Can we just have cuteness instead of straight-up porn?
>Lolicon (ロリコン?), also romanised as lolikon or rorikon, is Japanese discourse or media focusing on the attraction to young or prepubescent girls. The term lolicon is a portmanteau of the phrase "Lolita complex"; it describes an attraction to young or prepubescent girls
Regardless of the legality I'd prefer you have a seat over there.
If this is the case then I concede on a definition standpoint, however I still find real children repulsive, while finding lolis attractive.
One example I'd like to point out is Nowi from Fire Emblem. Just one of many lolis who is thousands of years old.
Please tell me this is fake. I can't tell from thumbnail.
Get this fucking shit out of here and into its own thread
I'm under the impression you're white knight for lolis because you are attracted to them yourself. When you spam loli thread, you're fighting the pedophile inside you.
That's why you don't care about shota threads.
Hey dudes I'm totally not undercover looking for any evidence to arrest somebody. With that said, what is your opinion on fucking little girls? Once again not a cop just a normal 4chan user like the rest of you here on /b/.
This is the truth. 99% of lolis don't actually look like children
This might be a little fucked up... But if she's consentent, why not ?
I mean repist must get their dicks cut off and be mentally destroyed like their victims. But if she wants it, she's still consentent.
(But come on. Fucking a kid ? What's sexy about it ? I'm here because spiderman makes me laugh, not the lolis)
The kind of loli art I jerk off to reminds me of my ex-girlfriend's body. She had very small boobs and was really skinny, also shorter than me. She's in her late 20s though, not a literal child.
Usually if the hentai isn't loli, then the woman is going to have medium-to-large, but mostly large, breasts. Loli is the go-to genre if you're looking for DFC.
It could be just the attraction to small and petite body. Or maybe they like children because the thought that a child could experience sexual pleasure at such a young age is a major turn on. Just speaking from personal experience. I don't know about other pedophiles.
For me, everyone should be free to jerk off to what they like as long as it doesn't hurt anybody.
I mean if you're a pedophile, type "nudist family pics" on google. Just tried it and yeah. Naked kids. And it's legal.
So yeah, the internet is crazy. But as long as you DON'T HURT ANYBODY, EVER, do whatever the fuck you want.
Spidey is obviously suffering from a loli deficiency.
"just one of many lolis who is thousands of years old"
only thing is,
humans don't live to be thousands of years old and if they did they wouldnt remain within a body which is comparable to that of a young girl
Don't go away, Spiderman.
Never go away.
I need you.
I can't imagine.
WE MUST GIVE SPIDERMAN LOLI!
SPIDEY NEEDS MORE LOLI!
If Spiderman doesn't get enough loli he starts stalking the playgrounds.
It's a good thing we're here.
It's the circle of liiiiiiife!
Spiderman Loves Me!
I need more Spidey love!
What's your stance on little girls who make videos of themselves nude or doing something sexual completely of their own accord? Not talking like 17 year old slut, I mean like maybe a 7 year old who spreads her ass or something. Doesn't hurt anyone, but would you still think that's okay? Or should the parents be investigated for an oversexualized environment or something to that extent?
Emergency Loli scram alert!
I don't need a social life! I have loli!
And public playgrounds!
All a mental thing though, isn't it? Afterall, there are fully grown adults who never maturd past the age of 3. Sure they may be legal to fuck, but you're basically fucking a sexy toddler. Some would say that's just as bad, if not worse. Would you draw a line there?
The nice thing about grade school is I get older. But the girls just stay the same age.
That's actually VERY interesting.
I'd say yeah, it's a mental thing. For me, you can be attracted and jerk off to ANYTHING YOU WANT ! Like I said, as long as you DON'T. HURT. ANYBODY.
Maybe there are kids who wants to fuck at the age of 7, whatever, as long as they WANT IT, and as long as it's not a rape.
Guys, can we all pretend it's 2016 again, please?
