What did she mean by this?

>>719870630

I think it's pretty clear cut.

OP were you in special education classes by any chance?

She steals razors

>>719870630
Analysis: why did you ask that question?

women believe that tampns and the like should be free. despite them not being a nesscesity

Razors are pretty expensive though......

>>719870630
She meant nothing, OP. Just another stupid cow that should be in a man's kitchen or cleaning his home.

If it's the UK it's about how Mens razors don't have VAT (an additional 20% tax) applied to them, but tampons do.

What the women fail to grasp is that if we lose VAT on Tampons the 3 major manufacturers will just up the prices to gain a sweet 20% profit

But you don't have to buy tampons. You can just clean your clothes you silly woman. Why aren't you freebleeding with your sisters?
Also you can buy a reusable cup.

>>719870630
College girls think they shouldn't have to pay for tampons. As for razors, I buy my own, like every other man. women?????

>>719870691
>>719870740
do you live in a county where razors are free as in free beer ?

>>719870630
but i do pay for razors already

She doesn't know what she is talking about. Both women and men use razors and mostly women use tampons, so I don't understand why she thinks women should get razors for free. There is no correlation between these two items. Dumb woman is dumb

do women think razors are free? i fucking wish they were, those things are expensive

>>719870630
Can I be getting free razors? If so how? Shits so expensive I just grew a beard.

>>719870900
she probably does freebleed just those feminists like to jump on anything they can bitch about because of their inferiority/victim complex

>>719870876

that doesn't make any sense, as if in making a product cheaper would make it more expensive.

the ladies of the left are nuts

>>719870630
But man already pays for everything that women buy.

>>719871049
>>719871060
If you show your White Male Privilege Pass at the checkout you get the cost of the razors discounted from your bill.

>>719870630
If it's the UK, it's because tampons/sanitary towels are considered luxury items and subjected to VAT. Razors (for both women and men) aren't. The question is why it's more important for women to shave and be smooth than it is for them to not uncontrollably squirt blood out their minges. Seems pretty reasonable, tbf

>>719870630
.. wait you guys don't get prescription razors? They are like the best ever and they are free, just go to your doctor.

>>719870876
>three companies can keep their tampons the same price by raising price 20%
>one doesn't
>the one that doesn't sells more and makes more money just by moving more product

Europe's economics are fucking stupid.

Wait do you guys not pay for razors?

>>719871104
Well that's because it doesn't. It'll make the product the same price and people generally wouldn't notice a change, but instead of the 20% going to the government or wherever the VAT goes, itll now go to the manufacturer

>>719870630
A bit of stupidity there. The point was about how tampons and other feminine hygene products are taxed but men's razors are not in many states.

>>719871046
She doesn't think women should get razors for free, nor does she think men get razors for free. The issue is about tax, and why tampons are taxed as a luxury good but razors aren't. The point isn't 'tax razors', it's 'don't tax female sanitary products'

>>719870819
Not if you get a double edged safety razor or a straight razor. Instead of tampons this woman could use a diva cup or a reusable and washable pad.

>>719871246
>Some random Anon's economics are fucking stupid.
ftfy

>>719870876

We don't pay VAT on razors? Fucking hell could have fooled me

What's a pack of 4 (decent branded, not the supermarket shit) razors going for? £10 nearly

Still way more expensive

>>719871313
Razors are more of a luxury item.

At least my beard won't stain the furniture with unfertilized fetus blood.

>>719870630
another stupid girl without argumens. She just want to be angry with the society without reasons

>>719870630
where is it?

>>719871410
>vat

euronig detected

your opinion is irrelevant

>>719871104
>Tampons are £8
>With VAT you pay £10

>Government removes VAT so now they're £8
Results in:
>Manufacturers choose to increase the industrial selling cost of Tampons
>Supermarkets now charge £10 for tampons

>The cost is the same and the government gets less money.

It's a free market and Tampon manufacturers have a basic monopoly to price fix if they want.

Besides the argument is invalid, Pads aren't taxed at all so use them.

>>719870630
So instead of saying "stop the VAT on tampons", this moron says this. She'd rather see VAT added onto razors than removed from tampons? Despite women also buying razors, probably more so than men? She'd fuck herself over just to get the smallest thing over men.

That, OP, is the future of womankind.

>>719870630
Razers are fucking expensive, almost 20 bucks for a good Gillette with only one blade and no replaceables

That's why I switched to dorco years ago. They supply dollar shave club. Why pay a middle man. Dorcousa.com. check slickdeals too always good deals on them. Never buying at a store again

>>719871583
you misspelled cumdumpsterkind

>>719870630
it's a woman, they're stupid, what did you expect?

>>719871441
Yeah, I'd probably agree with this. Yet I don't think razors should VAT either. Seems pretty reasonable for tampons to not be considered a luxury item to me.

>>719871410
So imagine having to pay VAT on top of that. That's what she's upset about.

>>719871580
>Start new tampon manufacturing company, producing, say, £9 tampons. Get all the custom. Win.
Also, as I understand it, pads are for less intense periods or something. So they're not completely interchangeable with tampons.

>>719871583
I think she's more highlighting how ridiculous it'd be for razors to be taxed, and therefore it's not unreasonable to want tampons to be untaxed. "stop the VAT on tampons" wouldn't have had the same emotional impact on you.

background of pic: that was one of the protests in London.

