A fair point
atheists, your rebuttal?
>>719907288
Weather prediction and archaeology are not the same thing
>>719907288
and we got it in one.
The weather is an astronomically different thing to predict. The thing is that the vast majority of evidence points to life millions of years ago
Turns out its way easier to predict the weather when its already happened.
>>719907288
to predict weather accurately you would have to know how each molecule is moving around in the air and where it's going
>>719907715
and yet scientists claim to know more than god. its sick.
>>719907441
nailed it.
>>719907871
The point he's making is we cannot accurately predict weather...
>>719908127
it's never been 100% accurate, most we get are probabilities.
You'd need absurd levels of computing power to get close to 100% correct predictions, probably only on the level that quantum computing could possibly provide
>>719907602
Chuckled
>>719907288
>why should I believe you on what happened yesterday when you can't predict tomorrow
>>719907288
science pretty accurately predicted how big of a faggot you'd be OP
i mean, there's some variance in the Total Cocks Sucked Per Day (TCSPD) but they usually get it within a margin of error of 3 cocks.
>>719907602
Score.
>>719907288
when was the last time you ever saw "100% chance" of anything retard. oh, thats right, it doesnt happen because you cannot predict the behaviours of molecules in the atmosphere.
stick to the comics dipshit, theyre more your speed.
>>719909128
>implying i can't predict with 100% chance i'll kick your ass
do you want a seven day forecast too, faggot?
>>719909092
>how did noah fit all the dinosaurs on the ark
he didn't, duh
>>719909128
if religious people were capable of rational though, then there would be no religious people.
>>719907602
bravo
>>719907288
predicting the future is harder than reading the past
>>719909320
yeah, that's the kind of moral hypocrisy religious people are so famous for ...
Ooh! I've got one of those!
>>719907288
As an atheist
i have no rebuttal, thats actually a great point
>>719909320
You've accepted you're going to hell, then?
>>719909960
>pretending to be your opponent(s) so you can weaken their stance
>>719909850
>>719908127
>...
>...
why do you type like you're a 15 year old on a forum? fuck off with your ellipses
>>719907288
>>719907602
idgi
>>719909320
>Evidence for evolution: a literally tangible peice of evidence
>Evidence for creationism: muh feelings
Which side is this guy on?
>>719907602
boom
>>719909320
I can't even make out what's the argument supposed to be here.
How is self-control evidence for creation? In what way does it relate to creation at all?
I mean, the comic is even more convoluted than just saying there's a connection.
It says 'the skull is evidence for creation because of self-control, gentleess, etc...'
What the fuck is he even getting at?
>>719910975
oh no
>>719910767
The side of the lord.
>>719910918
>>719910951
>>719910975
watthefuckdidijustread.jpg
>>719911079
How do you not understand comic strips?
>>719909092
how did the koalas and kangaroos manage to go to australia after being in the ark?
>>719911236
Then explain.
How is self-control and kindness an argument to support the statement 'the skull is evidence for creationism'.
>>719911281
>>719911314
>>719911357
>>719911390
>>719911418
>>719911528
oh god please stop
>>719907602
10/10
Why did it go from retarded creationist comics to catholic priest comics?
>>719911236
>natural selection
>domesticated dog breeds
How can anyone not grasp the difference there?
>>719911236
Man, this comic uses a kind of logic that I cant get. This is much to say, because I am christian and a biology student.
>>719911959
you cannot come to a separation of belief and science that is religion and biology. either you accept that one is always right, and one has been continually proven wrong and has never offered up evidence to the contrary, or you're proudly and willfully ignorant and should be the first in the ovens.
>>719911580
He is a critically acclaimed artist, though I do admit sometimes he is a bit "off"
>>719911236
But those dogs are bred by humans not naturally selected...
>>719911959
>calls an obvious misunderstanding or lie "logic"
kys
>>719907602
that's rich chum that's rich
>>719912251
>a bit off
>makes comics about molesting his children
>a bit
>>719912450
>only a bit
>>719912450
It is not really molestation in the proper sense of the word, it is more things that have happened incidentally.
>>719912181
I dont separate the two beliefs, I dont think the Bible is literal and that science is anti-religion.
>>719912288
Yeah, its what people call bad logic.
>>719907288
Hindsight is 20/20.
>>719907288
wind moves clouds , sure as shit they dont move rock
The law of superposition
if there was a god would you have been born?
>>719907441
This. Also meteorology and climatology aren't the same thing either.
>>719907602
and boom goes the dynamite
>>719909092
What ark? You know the bible has been proven to be a mere story right? You don't actually believe in a god do you? Like a child believing in Santa Claus lmao
>>719911236
The one labeled "Natural Selection" is actually Artificial Selection. The one labeled "Evolution" depicts Natural Selection. This artist can't even into science.
>>719912216
First accurate comic
>>719912265
Thats true they're artificially selected. In this case we are deturmining witch dogs get to breed and pass down their genes(in this case shortest and stubbiest dogs do)
Imagine if there was no people to select for them. then the only thing dictating who gets to breed and pass down their genes would be their ability to survive and breed. Darwin called this ability in animals fitness.
>>719907288
An excellent point. Instead of occasionally inaccurate predictions, we should believe in a fussy omnipotent sky man instead.
>>719912265
You could argue that living with people is the nature that dogs live in.
>>719909320
Physical evidence vs. the emotional outcome of an upbringing with some feelings thrown in for good measure.
An excellent point.
>>719910173
no...
>>719914176
slayed