Or at least my non-profit assigned big brother.
Because then we could have sooo much fun together.
Not posting it, but yes. That's why I though of that example specifically.
It may not be that they want to fuck. Many kids doing it that early will send the pictures or videos to older men because it makes them happy to know they're making someone else happy. Sometimes in a bit more of a dark situation, it makes them feel love from a stranger jacking off to them and they do it because that's the only love they've ever had because their parents don't care about them, but let's focus on the happier variant of those two.
I'm hebe and prefer XIII-XIV tho and the latter is even the aoc in my country, but I'm sure not going be a weirdo and talk to random girls that age so I keep it a fantasy
But they can't understand at that age ffs.
Like I said, they do what they want. As long as the pics don't go public though. That can destroy a child. Hell, even a grown man/woman/whatever the fuck tumblr wants you to be.
The trafficked kind.
They're expensive. He's rich.
What's good for the prez has to be good for Spiderman.
Where am I gonna find the pix with heavy/overweight, well hung, haory, older men fucking lolis? I picture myself in their position, not the other way around.
Go on with what? I'm not posting it. This is a civilised discussion. Go on kik or something if you want it that bad.
Good point. Would we then put an age limit on the use of any recording device for children until they have a complete understanding of what they're doing, or are we to just trust that the people it's being sent to will respect them enough to not send it?
The thinf is, the internet is full of douchebags. There will ALWAYS be assholes who would leak those pics because... They're douchebags. If it weren't for that, I'd say : "Kids, if you want to have cyber sex, go on".
first pic, should I go further?
Just about everyone here trying to derail this thread actually came here for the loli and only post about being anti-loli so that they can sleep better at night because they are contradicting hypocrite shit-sacks.
We all know that in reality they are saving these and fapping away to the "forbidden" and "disgusting".
People do things they can't understand all the time. Religion was created just to explain what we can't understand afterall.
True. It's not like anyone could actually moniter it all without invading privacy, or at all because of the population.
Does that mean though that aside from the pics/vids being leaked, any age can send something innocently sexual?>>720156279
I did explicity say we're not talking about teenagers. I should specify prepubescent since anything pubescent or older is naturally ready, even if they aren't mentally.
of course. the seven year old doesn't have all those ridiculous puberty hormones getting them interested in sex. on the other hand, the seven year old doesn't have all those ridiculous puberty hormones making them crazy and affecting their judgement.
>There is a big difference between a 7year old and a teenage virgin.
yea the fact that you'll cause serious internal bleeding which can literally kill her without medical help at an age that young
Some of us are fapping BECAUSE it's forbidden and disgusting.
Interesting factor I hadn't covered yet. They wouldn't be horny due to a lack of hormones, but that also means anything sexual they know that early is likely from over exposure, hence what I said early about possibly needing to investigate the parents because of an overly sexual environment to raise a child.
aight, just wasn't sure if anyone wanted this
Unless parents disallow television and closely screen/monitor most movies, there's an extremely high chance, in today's culture, that kids will be exposed to sexuality sooner rather than later. That doesn't mean their environment is 'oversexualized'. It may indicate that our culture itself is oversexualized, though.
Not always. The child can still stretch to fit a cock, but they won't be able to go from nothing to something that large. If they are to have sex, it would needimg to be preceeded with smaller objects or fingers until they can stretch enough to handle a cock without dying or bleeding excessively.
Alright, understandable. At that young an age though, they may not be recognizable when theh grow up anyway, so it wouldn't always be harmfu if they were spread.
Anyone else have a point to make on the matter as well?
I would agree that our culture is oversexualized. Especially since mammary glands have become as sexualized as they are.
I'll continue this all in the next thread if you all want me to, assuming their is a next one of course.
of course she hurts somebody: herself. you do not take into account only the temporary consequences.
a successful society doesnt want to treat kids as free individuals, as they develop extremely fast morally and caan be easily fucked up.