In the UK, Tampons are priced including VAT (Value Added Tax).
Razors are exempt, because of a weird clause from the 70's.

So its not "free tampons", its that you're paying tax on a tampon, but no tax on a razor.

So, genuine inequality there, shitty placard that is inaccurate.


here's an article about it:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-34649495

>>719872069
>pads are for less intense periods or something.

Both pads and tampons have various absorbency for differing flow rates. Pads simply sit outside the vagina while tampons are inserted.

>>719872112
In Canada the feds dropped the sales tax on hygiene products for women like 2 years ago because of some ass blasted feminists

>>719872186
So the two aren't interchangeable? I mean that if pads aren't taxed, it's not like all women can just but pads, some would still need/want tampons?

>>719870630
I'm 2nd on OP.. wtf

>>719872369
some women cant physically use tampons. some women find pads absolutely horrible.

>>719872256
Assuming a woman uses 4800 tampons in her lifetime (40 years menstruating, twelve periods a year, ten tampons per period, no panty liners), only buys name brand, and gets them from Walmart, she's looking at spending $10 per 36 pack of tampons. That gives us $1,334 spent on tampons in her lifetime. In my area we have a 9% sales tax so that results in a lifetime tax expense of $120 dollars, or $3 per year in taxes. A good quality menstruation cup will cost $30 dollars and is reusable.

But tampons have a luxury tax because it's only 5%, because it pays 5% it doesn't have to pay VAT, which is 20%. If they remove the luxury tax then tampons will increase in price by around 15% because they'll have to pay VAT instead, just like razors.

I don't know how nobody has researched this and people still complain!

>>719872112
Tampons are not ecofriendly. Plus you can make tampons with any cloth. You can't shave without a blade. So, in your socialist, what-is-a-need deciding country, razors should have priorities.

At best, the should ask for equal vat on NOT disposable razoers AND tampons. Go and use a fucking menstrual cum you filthy bitch.

>>719870740
i think it was sarcasm

>>719873181
>and is reusable
I can wipe my ass with my dinner napkin and technically it's reusable, but that doesn't mean it's a good idea

>>719871322
Have you seen a diva cup? I don't blame chicks for not wanting to shove that up them, take it out and empty it, clean it and shove it back up. And reusable, washaby pads, seriously?

>>719873257
>you can make tampons with any cloth
You're literally retarded, blood will soak through fabric.

tampons can't be recycled, double edge blades can be. good job polluting the earth with bloody, shitty plastics.

why do women pretend to give a shit about the environment, anyway? tampons and make-up can't be recycled. once they're done, that shit goes straight into the trash into a landfill.

good job.

>>719873718
>Getting confused over what we're talking about
She's complaining about tampon tax, not the environment, but I'm impressed your pair of brain cells rubbed together to make that link, even if it's non-sequitur and irrelevant.

>>719871246
>>or they agree to artificialy raise the price in secret instead.
No you are a dumb nigger to beleive in free market.

>>719873582
Ask your (grand)grandma what she used before disposable tampons.

>>719870876
Wow that's a retarded fucking law

I'm not a hurr durr tumblr blue haried feminazi, but that's pretty outrageous.

And no, taking off that extra tax would not just immeadiately result in the companies upping the prices.

If they had a monopoly, then yes it would. But that's just them figuring "they've been paying 10 euro anyway...They can keep paying 10"
It's not the act of getting rid of a tax that immeadiately results in a tampons being 20% more costly to produce.

>>719870630
>make them pay for child support since we have for eternity
>make women pay the same for car insurance as men
Curious what this cunt feels about that
>spoiler alert: she's against it

>>719870630
>ha ha im female !
>i have good ideas i promise
>gonna go march :)

File: 61Gnm15rnNL._SL1200_.jpg (106KB, 1200x1054px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1200x1054px

free razors for all

>>719870876
Stop digging for equality, dumbshit.

>>719874629
Well that's because what you're reading is a complete lie. Razors are all taxed at 20% in UK (It's called VAT)

Tampons are taxed at 5% instead (called luxury, because EU law says we can't tax less)

Tampons are actually taxed less than razors anyway they just want it for 0% tax (which is illegal in EU as I mentioned before)

File: 1481884076436.jpg (94KB, 818x709px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 818x709px

>>719874647

>>719874629
I see.
Do women pay VAT on their razors?

HURRRRRP

Bet you make the same equivalency between showing tits and cock.

Better comparison is tampons and condoms.
Condoms should be free for men, but cost 1,000 pounds sterling for women.

>>719874647
>make women pay the same for car insurance as men
No. Men are objectively more likely to get into crashes at certain ages, and those crashes are more likely to be more serious/more expensive. If you start insisting we all pay the same, you're arguing for exactly the kind of mindless 'equality' that you claim to hate, the kind that ignores actual facts and figures.

>>719870876
>if we lose VAT on Tampons the 3 major manufacturers will just up the prices to gain a sweet 20% profit
Wut. They'd still be making the same amount of money right? So why would they jack up prices?

>>719875123
shaun king is a white man

>>719875024
All women should be hanged in the streets from lampposts and trees.

Then men can finally enjoy the age of enlightenment that we have been awaiting since Adam lost his rib.

>>719875121
Did you know by EU law it's illegal to make car insurance cheaper based on gender? I agree with what you're saying but that other guy doesn't seem to realize we already pay the same.

>>719870766
So you support free bleeding?

