That's correct you mong, he's on the right. Where the stupid as fuck babies are.
nice meme pal
I've moved a lot further left than I was in highschool it looks like. Neat. Not surprising though.
Also much MUCH further south on the compass. Ooh, and trips. Cool.
I mean it's not really surprising. I live in a heavily left-of-centre part of a province which has somehow managed to elect a very fiscally conservative government for the past 16+ years. There's a lot of resentment towards the provincial government in a lot of rural areas, especially seeing how they continue to destroy our natural resources for short-term profit and tear our educational institutions apart bit-by-bit.
I don't politics. Someone briefly explain what my results mean.
neither of them work.
the only "example" people give are nordic countries, which are not socialist. they aren't doing great either way, because they're nanny states, but its not an example of socialism working.
in what way can you purchase freedom and happiness under capitalism?
Why is competition important when there's multiple forms of cooperation that are more efficient and effective? Not only that, but large parts of nature survive off of mutual aid
as if any country with an empire hasn't killed people, it's important to ask why and who are being killed.
>hash tagging a blanket term thinking it will end an argument.
No, I think he means
>socialist pigs will run out of other people's money
you are this in a nutshell it seems
private ownership is freedom.
give me an example.
the state murdering someone is wrong period. they shouldn't have that power, but that's what communism is all about. state controls all. its stupid.
as much as you love and support the following
>Obama did most of the drone bombings resulting in the civilian deaths you are accusing me of supporting despite a left wing clearly doing just that.
>Obama banned muslims for a total of 6 months from going to US where the current president is doing it for less than 2 months until a more effecient vetting process is made
>Obama forced unaffordable healthcare and fined people thousands each month for not using it
> the 10 trillion national debt increase made by him
>the deteriorating race relations under his presidency
>the TPP allowing Money Pigs from other countries to stomp out american business and dictate our finances
>the increased tensions with Russia pushing us to second cold war.
If you loved all that then i do just as much you little shit.
Whereas President George W. Bush authorized approximately 50 drone strikes that killed 296 terrorists and 195 civilians in Yemen, Pakistan and Somalia, Obama has authorized 506 strikes that have killed 3,040 terrorists and 391 civilians. (Using the average estimates provided by three non-governmental organizations
Snopes debunks point 2
President Bush added the second-greatest amount to the debt, at $5.849 trillion. But this was the fourth-largest percentage increase out of all the presidents
The national debt grew the most dollar-wise during President Obama's two terms. He added $7.917 trillion, a 68 percent increase, in seven years. This was the fifth-largest increase percentage-wise
mfw low-information idiots repeat factoids
you blow up the first and primary accusation against me
>mfw the painful stupidity
>implies that I supported Bush
if you went to the debt clock and cycled between 2008 and 2017 you will see more than 7.917 trillion added to our debt. And being as Obama came after Bush he should have known not to make such terrible mistakes that resulted in the near but inevitable doubling of our debt from 2008. The raw numbers is bad enough to consider him a joke.
>mfw libtard tries defending another libtard for their libtarded ways.
new to politics what does this mean, thanks
if by working age you still believe that a truly free market with little to no regulation is a fair and efficient way to organise an economy I'm genuinely curious how you come to that conclusion; pls educate me
boss makes a dollar
i make a dime
that's why i burn jews
on company time
that image loaded slowly and deliciously, I hope my internet isn't fucking up
That's definitely not what history shows
History has shown that it's an inherently exploitative system that sustains itself on leveraging inequality of any kind, and as a result rewards the fostering of such inequalities. Regulation has time and time again proven to be the only thing preventing it from destroying the societies that use it. There's no denying that it can allow for faster technological advancement, easily rivaling that of any other economic system, but it has to be forcefully channeled into that direction by strict regulation.
the biggest strides in human history were made when the markets were infinitely more free than they are today.
and you're simply wrong about exploitation. you clearly have no idea what that means. the government is to blame for any exploitation.
and btw this was my compass before you fucks ruined this country with your bullshit.
I want to dispute every part of your first point. First, strides in technological advancement have been getting bigger and coming more frequently than at any other point in history.
Secondly, and as a direct result of the technology that makes this possible, even though the market was ostensibly freer in the past in terms of legislation, in practise or was far more restricted both in capability but most importantly in scope. The market today can react and be manipulated far more quickly and more nimbly than it ever could before, which is what necessitates more strict regulation.
Thirdly, the government does not exist outside of the market, it is a part of the market. The government is an agency that has been constructed to defend the common man against the exploitation of the market, as well as acquire on their behalf the ensurance of some basic universal needs.
is this the dumbest tryhard infographic I've ever seen? No, but yeah anyone who reads it will be dumber for their time. kys. I wish I knew where you lived so I could stick a knife in the soft part of your jaw.
Well at least you'll add one to the death toll to your beloved ideology
I bet you're the priviliged individual that wouldn't give a dime to our fellow black man despite us enslaving him
Why do leftists keep using buzzwords like 'privilege' in order to victimise themselves and invalidate other's arguments? You're not doing yourself much of a favor by holding yourself back and blaming outside forces like the 'patriarch'.
>I'm a millennial that doesn't have any life experience that will parrot anything that Bernie says