a fedora wearing nerd?
>Oh no!
>the mirth!

File: ShawnLin1.jpg (376KB, 999x1350px) Image search: [Google]

376KB, 999x1350px

>>721469201
They need to implement batch upload or something

>>721469201
Thanks Doc

File: 1462186871211.jpg (411KB, 2124x1317px) Image search: [Google]

411KB, 2124x1317px

>>721464108

File: shen-fei-castle-path.jpg (367KB, 1920x803px) Image search: [Google]

367KB, 1920x803px

>>721469395

File: tumblr_oinjs4vEQ31s0u653o1_1280.jpg (400KB, 992x800px) Image search: [Google]

400KB, 992x800px

>>721469244
Oh yes, I sure do. Tanguy is intens stuff. Such a visceral experience his works. Paul Noble I'll have to look up, thanks.

>>721469395
do you know how flooded this image board would be if they did that?

File: duchampwheel.png (218KB, 502x746px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 502x746px

one of my favorites

>>721465768
Finally, some fappable art.

File: 14742343834831321725152.jpg (239KB, 635x960px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 635x960px

>>721469522
The amount of dubs/trips I'm getting is pretty good

>>721468782
pointillism
>yeah, i know stuff

File: lane-brown-meadow-v2-lanebrown.jpg (209KB, 652x1008px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 652x1008px

>>721469617

>>721468879

most of the time, questions like "But what is that thing there?" are a total mood-killer.
I've read a preface on Magritte, essentially saying he was actually a shit painter - it was all the stupid opinion by the author. It biased me so much, I couldn't help it, the words rang in my ears as I looked at his paintings.
Fuck these opinions. Most of the art historians nowadays want to contribute to the reception at whatever cost, they don't care if they create ludicrous theories or trash an artist for whatever aspect they try to talk bad about.

I stopped reading texts in exhibitions long ago. I don't need people pre-chewing my dinner.

File: 1443941997835.jpg (683KB, 2111x1300px) Image search: [Google]

683KB, 2111x1300px

getting tired

File: 14742342591841911254399.jpg (320KB, 2048x1675px) Image search: [Google]

320KB, 2048x1675px

>>721469724

File: 14742351040402088222830.jpg (241KB, 1165x1255px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 1165x1255px

>>721469793

File: _20170205_222114.jpg (87KB, 600x354px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 600x354px

>>721469158
Indeed
Artists should shut the fuck up about their work"
Yeah well the good ones are dead by my reckoning ;]
Fine art isn't as powerful as it once was.
For 1 it's just a picture now;]
And second the church isn't stealing anyones money for art work, as much, anymore.
I wanna see naked angels
With nice tits.

File: 1460771288213.png (2MB, 1100x732px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1100x732px

finishing off with a few databending ones, though most are way too big for /b/

File: art-dem-e2cwjt91pi0.jpg (389KB, 1358x1920px) Image search: [Google]

389KB, 1358x1920px

>>721469877
Hope you don't mind concept art

File: Hiremy.Hirschl.Adolf.Souls.on.the.Banks.of.the.Acheron.jpg (100KB, 1030x606px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1030x606px

>>721469122

Is this the same artist? Adolph Hirschler?
I love the one attached

You faggots sure have some shit taste.

I was going to post Zallinger's The Age of Reptiles, but unfortunately I can't find any good pictures of it online. Which is kind of understandable, since it's 110' long. But that still sucks.

>>721469537

LMAO, I just saw that Richter in Vienna, literally the day before yesterday! kek
Will have to say, he's pretty superficial, but I enhoy his small paintings. like that one

>>721470040
>shit taste
>contributes nothing
You must be one of our negro friends

>>721465823
Asian man is not impressed

File: Tarama_20170205.jpg (1MB, 2508x3567px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2508x3567px

thought I'd share mine

File: franklin-chan-true-messiash-game-cover.jpg (56KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 400x400px

>>721470015
Sorry anon don't know..

File: Rhino-Durer.jpg (208KB, 750x558px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 750x558px

thread needs more prints

File: Hats-For-Men-4.jpg (95KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 600x600px

>>721469387
Haha. No.
Never fedora
I only found out what they were a week ago
I prefer a trilby

>>721470040

all you probably know is Van Gogh and Picasso.

>>721470132
>>721470037
>>721469938
stop anytime

File: 1460650216969-0.png (2MB, 1920x2884px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x2884px

yeah, literally everything else is too big

File: hector-pohl-hermit-2-1.jpg (979KB, 1920x2878px) Image search: [Google]

979KB, 1920x2878px

>>721470197

>>721470175
I'd rather not throw my beloveds into a garbage pile.

>>721460555
I have no idea if OP is atill here, but if it hasn't alreacy been posted... omg a DL link would be SO appreciated...

>>721470155
kek, that's pretty crazy. And sure, pretty superficial indeed but they're just nice and comfy to look at. No grandeur, just easily digestible stuff.

File: Paysage_avec_deux_hommes_assis_près_d'un_taillis.jpg (58KB, 604x310px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 604x310px

>>721470206

File: georgecondo_d.jpg (50KB, 388x507px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 388x507px

>>721470450
mfw this terrible Kitsch

File: Plucking_the_Red_and_White_Roses_in_the_Old_Temple_Gardens_(1908)_by_Henry_Arthur_Payne_small.jpg (516KB, 1350x1427px) Image search: [Google]

516KB, 1350x1427px

This is basically Game of Thrones, the painting.

>>721470546
>This is basically Game of Thrones, the painting.
bad?

File: le-vuong-golden-flower-p.jpg (395KB, 1360x1980px) Image search: [Google]

395KB, 1360x1980px

>>721470298

>>721461806
>>721461829
>>721461857

Name of the Artist?

File: georgecondo_b.jpg (62KB, 557x560px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 557x560px

I'm trying to spread George Condos weirdass portraits here on /b/
I use em as reaction faces

here's a class nigger he made

File: Domenico_Campagnola_-_Massacre_of_the_Innocents_-_WGA03807.jpg (130KB, 816x536px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 816x536px

>>721470457

File: ZomboMeme 05022017073609.jpg (139KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1280x720px

Hey faggits you have been visited by Paul the Britbong Paedo. Reply "Hello Paedo" or he will rape all the children in your family in their sleep.

File: 1482672930351.png (613KB, 918x1300px) Image search: [Google]

613KB, 918x1300px

>>721470330
Right click....
Or hold on phone.

>>721470612
dat my mang John Atkinson Grimshaw

new thread?

>>721470546

Did Klimt copy paste this?

https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-1QZ8RYRDgps%2FTpLyhyvCS5I%2FAAAAAAAABII%2FzcHVzYPHOJQ%2Fs1600%2Fbeethoven_frieze.jpg&f=1

thread is full
thanks for the fun discussion, folks

>>721470592
No. Game of Thrones is based on the War of the Roses, and this is the most famous painting depicting that event.

>>721470619
kek I appreciate that

Great thread bros, thanks. I am too lazy to continue another thread, perhaps we meet again

>>721470194
Nice work anon

>>721470987
New thread