>>719875223
Homosexual with mommy issues

>>719875223
I'm happy to limit it to only women that haven't researched what they're protesting about.

>>719873385
Cups are fine.

Also your comparison would have been better if someone were saying reuse a linen napkin instead of a tampon.

File: 1485068617194.jpg (235KB, 894x1200px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 894x1200px

>>719870630

>>719872112
fucking women can use razers to you autist how is it inequality?

>>719875376
What struggle?

Putting down the fucking fork or walking?

My god. That thing claims to have self-respect?

>>719871049
I assume the sign is talking about handouts to prisoners?

>>719870876
>the 3 major manufacturers will just up the prices to gain a sweet 20% profit
don't razor manufacturers do this though?

>>719875252
In Canada and the US car insurance is based on stats, so men under 30 have higher insurance because statistically that's the demographic that has most accidents

>>719871046
>>719870766
>>719870828
see: >>719870876

So their stupid fucking marches have been over having to pay for tampons?

>>719875187
because they can

>>719874212
Actually, back then it was taboo to use any form of tampon, cloth or not because it was believed that it took away their virginity and caused sexual pleasure.

>>719871205
>>719870876
I love how these two explain it perfectly, yet still this thread is filled with overly opinionated fuckheads who are mad at the bitch with the sign although they don't understand it.

>>719875674
I'm pretty aware of insurance laws etc, since it's my job. America is completely different to EU so I understand for you females get it cheaper, but over here where we get luxury tax they're the same. (It might be changing back though because brexit, but I think we'll keep that law)

>>719875304
>unwanted fat dyke detected

>>719875886
Google it, what they said isn't actually how they're taxed - always research yourself.

>>719875760
So why don't they do that now?

>>719875886
all the bitch stated with her sign is that shes hairy and doesn't shave

I'd prefer it if all women didn't wear tampons or pads. Just blood all over public transport, benches, just everywhere. I'd love to have a good, firm lick of blood

>>719875317
It's a start.

There aren't enough lampposts to hang them all at the same time.
We can reduce them into groups, and do them in lots as you suggested.

>>719870828
So fucking true. Back to the fucking kitchen with that ho

>>719876029

shaving doesn't mean you don't have to bay tampons

>>719875877
Back then when and where and who? How do you think generations of human beings, since the invention of fabrics, collected the SHIT and PISS of their toddlers? With Pampers(TM)

File: 544.png (526KB, 600x526px) Image search: [Google]

526KB, 600x526px

>>719876072

>>719875999
nah, just a straight dude who prefers a world where women exist you massive faggot

>>719876228
Get a load of this cuck

>>719870876
>
lol you retard, losing sales tax doesn't affect the manufacturers, tax doesn't go to them. You goddamn retarded dipshit.

>>719876042
I'd prefer it if all bleeding women were shunned, as the bible states.

Locked in a shed for a week every month, rolling around in their own filth, and be industrially disinfected afterwards.

>>719876287
Says the guy who wants a world of only men. Do you think your gay buttbuddies wouldn't cuck you?

>>719876287

are you volunteering your asshole to get fucked after all the women are dead?

>>719876228
cuck

>>719876027
because the government isnt going to remove VAT so why hike prices up and push their buyers to their competition? if VAT was removed then the public wouldnt bat an eye if the company raised its product to its original price

File: Chief Bei Fong.jpg (42KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 500x500px

>>719870876

Hang on. So that 20% VAT was a TAX, right? Meaning the 20% wouldn't have EVER gone to the manufacturer previously, but the instant the tax is removed, you honestly think they would IMMEDIATELY bump their price up to make up the difference? ALL of them?? Together? Yeah, that's pants-on-head retarded, dude.

>>719876360

I feel as though this would interfere with the customer service industry

>>719875886
She has a sign about government paying for razors and tampons; not about tax rates. YOU are the fuckhead here.

>>719876372
I'll be basking in brojobs and semen showers while you're fapping to women you faggot

>>719876426
I think they would. I think there'd be a massive backlash, and if a single company didn't, they'd receive a huge amount of the market, just on principle.

>>719876428
But tampons pay luxury tax not VAT, which is 5%

>>719870630
Not a clue anon. I've had more legible posts after pissing it up at the pub.
Mebby she doesn't shave. That's ok, I've dated a wookie before.

>>719876202
It's not comparable to something narrow you shove up there though, do you realise how much women bleed? In comparison to a tiny piece of bundled up fabric, it does absolutely nothing.

>>719876491
Fapping to women makes me a faggot?

>>719876565

does it not give them sexual pleasure? it's kind of like a small dildo

>>719876217
>redditor detected
Nice reaction image - how about you post some black and white apple mac certified fish skeletons now.

>>719876459
or you could just accept reality although it doesn't fit perfectly to your personal narrative.

>>719875577
nice dubbadubbas

Methinks the struggle is in dem sweat pants.
Looks like she's smuggling a couple of hams.

>>719876650
No, it doesn't.

>>719876650
Tampons are haram

>>719876519
nice opinion you have their glad you think companies dont just see you as disposable income and they actually give a shit about people and the public over making money

>>719871313
>"tampons are taxed as a 'luxury good'"
Yeah...this isnt a thing in America.

>>719876650
Anything women do is based on selfish pleasure.

Sanitary towels worked fine for millions of years to hide the scent of blood from predators.

