Why can you access nude photos of children on Google Images by

What, what the fuck? You weren't lying...

dude... u got a point...

>>720038078
>>720038067

Some dude on here posted the infamous pictures of emily grey along with some other random child and we were all bashing him for having CP then he told us to google it. Like what the fuck is this shit, WHY ISNT THIS TAKEN DOWN???

>>720037870
It's technically not pornographic, it's just child nudity?

Not sure how legal it is but seems like there's a gray area or some very thin line.

nudity or nudism isn't porn.

Oh dear

What the actual fuck.

>>720038218
isn't emily grey a porn star?

>>720038565

No, an actress, she has a photo of her naked at eleven years old standing next to her naked mom and dad. really creepy shit.

>>720037870
Same with imagefap and searching for lolita porn. It's not blocked and legal.

>>720038565
She is now. The pics were back when she was under aged victim of sex trafficking

Because there isn't, or shouldn't be, anything sexual about it.
Nor is it pornographic

Pedos can technicaly just jeark off to this and not be punished,
this is fucked

>>720038565
She is a pornstar

>>720038751
there's a porn star named emily grey. There is not an actress named emily grey.

>>720038786

You can find that type of shit on imagefap? I don't think so they send your IP address to ICE if you even type in 'Jailbait' check there TOS

>>720038067
>>720038078
>>720038456
>>720038554
>>720038786

Expect some knocks at your doors, dudes

same as searching youtube for enature. how is it legal

>>720038906

EXACTLY LIKE WHAT THE FUCK AND THIS IS FROM GOOGLE! I THOUGHT THEY WOULD DO BETTER.

Is this safe?
http://yourxgirlfriends.com

>>720039052

What the fuck is that?

File: mondelo_genia.3.jpg (63KB, 800x523px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 800x523px

>>720038952
Well yeah if you type 'jailbait'
But there's kind of a loophole if you search for 'lolita' instead.

It's perfectly fine.

>>720039182
same thing only in video form

just image search Brooke Shields Nude In Pretty Baby and don't forget utube,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zy-fImeKhdM

>>720039266
Thanks bro, fapping hard.

nudity =/= pornography

there's nothing sexual about the pictures

Porn is about context. If the image is sexual in nature or taken with the intention of it being perceived as sexual then it is porn. Nakedness is just nakedness. Its just recently with all these sjws fetishising the human body that people have become obsessed with nude images being always fap material. Hell when I was a kid it was pretty nprmal to see little kids playing nude on the beach or seeing family photos of the kids running round the back yard nude playng in the paddling pool. SJWs have ruined the innocence of kids. Inb4 paedo, I am attracted to women older than me.

>>720038989

>Implying any local, state or federal LEA has the resources or power to investigate, create a case, and go to the house of each person who clicks on any questionable content

Top kek anon

>>720038946
>>720038751
a porn star is a sub-genre of actress

>>720039400
Spoken like a true pedo.

>>720039503

>Sees underage body
>Nothing sexual about it
>Somehow pedo

I think you have some soul searching to do.

>>720039496
that's fine, but emily grey is only a porn star, she wasn't in anything else. especially not as a kid.

Yeah I dont understand, why is it that when you type nudism or nudist family there is literally tons of CP
why is that allowed

>>720038067
you must be new here

>>720038989
nobody would catch on this bait anymore

>>720039667
See>>720039452

File: IMG_1362.jpg (22KB, 300x194px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 300x194px

The thing about pornography is that it is intended to stimulate EROTIC rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings. If every nude image was considered pornographic it would be near impossible to study things like anatomy of children or to display artwork of nude people. Nudism is considered an art form because it's not sexual by nature, it's just living your life without clothes and going about normal business. Although incestual fettishes do exist, family nudism is not pornography because it is not an inherently sexual thing to those partaking in that form of expression.

>>720037870
Only sexualized pictures of children are illegal. You wouldn't put someone in prison for taking pictures of their baby's first bath. Naked kids aren't anything bad. Taking advantage of them and abusing them is.

Of course reddit won't answer my question they keep deleting it, fucking faggots. I'm going to send google an email.

>>720039386
>>720039667

how about jailbait.ninja?

>>720039503
Jesus Christ this board is shit. Nudity does not equal pornography, that's why there are naturalists/nudists. The images are not SUPPOSED to be sexual, but some idiots like you might find them so

File: 1434983328286.jpg (38KB, 500x404px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 500x404px

da fuq. do not want.

>>720039776
>sexualized pictures
whats the definition?

>>720039800
why the fuck would you do that?

>>720039886
Look it up yourself lazybones. Thats what Google is for.

File: statue2.jpg (27KB, 240x180px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 240x180px

MOOOOOOODSSS..

Wtf pictures are you all even talking about.

Jesus fuck you all are retarded

>>720039052
Searched, didnt see anything

File: f7FdEdG.jpg (10KB, 260x194px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 260x194px

>>720039452

ITT : We try to get banned

>>720040031
>Can't follow simple instructions to a Google search
>Somehow everyone else is retarded

>>720040031
See
>>720039266
Search lolita on imagefap for answers

This thread's poster's average age is underage

>>720040090
you got child filter on, fucking kid

First time I've been into a b thread that's more discussion based. I didn't believe the meme that boards could die, but now I realise. It's painfully obvious there's a bunch of fucking kids here, or people who are mentally kids. You idiots are freaking out over nonsexual nude kids on google images. Pathetic.

>>720039758
You make a very good point actually.

I think you solved this entire thread.

>>720039737

I saw, makes sense now.

MY NEXT QUESTION IS if you guys are both right. Okay?
>> and i post an image from google about family nudism that you guys are saying is legal on here on this thread.
Would it in fact be flagged make this thread come down?
Because that only proves that it isnt legal or that it isn't as "okay" as you guys are saying it is.

>>720040274
Pedo scum

File: 0_868.jpg (73KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 600x800px

dunno, post teens

>>720040264
If its behind a child filter, its bad

>>720038218
what picture?

>>720040335
This guys got it all figured out

>>720040031

Type in family nudity

>>720040251
jailbait WILL get you logged, this requires x amount of VPNs or you will have a visit from the party van.

>>720040274
It's because is an actually interesting topic

The fact that its so controversial and or confusing.

No one goes on to find these images. But i came across it and wondered why is this on google and not illegal. Dont shit on a post because it doesn't have your autistic screaming meme's all over it kid.

>>720037870
Pic related

>>720040264
No it isnt, pedo

File: ss+(2017-01-23+at+11.19.15).png (1KB, 160x24px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 160x24px

>>720040251
>imagefap

Fuck that place.

>>720040335
Really....them bitches are like 40 years old

>>720039452
It's still common in Europe as far as I know. One of my friends (19) lived in Germany when he was younger and recalls running around naked quite fondly.

If it's fine then post something here.

>>720040524
Holy shit you are dumb. It's not interesting or controversial, it's a bunch of kids freaking out because they can't understand basic context. It's on Google because naturalists are people too, and like to share their experiences like everyone else

If you type in lolita you don't find girls anywhere close to the girls in google images when it comes to age. So pretty much this is legal??