I mean in the sense of going from nothing to a cock. They can occasionally handle it. If the stretching process I already discussed occurs though, they will be fine. They are delicate though, nothing should be rushed.
Bleeding excessively fits just fine.
Kids should be allowed monitored freedoms. Only to be guided when necessary so that they can become independent quickly and without harm. The following posts had explained the long term anyway, being if the pics/vids sent were to be released publicly.
>I mean in the sense of going from nothing to a cock
well that will never change(usually) but anal alone takes so much practice/time that I don't know if it's actually possible to even try vaginal
ever wondered why pre-p. pza is always anal?
risk is too high and everyone who's not a complete psychopath wont even try tho
I still refuse to post any of it, for obvious reasons, but I do have videos of both. Hell, even of one doing both at the same time. It's just not something that can be rushed. At the same time though, most people recording it who want to keep the child safe, are also in an environment where they can't afford to make even the slightest fuck up, such as very minor bleeding, because they'll get caught. As such, the follow the stretching process much slower than can be done.
They're the same sort who feel the need to "hack" actual CP sites that exist on places like the Tor network. The reality of the matter is that they're pedophiles and more than likely child porn collectors. They're not some "leet [email protected]" trying to "save the children" or any such bullshit. It's either a way to feel better about being a child molester or it's supposed to be some sort of "plausible deniability" if a three-letter agency eventually finds them. Probably both.
Try to imagine how that's going to work out for them...
>we have a warrant, just get on the ground. mark, start seizing electronics.
>"b-but we're leeto cheeto hackerz! we wuz hacking them to save the kiddosz! it was a sting operationz!"
And yet another criminal charge is added to the list, right there on the spot. These people are truly the most intelligent and gifted of our race.
>I still refuse to post any of it
I didn't request anything and yea it exists, but they have either reached puberty or are from south east asia(they don't have an aoc) and don't care about it
and tbh we both know that shit is hurtcore cancer and personally I don't want to be associated with those kind of ppl
They're from neither of those places. The only reason I know if because I know the people who recorded some of it all.
I am in agreeance though that hurtcore is cancer. There are certain limits, and in the case of cp, VERY fine lines on how it should be 'allowed' to take place.
Also, I was jusr specifying I wouldn't post it since other anons asked earlier and would likely ask again.
I could spend the next thread discussing how to do it 'properly' if you're interested. It's all just a matter of keeping a consenting child safe.
That would make sense. Most manga have the scenario happening abrupty, and in many cases, for the first time. There are very few where the same could be applied to actual children. That alone is why many people claim to enjoy loli without enjoying sexualized children. Loli take the basis of a child, put it in an envirnoment in which no living person is actually harmed, and then the loli is usually sexualized, or put in a suggestive scenario. Most of the lolis in this thread that aren't fucking (maybe all, I'm not going through it all just to specify that it's all) are just sexualized, which is where the appeal comes into play. I'm not sure if it was in this thread or a previous, but an anon had stated that actually children are like rectangles, whereas lolis have curves. It's a perfect and quick explanation for a non pedophilic enjoyment of lolis.
>They're from neither of those places
well the only place left is south/middle america there isn't much ''someone'' hasn't seen, but rarely do now things like candydo!! are superior to hc in my opinion
4pr!l from the eye of the tiger was the last vid I actually enjoyed
The girl who dresses like a tiger? I never did see all of it, but from what I have it seems like it was done 'properly', having a consenting child that is left unharmed. Though I could easily be wrong since I've yet to see it all.
I have very little, and it's very easily destroyable. I could do it from where I've been sitting this whole time by just reaching over and snapping it in two. Most of where my knowledge comes from vid/pic wise are from things I merely saw rather than chose to download.
Around the same time they hit puberty, and as far as their body is concerned, are ready to fuck. I already discussed the argument of body vs mind to age limits, so refer to that if you haven't read it already.