In the 60s, dyke hags declared tampons as liberating - take a look at tampon advertising.
The idea is that they can please themselves without the need of a man.
Even the name, when translated "tam pon" means "without man".

>>719875121
>making good male drivers pay more than bad female drivers
Obvious bait is obvious

>>719870630

according to my gf there's a tax on tampons for "not being a household necessity." that's what they're mad about

>>719876567
What other reason would there be?

File: wtff.gif (1MB, 298x206px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 298x206px

>>719876650
>>719876202
>>719873257
the amount of ignorance in this thread...

File: Cxv2JQOUQAAl0mQ.jpg (176KB, 900x1200px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 900x1200px

Having one good point about some policy here or there doesn't excuse the house of cards identity politics are built upon. If this woman were a hiring manager at an HR department she would choose other women and minorities over me intentionally even if I was vastly more skilled, had more relevant experience and was already well liked by much of the actual staff. How do I know? It's happened to me. 6 months of volunteer work and making every friend at a job I really wanted meant nothing when a black woman showed up to an SJW human resources department, she just won automatically. I know you're sitting there and feeling proud of that and that's exactly what's wrong, that's exactly what got Donald Trump elected. You can't just turn over order in society to your unfair whim based on some weird shit you think, I mean, if everyone had done it I never would have gotten work at all because it would be very easy for them to find a minority they'd rather hire.

If you keep this up we'll actually kill you. It won't be over identity, you won't be swarmed by "nazis" though I forgive you for saying it since apparently identity is the only thing you know. No, you'll just get mobbed by people who are unemployed but really ought not to be unemployed, people who's social lives will be instantly ruined by unemployment because their culture is based on the idea they could get a job if they wanted one and don't have to change gender or skin colors to even be considered.

You want us to be the niggers now, I get it. But unemployed people are violent, fucking, think carefully.

>>719874142
you can't see how i'm on your side because your own arrogance has your head really big. it's okay though.

>>719877098
tldr
Go back to your tumblr blob blog.

>>719871579

Who the fuck asked you, go join their little brigade you cuckolded cunt

>>719876876
Where do you get "hurrrrr, thinking companies care about you" out of a post about how a company could make massive profits by doing something?

has anyone ever fucked a woman on her period? what's it like? sticky?

>>719876876
They do only care about income. But I can choose who to give my money to. If a company acts in a way I don't like, say by hiking prices without any need, I have the amazing ability to not buy their things.

>>719876944
Statistically, young male drivers are involved in more expensive accidents than young female drivers are. Insurance is based on the statistical likelihood of you incurring a cost. Therefore young male drivers should pay more for insurance. I bet you're the kind of person who thinks women should be allowed to serve as front-line soldiers, even if they don't meet the same standards as men, since it's obviously more important to you to have equality than it is fairness.

>>719876359
no, but manufacturers will be able to up prices by 20% so that it's the same price for the public as before, but manufacturers take that 20% that would have usually gone to the government. Pls learn 2 read

>>719877389
Coupla times -- my wife has a pretty light flow, only real difference was a mild coppery smell

>>719877142
Oh, so your post was actually in favour of women? Because rereading it did not give me that impression at all. Maybe you need to improve your communication skills.

>>719877389
Slidey.
With an occasional chunk of ejected tissue that invariably ends up scooped out by your shovel-like dickhead.

Feels alright, just don't look down and put a towel under her before you do it.

Also is a fairly good means of birth control. Fire and forget.

>>719877281
Actually if you had read the first bit you'd know he's on pur side, illiterate faggot.

>>719877597

Women can get pregnant while on their periods

>>719877471
Women shouldn't be driving in the first place.

It is mainly women causing these accidents by driving in a slow, fearful and unpredictable way.

>>719877668
They can't.

File: IMG_1822.jpg (30KB, 703x587px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 703x587px

>>719876907
Wat

>>719877668
Not really.

Do you know what the process is doing.
Shedding the uterian lining, making implantation impossible.
The ovulation takes place 2 weeks after, the opposite side of the cycle.

Now thank me.

>>719877713
I mean, at this point this is just belief. It's like arguing with a fundie who thinks the Earth's 6,000 years old.

You're welcome to have your beliefs, but I prefer rational thought. We're not going to agree, because we value different things: emotion for you, empirical data and evidence for me. Have a good day, Anon.

>>719877716
B8

>>719877471
so lets say in a hypothetical reality all the tampon companies raise the price, what would you do about it personally? would you stop buying tampons?

>>719877866

Not exactly. Women can ovulate only a few days after their period is over, and sperm live for 3 days. The menstrual and ovulation cycle isn't exactly clockwork

>>719877899
All you have is the politically oriented snippets and buzzwords with no research, knowledge, information or logic.

Far more men drive than women. Men drive longer distances and more frequently, and it has been shown that the majority of accidents involve women in other cars causing circumstances leading to the accident.

Hang yourself from a lamppost with a sign around your neck, fat dyke.

>>719877866
Sperm can live in the uterus for a few days waiting for an egg
That's why the morning after pill can be effective even if she just had her period

>>719877349
i entered the nether realm so i could travel the cosmic nebula to consult the weight lifting monkey at the inner core of the nexus

>>719878010
You are mistaken and have mixed up whatever you learned in sex education.

The safest time to fuck a woman is while she is bleeding and a few days after.
It has been used as pregnancy prevention since the dawn of man, and is called the rhythm method.

Read about it.

>>719877985
If I was a female, I'd source them online or something. I'd find something else to replace them, and I'd write a letter of complaint to whichever brand I normally brought from. I'd encourage my friends to do the same, and then when a brand dropped the price, I'd start to buy from them.

The companies care about making money. If we make it financially beneficial for them to behave in a 'good' way, then they'll do that. And I do think there'd be a big enough backlash over something like that that they'd have no choice.

>>719878177
Sperm can live for 3 days, ovulation is 2 weeks after bleeding starts.

14 minus 3 is 0.

Read. Anywhere with facts.
Are you fucking stupid.

>>719878425
If you were female, you'd scream and cry about it until an adult, i.e. man, solved the problem for you just to shut your mouth.

>>719878425
yeah we can make them behave "in a good way", we can also alow the to open sweat shops in third world countries due to consumerism and pretend were not okay with it

>>719878485

Ovulation is not clockwork, neither is bleeding. Sometimes women don't bleed on time, sometimes women don't ovulate on time, sometimes the cycle is affected by pain, stress, or illness. Women aren't machines. Are you fucking stupid?

>>719870630
...implying govt pays for men's razors.

>>719878485
what do lawyers and sperm cells have in common? they both have a three and a half million chance of becoming a human being

>>719878687
Are you fucking stupid.
It can alter in length but a woman does not ovulate during menstruation you fucking retarded spastic.
You have no idea about any of this and sound eight years old arguing a fantasy in a playground.

Just stop it, and read.

It is like saying sometimes women don't need to be pregnant to give birth, women aren't machines - it's all magic!!!!

>>719878921
What do lawyers have in common.

They're all kikes.

>>719878146
I mean, it's not. Certainly in my country, the UK, young male drivers (17-25) are more likely to be in more expensive crashes than young female drivers (17-25). But hey, you're overly emotional and not going to listen to reason or statistics. That's fine, I don't judge you, Anon.

Stay safe.

>>719870630
not sure if it's a UK thing only, but razor blades are fuckin expensive as fuck here in Italy

>>719879053

It's not magic. Let's say you have sex with your girlfriend on the last day of her menstruation, when she's still bleeding. Menstruation can be longer or shorter than one week, so it's difficult to predict. Your sperm stay inside her for three days, or maybe a little more or less. Her ovulation cycle is a little off, so she ovulates. She's pregnant.

It might be a little unlikely, but less so when you consider how often fertile women ovulate and how often people have sex. Surely some women have gotten pregnant "on their period."

>>719879141
what do all lawyer have in common.

shit

>>719878614
I take it you've never actually met a woman. They're not so bad as the wizards would have you believe, friendo.

I think they mean make male and female oriented razors the same price? Since women shave their legs and stuff women's razors are more "reinforced" and in turn cost more.

>>719879186
You ignored all the facts I provided in order to maintain your own illusion. All of which render your parroted nonsense completely irrelevant.
That's pathetic. Braindead imbecile.

>>719879141
My dad's a lawyer, not jewish

>>719879390
Take another look at the photo at the top of this thread.
Are you fucking retarded.

>>719879583
Same thing, schlomo.

>>719879627
No

>>719879627

How can you tell if you're Jewish? Is there a test you can take?

>>719879500
suck on my big flaccid lubed up chubby

>>719879296
Really dude, read up on how the process works.
It will take you about five minutes to find out "oh, he was right, I was talking bollocks for no reason at all - I wish I could apologise to him publicly, now I'll always regret my stupidity".

>>719879627
who you calling a schlomo, cholo?

>>719879700
Yeah.
Crawl into an oven and see if you burn.
If you burn you are innocent.

>>719879810

I hope you get your girlfriend pregnant, when it's "impossible," and the baby comes out a lesbian

>>719879711
I don't want to go near your dildo collection, bloated dyke.

>>719879584
One woman is bad, therefore they're all bad? That's like a woman knowing one creepy guy and declaring all guys are rapists.

>>719879500
You haven't given any facts. But that's fine, like I say, I'm not expecting you to, any more than I'd expect a religious fundamentalist to give factual arguments. I don't judge you for being emotional and needlessly insulting me either, by the way... It's a little sad, sure, but I guess it's just who you are, so I accept it. Stay safe, mate.

>>719871441
I'm in the army and I wish I could grow a beard. I wish razors were a luxury item and not necessity for me. One day my contract will be over and my face will be full.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (135KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1280x720px

>>719879999

Do feminists think we get free razors at the white male patriarchy meetings?

>>719879932
Keep living in ignorance then.
Realise how stupid you sound "I won't read anything!! he can't make me!!! I'll show him!!! my theory based on something I overheard 5 years ago from a teacher is surely right, chaos theory or something!!!! there is a chance she can be pregnant by holding hands I heard one of my friends say!!! reading is for loozerz!!! faktz r lame!!!"

>>719879954
take a big whiff of my festering penis cheese as i squeeze it out the end of my hanging foreskin like a deflated balloon

>>719879999
>all guys are rapists
Quads reveals your true opinion.

>>719880242
Keep fantasising, maybe one day science will be able to give you a 'real' dick, pinnochio.
Until then, I'm sure a strapon is just as realz.

>>719880082
>>719880272
Exactly. It's stupid. There are plenty of shitty/creepy guys out there, but to call all guys shitty is stupid and comes across as an overly-emotional kneejerk reaction.

Likewise, calling all women stupid or dumb or lazy or unfaithful or whatever is exactly the same kind of overly-emotional kneejerk reaction. Some people are shitty, most aren't. The more of the world you see, the more you realise that's true.

>>719879999
grills r gross ew

>>719880242
thats my fetish

>>719880183

> This guy has no idea how sex works at all.

> http://www.parents.com/getting-pregnant/ovulation/fertile-days/pregnant-period/

File: trolowat.png (194KB, 323x238px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 323x238px

> mfw when razors in the uk aren't actually tax exempt but nobody has stopped to fact-check

>>719879999
Check the reasons of why your quoted and worthless generalised statistics come to be.

I gave the main reasons behind all of them, but you have serious problems with reading comprehension. Perhaps it comes from a childhood injury or non physical trauma.

>>719880506
mfw wtf does that mean

>>719871205
you're the one assigning importance to those things
that's not reasonable at all
it's not like people are making women buy razors
in fact, nobody has to buy a razor

>>719880435
I'm glad you accept that your viewpoint is tilted.
That is the first step in making a change.

Difficult to find counselling, as massively feminist ideologies are not currently seen as an official mental illness.
Shop around.

>>719880383
Im going to reenact your childhood and dress you up as a girl while a drug you tea bag your unconscious body with my peanut butter coated balls

>>719871322
>>719873415
yeah and obviously not many men are obliged to use a double edge or godforbid a straight edge. it's easier to cut yourself with a double edge if you don't know what you're doing, which is why they aren't as popular nevermind not advertised

>>719880480
Searched for "pregnant in period" instead of "how does the menstrual cycle work".

Amazing what you can find on the internet.

Check yahoo answers for more exciting factoids.

>>719880859
I don't know if they have a surgery to make fake balls yet.
I think they'd probably use rubber prostheses and stitch your flaps together to make a bag.
Consider the expense though. Psychiatrist might be cheaper in the long run.

>>719880561
No, you made claims without any backup. It's like someone saying: "yeah, women are more likely to instigate domestic abuse against men, but that's because men drove them to it!"

Like I say, it don't agree with what you're saying, but it's a belief and I'm happy to accept you believe it.

>>719880750
What viewpoint do I have that's tilted? My argument is that not all women are shitty. I'm comparing that claim to the 'all men are rapists' claim because they're both obviously stupid.

>>719880898
I want to start using these but I can only find them online

>>719870630
something about dollar a month shave club, harry's, and some government programs that give out razors to dudes. and honestly, i think she has a point, a lot of general healthcare stuff should be provided by the government along with a healthcare plan. of course, i might just be a nut who also wants each city to have a centralized, independent government ruled by a globally overarching socialist/laissez-faire government.

>>719881104
>>719880859
just fuck already

>>719881117
lemme see dem titties gurl

>>719881117
Every post your write reeks of an imbalanced mindset. What happened to you in your childhood?
An extremely domineering mother, absent father, abusive relatives?

You can't read anything without skipping past it and filling in the blanks with your ideologies.

Your 'facts' are like saying women are statistically proven to steal from baby shops than men, meaning women are thieves.
Without considering any of the reality whatsoever.

Try reading my original post again, with an objective mindset, if you can manage that.
Then look up the facts surrounding it yourself, instead of parroting mindless and irrelevant generalised statistics espoused by ultra feministic lunatics.

File: bunny-tails-119ps.jpg (253KB, 1600x1595px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 1600x1595px

>>719870630
Problem solved

>>719881104
install gentoo

>>719881306
Another fantasist arrives.

File: 7114bd2d73c4379034a04d838c346047.jpg (14KB, 236x314px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 236x314px

>>719881544

>>719881117
>All men are rapists
Repeating it doesn't make it any more true.
Get a grip.

>>719881590
i am aroused right now. what do?

File: FFPW3Z3IEKIXHVL.MEDIUM.jpg (39KB, 620x556px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 620x556px

>>719881599

>>719881599
mice

>>719881544
1. Fill the vagina with warding.
2. Glue the vaginal entranced closed.
3. Stitch the labia together.

Problem solved.

>>719881798
Insert large bore needle into meatus, withdraw cylinder.
Eject into disposal.
Repeat until loss of conciousness.

File: lol7.jpg (131KB, 525x809px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 525x809px

>>719881820
>>719881599
>>719881544
>perfectly safe

If you don't like having a vagina then become penis

>>719881514
At the end of the day, you can't challenge the fact that 17-25 year old males are more often in involved in more expensive car accidents than females of the same demographic. Your claims that men have more crashes because, really, it's /women/ that are the worse drivers is absurd. A claim you've still yet to back up with any evidence or data. This is why I call your beliefs beliefs. Again, I'm not judging you for that, and I hope you have a good day.

>>719881667
Ah, I think you're misunderstanding. I'm drawing a comparison, saying that calling all women shitty is like calling all men rapists. They're both stupid and obviously incorrect, which I thought it was obvious I was doing. Just to confirm, not all men are rapists, not all women are shitty. Does that clear it up for you?

>>719881910
yodel really loudly into the vegina to scare all the eggs away

problem solved

>>719875376
>"The march continues!"
Yea you certainly have a lot of walking to do

>>719879700
Yup, same as those "which Harry Potter character am I" quizzes. Or "ismygirlfriendahorse dot cum"

>>719882011
instructions not clear enough got my dick stuck in a mustard jar

File: main-qimg-299913abe050e0636b2756036c446c3f-c.jpg (54KB, 572x572px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 572x572px

>>719877471
>women should be allowed to serve as front-line soldiers, even if they don't meet the same standards as men, since it's obviously more important to you to have equality than it is fairness.

equality is what we want faggot. everyone, no matter what age, race, gender, or whatever the fuck else should be treated equal.

equality = you hit me i hit you back no matter who you are

fairness = you hit me i walk away so i don't hurt your fragile body

>>719871580
This is bullshit. If tampon manufacturers really had a monopoly (which they don't, hence the use of the plural "manufacturers") they could just as easily make tampons £10 without VAT and have consumers pay £12

>>719882285
At the end of the cliche, you can't challenge the fact that more women are thieves as 99% of all thefts from baby supplies shops are committed by women.
Your claims that men don't go into baby supplies shops is irrelevant and absurd, and quite frankly, sexist. All women are thieves, and this is the proof, the statistic in isolation without any background, real numbers or anything, nor any proportional consideration, because I am rampantly obsessed with this idea that I read in women's weekly in the "did you know" section a few years ago while waiting in the hairdresser for my third restyle and colour that month. Ipso facto straw man logical phallic symbol, rage rage.

>>719882779
exactly, police should hold down purps so rape victims can have their with them while a guy plays a banjo in the background

>>719876428
>i dont understand how late stage capitalism works

if your governent is doing nothing to stop it, expect it to happen

>>719870630
some woman believe tampons shouldn't have a tax on them since condoms do'nt have a tax on them

>>719882492
That's the first stage complete.
Now douse the mustard in vinegar and add a touch of paprika.

>>719883232
aaaaaaaaaaaaaahhh it burns

File: 700px-Wapienica_-_Stamped_1.jpg (23KB, 700x336px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 700x336px

>>719881164
Online is the best place to buy them. Get a good double edged razor - Feather portable or Gillette tech (or a tech clone) then some DE blades - Feather (extremely sharp & unforgiving) or Derby extra. 100 blades cost around $15-20 USD, & the razor might cost $10-20.

Or get a straight razor, strop, & whetstone / diamond sharpening plate. Never buy a blade again. The Poles made a great razor for their cold war hospitals that was cheap like borscht & holds an edge great. Tough to find these days, though.

Either way, loads better than disposables

>>719883096
autism speaks louder than words

>>719870630
She meant to say liberals are retarded and they don't really know why they are protesting other than Facebook told them too.

>>719883395
A rope is a lot quicker and cleaner.

>>719883682
Facebook also told me that men break rich cars lotsly and are rapists.

File: _.jpg (71KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 960x720px

>>719883071

why are woman the better humans ?

>>719883032
Again, you can't dispute that a higher portion of male drivers have accidents than women do. You keep claiming it's the fault of women, but you've got no data or evidence to back that up. It's a statistical fact. It's like if I ran a baby supply store and hired a female security guard to deal with the female thieves. Statistically, that't the right thing to do. It's the same reason why certain demographics should pay more because they have more crashes. The only person trying to draw gender issues into it is you. Point out the step in the following argument you disagree with:

>People who are more likely to have accidents should have higher premiums.
>17-25 year old males are more likely to have accidents than 17-25 year old females.
>17-25 year old males should pay higher premiums than 17-25 year old females.

You could take out the gender altogether and make it about old people, for instance, and the validity of the argument is the same.

I don't expect you to understand, or agree. I accept you have a different world-view to me, and that you rely more on emotion/gut-feel than on evidence or any kind of rational/reasoned thought. That's fine, though. If you keep repeating yourself like you have been, I'll stop replying and you can have the last word, if it helps you feel you won. I don't want to upset you.

>>719883395
Remember, sideways for attention, long ways for results

how dare you call me straw man. you sir hate america, and ill be damned before a i negotiate with a terrorist

>>719883815
Ever considered that you are an incredibly boring pseudo intellectual with nothing whatsoever to say.

Delete all your reddit-certified reaction image directory and try posting something original.
You might improve over the years, but it takes practice and risking looking like an idiot the first few thousand times.

>>719870630
Didn't you know that you get a free lifetime supply of Gillette products when the doctors see a penis?

>>719871104
It doesn't make sense to you because you haven't even been through Economics 101. Hell, you could use a high school economics book as a pillow and learn enough to understand that post.

Let's face it. You're just fucking stupid.

>>719874212

>still, it never occured to anon that there might be a reason it was colloquially referred to as "being on the rag"

>>719884096
So you agree, all women are thieves.
You never bothered to reread what was posted in the first place, nor commit yourself to further reading to satisfy your non-existent curiosity.
Instead you just repeated the same nonsense in every post like a high grade aspergers, followed by the tired "belief kiddo 300 kills fundamentalist" rouse.
Formulaic. I normally avoid the autist/aspergers mentions, but it is too accurate in this case.
I don't know if you are aware of your condition, but most aren't unless externally diagnosed.
I hope you can find the help and support you need.
Lots of sufferers describe feeling relieved when they find out why they are different.

File: fgsfds.jpg (46KB, 335x352px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 335x352px

There are more logical fallacies in this thread than chinks in chinatown

>>719876217
Women are worthless, face it, cuck. If we only had a great day where all women would get beheaded in the streets while all of us fuck their skulls in and throw them into the gas chambers, then it would be a great, great day.

>>719884596
Cuck

>>719871313
But women use razor for shaving or they just use a fucking machete?

>>719884596
See>>719884148

>>719884596
Kys cuck

>>719884603
/thread

>>719884603
wow, did a girl not wave back at you or something?

>>719882779
Fairness isn't really the right word.

It's equal opportunity vs equal outcome.

These insane people, void of critical thinking skills are pointing to unequal outcomes and claiming it's due to unequal opportunity.
In a truly free and equal opportunity society you are going to have various outcomes. You aren't going to have a 50/50 ratio of men and women, or all races represented in proportion to their population in the workplace or in earnings.
You have to create a tyrannical society to make what these people want happen, where women and minorities are forced to study in fields they aren't interested in or companies are just forced to hire people with no applicable skills to meet a gender/racial quota (which is already happening).
This is how you destroy a society, how you grind technological progress and competitiveness in the marketplace to a halt and why the left is not liberal and ultimately not even democratic.
They are only pro-liberty in a few select areas necessary to draw certain groups of voters. Across the rest of the board their all regulations, taxing and policing.
The only thing they are liberal with is expansion of government powers.

>>719884861
>fat whore or castrated hipster 'male' detected
Fuck off back to yumblr

>>719884861
no someone stole my animu waifu on the internet, NOW DENNIS MUST SMASH

>>719884558
Oh, you mean your claims that women are worse drivers, and that they magically cause all other road accidents? See, those are claims. Without any evidence or anything to back them up, I have no reason to believe them. It's the evidence I'm asking for, and it's the evidence you keep failing to provide. You also repeatedly fail to answer a single point, or find a single problem with any of this, beyond "all women are actually shit drivers, I don't care what the evidence says".

To use your analogy, it's like saying "oh, women only have to steal from baby supply shops because they had all their money stolen by men already, so actually men are more likely to steal from baby supply shops". It's what we call non-sequitur, which means it doesn't follow. Again, you're clearly not a logical person, which is fine. Not everyone is. I don't see what you're getting so upset about.

>>719885058
Nice contained dubs, pal.

>>719880898
Shave with a straight razor like a man anon. It's the best and closest goddamn shave you'll ever get.

>>719875376
The only struggle here is her pants keeping it together.

>>719885107
Nice contained dubs, pal, this is now a get thread. i predict all posts in this thread will begin with 71988 if true hillary will lose the election

>>719870630
Men grow beard not shave and no monies spending but they have to by the pluggings or bleed out death.

>>719885284
rolling

File: LikeGold.jpg (16KB, 213x236px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 213x236px

>>719876428
That is literally how things work here in the UK,
during the last administration to help businesses the Government reduced the VAT rate from 17.5% to 15% (its currently back at 20%) and no prices changed anywhere.

unlike other places we don't have advertised prices and then add tax on at point of sale ($4.99+Tax) we have an advertised prices which already include tax (£4.99=£4.16+VAT) so if the VAT changes up or down the listed price never changes, either the company selling it makes a bit more or a bit less money

and on that particular example Razors and Razors blades are retarded expensive in the UK the blades in my pic are £21.00 at my local supermarket, that's for 8, so £2.63 per blade
or in Ameribucks that's $25.98 or $3.25 each

>>719884603

ABSOLUTELY!
We can continue to procreate with..., uh... um....
Well...

>>719885337
/threed

>>719885337
>>719885444
Haha, samefag! With the same shitty spelling!

>>719885092
Alright. Here's a summary.

1. more men drive than women.
2. men own more expensive cars
3. men drive longer distances, and more frequently
4. women are involved in more accidents than men
5. the majority of accidents involving men, have a female driver as a secondary or tertiary driver at the scene.

These are facts. You can look them up.

Instead you will just spout off the same line over and over and over and never improve or learn anything for your entire life.
If you are female and/or diagnosed with a mental illness, it might be time to seek help.

>>719885284
fok the prophecy has been written someone alert the oracle the chosen one is among us

File: 2vjueyb.jpg (6KB, 319x188px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 319x188px

>>719870630
>3,000,000 protesters marching in defiance of our billionaire puppet President
>largest protest in US history
>endlessly focus on this one single sign every day

You are cancer.

>>719870630
I don't get free ANYTHING I have to buy all my own shit.

>>719885444
tripes cheecked

>>719870630
Sooooo..... The woman doesn't shave?

File: imrs.png (145KB, 600x554px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 600x554px

Is she referring to the "tampon tax" which is just sales tax?

>>719885092
As for the baby shops. You even completely missed the point of that one.
I'm beginning to pity you now. You really believe you are thinking in a straight forward manner. That's the delusion. Perhaps you'll be walking around muttering to yourself for weeks after this, every time you see a baby supply shop.
Maybe you'll try to live out the fantasy by stealing a few things and keeping them as trophies.

One thing is for sure. You can't stop posting about driving in a tampon thread that was made to draw the attention towards the hysterical screaming elephants with meaningless placards.
Friends of yours?

>>719885284
Woah nice contained dubs man.
That hilary, or shall I say HURL-ary is going down!!!l Like she does on her husband lol

>>719885366
Nice conspiracy theory fucking brush your teeth inbred.

>>719885581
That means we have 2,999,998 more thread content remaining.
What happened to do the other 300,000,000 Americans?